Total fundoplication does not obstruct the esophageal secondary peristalsis: investigation with pre- and postoperative 24-hour pH-multichannel intraluminal impedance

Multi-society consensus conference and guideline on the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diseases in North America and globally. The aim of this guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the most utilized and available endoscopic and surgical treatments for GERD.

METHODS

Systematic literature reviews were conducted for 4 key questions regarding the surgical and endoscopic treatments for GERD in adults: preoperative evaluation, endoscopic vs surgical or medical treatment, complete vs partial fundoplication, and treatment for obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 kg/m²) and concomitant GERD. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology by subject experts. Recommendations for future research were also proposed.

RESULTS

The consensus provided 13 recommendations. Through the development of these evidence-based recommendations, an algorithm was proposed for aid in the treatment of GERD. Patients with typical symptoms should undergo upper endoscopy, manometry, and pH-testing; additional testing may be required for patients with atypical or extra-esophageal symptoms. Patients with normal or abnormal findings on manometry should consider undergoing partial fundoplication. Magnetic sphincter augmentation or fundoplication are appropriate surgical procedures for adults with GERD. For patients who wish to avoid surgery, the Stretta procedure and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF 2.0) were found to have better outcomes than proton pump inhibitors alone. Patients with concomitant obesity were recommended to undergo either gastric bypass or fundoplication, although patients with severe comorbid disease or BMI > 50 should undergo Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the additional benefits that follow weight loss.

CONCLUSION

Using the recommendations an algorithm was developed by this panel, so that physicians may better counsel their patients with GERD. There are certain patient factors that have been excluded from included studies/trials, and so these recommendations should not replace surgeon-patient decision making. Engaging in the identified research areas may improve future care for GERD patients.

Sleeve Gastrectomy and Anterior Fundoplication (D-SLEEVE) Prevents Gastroesophageal Reflux in Symptomatic GERD

BACKGROUND

A worrying increase of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Barrett esophagus has been reported after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Recent reports on combined fundoplication and SG seem to accomplish initial favorable results. However, no study included manometry or pH monitoring to evaluate the impact of fundoplication in SG on esophageal physiology.

METHOD

In this study, 32 consecutive bariatric patients with GERD and/or esophagitis had high-resolution impedance manometry (HRiM) and combined 24-h pH and multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII-pH) before and after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy associated to anterior fundoplication (D-SLEEVE). The following parameters were calculated at HRiM: lower esophageal sphincter pressure and relaxation, peristalsis, and mean total bolus transit time. The acid and non-acid GER episodes were assessed by MII-pH, symptom index association (SI), and symptom-association probability (SAP) were also analyzed.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 14 months, HRiM showed an increased LES function, and MII-pH showed an excellent control of both acid exposure of the esophagus and number of reflux events. Bariatric outcomes (BMI and EWL%) were also comparable to regular SG (p = NS).

CONCLUSION

D-SLEEVE is an effective restrictive procedure, which recreates a functional LES pressure able to control and/or prevent mild GERD at 1-year follow-up.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity: do we need to perform reflux testing in all candidates to bariatric surgery?

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is a strong independent risk factor of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and esophageal erosions. However the relationship between obesity and GERD is still a subject of debate. In fact, if in most cases bariatric surgery can diminish reflux by losing a large amount of fat, on the other hand some restrictive procedure can worsen or cause the presence of GERD. Thus, it is unclear if patients candidate to bariatric surgery have to perform pre-operative reflux testing or not.

AIM

of the study was to verify the presence of GERD patterns in patients candidate to surgery and the need of pre-operative reflux testing.

METHODS

All patients underwent to a standardized questionnaire for symptoms severity (GERQ), upper endoscopy, high resolution manometry (HRiM) and impedance pH-monitoring (MII-pH). Patients were stratified into: group 1 (negative for both GERQ and endoscopy), group 2 (positive for GERQ and negative for endoscopy), group 3 (positive for both GERQ and endoscopy). A healthy-volunteers group (HV) was assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine subjects (obese, 124; HV normal weight, 15) were studied. Group 1 showed comparable mean LES pressure, peristaltic function, bolus transport and presence of hiatal hernia than HV. Group 2 showed a reduction of these parameters, while group 3 showed a statistical significant reduction in LES pressure, peristaltic function, bolus transport and increase in presence of hiatal hernia. At MII-pH, Group 1 showed a not significant increase in reflux patterns; group 2 and 3 showed a significant increase in esophageal acid exposure and in number of refluxes (both acid and weakly acid), with group 3 showing the higher grade of reflux pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

Obese subjects with pre-operative presence of GERD symptoms and endoscopical signs could be tested with HRM and MII-pH before undergoing bariatric surgery, especially for restrictive procedures. On the other hand, obese patients without any sign of GERD could not be tested for reflux, showing similar patterns to HV.

Is the advanced age a contraindication to GERD laparoscopic surgery? Results of a long term follow-up

Background

In this prospective non randomized observational cohort study we have evaluated the influence of age on outcome of laparoscopic total fundoplication for GERD.

Methods

Six hundred and twenty consecutive patients underwent total laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD. Five hundred and twenty-four patients were younger than 65 years (YG), and 96 patients were 65 years or older (EG). The following parameters were considered in the preoperative and postoperative evaluation: presence, duration, and severity of GERD symptoms, presence of a hiatal hernia, manometric and 24 hour pH-monitoring data, duration of operation, incidence of complications and length of hospital stay.

Results

Elderly patients more often had atypical symptoms of GERD and at manometric evaluation had a higher rate of impaired esophageal peristalsis in comparison with younger patients. The duration of the operation was similar between the two groups. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications was low and the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups. An excellent outcome was observed in 93.0% of young patients and in 88.9% of elderly patients (p = NS).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is a safe and effective treatment for GERD even in elderly patients, warranting low morbidity and mortality rates and a significant improvement of symptoms comparable to younger patients.

Prospective assessment of patient selection for antireflux surgery by combined multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring

INTRODUCTION

Selecting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients for surgery on the basis of standard 24-h pH monitoring may be challenging, particularly if this investigation does not correlate with clinical symptoms. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring (MII-pH) is able to physically detect each episode of intraesophageal bolus movements, enabling identification of either acid or non-acid reflux episodes and thus establish the association of the reflux with symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively assessed and reviewed data from 314 consecutive patients who underwent MII-pH for GERD not responsive or not compliant to proton pump inhibitor therapy. One hundred fifty-three patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year constituted the study population. Clinical outcomes and satisfaction rate were collected in all patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication. Outcomes were reported for patients with normal and ineffective peristalsis and for patients with positive pH monitoring, negative pH monitoring and positive total number of reflux episodes at MII, and negative pH monitoring and normal number of reflux episodes at MII and a positive symptom index correlation with MII.

RESULTS

The overall patient satisfaction rate was 98.3%. No differences were recorded in the clinical outcomes of the patients with preoperative normal and ineffective peristalsis. No differences in patients' satisfaction and clinical postoperative DeMeester symptom scoring system were noted between the groups as determined by MII-pH.

CONCLUSION

MII-pH provides useful information for objective selection of patients to antireflux surgery. Nissen fundoplication provides excellent outcomes in patients with positive and negative pH and positive MII monitoring or Symptom Index association. More extensive studies are needed to definitively standardize the useful MII-pH parameters to select the patient to antireflux surgery.

Objective assessment of gastroesophageal reflux after extended Heller myotomy and total fundoplication for achalasia with the use of 24-hour combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII-pH)

This study aims to evaluate by the use of 24-hour combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII-pH) the efficacy of the Nissen fundoplication in controlling both acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in patients that underwent Heller myotomy for achalasia. It has been demonstrated that fundoplication prevents the pathologic acid GER after Heller myotomy, but no objective data exists on the efficacy of this antireflux surgery in controlling all types of reflux events. The study population consisted of 20 patients that underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Nissen fundoplication for achalasia. All patients were investigated with manometry and MII-pH. MII-pH showed no evidence of postoperative pathologic GER. The overall number of GER episodes was normal in both the upright and recumbent position. This reduction was obtained because of the postoperative control of both the acid and nonacid reflux episodes. The Nissen fundoplication adequately controls both acid and nonacid GER after extended Heller myotomy. Further controls with MII-pH are warranted to check at a longer follow-up for the efficacy of this antireflux procedure in achalasic patients.

Endoscopic cervical bariatric surgery: follow-up study in a porcine model

BACKGROUND

The realisation of bariatric surgery has to date modified the digestive process solely through procedures within the abdominal cavity. However, endocrine surgeons have recently demonstrated the feasibility of a minimally invasive approach to the neck. In this study, we explored the feasibility, safety and weight progression of a bariatric procedure performed at the neck.

METHODS

Eleven 40-50 kg Yorkshire pigs underwent endoscopic placement of an adjustable band to the cervical esophagus (ECB). Weight was monitored at postoperative days 15, 30, and after 7 weeks; weight progression was compared with an identical group of pigs who underwent a sham procedure. At autopsy, the surgical site was evaluated in a microscopic and macroscopic manner.

RESULTS

Mean operating time was 66 +/- 5.76 min. All pigs tolerated the procedure well, except one subject that experienced food intolerance. The ECB group experienced significantly slower weight gain than the sham group (P = 0.005). Proper location of the band and absence of microscopic lesions at the esophageal wall were confirmed at autopsy and pathological examination.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery at the neck is feasible and produces effects on weight reduction. Further refinements and longer observation periods are required to propose this procedure as safe and effective alternative in humans.