Multichannel magnetoencephalography in ablative seizure surgery outside the anteromesial temporal lobe

Magnetoencephalographic Characteristics of Cortical Dysplasia in Children

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE

Magnetoencephalography has emerged as a tool for preoperative evaluation in children. We studied magnetoencephalography characteristics in subtypes of focal cortical dysplasia and correlated the findings with postoperative seizure outcome.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were children ≤18 years who underwent magnetoencephalography during the preoperative evaluation followed by epilepsy surgery and a histopathologic diagnosis of focal cortical dysplasia between February 2008 and February 2013. Patient demographics, MRI, video electroencephalography, and magnetoencephalography data were reviewed. Postoperative seizure outcome data were categorized per International League against Epilepsy definitions.

RESULTS

Of 178 magnetoencephalography studies performed in children during the study period, 33 patients met inclusion criteria. Focal cortical dysplasia type I, II, and III were found on histopathology in 52%, 39%, and 9% of patients, respectively. Thirty patients had positive magnetoencephalography dipoles, including all patients with focal cortical dysplasia type II and III and 82% of patients with focal cortical dysplasia type I. Three patients had magnetoencephalography unique spikes. Brain MRI lesions were noted preoperatively in 21 patients (64%). Twenty-three patients (77%) had surgical resection of magnetoencephalography dipoles and 11 (48%) of them achieved favorable outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetoencephalography supplemented scalp electroencephalography data in spike source localization and showed unique spikes in 10% of the focal cortical dysplasia patients. Magnetoencephalography spikes and tight magnetoencephalography clusters were found more frequently in patients with focal cortical dysplasia type II and III as compared with focal cortical dysplasia type I. Presence of an MRI lesion and complete versus incomplete resection of magnetoencephalography cluster did not result in significant difference in postoperative seizure outcome, likely reflecting selection bias of doing magnetoencephalography in only difficult-to-localize epilepsies.

A clinical and magnetoencephalography study of MRI-negative startle epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to investigate clinical findings, ictal semiology, and results of video/electroencephalography (video/EEG), and magnetoencephalography (MEG) in patients with startle epilepsy and normal brain MRI.

METHODS

Four patients (mean age 12.5 years) with startle epilepsy were investigated with MRI, video/EEG, and MEG.

RESULTS

Epilepsy diagnosis was established in childhood, and all had spontaneous and reflex seizures. Reflex seizures were triggered by sudden, unexpected sounds and tactile stimuli. The neurological examinations and MRIs were normal. MEG recordings showed focal epileptiform activity. An ictal MEG was obtained in one patient. Source modeling yielded dipole sources in right central frontal region.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that the origin of epileptiform activity in startle epilepsy can be localized in brain areas associated with supplementary motor seizures, even in patients with normal brain MRI. MEG adds complementary information to the localization of epileptiform activity and can be useful in planning invasive studies in cases evaluated for epilepsy surgery.

Influence of magnetic source imaging for planning intracranial EEG in epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Magnetic source imaging (MSI) is used routinely in epilepsy presurgical evaluation and in mapping eloquent cortex for surgery. Despite increasing use, the diagnostic yield of MSI is uncertain, with reports varying from 5% to 35%. To add benefit, a diagnostic technique should influence decisions made from other tests, and that influence should yield better outcomes. We report preliminary results of an ongoing, long-term clinical study in epilepsy, where MSI changed surgical decisions.

METHODS

We determined whether MSI changed the surgical decision in a prospective, blinded, crossover-controlled, single-treatment, observational case series. Sixty-nine sequential patients diagnosed with partial epilepsy of suspected neocortical origin had video-EEG and imaging. All met criteria for intracranial EEG (ICEEG). At a surgical conference, a decision was made before and after presentation of MSI. Cases where MSI altered the decision were noted.

RESULTS

MSI gave nonredundant information in 23 patients (33%). MSI added ICEEG electrodes in 9 (13%) and changed the surgical decision in another 14 (20%). Based on MSI, 16 patients (23%) were scheduled for different ICEEG coverage. Twenty-eight have gone to ICEEG, 29 to resection, and 14 to vagal nerve stimulation, including 17 where MSI changed the decision. Additional electrodes in 4 patients covered the correct: hemisphere in 3, lobe in 3, and sublobar ictal onset zone in 1. MSI avoided contralateral electrodes in 2, who both localized on ICEEG. MSI added information to ICEEG in 1.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic source imaging (MSI) provided nonredundant information in 33% of patients. In those who have undergone surgery to date, MSI added useful information that changed treatment in 6 (9%), without increasing complications. MSI has benefited 21% who have gone to surgery.

Magnetoencephalography source localization and surgical outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

We prospectively investigated the role of magnetoencephalography (MEG) in localizing the seizure focus and in predicting outcome to surgical resections for intractable temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

METHODS

We performed simultaneous interictal EEG and MEG recording (two 37-channel system) in 26 TLE patients followed by MEG source localization. We correlated early modeling dipoles with intracranial EEG, temporal surgical resection and surgical outcome.

RESULTS

There were 12 patients who had anterior temporal horizontal or tangential dipoles to the anterior infero-lateral temporal tip cortex. Two patients underwent selective amygdalo-hippocampectomy (SAH) and nine patients had antero-medial temporal lobectomy (AMTL). All patients had successful outcome except for one patient who initially failed SAH, but became seizure-free after AMTL. There were 11 patients who demonstrated anterior temporal vertical or tangential oblique dipoles. Five patients had AMTL and three had SAH; all became seizure free. Five of above 23 patients had invasive EEG and demonstrated mesial seizure onset. Three TLE patients had lateral vertical dipoles that were concordant with intracranial EEG and these became seizure free after temporal neocortical resections.

CONCLUSIONS

MEG source analysis produces distinct source patterns that provide useful localizing information, predict surgical outcome, and may aid in planning limited surgical resection in TLE.

Controversies in clinical neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in the localization of interictal epileptiform activity: Con

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether MEG is superior to scalp-EEG in the localization of interictal epileptiform activity and to stress the 'con' part in this controversy.

METHODS

Advantages and disadvantages of the two techniques were systematically reviewed.

RESULTS

While MEG and EEG complement each other for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges, EEG offers the advantage of long-term recording significantly increasing its diagnostic yield which is not feasible with MEG. Localization accuracies of EEG and MEG are comparable once inaccuracies for the solution of the forward problem are eliminated. MEG may be more sensitive for the detection of neocortical spike sources. EEG and MEG source localizations show comparable agreement with invasive electrical recordings, can clarify the spatial relationship between the irritative zone and structural lesions, guide the placement of invasive electrodes and attribute epileptic activity to lobar subcompartments in temporal lobe epilepsy and to a lesser extent in extratemporal epilepsy.

CONCLUSIONS

A clear superiority of MEG over EEG for the localization of interictal epileptiform activity cannot be derived from the studies presently available.

SIGNIFICANCE

The combination of EEG and MEG provides information for the localization of interictal epileptiform activity which cannot be obtained with either technique alone.

Epilepsy surgery, resection volume and MSI localization in lesional frontal lobe epilepsy

To verify whether interictal noninvasive information detected by magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings can contribute to localize focal epileptic activity relevant for seizure generation in lesional frontal lobe epilepsy, magnetic source imaging (MSI) localizations of epileptic discharges were compared to the extent of neurosurgical resection and postoperative outcome. Preoperative MEG spike localizations were displayed in postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to check whether dipole sites were located within the resection cavity. Moreover, MEG localizations were compared with results of prolonged video-EEG monitoring and, in three cases, with invasive EEG recordings. Our results in five cases with lesional frontal lobe epilepsy showed that good surgical outcome could be achieved in those patients where the majority of MEG spike localizations were located within the resected brain volume.

MEG and EEG in epilepsy

Both EEG and magnetoencephalogram (MEG), with a time resolution of 1 ms or less, provide unique neurophysiologic data not obtainable by other neuroimaging techniques. MEG has now emerged as a mature clinical technology. While both EEG and MEG can be performed with more than 100 channels, MEG recordings with 100 to 300 channels are more easily done because of the time needed to apply a large number of EEG electrodes. EEG has the advantage of the long-term video EEG recordings, which facilitates extensive temporal sampling across all periods of the sleep/wake cycle. MEG and EEG seem to complement each other for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges, because some spikes can be recorded only on MEG but not on EEG and vice versa. Most studies indicate that MEG seems to be more sensitive for neocortical spike sources. Both EEG and MEG source localizations show excellent agreement with invasive electrical recordings, clarify the spatial relationship between the irritative zone and structural lesions, and finally, attribute epileptic activity to lobar subcompartments in temporal lobe and to a lesser extent in extratemporal epilepsies. In temporal lobe epilepsy, EEG and MEG can differentiate between patients with mesial, lateral, and diffuse seizure onsets. MEG selectively detects tangential sources. EEG measures both radial and tangential activity, although the radial components dominate the EEG signals at the scalp. Thus, while EEG provides more comprehensive information, it is more complicated to model due to considerable influences of the shape and conductivity of the volume conductor. Dipole localization techniques favor MEG due to the higher accuracy of MEG source localization compared to EEG when using the standard spherical head shape model. However, if special care is taken to address the above issues and enhance the EEG, the localization accuracy of EEG and MEG actually are comparable, although these surface EEG analytic techniques are not typically approved for clinical use in the United States. MEG dipole analysis is approved for clinical use and thus gives information that otherwise usually requires invasive intracranial EEG monitoring. There are only a few dozen whole head MEG units in operation in the world. While EEG is available in every hospital, specialized EEG laboratories capable of source localization techniques are nearly as scarce as MEG facilities. The combined use of whole-head MEG systems and multichannel EEG in conjunction with advanced source modeling techniques is an area of active development and will allow a better noninvasive characterization of the irritative zone in presurgical epilepsy evaluation. Finally, additional information on epilepsy may be gathered by either MEG or EEG analysis of data beyond the usual bandwidths used in clinical practice, namely by analysis of activity at high frequencies and near-DC activity.

Non-supervised spatio-temporal analysis of interictal magnetic spikes: comparison with intracerebral recordings

OBJECTIVE

Our main goal was to evaluate the accuracy of an original non-supervised spatio-temporal magnetoencephalography (MEG) localization method used to characterize interictal spikes generators.

METHODS

MEG and stereotactic intracerebral recordings (stereo-electro-encephalographic exploration, SEEG) data were analyzed independently in 4 patients. MEG localizations were performed with and without anatomical constraints.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1326 interictal spikes recorded using MEG. For each patient, 2-3 typical source patterns were described. These source configurations were compared with SEEG. SEEG findings and MEG spatio-temporal localization results were remarkably coherent in our 4 patients. Most of the MEG patterns were similar to interictal SEEG patterns from a spatio-temporal point of view.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to evaluate the usefulness of our non-invasive localization method. This approach described correctly the part of the epileptogenic network involved in the generation of interictal events. Our results demonstrate the potential of MEG in the non-invasive spatio-temporal characterization of generators of interictal spikes.

Magnetoencephalographically directed review of high-spatial-resolution surface-coil MR images improves lesion detection in patients with extratemporal epilepsy

PURPOSE

To determine whether (a) interictal magnetoencephalographic (MEG) epileptiform activity corresponds to anatomic abnormalities at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, (b) high-spatial-resolution MR imaging depicts lesions in regions without MEG spike activity, (c) MEG-directed review of high-spatial-resolution MR images enables detection of abnormalities not apparent on conventional MR images, and (d) MEG information results in a greater number of diagnosed lesions at re-review of conventional MR images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with neocortical epilepsy were evaluated with MEG, conventional brain MR imaging with a head coil, and high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with either a surface coil (n = 17) or a high-spatial-resolution birdcage coil (n = 3). Abnormal MEG foci were compared with corresponding anatomic areas on conventional and high-spatial-resolution MR images to determine the presence (concordance) or absence (discordance) of anatomic lesions corresponding to foci of abnormal MEG activity.

RESULTS

Forty-four epileptiform MEG foci were identified. Twelve foci (27%) were concordant with an anatomic abnormality at high-spatial-resolution MR imaging, and 32 foci (73%) were discordant. Results of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging were normal in eight patients, and 23 lesions were detected in the remaining 12 patients. Twelve lesions (52%) were concordant with abnormal MEG epileptiform activity, and 11 (48%) were discordant (ie, there was normal MEG activity in the region of the anatomic abnormality). At retrospective reevaluation of conventional MR images with MEG guidance, four occult gray matter migration lesions that had initially been missed were observed. An additional patient with MEG-concordant postoperative gliosis was readily identified with high-spatial-resolution MR images but not with conventional MR images.

CONCLUSION

Review of MEG-localized epileptiform areas on high-spatial-resolution MR images enables detection of epileptogenic neocortical lesions, some of which are occult on conventional MR images.

Magnetoencephalography in focal epilepsy

The introduction of whole-head magnetoencephalographic (MEG) systems facilitating simultaneous recording from the entire brain surface has led to a major breakthrough in the MEG evaluation of epilepsy patients. MEG localizations estimates of the interictal spike zone showed excellent agreement with invasive electrical recordings and were useful to clarify the spatial relationship of the irritative zone and structural lesions. MEG appears to be especially useful for study of patients with neocortical epilepsy, and helped to guide the placement of subdural grid electrodes in patients with nonlesional epilepsies. MEG could differentiate between patients with mesial and lateral temporal seizure onset. Spike propagation in the temporal lobe and the spatio-temporal organization of the interictal spike complex could be studied noninvasively. MEG was useful to delineate essential brain regions before surgical procedures adjacent to the central fissure. MEG appears to be more sensitive than scalp EEG for detection of epileptic discharges arising from the lateral neocortex, whereas only highly synchronized discharges arising from mesial temporal structures could be recorded. A major limitation of MEG has been the recording of seizures because long-term recordings cannot be performed on a routine basis with the available technology. Because MEG and EEG yield both complementary and confirmatory information, combined MEG-EEG recordings in conjunction with advanced source modeling techniques should improve the noninvasive evaluation of epilepsy patients and further reduce the need for invasive procedures.