Effect of plasmapheresis on the immune system in endotoxin-induced sepsis

THE THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY OF PLASMAPHERESIS FOR SEPSIS WITH MULTIPLE ORGAN FAILURE: A PROPENSITY SCORE-MATCHED ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MIMIC-IV DATABASE

ABSTRACT

Background: Despite advancements in sepsis treatment, mortality remains high. Plasmapheresis (PE) targeting multiple pathways simultaneously seems to be a potential treatment option, but evidence is insufficient. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of PE for sepsis with multiple organ failure (MOF). Method: Septic patients with MOF were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. Patients who received PE were matched with those receiving conventional therapy via propensity score matching. Regression analyses evaluated the association between PE and outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to analyze the survival probability. The generalized additive mixed model investigated early indexes changes' association with treatment modalities and 28-day mortality. Results: Nine hundred six septic patients with MOF were enrolled. After propensity score matching, PE and conventional groups consisted of 60 cases each. Plasmapheresis was associated with a reduced risk of 28-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.94), 1-year mortality (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.74), and in-hospital mortality (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.71). The KM curves demonstrated significant differences in survival probability between groups. Compared with the conventional group, the sequential organ failure assessment, norepinephrine dosage, prothrombin time, actate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin, white blood cells, and immature granulocytes in the PE group significantly decreased over time, while platelets, red blood cells, and hemoglobin significantly increased over time. Conclusions: Plasmapheresis demonstrated an association with reduced risks of 28-day, in-hospital and 1-year mortality in septic patients with MOF. Moreover, plasmapheresis might exhibit the potential to improve outcomes by improving organ function, hemodynamics, and restoring several indicators, such as coagulation, anemia, and inflammation.

Blood Purification Techniques for Sepsis and Septic AKI

Sepsis is the primary cause of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. During the past decades, several extracorporeal blood purification techniques have been developed for sepsis and sepsis-induced acute kidney injury management. These therapies could act on both the infectious agent itself and the host immune response. In this article, we review the available literature discussing the different extracorporeal blood purification techniques, including high-volume hemofiltration, cascade hemofiltration, hemoperfusion, coupled plasma filtration adsorption, plasma exchange, and specific optimized renal replacement therapy membranes.

Efficiency of Therapeutic Plasma-Exchange in Acute Interstitial Lung Disease, Associated With Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis Resistant to Glucocorticoids and Immunosuppressive Drugs: A Retrospective Study

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a life-threating complication, commonly associated with polymyositis (PM), and dermatomyositis (DM). A subset of acute ILD associated with PM/DM patients are refractory to conventional treatment, and leads to a high rate of mortality. The efficacy of therapeutic plasma-exchange (TPE) as a PM/DM treatment to improve muscle involvement is controversial due to a lack of evidence. However, in recent reports, TPE has been effective in improving lung involvement. To evaluate the efficacy of this therapy, we retrospectively studied TPE treatment outcomes for in 18 acute PM/DM-ILD patients who were resistant to conventional therapies. Five patients were diagnosed with DM (27.8%), 11 with CADM (61.1%), and two with PM (11.1%). Among 18 patients, 11 (61.1%) achieved satisfactory improvement after four or more rounds of TPE, whereas seven died due to respiratory failure. We also analyzed risk factors to predict unresponsiveness to TPE in these patients. Notably, the prevalence of subcutaneous/mediastinal emphysema was significantly higher in the non-responsive group (6/7, 85.7%) than in the responsive group (2/11, 18.2%; P = 0.013); moreover, patients with this complication were mainly in the CADM subgroup (6/8, 75%). Subcutaneous/mediastinal emphysema and increased serum ferritin levels were shown to be poor prognostic factors, predictive of unresponsiveness to TPE, in PM/DM patients. No autoantibodies were found to be associated with TPE outcome, although we only investigated anti-Jo-1 and anti-Ro antibodies; the clinical significance of other myositis-specific autoantibodies, especially anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody, is not known. Our results indicate that TPE might be an alternative treatment for acute PM/DM-ILD patients resistant to conventional therapies, except for those with subcutaneous/mediastinal emphysema and high serum ferritin levels.

Purification methods: a way to treat severe acute inflammation related to sepsis?

After numerous negative randomized trials testing drugs for severe sepsis and/or septic shock, the blood purification approach remains one possibility. Many techniques have been proposed, having in common the goal to eliminate blood and/or plasma factors, supposed to play a negative role in outcomes. Among these, high dose of hemofiltration, high volume hemofiltration, high permeability hemofiltration and specific or non-specific hemoperfusion or hemoadsorption have been proposed. Until now, a poor level of proof has been published, questioning the pertinence of such a strategy. To have a chance to succeed, immune monitoring has to be performed to select suitable patients regarding their immune status, the intensity of inflammation and their cellular function. Because of the potential interaction with mediators and cell capture, Rimmelé and colleagues published the results obtained with an in vitro set up, testing different adsorption cartridges in comparison to hemofiltration. They nicely confirmed the complex impact on mediator levels and cell capture and phenotype. This is certainly a more systematic approach to better understand the action of such adsorbing cartridges, which has to be developed.

Plasmapheresis adjusts inflammatory responses in potential kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Plasmapheresis (PP) has been used in the treatment of various immunologic disorders, and its efficacy has mainly been attributed to the removal of humoral factors and autoantibodies. Besides these effects, PP may induce modifications of the cellular immunologic status, contributing to the restoration of impaired immunologic function. The effect of PP on lymphocyte subpopulations, plasma neopterin, and cytokines in renal transplant recipients was investigated in this study.

METHODS

We compared pre-PP and post-PP lymphocyte subpopulations and plasma neopterin in 37, and cytokine plasma levels in 30, potential renal transplant recipients. Plasma neopterin and cytokines were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits, lymphocyte subsets were determined using four-color fluorescence flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Lymphocyte subpopulation counts and ratios including CD45:μL (P=0.005), CD3:μL (P=0.02), CD4DR:μL (P=0.002), CD8:μL (P=0.01), and CD8DR:μL (P=0.005) T cells; CD4DR:CD4 (P=0.009) and CD8DR:CD8 (P=0.0004) ratios; DR cells:μL (P=0.003); CD19 B lymphocytes:μL (P=0.001); and plasma levels of neopterin (P<;0.0001), soluble interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (P<;0.0001), IL-8 (P=0.0001), and tumor necrosis factor-α (P=0.008) were significantly decreased after PP as compared with before PP. The results indicate a decrease of activated DR, CD4, and CD8 T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes, and a decrease of monocyte and macrophage activation as a result of PP.

CONCLUSION

Based on these results, we conclude that PP not only removes antibodies from the plasma but, in addition, modulates T-lymphocyte activation and the inflammatory response by decreasing plasma proinflammatory cytokines.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in an intensive care unit (ICU): a 10-year, single-center experience

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a blood purification method that effectively allows for the removal of waste substances by separating out plasma from other components of blood and the removed plasma is replaced with solutions such as albumin and/or plasma, or crystalloid/colloid solutions. Plasma exchange therapies are becoming increasingly essential, being used in daily practice in critical care settings for various indications, either as a first-line therapeutic intervention or as an adjunct to conventional therapies. This retrospective clinical study analyzes 10-year therapeutic plasma exchange activity experience in an 18-bed ICU at a tertiary care university hospital with a large, critically-ill patient population. Medical records of 1188 plasma exchange procedures on 329 patients with different diagnoses admitted from January 2000 to July 2010 were evaluated. The aim of the study was to determine the TPE indications and outcomes of the patients who underwent TPE in the ICU with conventional therapy. The secondary endpoints were to determine the differences between different patient groups (septic vs. non-septic indications) in terms of adverse events and procedural differences.

Use of therapeutic plasma exchange as a rescue therapy in 2009 pH1N1 influenza A--an associated respiratory failure and hemodynamic shock

OBJECTIVE

Acute pneumonitis with acute lung injury is a cause of significant mortality related to the 2009 pH1N1 influenza A virus. Widespread lung inflammation and increased pulmonary vascular permeability has been noted on autopsy. Also, many of these patients present with significant hemodynamic compromise suggesting systemic cytokine release. Therefore, attenuating circulating cytokines, and other mediators, by blood purification techniques is a theoretically attractive strategy. We report the use therapeutic plasma exchange in three children with 2009 H1N1 related acute lung injury with severe hemodynamic compromise that had failed conventional therapeutic interventions.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Pediatric intensive care unit in a university children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Three children, aged 8, 11, and 17 yrs, with acute respiratory distress syndrome and hemodynamic compromise related to the 2009 pH1N1 influenza A virus documented by polymerase chair reaction. All patients were on mechanical ventilation and inhaled nitric oxide, and one patient was on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Therapeutic plasma exchange was used as a rescue strategy.

INTERVENTIONS

Each patient received three exchanges of 35-40 mL/kg on consecutive days.

MEASUREMENTS

All three patients had dramatic reduction in pediatric logistic organ dysfunction scores, oxygen requirements, and vasopressor requirements after two exchanges. All survived with good functional recovery.

MAIN RESULTS

In this small series of patients with H1N1/acute respiratory distress syndrome and hemodynamic compromise, therapeutic plasma exchange appeared to benefit as a method of mitigating the associated cytokine storm. The procedure was well tolerated with no reported side effects. All three patients survived, defying the predicted mortality. Because these procedures used the filtration exchange method, it was performed in a timely fashion by intensive care unit personnel and on equipment already available in the intensive care unit for renal support.

CONCLUSIONS

This very limited case series suggest there may be a role for therapeutic plasma exchange as a rescue therapy in severe shock and acute lung injury related to pH1N1 that has not responded to traditional therapy.

Clinical review: blood purification for sepsis

Sepsis is the primary cause of death in the intensive care unit. Extracorporeal blood purification therapies have been proposed for patients with sepsis in order to improve outcomes since these therapies can alter the host inflammatory response by non-selective removal of inflammatory mediators or bacterial products or both. Recent technological progress has increased the number of techniques available for blood purification and their performance. In this overview, we report on the latest advances in blood purification for sepsis and how they relate to current concepts of disease, and we review the current evidence for high-volume hemofiltration, cascade hemofiltration, hemoadsorption, coupled plasma filtration adsorption, high-adsorption hemofiltration, and high-cutoff hemofiltration/hemodialysis. Promising results have been reported with all of these blood purification therapies, showing that they are well tolerated, effective in clearing inflammatory mediators or bacterial toxins (or both) from the plasma, and efficacious for improvement of various physiologic outcomes (for example, hemodynamics and oxygenation). However, numerous questions, including the timing, duration, and frequency of these therapies in the clinical setting, remain unanswered. Large multicenter trials evaluating the ability of these therapies to improve clinical outcomes (that is, mortality or organ failure), rather than surrogate markers such as plasma mediator clearance or transient improvement in physiologic variables, are required to define the precise role of blood purification in the management of sepsis.