Octreotide in the treatment of acute pancreatitis: results of a unicenter prospective trial with three different octreotide dosages

The effect of thymosin α1 for prevention of infection in patients with severe acute pancreatitis

INTRODUCTION

Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is an acute inflammatory disease with prolonged clinical course, which is complicated by the presence of persistent organ failure and severe infection. Infection mainly occurs in the late phase of SAP and it is found to be the main cause of death. Therefore, developing strategies for the prevention of SAP-related infection has been a crucial approach to improve patients' outcomes. Due to remarkable immune-cells-regulating properties, thymosin α1 has been recognized as a promising immune therapy, especially in several infectious diseases. Recently, thymosin α1 has been given high expectations to exert clinical benefits in the prevention of SAP-related infection.

AREAS COVERED

The review of currently available strategies for SAP-related infection prevention and the use of thymosin α1 in SAP patients.

EXPERT OPINION

The current available strategies achieve limited success for preventing SAP-related infection. A possible explanation is that the trigger of infection, immunosuppression has not been concurrently resolved. The application of thymosin α1 in a clinical study showed a prophylactic effect against SAP-related infection. However, the use of thymosin α1 in SAP patients is still at an early stage of clinical investigation and requires high-quality and large sample size evidences.

Pharmacological interventions for acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

In people with acute pancreatitis, it is unclear what the role should be for medical treatment as an addition to supportive care such as fluid and electrolyte balance and organ support in people with organ failure.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different pharmacological interventions in people with acute pancreatitis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2016, Issue 9), MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, and trial registers to October 2016 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We also searched the references of included trials to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered only RCTs performed in people with acute pancreatitis, irrespective of aetiology, severity, presence of infection, language, blinding, or publication status for inclusion in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently identified trials and extracted data. We did not perform a network meta-analysis as planned because of the lack of information on potential effect modifiers and differences of type of participants included in the different comparisons, when information was available. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the binary outcomes and rate ratios with 95% CIs for count outcomes using a fixed-effect model and random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 84 RCTs with 8234 participants in this review. Six trials (N = 658) did not report any of the outcomes of interest for this review. The remaining 78 trials excluded 210 participants after randomisation. Thus, a total of 7366 participants in 78 trials contributed to one or more outcomes for this review. The treatments assessed in these 78 trials included antibiotics, antioxidants, aprotinin, atropine, calcitonin, cimetidine, EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), gabexate, glucagon, iniprol, lexipafant, NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), octreotide, oxyphenonium, probiotics, activated protein C, somatostatin, somatostatin plus omeprazole, somatostatin plus ulinastatin, thymosin, ulinastatin, and inactive control. Apart from the comparison of antibiotics versus control, which included a large proportion of participants with necrotising pancreatitis, the remaining comparisons had only a small proportion of patients with this condition. Most trials included either only participants with severe acute pancreatitis or included a mixture of participants with mild acute pancreatitis and severe acute pancreatitis (75 trials). Overall, the risk of bias in trials was unclear or high for all but one of the trials.

SOURCE OF FUNDING

seven trials were not funded or funded by agencies without vested interest in results. Pharmaceutical companies partially or fully funded 21 trials. The source of funding was not available from the remaining trials.Since we considered short-term mortality as the most important outcome, we presented only these results in detail in the abstract. Sixty-seven studies including 6638 participants reported short-term mortality. There was no evidence of any differences in short-term mortality in any of the comparisons (very low-quality evidence). With regards to other primary outcomes, serious adverse events (number) were lower than control in participants taking lexipafant (rate ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.96; N = 290; 1 study; very low-quality evidence), octreotide (rate ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89; N = 770; 5 studies; very low-quality evidence), somatostatin plus omeprazole (rate ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.70; N = 140; 1 study; low-quality evidence), and somatostatin plus ulinastatin (rate ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.60; N = 122; 1 study; low-quality evidence). The proportion of people with organ failure was lower in octreotide than control (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.97; N = 430; 3 studies; very low-quality evidence). The proportion of people with sepsis was lower in lexipafant than control (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.83; N = 290; 1 study; very low-quality evidence). There was no evidence of differences in any of the remaining comparisons in these outcomes or for any of the remaining primary outcomes (the proportion of participants experiencing at least one serious adverse event and the occurrence of infected pancreatic necrosis). None of the trials reported heath-related quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Very low-quality evidence suggests that none of the pharmacological treatments studied decrease short-term mortality in people with acute pancreatitis. However, the confidence intervals were wide and consistent with an increase or decrease in short-term mortality due to the interventions. We did not find consistent clinical benefits with any intervention. Because of the limitations in the prognostic scoring systems and because damage to organs may occur in acute pancreatitis before they are clinically manifest, future trials should consider including pancreatitis of all severity but power the study to measure the differences in the subgroup of people with severe acute pancreatitis. It may be difficult to power the studies based on mortality. Future trials in participants with acute pancreatitis should consider other outcomes such as complications or health-related quality of life as primary outcomes. Such trials should include health-related quality of life, costs, and return to work as outcomes and should follow patients for at least three months (preferably for at least one year).

Immunomodulatory therapies for acute pancreatitis

It is currently difficult for conventional treatments of acute pancreatitis (AP), which primarily consist of anti-inflammatory therapies, to prevent the progression of AP or to improve its outcome. This may be because the occurrence and progression of AP, which involves various inflammatory cells and cytokines, includes a series of complex immune events. Considering the complex immune system alterations during the course of AP, it is necessary to monitor the indicators related to immune cells and inflammatory mediators and to develop more individualized interventions for AP patients using immunomodulatory therapy. This review discusses the recent advances in immunomodulatory therapies. It has been suggested that overactive inflammatory responses should be inhibited and excessive immunosuppression should be avoided in the early stages of AP. The optimal duration of anti-inflammatory therapy may be shorter than previously expected (< 24 h), and appropriate immunostimulatory therapies should be administered during the period from the 3^rd d to the 14^th d in the course of AP. A combination therapy of anti-inflammatory and immune-stimulating drugs would hopefully constitute an alternative to anti-inflammatory drug monotherapy. Additionally, the detection of the genotypes of critical inflammatory mediators may be useful for screening populations of AP patients at high risk of severe infections to enable the administration of early interventions to improve their prognosis.

Acute pancreatitis scoring systems

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common acute abdominal disease that can be divided into mild acute pancreatitis and severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). SAP accounts for 20%-30% of all AP cases, progresses rapidly and is associated with a high mortality rate. Early identification, diagnosis and treatment of SAP are important for improving the prognosis. This article will introduce common AP scoring systems and describe the characteristics of each system.

Therapeutic applications of octreotide in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

We report our experience with the use of octreotide as primary or adjunctive therapy in children with various gastrointestinal disorders.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A pharmacy database identified patients who received octreotide for gastrointestinal diseases. Indications for octreotide use, dosing, effectiveness, and adverse events were evaluated by chart review.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients (12 males), aged 1 month to 13 years, were evaluated. Eleven received octreotide for massive gastrointestinal bleeding caused by portal hypertension-induced lesions (n=7), typhlitis (1), Meckel's diverticulum (1), and indefinite source (2). Blood transfusion requirements were reduced from 23 ± 9 mL/kg (mean ± SD) to 8 ± 15 mL/kg (P<0.01). Four patients with pancreatic pseudocyst and/or ascites received octreotide over 14.0 ± 5.7 days in 2 patients. In 3 children, pancreatic pseudocyst resolved in 12 ± 2 days and pancreatic ascites resolved in 7 days in 2. Three patients with chylothorax received octreotide for 14 ± 7 days with complete resolution in each. Two infants with chronic diarrhea received octreotide over 11 ± 4.2 months. Stool output decreased from 85 ± 21 mL/kg/day to 28 ± 18 mL/kg/day, 3 months after initiation of octreotide. The child with dumping syndrome responded to octreotide in a week. Adverse events developed in 4 patients: Q-T interval prolongation and ventricular fibrillation, hyperglycemia, growth hormone deficiency, and hypertension.

CONCLUSION

Octreotide provides a valuable addition to the therapeutic armamentum of the pediatric gastroenterologist for a wide variety of disorders. Serious adverse events may occur and patients must be closely monitored.

Octreotide therapy in asparaginase-associated pancreatitis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Little is known about octreotide therapy in asparaginase-associated pancreatitis (AAP) in children. Of the 59 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) receiving E. coli L-asparaginase, 5 patients (8.5%) developed AAP. Octreotide was administered to four patients. Clinical and laboratory improvement were evident after octreotide therapy. There were no deaths and no severe adverse side effects were noted. No pseudocysts were detected; however, two of the four patients developed diabetes. One child without octreotide treatment developed chronic pancreatitis and pseudocyst. We conclude that octreotide therapy appears to be safe and potentially beneficial in the management of AAP in children.

Effects of octreotide in acute hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis in rats

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Octreotide is considered to reduce exocrine pancreatic secretion in acute hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis decreasing pancreatic autodigestion. The aim of this study was to determine whether octreotide also has antioxidative effects in acute pancreatitis. Additionally time and dose of application were of interest.

METHOD

Ninety male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into six groups (n = 15). Group 1 underwent a laparotomy, and animals in groups 2-6 received intraductal glycodeoxycholic acid followed by intravenous cerulein. Groups 3 and 4 were injected with 0.5 mg octreotide, while groups 5 and 6 received continuous intravenous infusion of 0.05 mg octreotide/h for 10 h. Treatment was initiated 6 hours after induction of pancreatitis (IP) in groups 3 and 5, and 14 h after IP in groups 4 and 6. At 24 h after IP all animals were killed and each pancreas was analyzed histopathologically. In addition, levels of pancreatic lipid peroxidation protective enzymes glutathione-peroxidase (GSH-Px) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) as well as lipid peroxidation via thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) were determined.

RESULTS

Early bolus application of octreotide reduced severity of histopathological changes in acute pancreatitis and decreased lipid peroxidation in pancreatic tissue samples; however, late bolus application and continuous intravenous infusion did not influence pancreatitis or lipid peroxidation.

CONCLUSION

Octreotide seems to have a dose- and time-dependent effect on histopathology and lipid peroxidation in a model of pancreatitis in rats.

Current pharmacotherapeutic recommendations for acute pancreatitis

Disease severity in patients with acute pancreatitis varies from mild disease with minimal morbidity to severe disease in which a whole spectrum of local and systemic complications may occur. Infectious complications frequently arise, and pancreatic necrosis in particular is an important risk factor for mortality. Several strategies have been investigated to stop the progression of organ dysfunction, targeting different steps in the pathogenesis, but none of these have proved beneficial. In recent years, the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics has also been in question, as one blinded study could not demonstrate an advantage. Better risk stratification methods should improve the design of future trials, so that only patients with a high probability of complications can be studied.

From acute pancreatitis to end-organ injury: mechanisms of acute lung injury

BACKGROUND

Multi-organ dysfunction, and in particular lung injury, is often responsible for the unfavorable outcome of patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Understanding of the mechanisms by which local inflammation in the pancreas leads to end-organ injury is crucial for the development of new therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed with the terms "acute pancreatitis," "lung injury," "inflammatory response," "SIRS," and "multi-organ dysfunction." Pertinent articles were selected for analysis.

RESULTS

Modulation of the inflammatory response using a combination of immunomodulatory agents may decrease the incidence of severe pancreatitis-related acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Clinical trials are of utmost importance to establish the validity of such strategies.

Evidence-based treatment of acute pancreatitis: a look at established paradigms

BACKGROUND

The management of acute pancreatitis (AP) is still based on speculative and unproven paradigms in many centers. Therefore, we performed an evidence-based analysis to assess the best available treatment.

METHODS

A comprehensive Medline and Cochrane Library search was performed evaluating the indication and timing of interventional and surgical approaches, and the value of aprotinin, lexipafant, gabexate mesylate, and octreotide treatment. Each study was ranked according to the evidence-based methodology of Sackett; whenever feasible, we performed new meta-analyses using the random-effects model. Recommendations were based on the available level of evidence (A=large randomized; B=small randomized; C=prospective trial).

RESULTS

None of the evaluated medical treatments is recommended (level A). Patients with AP should receive early enteral nutrition (level B). While mild biliary AP is best treated by primary cholecystectomy (level B), patients with severe biliary AP require emergency endoscopic papillotomy followed by interval cholecystectomy (level A). Patients with necrotizing AP should receive imipenem or meropenem prophylaxis to decrease the risk of infected necrosis and mortality (level A). Sterile necrosis per se is not an indication for surgery (level C), and not all patients with infected necrosis require immediate surgery (level B). In general, early necrosectomy should be avoided (level B), and single necrosectomy with postoperative lavage should be preferred over "open-packing" because of fewer complications with comparable mortality rates (level C).

CONCLUSIONS

While providing new insights into key aspects of AP management, this evidence-based analysis highlights the need for further clinical trials, particularly regarding the indications for antibiotic prophylaxis and surgery.

Initial experience with octreotide in the pediatric population

Octreotide is a somatostatin analogue that has been suggested as a therapeutic agent in various diverse disease processes including gastrointestinal bleeding, pancreatitis, hypoglycemia related to hyperinsulin states, and chylous peritoneum/thorax. Despite successful use in the adult population, there is limited information concerning its use in pediatric patients. The authors retrospectively review their experience with octreotide in 10 infants and children ranging in age from 14 days to 17 years. Octreotide, administered by continuous intravenous infusion or intermittent bolus dosing, was used in the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding in four patients, pancreatitis in three patients, chylous leaks in two patients, and hypoglycemia related to nesidioblastosis in one patient. The clinical course of these patients and the potential therapeutic impact of octreotide are evaluated. Additionally, previous experiences with octreotide in pediatric patients, dosing regimens, and the potential role of the drug in other disease processes are discussed.

The effects of somatostatin and octreotide on experimental and human acute pancreatitis

The role of somatostatin and octreotide for AP has been studied for two decades, yet the data still remain inconclusive. The inconsistencies of the results of experimental studies and clinical trials may stem from the fact that the optimal therapeutic modality has not been determined. Furthermore, although they are similar in structure and physiologic activities, the mechanisms of action and effects of somatostatin and octreotide in AP may be different. Because the data are sparse, most reports, primarily those in the English literature, on the efficacy of somatostatin and octreotide in the management of AP were reviewed. Included are both nonrandomized and prospective, double-blind, clinical trials and studies on the effects of these agents on various experimental models of the disease. The results of the studies on somatostatin and octreotide are presented and discussed separately, with specific reference to the experimental and treatment details. The main focus of the review is the effect of subcutaneous and intravenous administration of octreotide. Analysis of the data suggests that somatostatin could not be recommended for AP and that the efficacy of subcutaneous administration of octreotide is also questionable. Theoretically, intravenous octreotide may be more appropriate for this condition, but recent results with this therapeutic method are limited and contradictory. Studies that would delineate the optimal therapeutical modality and the patient population most likely to respond to the treatment are prerequisite for large-scale clinical trials on the effects of octreotide on human pancreatitis.

Successful management with octreotide of a child with L-asparaginase induced hemorrhagic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Octreotide is a synthetic somatostatin analogue which has been suggested for use in the management of acute pancreatitis. While studies have looked at octreotide use in the setting of pancreatitis due to chronic alcohol use or trauma, little is known of its role in management of drug induced acute pancreatitis; particularly in the pediatric setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present a case of a 5 1/2-year-old white female who developed severe, necrotizing, hemorrhagic pancreatitis with pseudocyst formation secondary to L-asparaginase use as a part of her therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). She was managed initially with intravenous fluids, bowel rest, nasogastric suctioning, parenteral narcotices, and broad spectrum antibiotics. In addition, within 12 hours of admission to The Children's Hospital (TCH) in Denver, Colorado, she began therapy with octreotide (5 micrograms/kg/day IV divided b.i.d.). With this management, her pseudocyst decompressed without need for surgical intervention, her pancreatitis fully resolved, and she recovered full pancreatic function without any long-term sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Use of octreotide may have served a role in limiting the severity of the disease process in this case. Further studies need to be done to verify its usefulness in this setting.

Effects of high dose octreotide on retrograde bile salt-induced pancreatitis in rats

The effects of somatostatin and octreotide (a long acting somatostatin analogue) in acute pancreatitis are inconclusive. This study examined the prophylactic and therapeutic effects of different doses of octreotide on retrograde sodium taurodeoxycholate-induced acute necrotizing pancreatitis in rats. The rats were divided into 4 groups receiving subcutaneous injection of saline, octreotide 10 microg/kg, 20 microg/kg at 0, 8 and 16 h and octreotide 20 microg/kg at 5, 13 and 21 h, separately. The serum levels of amylase and lipase, pancreatic histopathology, mortality and hemodynamics were examined. Octreotide significantly reduced serum levels of amylase and lipase at 12 h and the degree of pancreatic edema, necrosis and hemorrhage at 18-24 h as compared to the control group. Prophylactic octreotide 10 microg/kg significantly decreased the 24-h mortality from 100% to 44.4% (p < 0.05). The 24-h mortality further reduced to 12.5% and 10% with prophylactic and therapeutic octreotide 20 microg/kg, respectively. The decrease of mean arterial pressure at 12 h was significantly lower in octreotide groups than in the control group. We conclude that octreotide improves pancreatic histopathology and survival in acute necrotizing pancreatitis in rats.

Clinical uses of gut peptides

OBJECTIVE

The authors review clinical applications of gut-derived peptides as diagnostic and therapeutic agents.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

An increasing number of gut peptides have been evaluated for clinical use. Earlier uses as diagnostic agents have been complemented more recently by increasing application of gut peptides as therapeutic agents.

METHOD

The authors conducted a literature review.

RESULTS

Current experience with clinical use of gut peptides is described. Initial clinical applications focused on using secretomotor effects of gut peptides in diagnostic tests, many of which have now fallen into disuse. More recently, attention has been directed toward harnessing these secretomotor effects for therapeutic use in a variety of disorders, and also using the trophic effects of gut peptides to modulate gut mucosal growth in benign and malignant disease. Gut peptides have been evaluated in a variety of other clinical situations including use as adjuncts to imaging techniques, and modification of behaviors such as feeding and panic disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Gut peptides have been used successfully in an increasing variety of clinical conditions. Further refinements in analogue and antagonist design are likely to lead to even more selective agents that may have important clinical applications. Further studies are needed to identity and evaluate these new agents.

Octreotide treatment in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis and pulmonary failure

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficiency of intravenous infusion of octreotide in the treatment of patients with severe pancreatitis and pulmonary failure.

DESIGN

Prospective, case-control study.

SETTING

Intensive care unit of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Treatment group: 39 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis were selected for the study. In all, pulmonary failure developed under conservative treatment and surgical intervention had been necessary because of local (abscess, necrosis) or systemic (systemic inflammatory response syndrome) complications. The outcome was prospectively followed up until death or discharge from the hospital.

CONTROL GROUP

54 case-control matched patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis and pulmonary failure, who had not been treated with octreotide.

INTERVENTION

Each patient in the treatment group received 100 micrograms intravenous octreotide three times daily for 10 days, in addition to the standard intensive care therapy.

RESULTS

The groups (octreotide group, control group) were highly comparable with regard to age (mean age: 54, 51 years), sex, severity of illness (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score: 27, 27), etiology of pancreatitis, and pretreatment at the time of admission to the intensive care unit. There was no difference in the development of renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, hemostatic, neurologic, or local complications. But the frequency of the adult respiratory distress syndrome (18 vs 40%; p < 0.05) and circulatory shock (51 vs 87%; p < 0.05) was significantly lower in the treatment group. Furthermore, mortality was 26% (10 of 39 patients) in the octreotide group and 61% (33 of 54 patients) in the control group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results of our case-control study showed a beneficial effect of octreotide in patients with severe necrotizing pancreatitis and pulmonary failure. Based on these data, a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study should be performed to evaluate these results.