Evaluation of White Blood Cell- and Platelet-Derived Cytokine Accumulation in MIRASOL-PRT-Treated Platelets

Comparing transfusion reactions between pre-storage and post-storage leukoreduced apheresis platelets: an analysis using propensity score matching

Transfusion reactions induced by platelet transfusions may be reduced and alleviated by leukocyte reduction of platelets. Although leukoreduction of apheresis platelets can be performed either pre-storage or post-storage, seldom studies directly compare the incidence of transfusion reaction in these two different blood products. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the transfusion reactions between pre-storage and post-storage leukoreduced apheresis platelets. We reviewed the general characteristics and the transfusion reactions, symptoms, and categories for inpatients who received pre-storage or post-storage leukoreduced apheresis platelets. Propensity-score matching was performed to adjust for baseline differences between groups. A total of 40,837 leukoreduction apheresis platelet orders were reviewed. 116 (0.53%) transfusion reactions were reported in 21,884 transfusions with pre-storage leukoreduction, and 174 (0.91%) reactions were reported in 18,953 transfusions with post-storage leukoreduction. Before propensity-score matching, the odds ratio for transfusion reactions in the pre-storage group relative to the post-storage group was 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.72, P < 0.01); the odds ratio after matching was 0.63 (95% CI 0.49-0.80, P < 0.01). A two-proportion z-test revealed pre-storage leukoreduction significantly decreases the symptoms of chills, fever, itching, urticaria, dyspnea, and hypertension as compared with those in post-storage leukoreduction. Pre-storage leukoreduced apheresis platelet significantly decreased febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reaction as compared with post-storage groups. This study suggests pre-storage leukoreduction apheresis platelet significantly decreases the transfusion reaction as compared with those in post-storage leukoreduction.

Effect of mirasol pathogen reduction technology system on immunomodulatory molecules of apheresis platelets

Pathogen inactivation for platelets by riboflavin system (MIRASOL) efficiently reduces transfusion related pathogen transmission. However little is known about its impact on platelets' immunomodulatory biochemical profile. We aimed was to assess the effects of MIRASOL treatment on platelet quality parameters and immunomodulatory molecules CD62P, RANTES, and CD40L in Single Donor Platelets (SDPs) resuspended in plasma (SDP-P) or T-PAS and additive solution (SDP-A). Twenty nine SDPs (15 SDP-P and 14 SDP-A) were included in the study. Samples were collected before, after MIRASOL treatment and just before transfusion. P-selectin (CD62P), RANTES, and CD40L were tested by ELISA. Platelet products quality assays were also performed. Platelet count/unit decreased after Mirasol treatment by 13 %. The pH of all units decreased over the 5-day storage period but remained above expected limits and the swirling test was positive throughout storage. P-selectin levels were not different between the three different time points in both SDPs-P and SDPs-A while RANTES levels were found to differ statistically significantly at the three different time points in all units and in the SPD-A subgroup. CD40L levels in all SDP products increased slightly during storage but this was not statistically significant. CD62P, RANTES, and CD40L in all time points were elevated in SDPs-A compared to SDPs-P but not at a statistically significant level. In conclusion MIRASOL treatment apart from RANTES increase does not seem to substantially affect platelets associated other cytokines and immunomodulatory molecules namely P-selectin and sCD40L which are implicated in immune transfusion reactions.

Pathogen Reduction Technologies and Their Impact on Metabolic and Functional Properties of Treated Platelet Concentrates: A Systematic Review

Pathogen reduction technologies (PRTs) such as Mirasol and Intercept were developed to eliminate transfusion-transmitted infections. The impact of PRTs on platelet function during the storage period, their effect on platelet storage lesions, and the optimal storage duration following PRTs have not been clearly defined. The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing literature and investigate the impact of PRTs on functional alterations of PRT-treated platelets during the storage period. The authors identified 68 studies suitable to be included in this review. Despite the high heterogeneity in the literature, the results of the published studies indicate that PRTs may increase platelet metabolic activity, accelerate cell apoptosis, and enhance platelet activation, which can subsequently lead to a late exhaustion of activation potential and reduced aggregation response. However, these effects have a minor impact on platelet function during the early storage period and become more prominent beyond the fifth day of the storage period. Large in vivo trials are required to evaluate the effectiveness of PRT-treated platelets during the storage period and investigate whether their storage can be safely extended to more than 5 days, and up to the traditional 7-day storage period.

Platelet in vitro assays: their correspondence with their in vivo hemostatic potential

Developments during the past few years have resulted in multiple kinds of platelet products for transfusion. This involves different collection methods, containers, preservative solutions, modifications of storage temperatures and durations, and additional treatments such as pathogen reduction. Much experience has been obtained testing these processes in vitro to seek indications of in vivo effectiveness. Availability of an in vitro method that correlated with in vivo effectiveness would be extremely valuable for these different kinds of platelet products and as more innovation in platelet preparation occurs in the future. This report reviews the methods for in vitro platelet testing with a view to their in vivo implications and whether such testing could be helpful in projecting the clinical effectiveness of different platelet products.

Ultraviolet-Based Pathogen Inactivation Systems: Untangling the Molecular Targets Activated in Platelets

Transfusions of platelets are an important cornerstone of medicine; however, recipients may be subject to risk of adverse events associated with the potential transmission of pathogens, especially bacteria. Pathogen inactivation (PI) technologies based on ultraviolet illumination have been developed in the last decades to mitigate this risk. This review discusses studies of platelet concentrates treated with the current generation of PI technologies to assess their impact on quality, PI capacity, safety, and clinical efficacy. Improved safety seems to come with the cost of reduced platelet functionality, and hence transfusion efficacy. In order to understand these negative impacts in more detail, several molecular analyses have identified signaling pathways linked to platelet function that are altered by PI. Because some of these biochemical alterations are similar to those seen arising in the context of routine platelet storage lesion development occurring during blood bank storage, we lack a complete picture of the contribution of PI treatment to impaired platelet functionality. A model generated using data from currently available publications places the signaling protein kinase p38 as a central player regulating a variety of mechanisms triggered in platelets by PI systems.

Pathogen reduction technologies: The pros and cons for platelet transfusion

The transfusion of platelets is essential for diverse pathological conditions associated with thrombocytopenia or platelet disorders. To maintain optimal platelet quality and functions, platelets are stored as platelet concentrates (PCs) at room temperature under continuous agitation-conditions that are permissive for microbial proliferation. In order to reduce these contaminants, pathogen reduction technologies (PRTs) were developed by the pharmaceutical industry and subsequently implemented by blood banks. PRTs rely on chemically induced cross-linking and inactivation of nucleic acids. These technologies were initially introduced for the treatment of plasma and, more recently, for PCs given the absence of a nucleus in platelets. Several studies verified the effectiveness of PRTs to inactivate a broad array of bacteria, viruses, and parasites. However, the safety of PRT-treated platelets has been questioned in other studies, which focused on the impact of PRTs on platelet quality and functions. In this article, we review the literature regarding PRTs, and present the advantages and disadvantages related to their application in platelet transfusion medicine.

Hemovigilance survey of pathogen-reduced blood components in the Warsaw Region in the 2009 to 2013 period

BACKGROUND

In 2009 the Mirasol Pathogen Reduction Technology (PRT) was introduced to the routine blood component production of the Regional Blood Transfusion Center in Warsaw (RBTCW). The goal of this study was to investigate the safety of Mirasol-treated blood components.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The accumulated passive hemovigilance data of Mirasol-treated blood components collected at the RBTCW are presented and compared to historical and contemporary data. Furthermore, active hemovigilance data collected from patients with different hematologic disorders transfused with Mirasol-treated or untreated blood components at the Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (IHTM) are presented and discussed.

RESULTS

The adverse reaction (AR) reporting rate by hospitals to the RBTCW after the implementation of the Mirasol technology was 0.39% for Mirasol-treated platelet concentrates (M-PCs) and 0.05% for Mirasol-treated fresh-frozen plasma. When comparing contemporary rates of ARs recorded by RBTCW in the time period 2011 to 2012, no statistical difference was observed between Mirasol-treated and untreated blood components. No serious AR was attributed to Mirasol-treated components. At the IHTM a lower rate of ARs after transfusion of M-PCs was observed than with untreated PCs. Despite the fact that very large amounts of Mirasol-treated plasma have been transfused to patients with congenital or acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, no significant increase in AR rates was observed.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of blood components with the Mirasol PRT System has proven to be safe for patients and is not associated with increased rates and grades of adverse events in patients of hospitals in the Warsaw Region.

The effectiveness of riboflavin photochemical-mediated virus inactivation and changes in protein retention in fresh-frozen plasma treated using a flow-based treatment device

BACKGROUND

A flow-based treatment device using riboflavin and ultraviolet (UV) light was developed to inactivate viruses in fresh-frozen plasma (FFP). The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro effectiveness of virus inactivation and changes in protein quality in FFP treated with this device.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

FFP-contaminating viruses were treated with riboflavin and UV light using a one-pass linear flow device. The infectivity of viruses was measured using established biologic assays. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to detect damage to viral nucleotides after treatment. Treated plasma was analyzed using standard coagulation assays.

RESULTS

FFP treated at the UV dose of 3.6 J/cm(2) (J) exhibited a mean reduction of virus titer of more than 4 logs. The effectiveness increased significantly at higher doses. Real-time PCR showed that the cycle threshold values for both complete inactivation and virus recultivation were higher than that of the untreated sample. At doses of 3.6, 5.4, and 7.2 J, the protein recovery rates were 60.2 ± 8.6, 46.6 ± 9.4, and 28.0 ± 1.0% for fibrinogen; 67.0 ± 3.1, 57.3 ± 8.0, and 49.2 ± 3.8% for Factor VIII; 93.6 ± 2.8, 89.6 ± 6.1, and 86.5 ± 5.3% for antithrombin-III; and 72.1 ± 5.6, 59.8 ± 14.2, and 49.2 ± 8.4% for Protein C, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of virus inactivation was enhanced, but total activity of plasma factors was reduced, in a UV dose-dependent manner.

Pathogen reduction treatment alters the immunomodulatory capacity of buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates

BACKGROUND

Storage of platelet concentrates (PCs) after Mirasol pathogen reduction technology (PRT) treatment changes platelet (PLT) surface marker expression and secretion of immunomodulatory factors. Given that PLTs are known to participate in immune function, PRT may alter the way PLTs interact with the immune cells of a recipient upon transfusion. As such, the aim of this study was to assess the effects of PRT treatment on the functional ability of PLTs to interact with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Buffy coat-derived PCs were pooled and split to obtain matched pairs. One unit was treated using the Mirasol PRT system, while the control PC remained untreated. After 5 days of storage, either the PLTs or the PLT supernatants from the PCs were cocultured with PBMNCs, with or without lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The immunomodulatory factors secreted into culture medium after coculture were examined.

RESULTS

PRT-treated PLTs and PLT supernatant significantly increased the interleukin (IL)-8 concentration, which was manifested only in the presence of LPS. Conversely, PRT-treated PLTs secreted less soluble P-selectin (sCD62P) upon coculture with PBMNCs.

CONCLUSION

PRT-treatment induced differential secretion of IL-8 and sCD62P during coculture, which may be attributed to either bioactive substances present in PLT supernatant or as a result of cell-cell interactions.

Inflammatory response, immunosuppression, and cancer recurrence after perioperative blood transfusions

Debate on appropriate triggers for transfusion of allogeneic blood products and their effects on short- and long-term survival in surgical and critically ill patients continue with no definitive evidence or decisive resolution. Although transfusion-related immune modulation (TRIM) is well established, its influence on immune competence in the recipient and its effects on cancer recurrence after a curative resection remains controversial. An association between perioperative transfusion of allogeneic blood products and risk for recurrence has been shown in colorectal cancer in randomized trials; whether the same is true for other types of cancer remains to be determined. This article focuses on the laboratory, animal, and clinical evidence to date on the mechanistic understanding of inflammatory and immune-modulatory effects of blood products and their significance for recurrence in the cancer surgical patient.

Cytokine assays: an assessment of the preparation and treatment of blood and tissue samples

Cytokines are key components of the innate and adaptive immune system. As pivotal players in the progression or regression of a pathological process, these molecules provide a window through which diseases can be monitored and can thus act as biomarkers. In order to measure cytokine levels, a plethora of protocols can be applied. These methods include bioassays, protein microarrays, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) electrochemiluminescence and bead based multiplex immunoassays (MIA). Due to the interaction and activity of cytokines, multiplex immunoassays are at the forefront of cytokine analysis by allowing multiple cytokines to be measured in parallel. However, even with optimized protocols, sample standardization needs to occur before these proteins can optimally act as biomarkers. This review describes various factors influencing the levels of cytokines measured in plasma, serum, dried blood spots and tissue biopsies, focusing on sample collection and handling, long term storage and the repetitive use of samples. By analyzing how each of these factors influences protein levels, it is concluded that samples should be stored at low temperatures in order to maintain cytokine stability. In addition, within a study, sample manipulations should be kept the same, with measurement protocols being chosen for their compatibility with the research in question. By having a clear understanding of what factors influence cytokine levels and how to overcome these technical issues, minimally confounded data can be obtained and cytokines can achieve optimal biomarker activity.

Platelet derived cytokine accumulation in platelet concentrates treated for pathogen reduction

BACKGROUND

Pathogen reduction technologies (PRTs) prevent replication and proliferation of pathogens in platelet (PLT) concentrates (PCs) by modifying nucleic acids. Due to increased cell activation, PRT may also lead to increased cytokine release from α granules and promote adverse transfusion reactions in the recipient.

DESIGN

Fifteen double-dose leukoreduced apheresis PCs were collected on the Trima Accel platform (vs. 5.2.) allowing for the resuspension in PLT additive solution (PAS) immediately after collection. After a 2-h resting period (1st hour without, 2nd hour with agitation), splitting was performed: one unit remained untreated to serve as control (C), while the other was riboflavin-UVB treated using the Mirasol-PRT system according to the manufacturer's instructions (M). During 8 days of storage, PCs were analyzed for contaminating white and red blood cells, bacterial growth, PLT activation, LDH and cytokine release (MIP-1 α, RANTES, PF4, and TGF-β-1). Results obtained were opposed to a former study, where triple-dose PCs underwent Mirasol-PRT prior to resuspension or the INTERCEPT BLOOD SYSTEM (psoralen-UVA) or remained untreated.

RESULTS

Despite similar LDH release, PRT treatment was associated with significantly higher (p<0.05) cell activation but only slightly higher cytokine accumulation during storage. Differences became significant only for PF4 and RANTES at day 8 of storage. On the other hand, in the investigation on triple-dose PCs (yielding higher cytokine levels), TGF beta-1 and RANTES remained significantly (p<0.05) lower after PRT treatment compared to untreated units.

CONCLUSION

Factors, such as collection modality, onset of resuspension and additional amounts of magnesium/potassium in the PAS used may be of equal or even greater impact for cytokine accumulation in stored PCs than PRT treatment.

Inactivation of human white blood cells in platelet products after pathogen reduction technology treatment in comparison to gamma irradiation

BACKGROUND

During the transfusion of blood products, the transfer of allogeneic donor white blood cells (WBCs) can mediate adverse reactions in recipients. To minimize reactions, blood components are leukoreduced and/or exposed to gamma irradiation. Nucleic acid-targeted pathogen reduction technologies (PRTs) processes are well suited for WBC inactivation. The Mirasol PRT system (CaridianBCT Biotechnologies) uses riboflavin and ultraviolet light to reduce the active pathogen load and inactivate residual WBCs in blood products used for transfusion. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of PRT treatment to gamma irradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

WBCs were resuspended in 100% plasma or in plasma containing 65% platelet additive solution (SSP+). A single product was split into three aliquots: control, PRT treatment, or gamma irradiation. After treatment, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from products, and cell viability and functionality were assessed in limiting dilution assays (LDAs), by CD69 expression, by proliferation, and by cytokine accumulation after lipopolysaccharide addition.

RESULTS

PRT treatment and gamma irradiation reduced the ability of the T cells to proliferate by similar degrees as evidenced by a 6 log or greater reduction in the LDA and a lack of response to several stimuli. However, gamma-irradiated T cells were still capable of up regulating surface CD69, inducing a proliferative response in allogeneic responder cells, and producing levels of proinflammatory cytokines similar to those of untreated control cells, responses that PRT-treated T cells were incapable of mediating.

CONCLUSIONS

These in vitro results demonstrate that PRT treatment is more effective than gamma irradiation at abrogating selected WBC immune functions.