Prolactin short-loop feedback and prolactin inhibition of luteinizing hormone secretion during the breeding season and seasonal anoestrus in the ewe

Kisspeptin cells in the ovine arcuate nucleus express prolactin receptor but not melatonin receptor

Melatonin is secreted at night by the pineal gland and governs the reproductive system in seasonal breeders, such as sheep. The mechanism by which melatonin regulates reproduction is not known. The circannual rhythmicity of other factors, including prolactin, is also regulated by photoperiod via changes in melatonin secretion. In sheep, plasma prolactin levels are higher in the nonbreeding season than the breeding season. Kisspeptin, synthesised by neurones in the ovine arcuate nucleus (ARC) and preoptic area, is a key regulator of reproduction through stimulation of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone secretion and its expression in the ARC is reduced during the nonbreeding season. We hypothesised that kisspeptin expression is directly, or indirectly, regulated by melatonin and/or prolactin. We first examined the expression of melatonin receptor (MTNR1A) in kisspeptin (Kiss1 mRNA) neurones in the ARC of ovariectomised (OVX) sheep using double-label in situ hybridisation. MTNR1A mRNA was not expressed by kisspeptin neurones, whereas strong expression was detected in the pars tuberalis. We then examined the expression of the long-form prolactin receptor (PRLR-L) in ARC kisspeptin neurones. In OVX ewes, approximately 60% of kisspeptin neurones expressed PRLR-L mRNA at similar levels in the breeding and nonbreeding seasons. We then aimed to determine whether prolactin treatment during the breeding season regulates kisspeptin expression in the ARC. Continuous central infusion of prolactin (20 μg/h for 7 days) in oestradiol-treated OVX sheep did not alter Kiss1 mRNA expression or luteinising hormone secretion, although it induced substantial phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 5-immunoreactive nuclei staining in the mediobasal hypothalamus. We conclude that the seasonal change in kisspeptin neurones cannot be regulated directly by melatonin, although it may be a result of changes in prolactin levels. Despite this, kisspeptin expression was unchanged after exogenous prolactin treatment in breeding season ewes.

Prolactin acts on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis to modulate follicle-stimulating hormone gene expression in the female brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula)

Brushtail possums exhibit a distinct preovulatory pattern of prolactin (Prl) secretion suggesting that Prl is involved in normal reproductive function. In some mammals, Prl is essential for corpus luteum (CL) function and/or modulation of steroidal effects on hypothalamic-pituitary activity. The aim of this study was to test the effects of biologically active recombinant possum Prl (recPosPrl) on both pituitary gland and CL function in possums. To confirm biological activity, administration of recPosPrl-N2C1 (10 μg) resulted in an 18-fold stimulation (P<0.05) of progesterone (P(4)) production by possum granulosa cells in vitro. Based on these findings, minipumps containing either recPosPrl-N2C1 (n=10) or saline (n=8) were inserted into lactating female possums. The expression levels of pituitary-derived PRL, LHB, FSHB and GNRHR and CL-derived LHR mRNA were quantified. Following a resumption of reproductive activity, no differences in ovulation incidence or plasma Prl concentrations were observed. Plasma Prl levels were less variable (P<0.001) in Prl-treated possums, confirming a self-regulatory role for Prl in this species. There was a marked down-regulation (P<0.001) of FSHB mRNA at the mid-luteal stage in Prl-treated possums, whereas mean PRL, LHB, GNRHR and LHR mRNA expression levels were not different between experimental groups. Plasma P(4) concentrations were not different (P=0.05) in Prl-treated possums, although tended to be higher in the peri-ovulatory and early-luteal phase. We conclude in the brushtail possum that Prl is self-regulated via a short-feedback loop common to all mammals studied and is able to modulate FSHB expression probably at the level of the hypothalamus and/or pituitary gland.

Prolactin regulation of testosterone secretion and testes growth in DLS rams at the onset of seasonal testicular recrudescence

Our objective was to test the hypothesis that prolactin (PRL) acts at both the pituitary and testis levels to regulate testosterone secretion in the adult ram. The focus was on the mid-regression to mid-redevelopment stages of a photoperiod-condensed ‘seasonal’ testicular cycle. DLS rams (six per group) were given daily s.c. injections of bromocriptine (4 mg) or vehicle during the entire period. Serum PRL concentration in control rams peaked at 103.4±22.1 ng/ml in late regression and then steadily declined (P<0.01) to 19.5±4.3 ng/ml, whereas PRL in treated rams was always ≤4.0 ng/ml. Suppression of PRL tended (P<0.10) to increase the amplitude of natural LH pulses (transition stages) or reduce the number of LH receptors in the testis (regressed stage), although neither change disturbed testosterone levels in peripheral blood. These subtle changes were accompanied by significant (P<0.05) alterations in the capability of the pituitary to release LH (85% more) and of the testes to secrete testosterone (20% less). These effects of PRL were unmasked when rams were given highly stimulative i.v. injections of GNRH (single 3 μg dose) and NIH-oLH-S24 (three 5 μg doses given 20 min apart) respectively. PRL insufficiency also appeared to slow down the ‘seasonal’ rise in FSH secretion and slightly delayed (2 weeks) the times when the testes began to grow and were first significantly (P<0.05) enlarged from the regressed state. We conclude that PRL is an important part of the intricate regulation of the pituitary–gonadal system in moderately seasonal DLS rams.

Hypothalamic prolactin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid levels, prolactin signaling, and hyperprolactinemic inhibition of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion are dependent on estradiol

Hyperprolactinemia can reduce fertility and libido. Although central prolactin actions are thought to contribute to this, the mechanisms are poorly understood. We first tested whether chronic hyperprolactinemia inhibited two neuroendocrine parameters necessary for female fertility: pulsatile LH secretion and the estrogen-induced LH surge. Chronic hyperprolactinemia induced by the dopamine antagonist sulpiride caused a 40% reduction LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized rats, but only in the presence of chronic low levels of estradiol. Sulpiride did not affect the magnitude of a steroid-induced LH surge or the percentage of GnRH neurons activated during the surge. Estradiol is known to influence expression of the long form of prolactin receptors (PRL-R) and components of prolactin's signaling pathway. To test the hypothesis that estrogen increases PRL-R expression and sensitivity to prolactin, we next demonstrated that estradiol greatly augments prolactin-induced STAT5 activation. Lastly, we measured PRL-R and suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS-1 and -3 and CIS, which reflect the level of prolactin signaling) mRNAs in response to sulpiride and estradiol. Sulpiride induced only SOCS-1 in the medial preoptic area, where GnRH neurons are regulated, but in the arcuate nucleus and choroid plexus, PRL-R, SOCS-3, and CIS mRNA levels were also induced. Estradiol enhanced these effects on SOCS-3 and CIS. Interestingly, estradiol also induced PRL-R, SOCS-3, and CIS mRNA levels independently. These data show that GnRH pulse frequency is inhibited by chronic hyperprolactinemia in a steroid-dependent manner. They also provide evidence for estradiol-dependent and brain region-specific regulation of PRL-R expression and signaling responses by prolactin.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone stimulates prolactin release from lactotrophs in photoperiodic species through a gonadotropin-independent mechanism

Previous studies have provided evidence for a paracrine interaction between pituitary gonadotrophs and lactotrophs. Here, we show that GnRH is able to stimulate prolactin (PRL) release in ovine primary pituitary cultures. This effect was observed during the breeding season (BS), but not during the nonbreeding season (NBS), and was abolished by the application of bromocriptine, a specific dopamine agonist. Interestingly, GnRH gained the ability to stimulate PRL release in NBS cultures following treatment with bromocriptine. In contrast, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, a potent secretagogue of PRL, stimulated PRL release during both the BS and NBS and significantly enhanced the PRL response to GnRH during the BS. These results provide evidence for a photoperiodically modulated functional interaction between the GnRH/gonadotropic and prolactin axes in the pituitary gland of a short day breeder. Moreover, the stimulation of PRL release by GnRH was shown not to be mediated by the gonadotropins, since immunocytochemical, Western blotting, and PCR studies failed to detect pituitary LH or FSH receptor protein and mRNA expressions. Similarly, no gonadotropin receptor expression was observed in the pituitary gland of the horse, a long day breeder. In contrast, S100 protein, a marker of folliculostellate cells, which are known to participate in paracrine mechanisms within this tissue, was detected throughout the pituitaries of both these seasonal breeders. Therefore, an alternative gonadotroph secretory product, a direct effect of GnRH on the lactotroph, or another cell type, such as the folliculostellate cell, may be involved in the PRL response to GnRH in these species.

Reproduction and plasma concentrations of leptin, insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 in growth-hormone-transgenic female sheep before and after artificial insemination

The transgenic sheep used in this study expressed an additional copy of the gene for ovine growth hormone (GH), so they had continuously high plasma concentrations of GH. They were used to test whether the GH transgene affected plasma concentrations of the metabolic hormones leptin, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and insulin, and whether these effects were associated with changes in conception, pregnancy or parturition following artificial insemination. Compared with control animals, the GH-transgenic sheep had higher bodyweight, lower body condition score and less subcutaneous fat (P < 0.05). These sheep also had lower plasma concentrations of leptin, higher plasma concentrations of insulin, and higher plasma concentrations of IGF-1 (P < 0.001). A similar proportion of GH-transgenic and control ewes came into oestrus, but the conception rate to artificial insemination was lower in GH-transgenic ewes than in the controls. Only four live lambs were recovered from 12 GH-transgenic ewes (33%) compared with 38 lambs from 43 controls (88%). This outcome was not associated with any difference in plasma progesterone profile in the period leading up to artificial insemination (Day 0). The GH-transgenic ewes had lower concentrations of FSH at all times measured (Day -19, Day -2 and Day 19). These results indicate that appropriate regulation of GH secretion from pituitary or peripheral tissues is necessary for normal reproduction and normal levels of metabolic hormones. Chronically high concentrations of GH were associated with increased levels of IGF-1 and insulin, and decreased levels of leptin.

The effects of intracerebroventricular infusion of prolactin on luteinizing hormone, testosterone and growth hormone secretion in male sheep

This study tested a hypothesis that the enhancement of the prolactin (PRL) concentration within the central nervous system (CNS) disturbs pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) and growth hormone (GH) secretion in rams that are in the natural breeding season. A 3h long intracerebroventricular (icv.) infusion of ovine PRL (50 microg/100 microl/h) was made in six rams during the daily period characterized by low PRL secretion in this species (from 12:00 to 15:00 h); the other six animals received control infusions during the same time. Blood samples were collected from 9:00 to 18:00 h at 10 min intervals. A clear daily pattern of LH secretion was shown in control animals, with the lowest concentration at noon and an increasing basal level around the time of sunset (P < 0.001). No significant changes in LH concentration occurred in PRL-infused animals and the concentration noted after infusion of PRL was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than after the control infusion. The frequency of LH pulses tended to decrease in rams after PRL treatment. The changes in LH secretion clearly carried over to the secretion of testosterone in the rams of both groups. The GH concentrations changed throughout the experiment in both groups of rams, being higher after the infusions (P < 0.001). However, the mean GH concentration and GH pulse amplitude noted after PRL infusion were significantly lower (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively) from those recorded in the control. The continued fall in PRL secretion observed in rams following PRL infusion (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001) indicates a high degree of effectiveness of exogenous PRL at the level of the CNS. In conclusion, maintenance of an elevated PRL concentration within the CNS leads to disturbances in the neuroendocrine mechanisms responsible for pulsatile LH and GH secretion in sexually active rams.

Prolactin cycles in sheep under constant photoperiod: evidence that photorefractoriness develops within the pituitary gland independently of the prolactin output signal

The present study investigated photorefractoriness in the prolactin (PRL) axis in hypothalamopituitary-disconnected (HPD) sheep exposed to prolonged long days. In experiment 1, HPD Soay rams transferred from short (8L:16D) to long (16L:8D) days for 48 wk to induce a cycle of activation, decline (photorefractoriness), and reactivation in PRL secretion were treated chronically with bromocriptine (dopamine-receptor agonist) or vehicle from the onset of photorefractoriness. Bromocriptine (0.01-0.04 mg kg-1 day-1; 12-24 wk of long days) blocked PRL release and caused a rebound response after the treatment, but it had no effect on the long-term PRL cycle (posttreatment PRL minimum, mean +/- SEM, 35.3 +/- 0.6 and 37.0 +/- 0.4 wk for bromocriptine and control groups, respectively; not significant). In experiment 2, HPD rams were treated with sulpiride (dopamine-receptor antagonist) during photorefractoriness. Sulpiride (0.6 mg/kg twice daily; 22-30 wk of long days) induced a marginal increase in blood PRL concentrations, but again, it had no effect on the long-term PRL cycle (PRL minimum, 37.9 +/- 0.4 and 37.6 +/- 0.9 wk for sulpiride and control groups, respectively; not significant). The 24-h blood melatonin profile consistently reflected the long-day photoperiod throughout, and blood FSH concentrations were minimal, confirming the effectiveness of the HPD surgery. The results support the conclusion that photorefractoriness is regulated at the level of the pituitary gland independently of the PRL output signal.

Clock genes and the long-term regulation of prolactin secretion: evidence for a photoperiod/circannual timer in the pars tuberalis

Prolactin secretion is regulated by photoperiod through changes in the 24-h melatonin profile and displays circannual rhythmicity under constant photoperiod. These two processes appear to occur principally within the pituitary gland, controlled by the pars tuberalis. This is evident because: (i) hypothalamic-pituitary disconnected (HPD) sheep show marked changes in prolactin secretion in response to switches in photoperiod and manipulations of melatonin, similar to brain-intact controls; (ii) HPD sheep also show photoperiod-specific, long-term cycles in prolactin secretion under constant long or short days, with the timing maintained even when prolactin secretion is blocked for 2-3 months; and (iii) pars tuberalis cells, but not lactotrophs, express high concentrations of melatonin (MT1) receptor, and exhibit a duration-sensitive, cAMP-dependant, inhibitory response to physiological concentrations of melatonin. This suggests the existence of an intrinsic, reversible photoperiod-circannual timer in pars tuberalis cells. A full complement of clock genes (Bmal1, Clock, Per1, Per2, Cry1 and Cry2) are expressed in the ovine pars tuberalis, and undergo 24-h cyclical expression as observed in a cell autonomous, circadian clock. Activation of Per genes occurs in the early day (melatonin off-set), while activation of Cry genes occurs in the early night (melatonin on-set). This temporal association is evident under both long and short days, thus the Per-Cry interval varies directly with photoperiod. Because, PER : CRY, protein : protein interactions affect stability, nuclear entry and gene transcription based on rodent data, the change in phasing of Per/Cry expression provides a potential mechanism for decoding the long day/short day melatonin signal. A speculative, but testable, extension of this hypothesis is that intrinsically regulated changes in the phase of Per/Cry rhythms, regulates both photorefractoriness and the generation of circannual rhythms in prolactin secretion.

Effect of prolactin infused into the third ventricle on LH secretion in follicular-phase and ovariectomized ewes

This study tested a hypothesis that an acute enhancement of prolactin concentration within the central nervous system (CNS) would affect the LH secretion in ewes, depending on the level of endogenous estrogens in the organism. A 3-h long intracerebroventricular (icv.) infusion of ovine prolactin was made in late follicular-phase ewes, experiment 1, and in ovariectomized (OVX) ewes (experiment 2). No significant differences were found in mean LH concentrations and LH peak number before, during and after prolactin administration (50 microg/100 microl/h) in intact cyclic ewes. No diurnal rhythm in LH was detected in prolactin-infused ewes. From the two doses of prolactin used in OVX ewes (25 and 50 microg/100 microl/h) only the lower dose suppressed significantly the mean plasma LH concentration after the infusion, compared to those noted before (P < 0.01) and during (P < 0.001) prolactin treatment. Prolactin had no effect on LH pulse frequency in OVX ewes, however, a tendency to decrease in LH peak number was observed after administration of a lower dose. Plasma prolactin levels decreased significantly (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001) after the icv. infusion in all groups, indicating a high degree of effectiveness for exogenous prolactin at the level of the CNS.

Noradrenaline and dopamine regulation of prolactin secretion in sheep: role in prolactin homeostasis but not photoperiodism

The role of noradrenaline (NA) and dopamine (DA) in the hypothalamic control of prolactin (PRL) secretion was investigated in hypothalamic intact (control) and hypothalamo-pituitary disconnected (HPD) Soay rams. The animals were exposed to alternating 16-weekly periods of short (8 L : 16D) and long days (16 L : 8D) to induce marked cyclical changes in PRL secretion in both groups (as demonstrated previously). Selective NA and DA receptor antagonists (dose: 1.2 micromol/kg) were administered under short days (low endogenous PRL secretion), and agonists (dose: 0.0012-0.12 micromol/kg) were administered under long days (high endogenous PRL secretion). The acute changes in blood PRL concentrations were measured over 4 h as the index of responsiveness. Under short days, treatment with WB4101 (alpha-1 adenoceptor antagonist), and rauwolscine (alpha-2 antagonist), consistently increased PRL secretion in control, but not in HPD rams. The treatments produced similar acute, drug-specific behavioural effects in both groups. Propranolol (beta antagonist) had no effect on PRL secretion, while sulpiride (DA D-2 antagonist) induced a marked increase in blood PRL concentrations in control rams (> 4 h), and a transient effect in HPD rams (15 min). Under long days, when endogenous PRL secretion was increased, phenylephrine (alpha-1 agonist) produced no effects, while bromocriptine (DA D-2 agonist) robustly decreased PRL concentrations in both control and HPD rams, even at the lowest treatment dose. Overall, the positive responses to the antagonists in the control rams, support the view that DA (acting via D-2 receptors), and to a lesser extent NA (acting via alpha-1/alpha-2 receptors), negatively regulate PRL secretion. In contrast, the lack of responses to the antagonists in the HPD rams, support the view that neither DA, nor NA, mediate the photoperiodic control of PRL secretion.

The actions of prolactin in the brain during pregnancy and lactation

The vital role played by prolactin during pregnancy and lactation is emphasized by the physiological adaptations that occur in the mother to maintain a prolonged state of hyperprolactinemia. In many species the placenta provides a source of lactogenic hormones in the circulation, ensuring the continued presence of a hormone capable of activating the prolactin receptor throughout pregnancy. In addition, the tuberoinfundibular dopamine neurons, which normally maintain a tonic inhibitory influence over prolactin secretion, show a reduced ability to respond to prolactin during late pregnancy and lactation, allowing high levels of prolactin to be maintained unopposed by a regulatory feedback mechanisms. There is clear evidence that systemic prolactin gains access to the cerebrospinal fluid, from where it can diffuse to numerous brain regions. Prolactin receptors are expressed in several hypothalamic nuclei, including the medial preoptic and arcuate nuclei, and we have observed marked increases in expression of prolactin receptors in these nuclei during lactation. Moreover, a number of hypothalamic nuclei, including the paraventricular, supraoptic and ventromedial nuclei, in which prolactin receptors were not detected in diestrous rats, were found to express significant amounts of prolactin receptor during lactation. These observations have important implications for the variety of documented actions of prolactin on the brain. Prolactin has been reported to influence numerous brain functions, including maternal behavior, feeding and appetite, oxytocin secretion, and ACTH secretion in response to stress. In light of the high circulating levels of prolactin during pregnancy and lactation and the increased expression of prolactin receptors in the hypothalamus, many of these effects of prolactin may be enhanced or exaggerated during lactation. Hence, prolactin may be a key player in the coordination of neuroendocrine and behavioral adaptations of the maternal brain.

Prolactin replacement fails to inhibit reactivation of gonadotropin secretion in rams treated with melatonin under long days

This study tested the hypothesis that prolactin (PRL) inhibits gonadotropin secretion in rams maintained under long days and that treatment with melatonin (s.c. continuous-release implant; MEL-IMP) reactivates the reproductive axis by suppressing PRL secretion. Adult Soay rams were maintained under long days (16L:8D) and received 1) no further treatment (control, C); 2) MEL-IMP for 16 wk and injections of saline/vehicle for the first 8 wk (M); 3) MEL-IMP for 16 wk and exogenous PRL (s.c. 5 mg ovine PRL 3x daily) for the first 8 wk (M+P). The treatment with melatonin induced a rapid increase in the blood concentrations of FSH and testosterone, rapid growth of the testes, an increase in the frequency of LH pulses, and a decrease in the LH response to N-methyl-D,L-aspartic acid. The concomitant treatment with exogenous PRL had no effect on these reproductive responses but caused a significant delay in the timing of the sexual skin color and growth of the winter pelage. These results do not support the hypothesis and suggest that PRL at physiological long-day concentrations, while being totally ineffective as an inhibitor of gonadotropin secretion, acts in the peripheral tissues and skin to maintain summer characteristics.

Detection of prolactin receptor gene expression in the sheep pituitary gland and visualization of the specific translation of the signal in gonadotrophs

In sheep, as in other mammalian species, the pronounced reduction in GnRH and gonadotropin secretion that characterizes stages of infertility is normally associated with a conspicuous increase in the secretion of PRL. A possible role of PRL in modulating gonadotropin release implies the presence and activation of specific receptors in target tissues (i.e. pituitary, hypothalamus). In this study, we investigated the expression of PRL receptor (PRL-R) messenger RNA (mRNA) in the sheep pituitary and the distribution of the translated product in specific pituitary cell types. Using primers designed to flank different regions of the extracellular and cytoplasmic domains of the PRL-R, two complementary DNA (cDNA) fragments, one of which was specific for the long-form PRL-R, were amplified by reverse transcriptase-PCR. Sequencing revealed more than 95% identity with nucleotides 267-1272 of the bovine PRL-R cDNA. When these cDNA fragments were used as probes for the detection of PRL-R mRNA expression by Northern analysis, three major transcripts of approximately 13, 10, and 3.5 kb were identified in the pituitary. Both probes detected identical transcripts, suggesting that primarily the long form of PRL-R is expressed in the sheep pituitary gland. No difference in the abundance of pituitary PRL-R mRNA transcripts was observed between anestrous and breeding season ewes (P > 0.05). Additional RT-PCR studies revealed the existence of a cDNA variant bearing a 39-bp insert with a premature stop codon. Translation of the PRL-R mRNA was confirmed by Western blot analysis. The identification of PRL-R in specific pituitary cell types was carried out by immunocytochemistry. Double immunofluorescent staining, using antibodies to the rat liver PRL-R and specific monoclonal antibodies to the LHbeta-subunit, FSHbeta-subunit, free alpha-subunit, PRL, or GH, revealed that in both the pars distalis and pars tuberalis, all pituitary cells expressing PRL-R immunoreactivity were positive for LHbeta, although only 53% of LHbeta-positive cells expressed PRL-R. A small proportion (2%) of gonadotrophs expressing PRL-R immunoreactivity were negative for FSHbeta, indicating the specific localization of PRL-R in LH (or LH/FSH) secreting cells. Further, a selective cytological association was detected in the pars distalis where LH gonadotrophs appeared surrounded by lactotrophs. In contrast to these observations, PRL-R immunoreactivity was completely absent in lactotrophs and in the vast majority (>98%) of somatotrophs. In conclusion, here we show the expression of PRL-R mRNA in the sheep pituitary and the specific translation of the signal in LH (or LH/FSH) gonadotrophs. These results support the hypothesis that PRL may be involved in the regulation of gonadotropin secretion through a paracrine mechanism within the pituitary gland and that this action does not seem to be mediated by changes in PRL-R mRNA expression.

Evidence that melatonin acts in the pituitary gland through a dopamine-independent mechanism to mediate effects of daylength on the secretion of prolactin in the ram

A previous study provided evidence that melatonin acts in the pituitary gland to mediate the effects of daylength on the secretion of prolactin in sheep. This was based on the observation that hypothalamo-pituitary disconnected (HPD) Soay rams showed normal patterns in the changes in the peripheral blood concentrations of prolactin in response to alterations in photoperiod (10-fold higher concentrations under long than short days), and in response to exogenous melatonin (rapid decline following the administration of a constant-release implant of melatonin). The purpose of this study was to establish whether dopamine (DA) might be involved in mediating the effects of melatonin on the secretion of prolactin. Groups of HPD (n = 7) and control Soay rams (n = 8) were treated with vehicle (control, 2.0 ml 0.1 M tartaric acid/saline sc), bromocriptine (DA agonist, 0.06 mg/kg sc) or sulpiride (DA antagonist, 0.6 mg/kg sc), and the acute prolactin responses were measured over the next 4 h. Treatments were carried out under short days (8L: 16D, low prolactin), long days (16L: 8D), high prolactin), and under long days in the presence of a constant-release implant of melatonin (low prolactin). The prolactin response to TRH (1.25 micrograms/kg iv) was also measured. Bromocriptine caused a decrease in the plasma concentrations of prolactin in both HPD and control rams under short and long days. Sulpiride had no effect in the HPD rams on any occasion, but caused a very marked increase in the plasma concentrations of prolactin in the control rams under short days, long days, and under long days + melatonin. TRH caused an acute increase in the plasma concentrations of prolactin in the HPD rams under both long and short days although the responses were notably reduced compared with the controls especially under long days + melatonin. Overall, the inhibitory response to the DA agonist in HPD rams indicates the presence of DA D2 receptors linked to functional lactotrophs in the isolated pituitary gland. However, the total lack of a response to the DA antagonist indicates the absence of endogenous DA mechanisms regulating the secretion of prolactin in the HPD rams. The conclusion is that melatonin acts directly on the pituitary gland to mediate effects of photoperiod through a DA-independent mechanism.