Effect of the portacaval shunt on reperfusion injury after 65% hepatectomy in pigs

A Pre-Clinical Large Animal Model of Sustained Liver Injury and Regeneration Stimulus

A feasible large animal model to evaluate regenerative medicine techniques is vital for developing clinical applications. One such appropriate model could be to use retrorsine (RS) together with partial hepatectomy (PH). Here, we have developed the first porcine model using RS and PH. RS or saline control was administered intraperitoneally to Göttingen miniature pigs twice, two weeks apart. Four weeks after the second dose, animals underwent PH. Initially, we tested different doses of RS and resection of different amounts of liver, and selected 50 mg/kg RS with 60% hepatectomy as our model for further testing. Treated animals were sacrificed 3, 10, 17 or 28 days after PH. Blood samples and resected liver were collected. Serum and liver RS content was determined by Liquid Chromatograph-tandem Mass Spectrometer. Blood analyses demonstrated liver dysfunction after PH. Liver regeneration was significantly inhibited 10 and 17 days after PH in RS-treated animals, to the extent of 20%. Histological examination indicated hepatic injury and regenerative responses after PH. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated accumulation of Cyclin D1 and suppression of Ki-67 and PCNA in RS-treated animals. We report the development of the first large animal model of sustained liver injury with suppression of hepatic regeneration.

The beneficial role of simultaneous splenectomy after extended hepatectomy: experimental study in pigs

BACKGROUND

The role of hepatic hemodynamic modulation in the development of "small-for-size" syndrome (SFSS) after extended hepatectomy (EH) or living-donor liver transplantation is still controversial. We have designed an experimental study to investigate the effect of hemodynamic parameters of the liver circulation on the development of SFSS after EH in a porcine model.

METHODS

Eighteen pigs were randomly divided into two groups: group A has received EH (75%-80%) without splenectomy, and group B with EH and simultaneous splenectomy was carried out. Portal hemodynamics, liver function tests, histologic findings, injury and survival rates were compared between groups A and B.

RESULTS

The 7-d survival rate in the splenectomy group was significantly improved compared with group A (88.9% versus 44.4%, P < 0.05). Portal vein pressure, portal vein flow, and liver function tests in the splenectomy group were significantly lower than in group A immediately after splenectomy and postoperatively until the day of sacrifice. Histologic findings in group A clearly illustrate severe inflammation, bridging necrosis, ischemic cholangitis, and severe congestion, while in group B there were less serious histologic changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experimental study indicates that perioperative portal modulation can successfully prevent the manifestation of SFSS after EH. Therefore, by focusing on "flow" rather than on "size," researchers may understand better the pathophysiology of this syndrome.

Small for size liver remnant following resection: prevention and management

In the latest decades an important change was registered in liver surgery, however the management of liver cirrhosis or small size hepatic remnant still remains a challenge. Currently post-hepatectomy liver failure (PLF) is the major cause of death after liver resection often associated with sepsis and ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). ''Small-for-size'' syndrome (SFSS) and PFL have similar mechanism presenting reduction of liver mass and portal hyper flow beyond a certain threshold. Few methods are described to prevent both syndromes, in the preoperative, perioperative and postoperative stages. Additionally to portal vein embolization (PVE), radiological examinations (mainly CT and/or MRI), and more recently 3D computed tomography are fundamental to quantify the liver volume (LV) at a preoperative stage. During surgery, in order to limit parenchymal damage and optimize regenerative capacity, some hepatoprotective measures may be employed, among them: intermittent portal clamping and hypothermic liver preservation. Regarding the treatment, since PLF is a quite complex disease, it is required a multi-disciplinary approach, where it management must be undertaken in conjunction with critical care, hepatology, microbiology and radiology services. The size of the liver cannot be considered the main variable in the development of liver dysfunction after extended hepatectomies. Additional characteristics should be taken into account, such as: the future liver remnant; the portal blood flow and pressure and the exploration of the potential effects of regeneration preconditioning are all promising strategies that could help to expand the indications and increase the safety of liver surgery.

"Small-for-flow" syndrome: shifting the "size" paradigm

The "small-for-size" syndrome and "post-hepatectomy liver failure" refers to the development of liver failure (hyperbilirubinemia, coagulopathy, encephalopathy and refractory ascites) resulting from the reduction of liver mass beyond a certain threshold. This complication is associated with a high mortality and is a major concern in liver transplantation involving reduced liver grafts from deceased and living donors as well as in hepatic surgeries involving extended resections of liver mass. The limiting threshold for liver resection or transplantation is currently predicted based on the mass of the remnant liver (or donor graft) in relation to the body weight of the patient, with a ratio above 0.8 being considered safe. This approach, however, has proved inaccurate, because some patients develop the "small-for-size" syndrome despite complying with the "safe" threshold while other patients who surpass the threshold do not develop it. We hypothesize that the development of the "small-for-size" syndrome is not exclusively determined by the ratio of the mass of the liver remnant (or graft) to the body weight, but it is instead strictly determined by the hemodynamic parameters of the hepatic circulation. This hypothesis is based in recent clinical and experimental reports showing that relative portal hyperperfusion is a critical factor in the development of the "small-for-size" syndrome and that maneuvers that manipulate the hepatic vascular inflow are able to prevent the development of the syndrome despite liver-to-body weight ratios well below the "limiting" threshold. Measurements of hepatic blood flow and pressure, however, are not routinely performed in hepatic surgeries. Focusing on the "flow" rather than in the "size" may improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of the "small-for-size" syndrome and "post-hepatectomy liver failure" and it would have important implications for the clinical management of patients at risk. First, hepatic hemodynamic parameters would have to be measured in hepatic surgeries. Second, these parameters (in addition to liver mass) would be the principal basis for deciding the "safe" threshold of viable liver parenchyma. Third, the hepatic hemodynamic parameters are amenable to manipulation and, consequently, the "safe" threshold may also be manipulated. Shifting the paradigm from "small-for-size" to "small-for-flow" syndrome would thus represent a major step for optimizing the use of donor livers, for expanding the indications of hepatic surgery, and for increasing the safety of these procedures.

Development of an improved pig model of piggyback liver transplantation with temporary portacaval shunting

AIM: To improve the piggy-back orthotopic liver transplantation (PBOLT) technique in pigs and to enhance the survival rate of pigs after liver transplantation.

METHODS: Pigs were divided into control group and experimental group. The inferior caval vein was separated from the liver of recipients by curettage and aspiration using Peng's multifunctional operative dissector in the control group. Temporary portacaval shunting was added in the experimental group to reduce congestion in the portal system during anhepatic phase.

RESULTS: The PBOLT procedures were performed in eight pairs of pigs in both the control group and experimental group, with a success rate of 87.5% and 100%, respectively. There were significant differences in cold ischemia time (142.8 min ± 7.4 min vs 155.6 min ± 8.3 min, P = 0.006), anhepatic phase duration (25.8 min ± 1.3 min vs 36.3 min ± 1.0 min, P = 0.000), and operation time (264.1 min ± 9.5 min vs 277.3 min ± 8.6 min, P = 0.012) between the two groups though no significant difference was noted in mean bleeding volume (892.5 mL ± 113.9 mL vs 888.8 mL ± 93.7 mL, P = 0.94). The 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-day survival rates were 87.5% and 100%, 25% and 100%, 12.5% and 87.5%, and 0% and 87.5% in the control group and experimental group, respectively. On day 10 after PBOLT, 87.5% of pigs of the experimental group were still alive (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION: PBOLT with temporary portacaval shunting can maintain hemodynamic stability and relieve congestion of the portal system in pigs during liver transplantation. Control of gastrointestinal congestion is key to the success of liver transplantation and can raise the survival rate of pigs after liver transplantation.