Assessment of gastrointestinal sensation--a review

Cortical evoked potentials in response to rapid balloon distension of the rectum and anal canal

BACKGROUND

Neurophysiological evaluation of anorectal sensory function is hampered by a paucity of methods. Rapid balloon distension (RBD) has been introduced to describe the cerebral response to rectal distension, but it has not successfully been applied to the anal canal.

METHODS

Nineteen healthy women received 30 RBDs in the rectum and the anal canal at intensities corresponding to sensory and unpleasantness thresholds, and response was recorded as cortical evoked potentials (CEPs) in 64-channels. The anal canal stimulations at unpleasantness level were repeated after 4 min to test the within-day reproducibility. CEPs were averaged, and to overcome latency variation related to jitter the spectral content of single sweeps was also computed.

KEY RESULTS

Repeated stimulation of the anal canal generated CEPs with similar latencies but smaller amplitudes compared to those from the rectum. Due to latency jitter, reproducibility of averaged CEPs was lower than what was found in the rectum. The most reproducible feature was N2P2 peak-to-peak amplitude with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.7 and coefficient of variation (CV) of 18%. Spectral content of the single sweeps showed reproducibility with ICCs for all bands >0.8 and corresponding CVs <7%.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Cortical potentials evoked from the anal canal are challenged by latency jitter likely related to variability in muscle tone due to the distensions. Using single-sweep analysis, anal CEPs proved to be reproducible and should be used in future evaluation of the anal function.

Functional studies of the gastrointestinal tract in adult surgical clinics: when do they help?

Gut motility and visceral sensation are two important components of normal gastrointestinal (GI) tract function. Disordered gut motility and sensation can cause significant symptoms which not only pose a health burden to patients, but may also mimic structural diseases and may generate many surgical referrals from primary care. Unfortunately, diagnostic testing for disorders of function lags well behind that for structural disease. In this article we review common presentations of functional disorders in surgical clinics, and relevant testing modalities.

Neuroimaging of the human visceral pain system–A methodological review

During the last decades there has been a tremendous development of non-invasive methods for assessment of brain activity following visceral pain. Improved methods for neurophysiological and brain imaging techniques have vastly increased our understanding of the central processing of gastrointestinal sensation and pain in both healthy volunteers as well as in patients suffering from gastrointestinal disorders. The techniques used are functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), positron emission tomography (PET), electroencephalography (EEG)/evoked brain potentials (EPs), magnetoencephalography (MEG), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and the multimodal combinations of these techniques. The use of these techniques has brought new insight into the complex brain processes underlying pain perception, including a number of subcortical and cortical regions, and paved new ways in our understanding of acute and chronic pain. The pathways are dynamic with a delicate balance between facilitatory and inhibitory pain mechanisms, and with modulation of the response to internal or external stressors with a high degree of plasticity. Hence, the ultimate goal in imaging of pain is to follow the stimulus response throughout the neuraxis.

Brain activity measured by fMRI is based on subtracting regional changes in blood oxygenation during a resting condition from the signal during a stimulus condition, and has high spatial resolution but low temporal resolution. SPECT and PET are nuclear imaging techniques where radiolabeled molecules are injected with visualization of the distribution, density and activity of receptors in the brain allowing not only assessment of brain activity but also study of receptor sites. EEG is based on assessment of electrical activity in the brain, and recordings of the resting EEG and evoked potentials following an external stimulus are used to study normal visceral pain processing, alterations of pain processing in different patient groups and the effect of pharmacological intervention. EEG has high temporal resolution, but relative poor spatial resolution, which however to some extent can be overcome by applying inverse modelling algorithms and signal decomposition procedures. MEG is based on recording the magnetic fields produced by electrical currents in the brain, has high spatial resolution and is especially suitable for the study cortical activation.

The treatment of chronic abdominal pain is often ineffective and dissapointing, which leads to search for optimized treatment achieved on the basis of a better understanding of underlying pain mechanisms. Application of the recent improvements in neuroimaging on the visceral pain system may likely in near future contribute substantially to our understanding of the functional and structural pathophysiology underlying chronic visceral pain disorders, and pave the road for optimized individual and mechanism based treatments.

The purpose of this review is to give a state-of-the-art overview of these methods, with focus on EEG, and especially the advantages and limitations of the single methods in clinical gastrointestinal pain esearch including examples from relevant studies.

New technologies to investigate the brain-gut axis

Functional gastrointestinal disorders are commonly encountered in clinical practice, and pain is their commonest presenting symptom. In addition, patients with these disorders often demonstrate a heightened sensitivity to experimental visceral stimulation, termed visceral pain hypersensitivity that is likely to be important in their pathophysiology. Knowledge of how the brain processes sensory information from visceral structures is still in its infancy. However, our understanding has been propelled by technological imaging advances such as functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, Magnetoencephalography, and Electroencephalography (EEG). Numerous human studies have non-invasively demonstrated the complexity involved in functional pain processing, and highlighted a number of subcortical and cortical regions involved. This review will focus on the neurophysiological pathways (primary afferents, spinal and supraspinal transmission), brain-imaging techniques and the influence of endogenous and psychological processes in healthy controls and patients suffering from functional gastrointestinal disorders. Special attention will be paid to the newer EEG source analysis techniques. Understanding the phenotypic differences that determine an individual’s response to injurious stimuli could be the key to understanding why some patients develop pain and hyperalgesia in response to inflammation/injury while others do not. For future studies, an integrated approach is required incorporating an individual’s psychological, autonomic, neuroendocrine, neurophysiological, and genetic profile to define phenotypic traits that may be at greater risk of developing sensitised states in response to gut inflammation or injury.

Multimodal sensory testing of the rectum and rectosigmoid: development and reproducibility of a new method

Evaluation of rectal and rectosigmoid sensation is important in basic, clinical and pharmacological studies. New methods to evoke and assess multimodal (electrical, thermal and mechanical) experimental pain of the upper gut activate distinct pathways and mimics clinical pain. The aims of the current study were to characterize the sensory response and reproducibility to multimodal stimulation of rectum and the rectosigmoid. A multimodal rectal probe was developed. Mucosal electrostimulation was delivered at the recto-sigmoid junction. In Rectum, impedance planimetry was used for measurement of cross-sectional area (CSA) during distension. Circulation of water within the bag at either 4 or 60 degrees C was applied for thermal stimulation. The method was tested in 12 healthy volunteers (six men mean age 32 years) on two subsequent days. Mechanical and sensory responses and referred pain areas were assessed. Stimulation with electrical, thermal and mechanical modalities resulted in different sensory perceptions. The relationship between stimulus intensity and sensory response was linear for all modalities. Sensory response to different modalities did not differ between investigation days (all P-values > 0.1). Approximately 75% of subjects felt referred pain in distinct skin locations. Between-days reproducibility was good for all modalities [intra-class correlation (ICC) > or = 0.6]. At sensory threshold, CSA showed best reproducibility (ICC > or = 0.9). At pain detection threshold stretch ratio, CSA and electrostimulation showed best reproducibility (ICC = 1.0; 0.9; 0.9). The present model was easily implemented, robust and showed good reproducibility. It can be used to study pathophysiology or pharmacological interventions in healthy controls and in patients with diseases involving the distal hindgut.