Theophylline attenuates the neutrophil-dependent augmentation of eosinophil trans-basement membrane migration

Neutrophils and Asthma

Although eosinophilic inflammation is characteristic of asthma pathogenesis, neutrophilic inflammation is also marked, and eosinophils and neutrophils can coexist in some cases. Based on the proportion of sputum cell differentiation, asthma is classified into eosinophilic asthma, neutrophilic asthma, neutrophilic and eosinophilic asthma, and paucigranulocytic asthma. Classification by bronchoalveolar lavage is also performed. Eosinophilic asthma accounts for most severe asthma cases, but neutrophilic asthma or a mixture of the two types can also present a severe phenotype. Biomarkers for the diagnosis of neutrophilic asthma include sputum neutrophils, blood neutrophils, chitinase-3-like protein, and hydrogen sulfide in sputum and serum. Thymic stromal lymphoprotein (TSLP)/T-helper 17 pathways, bacterial colonization/microbiome, neutrophil extracellular traps, and activation of nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor family, pyrin domain-containing 3 pathways are involved in the pathophysiology of neutrophilic asthma and coexistence of obesity, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and habitual cigarette smoking have been associated with its pathogenesis. Thus, targeting neutrophilic asthma is important. Smoking cessation, neutrophil-targeting treatments, and biologics have been tested as treatments for severe asthma, but most clinical studies have not focused on neutrophilic asthma. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors, anti-TSLP antibodies, azithromycin, and anti-cholinergic agents are promising drugs for neutrophilic asthma. However, clinical research targeting neutrophilic inflammation is required to elucidate the optimal treatment.

Effects of inhaled aminophylline on airway constriction and inflammation in ovalbumin-sensitized guinea pigs

BACKGROUND

The systemic administration of theophylline is useful for asthma treatment. However its narrow therapeutic range makes it difficult to use. Little is known about its potential in inhalation therapy, particularly repeated inhalation.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the therapeutic usefulness of inhaled aminophylline in an asthma model.

METHODS

The effects of pretreatment with inhaled aminophylline (25 mg/mL for 30 min/dose) on airway response and inflammation after an ovalbumin (OVA) challenge and airway hypersensitivity to acetylcholine (Ach) were evaluated using guinea pigs sensitized with OVA.

RESULTS

Aminophylline relaxed the ACh-induced contraction of tracheal smooth muscle in vitro in a concentration-dependent manner. Pretreatment with single-dose aminophylline inhalation suppressed OVA-induced airway constriction to the same extent as the intraperitoneal pretreatment with high-dose aminophylline (10-20 mg/kg). However, pretreatment with single-dose aminophylline inhalation did not suppress eosinophil infiltration into airways (neither bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] fluid nor lung tissue) and did not suppress airway hyperreactivity to ACh, 24 h after OVA challenge. Repeated inhalation of aminophylline (twice daily for 7 days) suppressed the infiltration of eosinophils and suppressed airway hypersensitivity to ACh. In addition, high concentrations of aminophylline inhibited production of oxygen radicals by BAL cells.

CONCLUSION

Single-dose inhalation treatment with aminophylline has transient but relatively strong bronchodilating effects due to delivery of high doses into local airways. Repeated inhalation treatment suppressed airway inflammation and hypersensitivity induced by allergens. Therefore, inhaled aminophylline may be useful for asthma treatment.

Blocking the leukotriene B4 receptor 1 inhibits late-phase airway responses in established disease

Most of the studies investigating the effectiveness of blocking the leukotriene B4 (LTB4) receptor 1 (BLT1) have been performed in models of primary or acute allergen challenge. The role of the LTB4-BLT1 pathway in secondary challenge models, where airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and airway inflammation have been established, has not been defined. We investigated the effects of blocking BLT1 on early- and late-phase development of AHR and airway inflammation in previously sensitized and challenged mice. Female BALB/c mice were sensitized (Days 1 and 14) and challenged (primary, Days 28-30) with ovalbumin. On Day 72, mice were challenged (secondary) with a single OVA aerosol, and the early and late phases of AHR and inflammation were determined. Specific blockade of BLT1 was attained by oral administration of a BLT1 antagonist on Days 70 through 72. Administration of the antagonist inhibited the secondary ovalbumin challenge-induced alterations in airway responses during the late phase but not during the early phase, as demonstrated by decreases in AHR and in bronchoalveolar lavage neutrophilia and eosinophilia 6 and 48 hours after secondary challenge. The latter was associated with decreased levels of KC protein, macrophage inflammatory protein 2, and IL-17 in the airways. These data identify the importance of the LTB4-BLT1 pathway in the development of late-phase, allergen-induced airway responsiveness after secondary airway challenge in mice with established airway disease.