Multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) as second-line chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients pretreated with 5-fluorouracil plus irinotecan

A case report of synchronous triple primary malignancies: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, rectal adenocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma

A 59-year-old man was admitted to our hospital in August 2020 because of fever with night sweats and weight loss. The patient was eventually diagnosed with synchronous triple primary malignancies: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), rectal adenocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which has not been reported previously. The patient initially received six cycles of R-Gemox chemotherapy targeting DLBCL, the response to the treatment was partial remission. We continued six cycles of R-CHOP therapy, and DLBCL achieved a complete remission to treatment. During R-CHOP chemotherapy, PD-1 inhibitor (Sintilimab) was used to control the disease progression of HCC, which was effective and tolerable. Subsequently, he successfully completed curative intent Dixon operation and right hemihepatectomy. The diagnosis and treatment for like these synchronous triple primary malignancies are a huge challenge, herein we provide our experience in this regard.

Gemcitabine: An Alternative Treatment for Oxaliplatin-Resistant Colorectal Cancer

Resistance to treatments is one of the leading causes of cancer therapy failure. Oxaliplatin is a standard chemotherapy used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer. However, its efficacy is greatly reduced by the development of resistances. In a previous study, we deciphered the mechanisms leading to oxaliplatin resistance and highlighted the roles played by ROS production and the p38 MAPK pathway in this phenomenon. In this report, we studied the effects of different chemotherapy molecules on our oxaliplatin-resistant cells to identify alternative treatments. Among all the studied molecules, gemcitabine was the only one to present a major cytotoxic effect on oxaliplatin-resistant cancer cells both in vivo and in vitro. However, the combination of oxaliplatin and gemcitabine did not present any major interest. Indeed, the study of combination efficiency using Chou and Talalay's method showed no synergy between oxaliplatin and gemcitabine. Using PamGene technology to decipher gemcitabine's effects on oxaliplatin-resistant cells, we were able to show that gemcitabine counteracts chemoresistance by strongly inhibiting the Akt and src/p38 MAPK pathways, leading to apoptosis induction and cell death. In view of these results, gemcitabine could be an interesting alternative therapy for patients with colorectal cancer not responding to oxaliplatin-based protocols such as FOLFOX.

Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the phase II BEVACOLOR study

BACKGROUND

This prospective phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy regimens commonly used in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

Patients with mCRC who progressed or relapsed after first-line oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based treatment received bevacizumab 2.5 mg/kg/week plus chemotherapy until disease progression. The primary endpoint was disease-control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (66% men; median age, 62 years old) received second-line bevacizumab plus folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI; 57%), folinic acid, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; 26%), irinotecan (15%), or capecitabine plus irinotecan (XELIRI; 2%). The DCR was 87% (95% CI, 77%-97%); ORR was 32% (95% CI, 19%-46%). Median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.8-7.8 months) and median OS 19.3 months, (95% CI, 14.2-25.1 months).The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (21%), diarrhea (15%), asthenia, and vomiting (9% each). Five patients (9%) had grade 3/4 targeted toxicities: grade 3 hypertension (n = 2), grade 3 venous thromboembolism (n = 2), and grade 4 arterial thromboembolism (n = 1). None of these events led to death during the study.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab plus standard second-line chemotherapy is highly active in patients with mCRC and has an acceptable safety profile.

Oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and gemcitabine: a novel combination in the therapy of progressed, relapsed, or refractory tumors in children

Therapeutic options for unresectable neuroendocrine carcinomas and relapsed or refractory solid tumors are still limited in pediatric patients. We present a retrospective review of 12 children (3 to 16 y) in a case series treated with a novel combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and gemcitabine (triple therapy). We defined its feasibility in a mainly outpatient setting and assessed its toxicity and effectiveness. Three patients with unresectable neuroendocrine carcinomas received triple therapy as first-line treatment; 9 children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors of different entities were assigned after failure of standard treatment protocols. The treatment schedule comprised oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²), irinotecan (175 mg/m²), and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m²), the latter to be repeated on day 8. A median of 7 cycles was applied. Nine of 12 patients showed hematotoxicity 0-III degrees. Gastrointestinal toxicity I-II degrees were handled satisfactorily by supportive drugs. Tumor response was defined as partial response in 1 of 12 children, stable disease in 8 of 12 children, and progressive disease in 3 of 12 children with a median time of disease control of 7 months. We regard triple therapy as a well-tolerated outpatient treatment option offering children a high quality of life and showing considerable effectiveness in delaying tumor progress.

Combining capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and gemcitabine (XELOXGEM) for colorectal carcinoma patients pretreated with irinotecan: a multicenter phase I/II trial

PURPOSE

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) is an effective second-line regimen for advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients pretreated with irinotecan. Previous studies have shown supra-additive anti-tumor activity of gemcitabine (GEM) when administered with oxaliplatin. We investigated the dose, toxicity, and efficacy of a second-line XELOXGEM regimen in CRC patients pretreated with irinotecan.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic or recurrent CRC who failed after a first-line irinotecan-containing regimen received escalating doses of gemcitabine (600, 800, 1,000 mg/m(2) d1, d8) followed by capecitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) b.i.d d1-14) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2) d1) on a 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients were treated. At 800 mg/m(2), two of six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (diarrhea and thrombocytopenia). Therefore, the clinically recommended dose was defined as 600 mg/m(2) gemcitabine (d1, d8) followed by 1,000 mg/m(2) capecitabine (b.i.d dl-14) and 100 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin (d1). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (32%), thrombocytopenia (13%), anemia (11%), and peripheral neuropathy (11%). Ten (26.3%) and 23 (60.5%) patients experienced partial response and stable disease, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.4 months (95% CI 3.8-6.9 months) and 17.7 months (95% CI 8.4-26.9 months), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The XELOXGEM triplet combination is an active and safe second-line regimen for advanced CRC patients pretreated with irinotecan.

Randomized phase 2 sequencing and pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

AIM

This multicentre phase II trial examined the combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The effect of sequence administration was randomized and pharmacokinetics (PK) assessed.

METHODS

Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV or recurrent NSCLC, no prior chemotherapy, World Health Organization performance status ≤2 and measurable disease. Treatment comprised: gemcitabine (1250 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (70 mg/m(2)), each given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Patients were randomized 1:1 to the sequencing of the two drugs for the duration of their treatment. The primary end-point was response rate (RR). Secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, PK and the effect of drug sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients were enrolled of whom 43 were evaluable for response. Overall 13 patients (30%) achieved a partial response, PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI 2.8-5.8 months), and OS was 6.8 months (95% CI 4.4-10.1 months). There was only one case of grade 3 neurosensory toxicity despite a median cumulative oxaliplatin dose in excess of 500 mg/m(2) . No differences in clinical or PK end-points were observed between the two different sequencing arms.

CONCLUSION

This oxaliplatin and gemcitabine schedule has shown activity in advanced NSCLC with modest toxicity. Neither clinical nor PK outcomes were influenced by the sequencing of these agents, although definite conclusions are limited by small patient numbers. The favorable toxicity profile of this doublet, in light of an encouraging RR, warrants its further investigation in NSCLC.

Association of RRM1 -37A>C polymorphism with clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

To investigate whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in gemcitabine (GMB) metabolism genes were associated with clinical outcome in pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

SNPs of hCNT1, hENT1, CDA, dCTD and RRM1 genes were evaluated in 95 mCRC patients and detected using TaqMan genotyping assays. Association of genotypes with overall response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) was tested by univariate and multivariate analysis. RRM1 -37A>C polymorphism was correlated with GMB IC50 value and with the RRM1 gene expression level in CRC cell lines.

RESULTS

The ORR was 38.9%. The median TTP and OS were 4 and 14.3 months, respectively. By multivariate analysis, patients carrying the RRM1 -37CC genotype or the CDA A-76 C-containing allele had a significantly higher likelihood of achieving a tumour response. RRM1 -37A>C polymorphism remained associated with clinical efficacy (TTP). In vitro experiments, in CRC cell lines, showed that the RRM1 A-37C genotype was associated with the levels of RRM1 expression and with GMB IC50 values. Finally, the down-regulation of RRM1 with a specific siRNA strongly influenced GMB sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

RRM1 -37A>C polymorphism may represent a useful biomarker to select mCRC patients most likely to benefit from GMB-based salvage therapy.

Dose-finding study and pharmacogenomic analysis of fixed-rate infusion of gemcitabine, irinotecan and bevacizumab in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

To determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose, recommended dose (RD) and preliminary evidence of activity of escalating doses of irinotecan (CPT-11) fixed-dose-rate infusional gemcitabine (FDR-GMB) and bevacizumab in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Pharmacogenomic analysis was performed to investigate the association between VEGF single-nucleotide polymorphisms and clinical outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 89 mCRC patients were recruited in a two-step study design; 28 were included in the dose-finding study and 59 in the pharmacogenomic analysis. The FDR-GMB of 1000 mg m⁻², bevacizumab 5 mg kg⁻¹ and CPT-11 doses ranging from 100 to 160 mg m⁻² were explored. The VEGF protein serum levels were quantified by EIA. Allelic discrimination was performed to genotype polymorphisms in the VEGF gene.

RESULTS

CPT-11 RD was 150 mg m⁻². Diarrhoea and neutropenia were the DLT. After a median follow-up of 42 months, the median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival were 5.2 and 19.9 months, respectively. VEGF levels were significantly correlated with VEGF-2578AA and VEGF-460CC genotypes, and a trend was observed with VEGF+405GG genotype. The presence of any of these genotypes correlated with a longer median TTP (8.8 vs 4.5 months, P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

The triplet combination tested in this study is effective and well tolerated. A possible predictive role for VEGF gene polymorphisms and baseline VEGF circulating levels is suggested.

Hypersensitivity reactions associated with platinum antineoplastic agents: a systematic review

Platinum-containing chemotherapy agents (cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin) have been approved in the first-line setting of numerous malignancies, such as ovarian, bladder, head and neck, colorectal, and lung cancer. Their extensive use over the last decade has led to a significant increase in the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions, which are defined as unforeseen reactions whose signs and symptoms cannot be explained by the known toxicity of these drugs. Skin rash, flushing, abdominal cramping, itchy palms, and back pain are common symptoms. Cardiovascular and respiratory complications can prove fatal. Multiple pathogenetic mechanisms have been suggested. Hypersensitivity usually appears after multiple infusions, suggesting type I allergic reactions; however, other types of hypersensitivity also seem to be implicated. Several management options are available to treating physicians: discontinuation of chemotherapy, premedication, prolonging of infusion duration, desensitization protocols, and replacement with a different platinum compound after performing skin tests that rule out cross-reactions among platinum agents.

The role of salvage treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

The selection of salvage therapy after first-line treatment failure for metastatic colorectal cancer patients has become more complex with the development of several active drugs in this setting. The addition of oxaliplatin and irinotecan to 5-fluorouracil in the first-line therapy has conditioned the election of the regimen used in second-line, becoming a standard of care the switch between both schedules at the time of disease progression. The recent introduction of new targeted drugs has complicated the scenario even more, allowing different possible combinations in first-, second-, third- and even fourth-line therapy. The role of hepatic arterial infusions has been reconsidered with the availability of new and more active cytotoxic drugs and has become an approach to be taken in mind in the management of these patients. With the possibility of active salvage therapy, surgery rescue approaches should be taken in account during all the course of the patients' disease.

Oxaliplatin and fixed-rate infusional gemcitabine in the second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colon cancer: final results of a Phase II trial prematurely closed as a result of poor accrual

BACKGROUND

Second-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) after failure of a combination of irinotecan, a fluoropyrimidine, and bevacizumab includes the use of oxaliplatin and a fluoropyrimidine. In animal models, synergistic effects of gemcitabine and platinum agents have been established. Additionally, superior antitumor activity of prolonged administration of gemcitabine compared with bolus administration has been demonstrated in vivo against murine colon tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 2-stage phase II trial was developed to assess the efficacy (primary endpoint: response rate) and safety of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) over 100 minutes on days 1 and 15 in combination with oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) over 2 hours on days 2 and 16, every 4 weeks. Patients with metastatic CRC in whom irinotecan and a fluoropyrimidine treatment had failed were enrolled. Calcium and magnesium infusion was routinely given before and after oxaliplatin administration.

RESULTS

Because of slow accrual as a result of oxaliplatin becoming more commonly used in first-line treatment, the trial was stopped with only 10 patients enrolled. Eight were men and 2 were women. Median age was 58.5 years (range, 47-72 years). Nine patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1. A median of 3.5 cycles was administered (range, 1-9; total, 42). Six patients had stable disease and 1 had progressive disease. Two patients had confirmed partial responses, and 1 patient had a partial response but developed necrotizing fasciitis, declined surgical treatment, and died before a confirmatory scan could be performed. The regimen was otherwise well tolerated: 1 patient developed grade 3 neutropenia. With a median follow-up of 5.5 months, 4 patients have died. The time to treatment failure was 3.7 months.

CONCLUSION

Despite premature study closure because of poor accrual, oxaliplatin in combination with fixed-rate infusional gemcitabine seems to be a safe and potentially effective regimen in the treatment of CRC. Further studies should be considered with the addition of targeted therapy.