Study of the pharmacokinetics of mitomycin C in humans during intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia with special mention of the concentration in local tissues

Effects of Hyperthermia and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion on the Peritoneal and Tumor Immune Contexture

Hyperthermia combined with intraperitoneal (IP) drug delivery is increasingly used in the treatment of peritoneal metastases (PM). Hyperthermia enhances tumor perfusion and increases drug penetration after IP delivery. The peritoneum is increasingly recognized as an immune-privileged organ with its own distinct immune microenvironment. Here, we review the immune landscape of the healthy peritoneal cavity and immune contexture of peritoneal metastases. Next, we review the potential benefits and unwanted tumor-promoting effects of hyperthermia and the associated heat shock response on the tumor immune microenvironment. We highlight the potential modulating effect of hyperthermia on the biomechanical properties of tumor tissue and the consequences for immune cell infiltration. Data from translational and clinical studies are reviewed. We conclude that (mild) hyperthermia and HIPEC have the potential to enhance antitumor immunity, but detailed further studies are required to distinguish beneficial from tumor-promoting effects.

Exposure to Neoadjuvant Oxaliplatin-Containing Chemotherapy, Does it Effect Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy Perfusion?

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) are commonly exposed to oxaliplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) regimens. The impact of systemic exposure to oxaliplatin prior to HIPEC with oxaliplatin is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional registry of CRS/HIPEC cases who received oxaliplatin-containing NAT, and compared patients who underwent HIPEC with oxaliplatin versus cases perfused with mitomycin C. The primary outcome was survival, defined by overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Subgroup analysis was performed based on primary tumor etiology and completeness of cytoreduction.

RESULTS

A total of 333 cases satisfied the selection criteria-159 appendiceal primaries (all high-grade disease) and 174 colorectal cases. Thirty-one cases (9.3%) underwent HIPEC with oxaliplatin, with the remaining 302 cases (90.7%) receiving mitomycin C. Both cohorts were identical in regard to baseline characteristics, and both groups were alike in regard to NAT regimens and oxaliplatin exposure. There was no difference in survival outcomes. OS times were 2.9 (± 2.8) and 2.8 ( ± 3.6) years for oxaliplatin and mitomycin C perfusions, respectively (p = 0.94), and the 5-year OS rates were also similar at 9.7 and 18.5% (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-1.67, p = 0.24) for oxaliplatin and mitomycin cases, respectively. Likewise, DFS findings were similar, with survival of 2.5 (± 4.5) and 1.8 (± 2.4) years for oxaliplatin and mitomycin perfusions, respectively (p = 0.21). There was no difference in 5-year DFS rates, at 10.5 and 7.8% (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.30-6.56, p = 0.68) for oxaliplatin and mitomycin C, respectively. Subgroup analysis found minimal discordant findings from the main results.

CONCLUSION

This analysis found no discernable association with NAT oxaliplatin exposure in regard to survival outcomes following CRS/HIPEC stratified out by perfusion agent.

Switching Perfusion Agents for Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Surgical Dogma or Evidence-Based Practice?

BACKGROUND

A common practice is to switch chemotherapy perfusion agents for repeat cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). However, there is a paucity of objective benefit with this practice.

METHODS

A retrospective review of our institutional registry involving repeat CRS-HIPEC cases was conducted, comparing cases that underwent a perfusion agent switch versus those cases with no switch. The primary outcome of this study was survival, measured by overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of primary etiology.

RESULTS

A total of 101 cases met selection criteria. Mitomycin C was used as the index perfusion agent in 84% of cases, while oxaliplatin was utilized in the remaining 16% of cases. In total, 66 cases underwent a perfusion switch, with 35 cases using the same agent. Analysis revealed no survival benefit with HIPEC perfusion switch. For OS, there were similar mean survival times of 5.2 (± 4.1) years and 5.1 (± 3.6) years for cases with perfusion switch and no perfusion switch, respectively (P = 0.985). The 5-year OS rates were also similar at 61.4% and 53.3% for switch and non-switch cases, respectively [odds ratio (OR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-3.56, P = 0.49]. Mean DFS was 4.0 (± 4.2) years and 3.6 (± 3.8) years for switch and non-switch cases, respectively (P = 0.74). The 5-year DFS rates had a greater difference with statistical trend, with rates of 53% versus 28% for switch and non-switch cases, respectively (OR 2.91, 95% CI 0.86-9.86, P = 0.081). Subgroup analysis had a similar trend to the main results.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings revealed no survival benefit with switching perfusion agents. Analysis suggests that the practice of perfusion switch is ineffective.

Management of peritoneal surface metastases from colorectal cancer: Cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, pressurized intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and beyond

This article provides a contemporary review of the current surgical management of peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) of colorectal origin. A brief review of the founding history of surgical intervention for PSM is followed by a focused review of the level I evidence, current clinical questions, and evolving advancements. While not intended to address all the facets of PSM, this review aims to provide the reader with the essential knowledge and resources to effectively provide surgical care for carcinomatosis due to colorectal malignancies.

Prophylactic surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC CO2) versus standard surgery in colorectal carcinoma at high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis: short-term and long-term outcomes from the CHECK study - protocol for a randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial

INTRODUCTION

Up to one-fifth of patients with colorectal cancer will develop peritoneal metastases, frequently without other districts' involvement. Despite the recent unsuccesses of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases treatment, the rationale in the prophylactic setting remains strong. Several clinical and pharmacokinetic data suggest that the efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy is highest when the disease is microscopic. However, robust evidence demonstrating whether the addition of HIPEC for high-risk colorectal cancers offers better control of local recurrence is lacking.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a multicentre randomised phase 3 trial comparing prophylactic surgery plus HIPEC CO2 with mitomycin, over standard surgical excision in patients with colorectal cancer at high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis; 388 patients will be included in this study. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of prophylactic surgery (radical colorectal resection, omentectomy, appendectomy, round ligament of the liver resection and bilateral adnexectomy) plus HIPEC CO2 with mitomycin and standard surgery in terms of local recurrence-free survival. The main secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. The primary endpoint will be described with a cumulative incidence function and will be analysed with Grey test to take account of the competing risks. DFS and OS will be described with the Kaplan-Meier method.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial has been evaluated by the Italian Medicines Agency, local ethics committees and will be submitted to the Ministry of Health to notify the start of the trial according to the regulation of trials on devices with CE mark/certification.The results will be submitted for presentation at academic meetings and for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, whatever the findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03914820.

Utility of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in cases of incomplete cytoreductive surgery

INTRODUCTION

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is typically reserved for a complete or optimal cytoreduction. There is the potential for therapeutic effect of HIPEC with an incomplete cytoreduction, particularly for near optimal cytoreductions.

METHODS

Retrospective review of incomplete cytoreductions (R2b, R2c) for appendiceal and colorectal primaries. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Subgroup analysis for primary etiology and specific cytoreductive score.

RESULTS

A total of 121 cases of incomplete CRS, 74 CRS alone, and 47 CRS-HIPEC. For the entire study group there was a survival benefit with HIPEC. OS and PFS were 2.3 versus 1.4 (p = 0.001) and 1.6 versus 0.7 (p < 0.0001) respectively for cases with and without HIPEC. Subgroup analysis of appendiceal neoplasms, 43 CRS-HIPEC and 50 CRS alone, found HIPEC benefit persisted; OS and PFS were 2.4 versus 1.5 (p = 0.016) and 1.7 versus 0.8 (p < 0.0001), respectively for cases with and without HIPEC. Benefit most pronounced in low-grade cases with doubling of the OS and PFS (p = 0.004). With colorectal primary cases, 10 CRS-HIPEC and 18 CRS alone, no difference in OS and PFS. When stratifying out by cytoreduction scores, R2b and R2c, HIPEC only provided a benefit for R2b cases; OS and PFS for R2b cases were 2.28 versus 1.01 (p = 0.011) and 1.67 versus 0.75 (p = 0.001), respectively for cases with and without HIPEC.

CONCLUSION

HIPEC has utility for incomplete cytoreductions with appendiceal neoplasms, greatest effect with low-grade appendiceal neoplasms. HIPEC is only beneficial for near optimal cytoreductions (R2b).

Impact of Perfusate Concentration on Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Efficacy and Toxicity in a Rodent Model

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to be beneficial in treating limited peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Perfusate volume directly affects treatment concentration and therefore is a key parameter defining HIPEC; yet little is known about the impact of perfusate concentration on systemic toxicity and treatment morbidity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PC was induced through intraperitoneal injection of human CRC cell lines. A novel perfusion model was developed to treat athymic nude mice with continuous circulation of adequately miniaturized volumes of heated perfusate. Oxaliplatin HIPEC was performed applying different volumes of perfusate with fixed doses or fixed concentrations. Early postoperative mortality and morbidity were assessed as well as long-term survival. In addition, antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of HIPEC were determined in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

Perfusate concentration crucially affected the toxicity of fixed-dose oxaliplatin HIPEC as indicated by postoperative weight loss and early postoperative mortality. Applying different perfusate volumes at a fixed concentration did not influence toxicity. Adequately miniaturized HIPEC with oxaliplatin did not exert relevant cytotoxic effects toward PC arising from human CRC cells in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a novel murine model that adequately miniaturizes all physical parameters of HIPEC as applied in humans. HIPEC drug concentration is a crucial parameter determining excess toxicity and should be better standardized. HIPEC with oxaliplatin fails to induce relevant antitumor activity or to improve survival in this murine model of PC from CRC.

Peritoneal mesothelioma in Sweden: A population-based study

The study aim was to report survival and morbidity of all patients in Sweden with peritoneal mesothelioma treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as well as investigate whether the survival has increased on a population level since this treatment was nationalized 2011. Study data were collected from the Swedish HIPEC registry and the Swedish National Cancer Registry. All patients with peritoneal mesothelioma scheduled for CRS/HIPEC treatment in Sweden January 2011 to March 2018 were retrieved from the Swedish HIPEC registry. Clinicopathological and survival data were collected. For population‐level analysis, all patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) were identified from the Swedish National Cancer Registry and data were retrieved from two separate 5‐year time periods: 1999‐2003 and 2011‐2015. Thirty‐two patients were accepted for CRS/HIPEC. Four were open/close cases. Two‐year survival rate was 84% or 59% when excluding borderline peritoneal mesotheliomas (n = 17). Median overall survival was not reached. Grade III‐IV Clavien‐Dindo events occurred in 22% with no mortality. From the national cancer registry, 102 DMPM cases were retrieved: 40 cases between 1999 and 2003, and 62 cases between 2011 and 2015 (corresponding to an increase from 0.9 to 1.24/million/year, P = .04). Six patients (10%) received CRS/HIPEC in the second period. Median OS increased between periods from 7 to 15 months and 5‐year survival from 14% to 29% (P = .03). Peritoneal mesothelioma of both borderline and DMPM subtypes undergoing CRS/HIPEC have good long‐term survival. The incidence of DMPM in Sweden has increased. Overall survival has increased alongside the introduction of CRS/HIPEC, which may be a contributing factor.

Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer: Rationale for a new Approach

There is preliminary evidence from experience in the treatment of various abdominal malignancies that intraperitoneal chemotherapy alone or combined with hyperthermia may attain a role in the therapeutic strategy. This paper considers the rationale for such an approach, as well as its current results and potential indications in patients with gastric cancer. The literature is critically reviewed, with special emphasis on specific topics such as patterns of tumor spread, mechanisms of local recurrence, the rationale for intraperitoneal chemotherapy and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy, toxicity, and results from non-controlled as well as randomized clinical trials in patients with gastric cancer. There is some evidence that intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy has a favorable effect on clinical outcome in patients with limited peritoneal carcinomatosis or malignant ascitis and in those at risk of future peritoneal spread, such as patients with pT3-pT4 cancers or with positive cytology of the peritoneal fluid. Hyperthermic chemotherapy should be considered a promising approach in limited or impending peritoneal carcinomatosis, and should be included in the multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer.

Feasibility of Peritonectomy Associated with Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Perfusion in Patients with Pseudomyxoma Peritonei

Aims and background

Pseudomyxoma peritonei is a rare disease characterized by a complete redistribution of mucin within the peritoneal cavity. It can be classified into three histologic groups: disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis, peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis, and an intermediate group. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of cytoreductive surgery requiring peritonectomy procedures associated with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion, a technique that combines hyperthermia and high drug doses administered locally.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (19 males and 8 females) were enrolled in a phase II clinical trial. Twenty-two cases underwent cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion, and 6 received de-bulking surgery only. One patient was operated on twice for disease recurrence. All patients with peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis presented serous ascites, whereas all but one patient with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis or in the intermediate group presented mucinous ascites. Cytoreductive surgery was performed with peritonectomy procedures. The closed abdomen technique was adopted for intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion using a preheated poly-saline perfusate containing cisplatin (25 mg/m2/L) plus mitomycin-C (3.3 mg/m2/L) through a heart-lung pump at a mean flow of 600 mL/min for 60 mins from the hyperthermic phase (42.5 °C).

Results

All but one of the patients with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis and 2 of the 3 patients in the intermediate group were optimally cytoreduced. Patients with serous ascites (all patients with peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis and 1 patient with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis) were considered ineligible for treatment because of tumor diffusion. The morbidity rate was 22%. There was one case of treatment-related mortality 30 days after treatment.

Conclusions

The following conclusions can be drawn from this phase II clinical trial: 1) patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei originating from undifferentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma (peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis), with complete distribution into the peritoneal cavity, are not eligible for the cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion technique; 2) the presence of serous ascites would seem to exclude patients from the treatment; 3) cytoreductive surgery associated with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion is the most suitable approach for patients with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis and in the intermediate group.

Safety of intraoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU for colorectal cancer patients receiving curative resection: a randomized, multicenter, prospective, phase III IOCCRC trial (IOCCRC)

PURPOSE

The safety and efficacy of intraoperative chemotherapy in colorectal cancer have not yet been extensively investigated. This randomized control trial was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of intraoperative chemotherapy in combination with surgical resection to those of traditional surgical resection alone.

METHODS

From January 2011 to January 2016, 696 colorectal cancer patients were enrolled in this study: 341 patients were randomly assigned to the intraoperative chemotherapy, which consist of portal vein chemotherapy, intraluminal chemotherapy and intraperitoneal chemotherapy, plus surgery group, whereas 344 patients were randomized to the control group to undergo surgery alone. Eleven patients withdrew consent.

RESULTS

Intraoperative chemotherapy did not increase the rate of surgical complications, and no severe chemotherapy-associated side effects were observed. Four patients in each of the intraoperative chemotherapy and the control groups experienced anastomotic leakage and underwent a second operation (1.2 vs. 1.2%, P = 0.99). There were no deaths within 90 days after surgery in the chemotherapy group, whereas one patient died in the control group. Intraoperative chemotherapy did not decrease the rate of patients who received postoperative chemotherapy between the intraoperative group and control group (29.3 vs. 30.2%, P = 0.795).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative chemotherapy can be safely performed during colorectal surgery; however, follow-up is necessary for a better assessment of its efficacy. ClinicalTrial.gov Register Number: NCT01465451.

Pharmacological principles of intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with a significant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic benefit and can, alone or in combination with systemic chemotherapy (bidirectional chemotherapy), be used for treating primary and secondary peritoneal surface malignancies. Due to the peritoneal-plasma barrier, high intraperitoneal drug concentration can be achieved by intraperitoneal chemotherapy, whereas systemic concentration remains low. Bidirectional chemotherapy may provide in addition adequate drug concentrations from the side of the subperitoneal space to the peritoneal tumour nodules. Major pharmacological problems of intraperitoneal chemotherapy are limited tissue penetration and poor homogeneity of drug distribution to the entire seroperitoneal surface. Significant pharmacological determinants of intraperitoneal chemotherapy are choice of drug, drug dosage, solution volume, carrier solution, intra-abdominal pressure, temperature, duration, mode of administration, extent of peritonectomy and interindividual variability. Drugs most commonly applied for intraperitoneal chemotherapy include mitomycin C, cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluoruracil, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, doxorubicin, premetrexed and melphalan. The drugs and their doses that are used vary widely among centres. While the adequate drug choice for intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy is essential, randomized clinical trials to determine the most optimal drug or drug combination are lacking, and only eight retrospective comparative clinical studies are available. Further clinical pharmacological studies are required to determine the most effective drug regimen for intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy in various indications. In the future, reliable drug sensitivity testing and genetic profiling of peritoneal metastases will be needed for enabling patient-specific therapy.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment to prevent peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer origin: a systematic review

Background:

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal cancer (CRC) origin is associated with poor outcome. This systematic review evaluates the available evidence about adjuvant (hyperthermic) intraperitoneal chemotherapy ((H)IPEC) to prevent the development of PC.

Methods:

A systematic search of literature was conducted in August 2013 in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database for studies on (H)IPEC to prevent PC in patients who underwent curative surgery for primary CRC.

Results:

Seven comparative studies and five cohort studies were selected. Treatment schedules varied between repeated fluoropyrimidine-based IPEC administration in the ambulatory setting to intra-operative (H)IPEC procedures using mitomycin-C or oxaliplatin. The reported rates of major complications related to adjuvant (H)IPEC was low. Four out of five evaluable comparative studies reported a significant difference in the incidence of PC in favour of (H)IPEC. All three comparative studies reporting on survival after intra-operative (H)IPEC showed a significant survival benefit in favour of the experimental arm. Substantial heterogeneity in patient selection, treatment protocols, and treatment effect evaluation among studies was observed.

Conclusions:

The currently available evidence about adjuvant (H)IPEC in high-risk CRC is limited and subject to bias, but points towards improved oncological outcome and supports further randomised studies.

Principles and Innovations in Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment

Cytoreductive surgery with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) remains a controversial treatment for malignant disease of the peritoneal cavity. We review the scientific principles underscoring the rationale for CRS/HIPEC, recent innovations and ongoing controversies. Lack of level 1 data limits the understanding of the true benefit of CRS/HIPEC.

Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: state of the art and future developments

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) had long been regarded as a terminal disease, characterized by a very poor survival and worth treating with palliative therapy. A new strategy combining maximal surgery (cytoreductive surgery, CRS), with maximal regional chemotherapy (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, HIPEC), has been proposed to treat PC, resulting in long-term survival rates in selected patients. The emerging trend is to view localised peritoneal carcinomatosis, in the absence of other metastases, as a regional metastatic disease that is amenable to locoregional therapy. In spite of the need for more high quality studies, many international experts now agree that the use of this new strategy is a gold standard for treating selected patients with PC with the intent of curing. The best results are achieved in patients with limited disease who have completed macroscopic tumor removal. To offer a comprehensive review, we summarized the present status and possible future progress of this treatment modality, in particular outlining its rationale, current practice and general outcome.

Changes induced by surgical and clinical factors in the pharmacology of intraperitoneal mitomycin C in 145 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy are a combined treatment modality considered for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal and appendiceal cancer. Mitomycin C is a drug often used in this clinical setting. The surgical and clinical factors that may influence the pharmacokinetics of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy should be further elucidated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients included were 145 who had colorectal or appendiceal carcinomatosis resected using cytoreductive surgery prior to treatment with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with mitomycin C as part of a multidrug regimen. The effect of clinical and surgical factors on drug distribution after single intraperitoneal bolus administration with mitomycin C was determined.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of 145 patients treated with intraperitoneal mitomycin C showed a 27 times greater exposure to peritoneal surfaces when compared to plasma. At 90 min, 29% of the drug remained in the chemotherapy solution, 62% was retained in the body, and 9% was excreted in the urine. The extent of peritonectomy increased the clearance of mitomycin C from the peritoneal space (p = 0.051). A major resection of visceral peritoneal surface and a contracted peritoneal space reduced drug clearance. A contracted peritoneal space significantly reduced (p = 0.0001) drug concentrations in the plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical and clinical factors may require modifications of drug dose or timing of chemotherapy administration. A large visceral resection and a contracted peritoneal space caused a reduced mitomycin C clearance. Total diffusion surface is an important determinant of mitomycin C pharmacokinetics.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Rationale and technique

The combination of complete cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy provides the only chance for long-term survival for selected patients diagnosed with a variety of peritoneal neoplasms, either primary or secondary to digestive or gynecologic malignancy. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) delivered in the operating room once the cytoreductive surgical procedure is finalized, constitutes the most common form of administration of perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. This may be complemented in some instances with early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). HIPEC combines the pharmacokinetic advantage inherent to the intracavitary delivery of certain cytotoxic drugs, which results in regional dose intensification, with the direct cytotoxic effect of hyperthermia. Hyperthermia exhibits a selective cell-killing effect in malignant cells by itself, potentiates the cytotoxic effect of certain chemotherapy agents and enhances the tissue penetration of the administered drug. The chemotherapeutic agents employed in HIPEC need to have a cell cycle nonspecific mechanism of action and should ideally show a heat-synergistic cytotoxic effect. Delivery of HIPEC requires an apparatus that heats and circulates the chemotherapeutic solution so that a stable temperature is maintained in the peritoneal cavity during the procedure. An open abdomen (Coliseum) or closed abdomen technique may be used, with no significant differences in efficacy proven to date. Specific technical training and a solid knowledge of regional chemotherapy management are required. Concerns about safety of the procedure for operating room personnel are expected but are manageable if universal precautions and standard chemotherapy handling procedures are used. Different HIPEC drug regimens and dosages are currently in use. A tendency for concurrent intravenous chemotherapy administration (bidirectional chemotherapy, so-called “HIPEC plus”) has been observed in recent years, with the aim to further enhance the cytotoxic potential of HIPEC. Future trials to ascertain the ideal HIPEC regimen in different diseases and to evaluate the efficacy of new drugs or drug combinations in this context are warranted.

Management of pseudomyxoma peritonei

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare disease. It refers to a progressive disease process within the peritoneum which originates from the appendix or ovaries and is characterised by the production of copious amounts of mucinous fluid resulting in a “jelly belly”. If untreated the condition is fatal. The traditional approach to PMP is based on repeated surgical debulking procedures, often associated with intraperitoneal or systemic chemotherapy. The natural history of this disease has been drastically modified since the introduction of a new surgical approach defined as a peritonectomy procedure. This paper is to review the literature on this treatment strategy.

Analysis of loss of heterozygosity for tumor-suppressor genes can accurately classify and predict the clinical behavior of mucinous tumors arising from the appendix

BACKGROUND

Pseudomyxoma peritonei is a rare heterogenous clinical syndrome with a variable clinical course. On the basis of the hypothesis that cumulative mutational damage can predict biological aggressiveness, we evaluated the utility of integrated histopathology and molecular analysis for patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome.

METHODS

Tissue specimens from 23 mucinous appendiceal tumors were analyzed. DNA samples from multiple sites were analyzed for loss of heterozygosity by using a panel of 15 allelic loss microsatellite markers and K-ras-2 point mutational damage. The fractional mutational rate (FMR), determined as the number of mutated markers divided by the total number of informative markers, was calculated by using the six most informative markers and the K-ras-2 gene. Kappa statistics were calculated to test the association between FMR and the histopathologic classification.

RESULTS

Our study included 6 female and 17 male patients with a mean age of 53.6 years and a mean survival of 43.9 months. We found an association between tumor loss of heterozygosity markers and histopathologic classification (P < .05). In addition, there was also an association between the FMR and pathological classification as well as between the FMR and survival (P < .05). An FMR less than .25 indicated low-grade disease, an FMR of .25 to .50 indicated intermediate grade, and an FMR greater than .5 indicated a high-grade tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Mutational profiling of accumulated allelic loss and point mutational damage correlated strongly with histopathologic definitions of pseudomyxoma peritonei disease and helped to predict the prognosis of these patients. FMR, along with histopathology, offers a comprehensive classification of these rare tumors.

[Principles of the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis due to colorectal cancer. Current review and update]

Colorectal cancer is the most frequent digestive tumor. The incidence of abdominal dissemination is high and all studies of the natural history of colorectal carcinomatosis demonstrate that prognosis in these patients is poor, with a mean survival of between 5 and 9 months. Furthermore, the results of systemic adjuvant treatment are disappointing, with a maximum survival of 18 months. Consequently, other treatment strategies need to be studied and developed. We present a review of the principles that underlie Sugarbakers treatment protocol, which includes maximal cytoreductive surgery for the treatment of macroscopic disease through peritonectomy together with perioperative intraperitoneal intensification chemotherapy for residual microscopic disease. We present all the phase II studies with more than 10 treated patients published in the medical literature by the main groups working in this line of treatment, together with the only phase III study published to date. With this new therapeutic alternative, the mean overall survival at 2 and 5 years is 40% and 20% respectively. Based on these results, this new therapeutic approach is recommended as the treatment of choice in these unfortunate patients. The limits of the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer are also discussed.

Chemoradiotherapy Combined With Intracavitary Hyperthermia for Anal Cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate in a randomized way the clinical benefit of addition of intracavitary hyperthermia (ICHT) to a conventional chemoradiotherapy schedule in patients with T2-T3N0M0 anal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were randomly assigned to undergo chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin-C combined with radiotherapy with (arm A: 24 patients) or without ICHT (arm B: 25 patients). A microwave applicator operating at 433 MHz inserted into the anal-rectal cavity was used for ICHT. Patients in both arms received 1000 mg/m2 per day of 5-FU on days 1-4 and days 28-31 plus 15 mg/m mitomycin-C on day 1. Radiotherapy was administered with a dose of 41.4 Gy (1.8 Gy per fraction) plus a booster dose of 14 Gy (2 Gy per fraction).

RESULTS

One patient from group A developed severe mucositis, whereas no severe morbidity was noted in the rest of the patients in both groups. The incidence of lower-intestine acute reactions was higher in the ICHT arm. After a 5-year follow up in the hyperthermia arm, 23 of 24 patients (95.8%) preserved their anorectal function and avoided permanent colostomy, whereas in the second arm, 17 of 25 (68.0%) had sphincter preservation. Local recurrence-free survival time was significantly higher in the ICHT arm (P = 0.0107, log rank test), whereas no significant difference in overall survival was noted.

CONCLUSION

The addition of ICHT to the chemoradiotherapy schedule of anal cancer seems to offer a new effective and safe therapeutic modality. The preservation of anorectal function seems to be the significant clinical benefit of adjuvant ICHT.

Peritonectomy and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP): a strategy that has confirmed its efficacy in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei

BACKGROUND

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis characterized by a complete redistribution of mucin within the peritoneal cavity. The aim of this multicentric study was to evaluate the survival, morbidity, toxicity, and mortality of patients with PMP treated by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP).

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with PMP (21 males and 12 females) were enrolled in a phase II clinical trial. One patient underwent surgery twice because of disease recurrence. CRS was performed with peritonectomy procedures. The closed abdomen technique was employed for IPHP with use of cisplatin (25 mg/m2/L) plus mitomycin-C (3.3 mg/m2/L) for 60 minutes under hyperthermic conditions (42.5 degrees C).

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (92%) were optimally cytoreduced. Five-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional progression-free survival rates were 97%, 43%, and 59%, respectively. Grade II and grade III morbidity was observed in 5 patient (15%) and 6 patients (18%), respectively. There was one treatment-related death (3%), 21 days after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS associated with IPHP permitted complete tumor removal with an acceptable morbidity and mortality for patients with PMP. This study confirms the efficacy of the combined treatment in terms of long-term survival and local disease control.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mitomycin during intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

During recent years, cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with mitomycin has been used for various malignancies.

OBJECTIVE

To characterise the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mitomycin during HIPEC.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients received mitomycin 35 mg/m2 intraperitoneally as a perfusion over 90 minutes. Mitomycin concentrations were determined in both the peritoneal perfusate and plasma. The observed concentration-time profiles were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model using nonlinear mixed-effect modelling (NONMEM). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was related to the haematological toxicity.

RESULTS

Concentration-time profiles of mitomycin in perfusate and plasma were adequately described with one- and two-compartment models, respectively. The average volume of distribution of the perfusate compartment (V1) and rate constant from the perfusate to the systemic circulation (k12) were 4.5 +/- 1.1L and 0.014 +/- 0.003 min(-1), respectively (mean +/- SD, n = 47). The average volume of distribution of the central plasma compartment (V2), clearance from the central compartment (CL) and volume of distribution of the peripheral plasma compartment (V3) were 28 +/- 16L, 0.55 +/- 0.18 L/min and 36 +/- 8L, respectively. The relationship between the AUC in plasma and degree of leucopenia was described with a sigmoidal maximum-effect (Emax) model.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics of mitomycin during HIPEC could be fitted successfully to a multicompartment model. Relationships between plasma exposure and haematological toxicity were quantified. The developed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model can be used to simulate different dosage schemes in order to optimise mitomycin administration during HIPEC.

Intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia using a closed abdominal procedure and cytoreductive surgery for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: morbidity and mortality analysis of 216 consecutive procedures

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal carcinomatosis has been regarded as a lethal clinical entity. Recently, aggressive treatments combining intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (IPCH) with cytoreductive surgery have resulted in long-term survival in selected patients. The aim of this trial was to analyze the mortality and morbidity of 216 consecutive treatments of peritoneal carcinomatosis by IPCH by using a closed abdominal procedure combined with cytoreductive surgery.

METHODS

Between February 1989 and August 2001, 207 patients who underwent 216 IPCH procedures using a closed abdominal procedure with mitomycin C, cisplatin, or both were prospectively studied.

RESULTS

The postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 3.2% and 24.5%, respectively. The most frequent complications were digestive fistula (6.5%) and hematological toxicity (4.6%). Morbidity was statistically linked with the carcinomatosis stage (P =.016), the duration of surgery (P =.005), and the number of resections and peritonectomy procedures (P =.042). Duration of surgery and carcinomatosis stage were the most common predictors of morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of complications after IPCH and cytoreductive surgery was mainly associated with the carcinomatosis stage and the extent of the surgical procedure. The IPCH closed abdominal procedure has shown an acceptable frequency of adverse events.

Chimiohyperthermie pour carcinoses péritonéales primitives et d’origine digestive

Peritoneal carcinomatosis should no longer be considered as an automatically terminal disease in abdominal cancer patients. The aim of this comprehensive review of the literature was to evaluate the indications and contraindications of intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy with extensive cytoreduction surgery. Several aspects of the procedure are detailed. Feasibility, short-term and survival results are analysed owing to a comprehensive review of published studies.

Pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal mitomycin C

The favorable pharmacokinetics of MMC, used during intraperitoneal chemotherapy, has been reported in several studies [11-19]. A major safety issue in studies using intraperitoneal chemotherapy perfusion is the resulting systemic drug exposure. The AUCplasma is determined by the dose, the clearance, and the fraction absorbed from the peritoneal cavity. The reported mean plasma peak concentrations are about one-third of the systemic exposure following a therapeutic dose of MMC given by intravenous administration [30]. The best method to quantify the exposure to MMC are the time concentration profiles (AUC). Because MMC can still be found in plasma the day after intraperitoneal administration, the AUC0-90 is an underestimate of the real AUC; extrapolation to infinity gives the most reliable AUCplasma value. In our series the AUCplasma is about half the AUCplasma when given a therapeutic dose MMC intravenously [30]. What is the best dose in intraperitoneal chemotherapy perfusion? The ideal amount of MMC should include a high AUCperfusate, a high AUCplasma and an acceptable systemic toxicity. In our series grade III/IV leucopenia was observed in 28% patients. We find this rather high percentage acceptable as the problem has proved to be transient, and we have experienced no toxic deaths in recent years. In a phase I study it was estimated that a dose of 25 mg/m2 would result in approximately 10% of grade III/IV leucopenia [20]. Our data indicate that dosing based on body surface area is rational and reliable. The variation between individuals is low. Dosing based on a fixed concentration per liter perfusion fluid is probably more liable to have unforeseen variations, given the fact that we deal with linear pharmacokinetics of MMC [20]. As represented in Fig. 3, the dose of MMC can best be administered in three divided doses, resulting in the more equal exposure of peritoneal structures to MMC during the perfusion. It must be emphasized that our findings only hold true for the perfusion system as used in The Netherlands Cancer Institute. This involves a semi-open abdomen, basic perfusate volume of 3 L, perfusion rate of 1 L/min, abdominal temperature of 40 degrees C, 90 minutes of perfusion, and three drug additions (50% at t = 0, 25% at t = 30 and t = 60 minutes). The differences in perfusion techniques make comparisons of published pharmacokinetics data difficult. Cautions comparison suggest that most groups are dosing far below the maximal tolerated dose. We assume that there is a dose-effect relation for MMC. This means that obtaining a maximal safe dose is important to get maximal results. It seems that better dosing of intraperitoneal MMC can still improve results. The pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal MMC can, however, be influenced by many details. Open or closed perfusion for instance may make some essential differences. It is therefore important that each treatment group performs its own pharmacokinetics studies on intraperitoneal MMC to achieve the optimal dose method for their chemotherapy perfusion setting. In conclusion, the major advantage of intraperitoneal chemotherapy is the regional dose intensity provided. Following intraperitoneal MMC administration, the affected peritoneal surface is exposed to high concentrations while the systemic toxicity is limited. Comparative analyses on MMC pharmacokinetics are difficult to perform because the diversity of treatment techniques. We recommend administration of MMC, divided in three drug additions, based on BSA.

Surgery combined with peritonectomy procedures and intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia in abdominal cancers with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a phase II study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the tolerance of peritonectomy procedures (PP) combined with intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (IPCH) in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), a phase II study was carried out from January 1998 to September 2001.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients (35 females, mean age 49.3) were included for PC from colorectal cancer (26 patients), ovarian cancer (seven patients), gastric cancer (six patients), peritoneal mesothelioma (five patients), pseudomyxoma peritonei (seven patients), and miscellaneous reasons (five patients). Surgeries were performed mainly on advanced patients (40 patients stages 3 and 4 and 16 patients stages 2 and 1) and were synchronous in 36 patients. All patients underwent surgical resection of their primary tumor with PP and IPCH (with mitomycin C, cisplatinum, or both) with a closed sterile circuit and inflow temperatures ranging from 46 degrees to 48 degrees C. Three patients were included twice.

RESULTS

A macroscopic complete resection was performed in 27 cases. The mortality and morbidity rates were one of 56 and 16 of 56, respectively. The 2-year survival rate was 79.0% for patients with macroscopic complete resection and 44.7% for patients without macroscopic complete resection (P =.001). For the patients included twice, two are alive without evidence of disease, 54 and 47 months after the first procedure.

CONCLUSION

IPCH and PP are able to achieve unexpected long-term survival in patients with bulky PC. However, one must be careful when selecting the patients for such an aggressive treatment, as morbidity rate remains high even for an experienced team.

Cytoreduction and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis, sarcomatosis and mesothelioma

Despite new developments in multi-modality treatments, complete resection remains as an absolute requirement for cure of gastrointestinal cancer. We have reported benefits from combined treatment with complete cytoreduction and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. This has been achieved with low morbidity and mortality. Success in the surgical management of peritoneal surface malignancy depends on the surgeon's ability to complete complex cytoreductive procedures so that only microscopic residual disease remains. This paper describes the current strategy that the surgical oncologist should pursue in the treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, sarcomatosis and mesothelioma. Technical details required for this surgery include patient position, incision and exposure, complete lysis of adhesion, electroevaporative dissection with irrigation and suction to preserve the translucent quality of tissues, peritonectomy procedures, proper positioning of tubes and drains for intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and reconstructive surgery. Understanding the treatment and mastery of surgical skills to manage the peritoneal surface spread of cancer has led to long-term survival of selected patients. Combination of this treatment strategy with proper patient selection has reduced the mortality and morbidity. The success of cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy depends on a long-term dedication to achieve the full potential of a curative outcome. Our unit has continued to achieve good results over two decades as improved results of treatment have evolved.

Cytoreductive surgery and intraoperative hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma or pleural metastases of thymoma

STUDY OBJECTIVES

No established curative treatment is available for pleural thymoma metastases and malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Recently, peritoneal malignancies have been treated by cytoreductive surgery and intraoperative hyperthermic intracavitary perfusion chemotherapy (HIPEC). We investigated the feasibility and safety of this multimodality treatment in the thoracic cavity.

DESIGN

Patients with pleural thymoma metastases or early-stage MPM were enrolled in a feasibility study. Morbidity, recurrence, and survival rates were recorded.

SETTING

The Netherlands Cancer Institute.

PATIENTS

Three patients with pleural thymoma metastases and 11 patients with pleural mesothelioma were treated.

INTERVENTIONS

Cytoreductive surgery and intraoperative hyperthermic intrathoracic perfusion chemotherapy (HITHOC) with cisplatin and adriamycin were performed. The mesothelioma patients received adjuvant radiotherapy on the thoracotomy wound and drainage tracts.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Morbidity and mortality rates were 47% and 0%, respectively. Reoperation was necessary in four cases. Severe chemotherapy-related complications were not observed. A solitary mediastinal and a contralateral pleural thymoma recurrence were successfully treated by radiotherapy and a contralateral HITHOC procedure. All thymoma patients were alive and free of disease after a mean follow-up period of 18 months. After a mean follow-up period of 7.4 months, nine mesothelioma patients are alive. Two mesothelioma patients died of contralateral pleural and peritoneal recurrent disease, while one patient is alive with locoregional recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytoreductive surgery and HITHOC with cisplatin and adriamycin is feasible in patients with pleural thymoma metastases and early-stage MPM, and is associated with acceptable morbidity rates. Early data on locoregional disease control are encouraging, and a phase II study will be conducted.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

The peritoneal surface remains an important failure site for patients with colorectal cancer. Peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer are at present considered equal to distant metastatic disease. Consequently, peritoneal carcinomatosis is treated with systemic chemotherapy and surgery only to palliate complications such as obstruction. Despite the development of new chemotherapeutic agents and combinations, the results remain disappointing with a limited impact on survival. Colorectal carcinoma cells are relatively resistant to chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy seems to be an attractive approach in the treatment of high-risk colorectal cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal origin providing high local drug concentration with limited systemic side effects. Adjuvant early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is worthwhile for consideration as treatment option after resection of high-risk colorectal cancer. In the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy leads to inadequate exposure of the peritoneal surface. Only an intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy performed with direct cytotoxic drugs such as MMC and cisplatin overcome this problem. The limited drug penetration in tissue implies the need for extensive cytoreductive surgery. The results of phase II studies suggest that an increased median survival can be achieved with this approach. The natural history of this disease and the heterogeneity of the patients are such that only a randomized trial design will adequately answer the question whether regional treatment of patients with peritoneal dissemination of colorectal cancer actually prolongs survival. The results of such a study are to be expected in approximately 2 years time.

Rationale and techniques of intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

In recent years surgical cytoreduction followed by intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was introduced as treatment modality in patients with peritoneal surface malignancy. In the current review the rational for this approach, the prerequisites and the different techniques used are discussed.

METHODS

A literature search through PubMed was performed.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic studies have shown an important dose advantage for intraperitoneal versus intravenous application. Hyperthermia enhances the penetration of cytostatic drugs into tumour tissue and also shows synergism with various cytostatic drugs. The penetration depth of drugs into tissue is limited, therefore HIPEC can only be effective in patients with minimal residual disease after (aggressive) surgery. HIPEC can be conducted in various ways, without clear proven advantage of one method over the others. Local complications after this combined treatment approach are mainly surgery related. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy may cause systemic toxicity, dependent on the drug used. In randomised studies cytoreductive surgery followed by HIPEC has proven its value in the prevention of peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer. Phase II data on HIPEC in peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin and pseudomyxoma peritonei are promising, but randomised studies are still not available.

CONCLUSION

Aggressive surgical cytoreduction and HIPEC in patients with peritoneal surface malignancy has a clear rational and seems to have clinical value.

Intracavitary therapies for mesothelioma

The diagnosis of mesothelioma needs to be defined histologically. The staging system has been recently redefined anatomically, but may not be applicable to extrapleural mesothelioma. Further clinicopathologic studies need to be performed to molecularly classify the disease further, according to prognosis. Intracavitary therapy has a definite role in the treatment of mesothelioma. Randomized studies of intracavitary therapies are needed to define the best treatment option. The role of complementary therapeutic modalities such as surgery and radiotherapy needs to be defined by randomized studies. There is an urgent need to better understand the biology of mesothelioma, which may lead to more focus on molecularly relevant therapies.

Extensive cytoreductive surgery followed by intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with mitomycin-C in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin

Peritoneal seeding from colorectal cancer has a very poor prognosis and is relatively resistant to systemic chemotherapy. We performed a phase I/II trial to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of extensive cytoreductive surgery in combination with intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in these patients. 29 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin without evidence of distant metastases underwent cytoreductive surgery and intra-operative HIPEC with mitomycin-C (MMC), followed by systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin. Surgical complications occurred in 11 patients (38%). One patient died directly related to the treatment, resulting in a mortality rate of 3%. MMC toxicity existed mainly of leucocytopenia (in 15 patients; 52%). After a median follow-up of 38 months (range 26-52 months) we found a 2- and 3-year survival rate (Kaplan-Meier) of 45 and 23%, respectively. Extensive cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC is feasible in patients with peritoneal seeding of colorectal cancer. First results suggest that a higher median survival could be achieved compared with conventional palliative surgery and systemic chemotherapy, therefore a randomised phase III study is now being conducted.

Extensive surgical cytoreduction and intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei

BACKGROUND

Pseudomyxoma peritonei remains a fatal disease. However, extensive surgical cytoreduction combined with intraoperative heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has recently emerged as a new treatment modality, which might improve survival.

METHODS

Patients underwent treatment if the tumour appeared to be technically resectable on preoperative abdominal computed tomography and there were no distant metastases. After aggressive surgical cytoreduction, HIPEC with the administration of mitomycin C was performed for 90 min. Depending on histological grading, patients received adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin therapy.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were treated. Optimal surgical cytoreduction was obtained in 40 patients. Postoperative surgical complications occurred in 18 patients. Four patients died as a direct result of the treatment. Bone marrow suppression due to mitomycin C toxicity occurred in 22 patients. There was no other major toxicity related to the HIPEC procedure. After a median follow-up of 12 months, 40 patients are alive, eight of whom have proven recurrence. The actuarial survival rate (Kaplan-Meier) at 3 years was 81 per cent.

CONCLUSION

These results confirm that extensive surgery combined with HIPEC is feasible in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei and that improved long-term survival might be achieved.

[Peritoneal carcinomatosis treated by cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia]

STUDY AIM

The aim of this prospective non-randomized trial was to report a series of intraperitoneal carcinomatosis due to miscellaneous causes, treated by intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP) and cytoreductive surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

From January 1995 to May 1999, 35 patients were treated by IPHP and 26 of them underwent maximal cytoreductive surgery. IPHP was performed for 60 minutes at an intraperitoneal temperature of 42 degrees C with Mitomycin C (10 mg/L) or cisplatinum (12 mg/L) at a flow rate of 0.9 L/min.

RESULTS

There was one (2.8%) postoperative death due to respiratory complications on day 16. Three patients (8.5%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. A high morbidity rate (54%) was observed with intra-abdominal complications in 28.5% of patients, requiring reoperation in three patients. In patients with stages 1 and 2 peritoneal carcinomatosis (granulations less than 5 mm), the 12- and 24-month survival rates were 63.1% and 31.5%, respectively. In patients with advanced stage 3 (diffuse malignant nodules less than 2 cm) and stage 4 carcinomatosis (malignant nodules larger than 2 cm), the 12- and 24-month survival rates were 31.2% and 12%, respectively. Six patients survived for more than 30 months.

CONCLUSION

IPHP appears to be an effective treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis. IPHP combined with cytoreductive surgery is aggressive with a high morbidity rate. Rigorous patient selection is necessary. IPHP is still under evaluation. Prospective randomized trials with identical IPHP protocols are required.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion in the treatment of locally advanced intra-abdominal cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of intra-abdominal cancer is often followed by local recurrence. In a subgroup of patients, local recurrence is the sole site of disease, reflecting biologically low-grade malignancy. These patients might, therefore, benefit from local treatment. Recently, debulking surgery followed by hyperthermic chemoperfusion has been proposed in the treatment of locally advanced or recurrent intra-abdominal cancer. This paper reviews the rationale and assesses the currently accepted indications for and results of this novel treatment.

METHODS

A systematic web-based literature review was performed. Information was also retrieved from handbooks, congress abstracts and ongoing clinical trials.

RESULTS

A growing body of experimental evidence supports the use of hyperthermia combined with chemotherapy as an adjunct to cytoreductive surgery. Randomized clinical trials are available to support its use in the treatment and prevention of peritoneal carcinomatosis following resection of pathological tumour stage pT3 or pT4 gastric cancer; several other phase III trials are ongoing. Numerous phase I and II trials have reported good results for various other indications, with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Case mix, limited patient numbers and absence of a standardized technique are, however, a drawback in many of these series.

CONCLUSION

For a subgroup of patients with peritoneal cancer without distant disease, debulking surgery followed by hyperthermic chemoperfusion may offer a chance of cure or palliation in this otherwise untreatable condition. This novel therapy should, however, be considered experimental until further results from ongoing phase III trials become available.

Intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia with mitomycin C for digestive tract cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND

Most patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of digestive tract origin die within 6 months. Intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (IPCH) associated with surgery has been reported as a possible new therapeutic approach.

METHODS

A prospective Phase II trial was carried out with 83 patients who had digestive tract cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis to evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of IPCH with mitomycin C (MMC) associated with surgery. Eighty-six IPCH treatments with MMC were given as complementary therapy after surgery (peritoneal perfusate with a 10 mg/L dose of MMC; inflow temperature, 46-49 degrees C; use of a closed circuit; duration, 90 minutes). Primary tumors were mainly gastric (in 42 cases) or colorectal (in 27 cases).

RESULTS

Mortality and morbidity occurred in 3 of 83 cases and 8 of 83 cases, respectively. For patients with resectable tumors, the median survival time was 16 months when carcinomatosis was Stage I and II (malignant granulations less than 5 mm in greatest dimension), whereas it was 6 months when carcinomatosis was Stage III and IV (malignant granulations more than 5 mm in greatest dimension). For patients with resectable gastric cancer and Stage I and II carcinomatosis, 1-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 80%, 61%, and 41%, respectively, whereas the rate was 10% at 1 year for patients with bulky disease (Stage III and IV).

CONCLUSIONS

IPCH appears to be a promising new approach to treating patients with digestive tract cancers and peritoneal carcinomatosis with small, malignant granulations (Stage I and II).

Strategies to decrease the incidence of intra-abdominal recurrence in resectable gastric cancer

Two main approaches are suggested to improve treatment results in resectable gastric cancer: extended lymphadenectomy and adjuvant antitumour therapy. Progress is to some extent stalled by the perception of gastric cancer as a pathophysiologically uniform disease; it has been demonstrated, however, that there are variants of gastric cancer associated with predominantly intra-abdominal spread or with haematogenous metastases. Recent clinicopathological studies have provided information about the mechanisms of this metastatic diversity. A review of clinical trials suggests that no single method of treatment can efficiently address all variants of gastric cancer spread, but new treatment strategies may be based on defining the pathophysiological variant of gastric cancer and selecting adjuvant therapy according to the most probable mode of tumour spread. Treatment should start with surgery which includes a 'reasonably' extended lymphadenectomy aimed at achieving an increased rate of curative resection and more accurate staging. Risk factors for peritoneal spread of tumour require the perioperative use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Subsequent adjuvant therapy may be indicated in patients at high risk of further cancer spread or occult metastases, as determined by pathological examination of the resected specimen.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis: natural history and rational therapeutic interventions using intraperitoneal chemotherapy

The rationale and the treatment strategies for peritoneal carcinomatosis have gained prominence over the last decade. Their definite contribution to the management of gastrointestinal cancer has been established. The significant contributions are summarized in Table 7.

Complications of heated intraperitioneal chemotherapy and strategies for prevention

Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a potentially useful strategy for therapy of peritoneal carcinomatosis in adult patients, and we have found it to be associated with an acceptable complication rate. Careful perioperative management is critical, and we have presented our current experience guidelines for management and overview of complications.

Prophylaxis with intraoperative chemohyperthermia against peritoneal recurrence of serosal invasion-positive gastric cancer

Continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP) with a solution which contains 30 mg mitomycin C and 300 mg cisplatin has been introduced as a prophylactic treatment for peritoneal recurrence after curative resection of 79 advanced gastric cancers. The control group consisted of 81 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent curative surgery during the same period. CHPP was performed for 60 minutes by perfusing MMC- and CDDP-containing saline solutions warmed at 43.5 degrees C by a special CHPP device. In patients with pathologically confirmed serosal invasion-positive tumors, the survival rate of the CHPP group was significantly higher than that of the control group. A survival advantage for stage IV patients was also obtained by CHPP. However, there was no survival advantage between the CHPP group and the control group with serosal invasion-negative tumors. Adverse effects were observed in four patients who underwent CHPP: One developed severe bone marrow suppression, and transient hyperazotemia was observed in the other three. There was no difference in the incidence of mortality and morbidity between the two groups. These results indicate that CHPP is a safe, readily available prophylactic therapy for peritoneal recurrence after gastric cancer surgery.