Interphase FISH as a new tool in tumor pathology

Application of the FISH method and high-density SNP arrays to assess genetic changes in neuroblastoma-research by one institute

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor in children. Amplification of the MYCN gene has been observed in approximately 20%-30% of tumors. It is strongly correlated with advanced-stage disease, rapid tumor progression, resistance to chemotherapy and poor outcomes independent of patient age and stage of advanced disease. MYCN amplification identifies high-risk patients. To assess neuroblastoma tumors with MYCN amplification we used paraffin-embedded tissue sections in 57 patients and intraoperative tumor imprints in 10 patients by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Positive results for MYCN amplification have been observed in twelve patients' paraffin-embedded tissue sections and in three patients' intraoperative tumor imprints, which represents 22.4% of all patients tested in the analysis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization is a highly sensitive and useful technique for detecting MYCN amplification on paraffin-embedded tissue sections of neuroblastoma tumors and intraoperative tumor imprints thus facilitating therapeutic decisions based on the presence or absence of this important biologic marker. The presence of structural changes, regardless of MYCN gene amplification status, influences the clinical behavior of neuroblastoma. High-Density SNP Arrays have emerged as the perfect tools for detecting these changes due to their exceptional accuracy, sensitivity and ability to analyze copy number and allele information. Consequently, they are proven to be highly valuable in the genomic diagnosis of immature neuroectodermal tumors.

European recommendations and quality assurance for cytogenomic analysis of haematological neoplasms

Cytogenomic investigations of haematological neoplasms, including chromosome banding analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and microarray analyses have become increasingly important in the clinical management of patients with haematological neoplasms. The widespread implementation of these techniques in genetic diagnostics has highlighted the need for guidance on the essential criteria to follow when providing cytogenomic testing, regardless of choice of methodology. These recommendations provide an updated, practical and easily available document that will assist laboratories in the choice of testing and methodology enabling them to operate within acceptable standards and maintain a quality service.

[Correct use of Kreatech DNA probes to detect MYC gene amplification in medulloblastomas by fluorescence in situ hybridization]

In most cases, oncogene amplification are prognostic and predictive markers for various tumors, therefore DNA probes are unable to reveal changes in the copy numbers should not be used to diagnose malignant tumors.

OBJECTIVE

To comparatively analyze DNA probes from different manufacturers to detect MYC gene amplification in routine practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study material was formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded medulloblastoma fragments from 4 patients, with discrepancies in the results in the detection of MYC gene amplification.

RESULTS

MYC gene amplification was determined using DNA probes: Kreatech MYC (8q24)/SE 8, Vysis LSI MYC SO, Vysis CEP 8 (D8Z2) SG, and Zytolight SPEC MYC/CEN 8 Dual Color Probe. The use of the probes Kreatech TERC (3q26)/MYC (8q24)/SE7 Triple-Color probe failed to detect MYC gene amplification; this probe showed a balanced profile of chromosome 8.

CONCLUSION

In routine practice, fluorescence in situ hybridization with the DNA probes Kreatech MYC (8q24)/SE 8, Vysis LSI MYC SO, Vysis CEP 8 (D8Z2) SG and Zytolight SPEC MYC/CEN 8 Dual Color Probe can be the method of choice for studying the copy number of the MYC gene. However, the authors strongly recommend that the Kreatech TERC (3q26)/MYC (8q24)/SE7 Triple-Color should not be used for this purpose. In addition, probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization must be necessarily tested in large reference laboratories dealing with one or another area of oncopathology.

Multicenter ALK testing in non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a round robin test

BACKGROUND

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor crizotinib has recently received approval for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As the therapeutic prescription postulates the detection of ALK rearrangements, reliable diagnostic approaches are of utmost importance. With this study, we present the data of the first German ALK-round robin test based on genomic DNA in situ hybridization (ISH). The application of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ALK protein detection was optional and not required for certification.

METHODS

Two tissue microarrays, each consisting of the same 10 NSCLC but in different arrangement of the cases, were generated (five unequivocally ALK-positive and five unequivocally ALK-negative cases). ISH-based results and optional IHC data had to be submitted within 10 working days. A successful participation (certification) was reached if at least 19 of the 20 possible points were scored (2 points for a correct case classification).

RESULTS

Fifty-three of 59 participants (89.8%) provided their data for ISH-ALK detection within the submission period. Thirty-two of 53 participants (60.3%) received at least 19 points required for certification. Remarkably, the range of cells with aberrant ALK signal configuration was broad in ALK-negative (0-13%) and in ALK-positive cases (15-95%). Thirty-five participants supported the round robin test with optional ALK IHC results, which displayed a great heterogeneity in the ALK ISH-positive cases.

CONCLUSION

In essence, our ALK ISH round robin test clearly demonstrates that there is accumulating need for improvement of ALK testing. Although ISH may be regarded as a well-established procedure, its broad application in a diagnostic setting is challenging and requires standardized methods and harmonized interpretation to achieve sound results for therapeutic decisions. The same is true for ALK IHC which, however if standardized, might improve the diagnostic approach.

The current state of molecular cytogenetics in cancer diagnosis

Cytogenetics and molecular cytogenetics are and will continue to be indispensable tools in cancer diagnostics. Leukemia and lymphoma diagnostics are still emphases of routine (molecular) cytogenetics and corresponding studies of solid tumors gain more and more prominence. Here, first a historical perspective of molecular tumor cytogenetics is provided, which is followed by the basic principles of the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) approach. Finally the current state of molecular cytogenetics in cancer diagnostics is discussed. Nowadays routine diagnostics includes basic FISH approaches rather than multicolor-FISH. The latter together with modern high-throughput methods have their impact on research to identify new tumor-associated genomic regions.

Quantitative analysis of centromeric FISH spots during the cell cycle by image cytometry

Two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosome enumeration DNA probes specific to chromosomes 7, 11, 17, and 18 was applied to CAL-51 breast cancer cells to examine whether the fluorescence intensity of FISH spots was associated with cell cycle progression. The fluorescence intensity of each FISH spot was quantitatively analyzed based on the cell cycle stage determined by image cytometry at the single-cell level. The spot intensity of cells in the G2 phase was larger than that in the G0/1 phase. This increased intensity was not seen during the early and mid S phases, whereas the cells in the late S phase showed significant increases in spot intensity, reaching the same level as that observed in the G2 phase, indicating that alpha satellite DNA in the centromeric region was replicated in the late S phase. Thus, image cytometry can successfully detect small differences in the fluorescence intensities of centromeric spots of homologous chromosomes. This combinational image analysis of FISH spots and the cell cycle with cell image cytometry provides insights into new aspects of the cell cycle. This is the first report demonstrating that image cytometry can be used to analyze the fluorescence intensity of FISH signals during the cell cycle.

microFIND(®) approach to fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)

FISH technology has gained increasing attention in the management of cancer disease, either for predictive or prognostic indications. Molecular cytogenetics has greatly improved diagnostic capability of classical cytogenetics analysis of metaphase-based chromosome for the identification of genetic aberrations. The availability of a large number of fluorescent probes, each specific for different genetic lesions, together with a robust protocol for interphase FISH, provide the pathologist with the essential tools for an accurate evaluation of patient's disease. Hemato-oncological and many of the solid tumors have been comprehensively characterized by peculiar genetic defects and are now routinely evaluated by interphase FISH. Despite the reliability of the method, which has undergone only minor changes since the 1970s, FISH assay is still hampered by reagents cost, preventing its adoption in large-scale oncological screening. In this chapter we describe a major improvement of interphase FISH assay for cytological samples through the description of the miniaturized device microFIND(®) that offers, besides reduction of cost per assay, a completely novel vision to the FISH technology, thanks to the perspective of full automation of FISH assay using a dedicated robotic platform for microFIND(®) handling, (not presently described in the chapter).

HER2 gene copy number status may influence clinical efficacy to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), KRAS is the only validated biomarker used to select patients for administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapies. To identify additional predictive markers, we investigated the importance of HER2, the primary EGFR dimerisation partner, in this particular disease.

METHODS

We evaluated the HER2 gene status by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in 170 KRAS wild-type mCRC patients treated with cetuximab or panitumumab.

RESULTS

Depending on HER2 gene copy number status, patients showed three distinct cytogenetic profiles: 4% of patients had HER2 gene amplification (R:HER2/CEP17 ≥ 2) in all neoplastic cells (HER2-all-A), 61% of patients had HER2 gain due to polysomy or to gene amplification in minor clones (HER2-FISH+*), and 35% of patients had no or slight HER2 gain (HER2-FISH-). These subgroups were significantly correlated with different clinical behaviours, in terms of response rate (RR; P=0.0006), progression-free survival (PFS; P<0.0001) and overall survival (OS; P<0.0001). Patients with HER2-all-A profile experienced the worst outcome, patients with HER2-FISH- profile showed an intermediate behaviour and patients with HER2-FISH+* profile were related to the highest survival probability (median PFS in months: 2.5 vs 3.9 vs 7.6, respectively; median OS in months: 4.2 vs 9.7 vs 13, respectively).

CONCLUSION

HER2 gene copy number status may influence the clinical response to anti-EGFR-targeted therapy in mCRC patients.

Genetic heterogeneity in HER2 testing may influence therapy eligibility

Prospective studies have demonstrated that approximately 20% of HER2 testing may be inaccurate. When carefully validated testing is conducted, available data do not clearly demonstrate the superiority of either IHC or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a predictor of benefit from anti-HER2 therapy. In addition, the interpretation of the findings of HER2 tests according to international guidelines is not uniform. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) recently published practice guidelines for a definition of HER2 amplification heterogeneity that can give rise to discrepant results between IHC and FISH assays for HER2. In this article, we compare the HER2 status of 291 non consecutive breast cancers. The status is determined by both IHC and FISH approaches, using a specific FISH strategy to investigate genetic heterogeneity. Our data demonstrate that HER2 amplified cells may be found as diffuse, clustered in a specific area or section, intermingled with non-amplified cells or confined to metastatic nodules. The correct evaluation of ratio value in the presence of genetic heterogeneity and of polysomy contributes to the accurate assessment of HER2 status and potentially affects the selection of appropriate anti-HER2 therapy. By taking into account the presence of different genetic cell populations, the immunotherapy eligibility criteria for HER2 FISH scoring proposed in the CAP (2009) and SIGU guidelines identify an additional subset of cases for trastuzumab or lapatinib therapy compared to the ASCO/CAP (2007) guidelines.

Molecular diagnostics of gliomas

CONTEXT

Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors of adults and include a variety of histologic types and morphologies. Histologic evaluation remains the gold standard for glioma diagnosis; however, diagnostic difficulty may arise from tumor heterogeneity, overlapping morphologic features, and tumor sampling. Recently, our knowledge about the genetics of these tumors has expanded, and new molecular markers have been developed. Some of these markers have shown diagnostic value, whereas others are useful prognosticators for patient survival and therapeutic response.

OBJECTIVE

To review the most clinically useful molecular markers and their detection techniques in gliomas.

DATA SOURCES

Review of the pertinent literature and personal experience with the molecular testing in gliomas.

CONCLUSIONS

This article provides an overview of the most common molecular markers in neurooncology, including 1p/19q codeletion in oligodendroglial tumors, mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 genes in diffuse gliomas, hypermethylation of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene promoter in glioblastomas and anaplastic gliomas, alterations in the epidermal growth factor receptor and phosphatase and tensin homolog genes in high-grade gliomas, as well as BRAF alterations in pilocytic astrocytomas. Molecular testing of gliomas is increasingly used in routine clinical practice and requires that neuropathologists be familiar with these genetic markers and the molecular diagnostic techniques for their detection.

Miniaturized FISH for screening of onco-hematological malignancies

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) represents a major step in the analysis of chromosomal aberrations in cancer. It allows the precise detection of specific rearrangements, both for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Here we present a miniaturized FISH method performed on fresh and fixed hematological samples. This procedure has been developed together with a microfluidic device that integrates cluster-assembled nanostructured TiO2 (ns-TiO2) as a nanomaterial promoting hematopoietic cell immobilization in conditions of shear stress. As a result of miniaturization, FISH can be performed with at least a 10-fold reduction in probe usage and minimal cell requirements, creating the possibility of using FISH in genetic screening applications. We developed the protocol on tumor cells and bone marrow (BM) from a normal donor using commercially sex-specific and onco-hematology probes. The procedure was then validated using either BM or peripheral blood (PB) from six patients with hematological diseases, each associated with different genetic lesions. Miniaturized FISH demonstrated comparable performance to standard FISH, indicating that it is suitable for genetic screenings, in research, and in clinical settings for the diagnosis of samples from onco-hematological malignancies.

Clinical utility of FISH analysis in addition to G-banded karyotype in hematologic malignancies and proposal of a practical approach

Background

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis can provide important information in the management of patients with hematologic malignancies. However, FISH performed in addition to G-banded karyotype can be labor-intensive and expensive. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether FISH gives additional information in the setting of adequate conventional cytogenetics in cases of hematologic malignancies.

Methods

Bone marrow aspirates were obtained from 135 patients at diagnosis (56 AML, 32 MDS, 20 ALL, and 27 MM) between 2005 and 2010. Interphase FISH was performed using the following probes: BCR/ABL1, AML1/ETO, PML/RARA, CBFB, MLL, EGR1, CEP8, and D7S486 for AML; CEP8, D20S108, EGR1, and D7S486 for MDS; BCR/ABL1, MLL, CDKN2A (p16), ETV6, and 6q21/c-myc for ALL; IgH, TP53, D13S25, IgH/CCND1, IgH/MAF, IgH/FGFR3, and 1q21/8p21 for MM. We compared the results of FISH with the corresponding aberrations identified by G-banded karyotype.

Results

Additional genetic aberrations detected by FISH (which were not identified by G-banded karyotype) were 4%, 9%, 50%, and 67% in AML, MDS, ALL, and MM, respectively. In ALL, CDKN2A and ETV6 FISH revealed additional genetic aberrations in 33% and 28% of cases, respectively. In MM, FISH was of benefit in detecting IgH, D13S25, TP53, and 1q21 rearrangements, not detected by G-banded karyotype (31%, 36%, 20%, and 40%, respectively).

Conclusion

These results suggest that performing FISH in addition to G-banded karyotype may contribute little additional genetic information in AML and MDS, whereas routine FISH analysis appears to be an efficient screening method in ALL and MM.

DNA copy number analysis on tissue microarrays

Detection of DNA sequence copy number changes is essential in both clinical practice and basic research, especially in cancer research. The combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and tissue microarray (TMA) technology provides high-throughput means for the evaluation of genetic aberrations in a large number of tissue samples. FISH on TMA is technically demanding and several protocols that include a variety of tissue pretreatment steps have been developed to improve the success of this methodology. Despite of the technical difficulties, FISH analysis on TMA has been successfully used not only to uncover genetic alterations in various malignancies but to also rapidly establish the clinical significance of such changes.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques in medical diagnostics

BACKGROUND

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a well-established method in medical diagnostics. FISH methods complement conventional cytogenetic banding techniques and offer extra clinical applications. FISH is based on the binding of complementary, single-stranded fluorescence-labeled nucleic acid sequences to the fixed and denatured target DNA of metaphases, interphase nuclei or isolated DNA sequences (BACs, oligonucleotides).

OBJECTIVE

The intent of this article is to review the development of molecular cytogenetic techniques available at present and to summarize the most efficient and appropriate use of these techniques in medical diagnostics. The technical aspects and most important applications of FISH assays are described.

CONCLUSION

FISH is bridging the gap between conventional cytogenetic banding analysis and molecular genetic DNA studies. The use of FISH techniques enhances the correct interpretation of numerical and structural chromosome aberrations.