T Cells Survey the Stability of the Self: A Testable Hypothesis on the Homeostatic Role of TCR-MHC Interactions

Tackling cancer cell dormancy: Insights from immune models, and transplantation

Disseminated non-dividing (dormant) cancer cells as well as those in equilibrium with the immune response remain the major challenge for successful treatment of cancer. The equilibrium between disseminated dormant cancer cells and the immune system is reminiscent of states that can occur during infection or allogeneic tissue and cell transplantation. We discuss here the major competing models of how the immune system achieves a self nonself discrimination (pathogen/danger patterns, quorum, and coinhibition/tuning models), and suggest that taking advantage of a combination of the proposed mechanisms in each model may lead to increased efficacy in tackling cancer cell dormancy.

Exploiting autoimmunity unleashed by low-dose immune checkpoint blockade to treat advanced cancer

As a result of the cancer immunotherapy revolution, more than 2000 immuno-oncology agents are currently being tested or are in use to improve responses. Not unexpectedly, the 2018 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to James P. Allison and Tasuku Honjo for their development of cancer therapy by the blockade of co-inhibitory signals. Unfortunately, manipulation of the co-inhibitory receptors has also resulted in a safety issue: widespread iatrogenic immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Autoimmunity is emerging as the nemesis of immunotherapy. Originally, it was assumed that CTLA-4 blockade selectively targets T cells relevant to the antitumour immune response. However, an uncontrolled pan T cell activation was induced compromising tolerance to healthy self-tissues. The irAEs are very similar to that of a chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) reaction following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). We hypothesized that ipilimumab induced a graft-versus-malignancy (GVM) effect, which eradicated metastatic melanoma in a minority of patients, but also involved an auto-GVHD reaction that resulted in widespread autoimmunity in the majority. Therefore, we argued for a profound theoretical point against the consensus of experts. The task is not to desperately put the genie back in the bottle by immune-suppressive treatments, but instead to harness the autoimmune forces. In this way, the same goal could be achieved by an antibody as by the adoptive transfer of alloreactive donor lymphocytes, but without severe GVHD. The proof-of-principle of a low-dose-combination immune checkpoint therapy, consisting only of approved drugs and treatments, was demonstrated in 111 stage IV cancer patients.

MiStImm: an agent-based simulation tool to study the self-nonself discrimination of the adaptive immune response

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing need for complex computational models to perform in silico experiments as an adjunct to in vitro and in vivo experiments in immunology. We introduce Microscopic Stochastic Immune System Simulator (MiStImm), an agent-based simulation tool, that is designed to study the self-nonself discrimination of the adaptive immune system. MiStImm can simulate some components of the humoral adaptive immune response, including T cells, B cells, antibodies, danger signals, interleukins, self cells, foreign antigens, and the interactions among them. The simulation starts after conception and progresses step by step (in time) driven by random simulation events. We also have provided tools to visualize and analyze the output of the simulation program.

RESULTS

As the first application of MiStImm, we simulated two different immune models, and then we compared performances of them in the mean of self-nonself discrimination. The first model is a so-called conventional immune model, and the second model is based on our earlier T-cell model, called "one-signal model", which is developed to resolve three important paradoxes of immunology. Our new T-cell model postulates that a dynamic steady state coupled system is formed through low-affinity complementary TCR-MHC interactions between T cells and host cells. The new model implies that a significant fraction of the naive polyclonal T cells is recruited into the first line of defense against an infection. Simulation experiments using MiStImm have shown that the computational realization of the new model shows real patterns. For example, the new model develops immune memory and it does not develop autoimmune reaction despite the hypothesized, enhanced TCR-MHC interaction between T cells and self cells. Simulations also demonstrated that our new model gives better results to overcome a critical primary infection answering the paradox "how can a tiny fraction of human genome effectively compete with a vastly larger pool of mutating pathogen DNA?"

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of our in silico experiments, presented here, are supported by numerous clinical trial observations from the field of immunotherapy. We hope that our results will encourage investigations to make in vitro and in vivo experiments clarifying questions about self-nonself discrimination of the adaptive immune system. We also hope that MiStImm or some concept in it will be useful to other researchers who want to implement or compare other immune models.

Anti-CTLA-4 therapy may have mechanisms similar to those occurring in inherited human CTLA4 haploinsufficiency

The inhibitory anti-CTLA-4 antibody, ipilimumab, dramatically improved survival in a subgroup of metastatic melanoma patients. The majority, however, suffered autoimmune-related adverse events (irAEs), sometimes pathognomonic of acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). This implies that the CTLA-4 blockade is not tumor specific. We make a risky but testable prediction: anti-CTLA-4 therapy may have mechanism similar to that occurring in inherited human CTLA-4 haploinsufficiency. If so, a therapeutic paradigm shift is required. The task is not desperately trying to put the genie back in the bottle by immune-suppressive treatments, but harnessing the immense forces liberated by the anti-CTLA-4 antibody blockade by pretargeting or dose adjustment.

Interesting possibilities to improve the safety and efficacy of ipilimumab (Yervoy)

As predicted, an anti-CTLA-4 mAb (ipilimumab) on binding to T lymphocytes breaks down immune-tolerance. Thereby, it was hoped, tumor-specific-T cells would be freed for a sustained attack on cancer cells. Data on ipilimumab treatment in 1498 patients with advanced melanoma (in 14 phase I-III trials) has shown immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in 64.2% of the patients consistent with tolerance breakdown. However, there is no evidence that the antitumor effects via a CTLA-4 blockade are attributable to T cells specifically targeting tumor cells. In fact, several trials indicate a possible correlation between grade 3 and 4 irAEs with clinical efficacy of ipilimumab; tumor regression may be associated with autoimmunity development. Therefore, we suggest a new treatment paradigm. The non-tumor specific pan-lymphocytic activation should be exploited by a 'pretargeting' approach proven successful in radioimmunodetection and radioimmunotherapy. First, an anti-tumor mAb conjugated with streptavidin (StAv) should be administered to be followed by the delivery of biotin-labeled anti-CTLA-4 mAb. This schedule has the virtue of endowing T cells with the ability to travel to tumor sites without prematurely succumbing to apoptosis, while streptavidin's ultra-high affinity for biotin (K(D), 10⁻¹⁵ M) ensures capturing all T cells binding biotin labeled anti-CTLA-4. Using the law of mass action, we calculated that following administration of ipilimumab at >1 mg/L concentration (∼5 mg per patient ∼70 kgbw), the immense forces of the immune system liberated by the anti-CTLA-4 antibody blockade would then be focused with laser sharp accuracy on tumor cells without collateral damage to normal host cells.

SUFFICIENT TO RECOGNIZE SELF TO ATTACK NON-SELF: BLUEPRINT FOR A ONE-SIGNAL T CELL MODEL

Current consensus postulates that the class I-antigen processing system is evolved to present microbial antigens to specific T cells. Since such cells are rare and short-lived, they require three to five days to attain fighting strength. During this critical period he innate immune system holds back the briskly multiplying pathogens. Nevertheless, a T cell response is measurable in the lymph nodes draining the infection site within 12 to 18 h. In order to explain this paradox here we suggest a new T cell model. This is based on the observation that T cells require continuous contact of the T cell receptor (TCR) with selecting self-peptide–major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules in the periphery for their survival. We postulate that a dynamic steady state, a so-called coupled system is formed through low affinity complementary TCR–MHC interactions between T cells and host cells. Under such condition it is sufficient to recognize what is self in order to attack what is not self. A coupled system is regulated via soluble forms of peptide–MHC and TCR molecules by the law of mass action. In a coupled system one signal is sufficient for T cell activation. The new model implies that a significant fraction of the naive polyclonal T cells are recruited into the first line of defense from the very outset of an infection, so the number of activated T cells is increased by several orders of magnitude compared to conventional models. The one-signal model also predicts that therapeutic administration of soluble agonist or antagonist T cell receptor ligands may be able to fine tune the homeostatic physiological regulatory mechanism and thus improve the treatment of some chronic diseases such as metastatic cancer, HIV/AIDS, and transplantation.

Ipilimumab (Yervoy) and the TGN1412 catastrophe

The development of the anti-CTLA-4 antibody (ipilimumab; marketed as Yervoy) immune regulatory therapy was based on the premise that "Abrogation of the function of CTLA-4 would permit CD28 to function unopposed and might swing the balance in favor of immune stimulation, tolerance breakdown and tumor eradication…" (Weber, 2009). By now, the vast majority of data collected from more than 4000 patients proves that this prediction was entirely correct. Paradoxically, the successful blockade of immune checkpoints raises the question whether an anti-CTLA-4 antibody could ever become an important therapy against cancer. T cells lost their ability to discriminate between self and non-self. Thus, tolerance to self tissues was broken in ∼70% of the patients. In the recent industry-sponsored phase III clinical trial of ipilimumab, 147 (38.7%) of the patients experienced severe adverse events and 6.8% suffered dose-limiting events (8.4%, in the ipilimumab-alone group). There were 14 deaths related to the study drugs and 7 of these were associated with immune-related adverse events. In contrast, the complete response rate was only 0.2%, in one patient out of 403 who received ipilimumab plus a peptide vaccine. Promoters of ipilimumab appear to be unmindful of the clinical trial catastrophe in London. Then, a humanized "superagonist" anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody, TGN1412, which "preferentially" activated regulatory T cells, at a higher dose, also activated all CD28 positive T cells. This precipitated a "cytokine storm" leading to life-threatening multiple organ failure in the six healthy human volunteers. Neither anti-CD28 nor anti-CTLA-4 therapies rely on antigen-specificity. Both release free antibody into the body against common molecular targets that are expressed on the targeted as well as on the non-targeted T cells. At lower antibody doses specific T cells are preferentially activated. With increasing antibody dose, however, the kinetics of the interaction is pushed in favor of widespread non-specific T cell expansion. Using the law of mass action we calculated that the vast majority of the CTLA-4 receptors on all activated T cells (including melanoma specific T cells) in the phase III clinical trial of ipilimumab will have been saturated. This would explain the runaway immune response observed. The conclusions drawn by the authors of the ipilimumab trial paper could bear an independent inspection and reassessment concerning the validation of the blockade of immune checkpoints as an important therapeutic strategy against cancer.

Breast and other cancer dormancy as a therapeutic endpoint: speculative recombinant T cell receptor ligand (RTL) adjuvant therapy worth considering?

BACKGROUND

Most individuals who died of trauma were found to harbour microscopic primary cancers at autopsies. Surgical excision of the primary tumour, unfortunately, seems to disturb tumour dormancy in over half of all metastatic relapses.

PRESENTATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS

A recently developed immune model suggested that the evolutionary pressure driving the creation of a T cell receptor repertoire was primarily the homeostatic surveillance of the genome. The model is based on the homeostatic role of T cells, suggesting that molecular complementarity between the positively selected T cell receptors and the self peptide-presenting major histocompatibility complex molecules establishes and regulates homeostasis, strictly limiting variations of its components. The repertoire is maintained by continuous peripheral stimulation via soluble forms of self-peptide-presenting major histocompatibility complex molecules governed by the law of mass action. The model states that foreign peptides inhibit the complementary interactions between the major histocompatibility complexes and T cell receptors. Since the vast majority of clinically detected cancers present self-peptides the model assumes that tumour cells are, paradoxically, under homeostatic T cell control.The novelty of our hypothesis therefore is that resection of the primary tumour mass is perceived as loss of 'normal' tissue cells. Consequently, T cells striving to reconstitute homeostasis stimulate rather than inhibit the growth of dormant tumour cells and avascular micrometastases. Here we suggest that such kick-start growths could be prevented by a recombinant T cell receptor ligand therapy that modifies T cell behaviour through a partial activation mechanism.

TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS

The homeostatic T cell regulation of tumours can be tested in a tri-transgenic mice model engineered to express potent oncogenes in a doxycycline-dependent manner. We suggest seeding dissociated, untransformed mammary cells from doxycycline naïve mice into the lungs of two mice groups: one carries mammary tumours, the other does not. Both recipient groups to be fed doxycycline in order to activate the oncogenes of the untransformed mammary cells in the lungs, where solitary nodules are expected to develop 6 weeks after injection. We expect that lung metastasis development will be stimulated following resection of the primary tumour mass compared to the tumour-free mice. A recombinant T cell receptor ligand therapy, starting at least one day before resection and continuing during the entire experimental period, would be able to prevent the stimulating effect of surgery.

IMPLICATIONS OF THE HYPOTHESIS

Recombinant T cell receptor ligand therapy of diagnosed cancer would keep all metastatic deposits microscopic for as long as the therapy is continued without limit and could be pursued as one method of cancer control. Improving the outcome of therapy by preventing the development of metastases is perhaps achievable more readily than curing patients with overt metastases.