Radiographic Evaluation of Children with Growth Disorders

MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY: Novel genetic causes of short stature

The fast technological development, particularly single nucleotide polymorphism array, array-comparative genomic hybridization, and whole exome sequencing, has led to the discovery of many novel genetic causes of growth failure. In this review we discuss a selection of these, according to a diagnostic classification centred on the epiphyseal growth plate. We successively discuss disorders in hormone signalling, paracrine factors, matrix molecules, intracellular pathways, and fundamental cellular processes, followed by chromosomal aberrations including copy number variants (CNVs) and imprinting disorders associated with short stature. Many novel causes of GH deficiency (GHD) as part of combined pituitary hormone deficiency have been uncovered. The most frequent genetic causes of isolated GHD are GH1 and GHRHR defects, but several novel causes have recently been found, such as GHSR, RNPC3, and IFT172 mutations. Besides well-defined causes of GH insensitivity (GHR, STAT5B, IGFALS, IGF1 defects), disorders of NFκB signalling, STAT3 and IGF2 have recently been discovered. Heterozygous IGF1R defects are a relatively frequent cause of prenatal and postnatal growth retardation. TRHA mutations cause a syndromic form of short stature with elevated T3/T4 ratio. Disorders of signalling of various paracrine factors (FGFs, BMPs, WNTs, PTHrP/IHH, and CNP/NPR2) or genetic defects affecting cartilage extracellular matrix usually cause disproportionate short stature. Heterozygous NPR2 or SHOX defects may be found in ∼3% of short children, and also rasopathies (e.g., Noonan syndrome) can be found in children without clear syndromic appearance. Numerous other syndromes associated with short stature are caused by genetic defects in fundamental cellular processes, chromosomal abnormalities, CNVs, and imprinting disorders.

Genetic evaluation of short stature

CONTEXT

Genetics plays a major role in determining an individual's height. Although there are many monogenic disorders that lead to perturbations in growth and result in short stature, there is still no consensus as to the role that genetic diagnostics should play in the evaluation of a child with short stature.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A search of PubMed was performed, focusing on the genetic diagnosis of short stature as well as on specific diagnostic subgroups included in this article. Consensus guidelines were reviewed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

There are a multitude of rare genetic causes of severe short stature. There is no high-quality evidence to define the optimal approach to the genetic evaluation of short stature. We review genetic etiologies of a number of diagnostic subgroups and propose an algorithm for genetic testing based on these subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Advances in genomic technologies are revolutionizing the diagnostic approach to short stature. Endocrinologists must become facile with the use of genetic testing in order to identify the various monogenic disorders that present with short stature.

Genetic evaluation of short stature

After a proper medical history, growth analysis and physical examination of a short child, followed by radiological and laboratory screening, the clinician may decide to perform genetic testing. We propose several clinical algorithms that can be used to establish the diagnosis. GH1 and GHRHR should be tested in children with severe isolated growth hormone deficiency and a positive family history. A multiple pituitary dysfunction can be caused by defects in several genes, of which PROP1 and POU1F1 are most common. GH resistance can be caused by genetic defects in GHR, STAT5B, IGF1, IGFALS, which all have their specific clinical and biochemical characteristics. IGF-I resistance is seen in heterozygous defects of the IGF1R. If besides short stature additional abnormalities are present, these should be matched with known dysmorphic syndromes. If no obvious candidate gene can be determined, a whole genome approach can be taken to check for deletions, duplications and/or uniparental disomies.

Diagnostic use of skeletal survey in suspected skeletal dysplasia

OBJECTIVE

To review the practice of skeletal surveys in cases of suspected skeletal dysplasia.

METHODS

Retrospective review of records of patients with suspected skeletal dysplasia between December 1997 and December 2005.

RESULTS

A diagnosis of a specific skeletal dysplasia was reached in 155 out of a total of 285 suspected cases (54%). In 260 (91%), a record of radiological examination was available and out of these cases, 91 (35%) had a full skeletal survey. A diagnosis was reached in 79% of cases that had a full skeletal survey and in 44% of cases that had a limited survey. A possible skeletal dysplasia was excluded in 44 out of 260 (17%) cases. In 79 out of 260 (30%) cases, skeletal abnormalities were present but a clear diagnosis could not be reached. Over the period of study, there was no clear change in the practice of performing x-rays and the rate of reaching a diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

A clear diagnosis of skeletal dysplasia is not possible in a third of cases and there is a need for greater access to multidisciplinary input.

Idiopathic short stature: definition, epidemiology, and diagnostic evaluation

Idiopathic short stature is a condition in which the height of the individual is more than 2 SD below the corresponding mean height for a given age, sex and population, in whom no identifiable disorder is present. It can be subcategorized into familial and non-familial ISS, and according to pubertal delay. It should be differentiated from dysmorphic syndromes, skeletal dysplasias, short stature secondary to a small birth size (small for gestational age, SGA), and systemic and endocrine diseases. ISS is the diagnostic group that remains after excluding known conditions in short children.