Usefulness of US imaging in overhydrated nephropathic patients

Achievement of a normal hydration status is one of the major targets of hemodialysis. It is based on the estimation of "dry weight", the term used to define normal body fluid content. The concept of dry weight in hemodialysis patients is clinically undisputed, but it is not always easy to achieve in this population. Assessment of hydration status by clinical evaluation is imprecise and often unreliable. Measurement of the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter has been shown to reflect individual fluid status. The relationship between variation in IVC diameter before and after hemodialysis session and weight loss has been investigated. Ultrasound (US) measurement of the IVC diameter is considered a valid measure of the hydration status and is routinely used in hemodialysis patients. Moreover, a relationship between IVC diameter, respiratory activity and hydration status, evaluated by considering both plasma volume and central venous pressure, has been demonstrated. In conclusion, assessment of hydration status based on blood pressure and central venous pressure can be considered reliable only in patients without signs of heart failure.

Concordance of absolute and relative plasma volume changes and stability of Fcells in routine hemodialysis

Central hematocrit (H) measurements are currently used to track the degree of ultrafiltration-induced hemoconcentration with the aim to detect and prevent excessive intravascular fluid depletion during hemodialysis (HD). Failure to maintain hemodynamic stability is commonly attributed to the misinterpretation of H caused by an unaccountable increase in Fcells , the ratio of whole-body hematocrit to H. It was the aim to examine Fcells under everyday conditions in a group of stable HD patients. Absolute plasma volume (Vp ) and H were concomitantly measured during routine HD in the extracorporeal system in hourly intervals by noninvasive and continuous technology (CritLine-Instrument-III) and indocyanine green dye dilution to derive relative plasma volumes from Vp and H (RPVp , RPVH ), respectively, and to calculate Fcells . Thirteen patients were studied during two midweek treatments (n = 26). Both absolute Vp (P < 0.05) and relative plasma volumes RPVH (P < 0.001) decreased during HD. Vp at any time point was positively correlated to RPVH (r = 0.52). Moreover, relative plasma volumes RPVH and RPVp determined by independent techniques were identical and showed negligible bias (-0.2%) but considerable limits of agreement (-15.6% to +15.3%). Fcells was stable and in the range of 0.9 ± 0.05 throughout HD and not different from the value assumed at the beginning of HD. Although Fcells remains constant in patients on routine dialysis and relative plasma volumes (RPVH and RPVp ) determined by independent techniques are therefore comparable, the variability of experimental conditions during dialysis and the limited accuracy of absolute volume measurements using available technology continues to complicate the ultrafiltration control problem.

The Evaluation of Filtration Coefficients of Microvasculature for the Assessment of Fluid Status in Hemodialysis Patients

Purpose

Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is widely used to assess fluid status in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Our purpose is to evaluate filtration coefficients (Lpst) as an alternative test to assess fluid status by utilizing BIS as a reference test.

Methods

106 HD patients (determined group) were divided into two groups with (EX group: 53) or without excess fluid mass (ExF). ExF calculated from extracellular water and intracellular water measured by BIS. Multiple linear regression equation of Lpst was made using ExF (ExF/DW) and ultrafiltration rate (UFR/DW) to adjust Lpst (AdjLpst). The cut-off values of the tests for detection of EX were determined by receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis. Lpst, AdjLpst, serum atrial natriuretic peptide concentration (ANP), ultrasonically measured inferior vena cava diameter (IVCe/BSA), and blood volume change (ΔBV/TUF/DW) were examined. The detection abilities of these tests were evaluated in the distinct 61 patients (evaluated group).

Results

Patients of the EX group numbered 29 in the evaluated group. The correlation between AdjLpst and ExF/DW was the highest. The sensitivity of AdjLpst and specificity of Lpst were the highest. The specificity of AdjLpst was equivalent to that of Lpst. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of AdjLpst were the higher (20.80, 95% CI, 5.61-77.10, 16.06, 95% CI 4.00-64.59, respectively) than those of the other tests.

Conclusions

AdjLpst can detect patients of the EX group more accurately than other tests. Because AdjLpst is related to plasma refilling, it may indicate removable fluid overload. AdjLpst in conjunction with BIS may contribute to more adequate fluid management.

Dialysis adequacy today: a European perspective

The need to improve haemodialysis (HD) therapies and to reduce cardiovascular and all-cause mortality frequently encountered by dialysis patients has been recognized and addressed for many years. A number of approaches, including increasing the frequency versus duration of treatment, have been proposed and debated in terms of their clinical efficacy and economic feasibility. Future prescription of dialysis to an expanding end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD-5D) population needs a re-evaluation of existing practices while maintaining the emphasis on patient well-being both in the short and in the long term. Efficient cleansing of the blood of all relevant uraemic toxins, including fluid and salt overload, remains the fundamental objective of all dialysis therapies. Simultaneously, metabolic disorders (e.g. anaemia, mineral bone disease, oxidative stress) that accompany renal failure need to be corrected also as part of the delivery of dialysis therapy itself. Usage of high-flux membranes that enable small and large uraemic toxins to be eliminated from the blood is the first prerequisite towards the aforementioned goals. Application of convective therapies [(online-haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF)] further enhances the detoxification effects of high-flux haemodialysis (HF-HD). However, despite an extended clinical experience with both HF-HD and OL-HDF spanning more than two decades, a more widespread prescription of convective treatment modalities awaits more conclusive evidence from large-scale prospective randomized controlled trials. In this review, we present a European perspective on the need to implement optimal dialysis and to improve it by adopting high convective therapies and to discuss whether inertia to implement these practice patterns may deprive patients of significantly improved well-being and survival.