[Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: pathological analysis and interpretation]

This overview examines how the introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has changed the pathological staging of breast cancer. The more intensive analysis of the sentinel lymph nodes (gross slicing, step sections, immunohistological or molecular analysis) has lead to stage shifting in breast cancer. Regarding the rate of up-staging by positive results of SLNB, there are significant differences between institutes, some method-related, some related to the interpretation of results. Methodological differences should be reduced by means of reliable guidelines with the goal of systematically identifying metastases of a particular size (a macrometastasis over 2 mm being the minimum criterion). The next review of the TNM classification should result in a reduction in interobserver variability as a result of better definitions of staging categories for isolated tumor cells and micrometastases. In addition, a staging category is expected for metastases which have been identified by calibrated quantitative molecular tests only and which are larger than isolated tumors. Even in settings where nodal staging by SLNB is based on molecular tests at least a proportion of the lymph node should be investigated histologically.

Variations in sentinel node isolated tumour cells/micrometastasis and non-sentinel node involvement rates according to different interpretations of the TNM definitions

Breast cancers with nodal isolated tumour cells (ITC) and micrometastases are categorised as node-negative and node-positive, respectively, in the tumour node metastasis (TNM) classification. Two recently published interpretations of the TNM definitions were applied to cases of low-volume sentinel lymph node (SLN) involvement and their corresponding non-SLNs for reclassification as micrometastasis or ITC. Of the 517 cases reviewed, 82 had ITC and 435 had micrometastasis on the basis of one classification, and the number of ITC increased to 207 with 310 micrometastases on the basis of the other. Approximately 24% of the cases were discordantly categorised. The rates of non-SLN metastases associated with SLN ITCs were 8.5% and 13.5%, respectively. Although the second interpretation of low-volume nodal stage categories has better reproducibility, it may underestimate the rate of non-SLN involvement. The TNM definitions of low-volume nodal metastases need to be better formulated and supplemented with visual information in the form of multiple sample images.

Minimal disease in sentinel nodes

Isolated tumor cells and micrometastases represent low-volume or minimal disease in the regional lymph nodes of breast cancer patients as compared to macrometastases. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a functional selection and removal of the most likely site of regional metastasis, and gives pathologists the opportunity to concentrate detection techniques on a limited number of lymph nodes. Consequently, more lesions belonging in the two mentioned staging categories are discovered in sentinel lymph nodes. Despite some publications contradicting stochastic models of breast cancer, micrometastases seem to reflect a prognosis intermediate between the node-negative and macrometastatic nodal status, and they also reflect a risk of non-sentinel node involvement slightly higher than that associated with a node-negative status. Data are more contradictory as concerns isolated tumor cells. This minireview summarizes the definitions, their inconsistencies, pathological protocols aiming at the detection of minimal nodal disease, the prognostic impact and non-sentinel node involvement related risk of such nodal lesions, and their therapeutic consequences.