FcIgG receptor-bearing lymphocytes and monoclonal antibody-defined T cell subsets in atopic dermatitis: effect of treatment with thymopoietin pentapeptide (TP-5)

Specific allergen immunotherapy for the treatment of atopic eczema

BACKGROUND

Specific allergen immunotherapy (SIT) is a treatment that may improve disease severity in people with atopic eczema (AE) by inducing immune tolerance to the relevant allergen. A high quality systematic review has not previously assessed the efficacy and safety of this treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of specific allergen immunotherapy (SIT), including subcutaneous, sublingual, intradermal, and oral routes, compared with placebo or a standard treatment in people with atopic eczema.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up to July 2015: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2015), MEDLINE (from 1946), EMBASE (from 1974), LILACS (from 1982), Web of Science™ (from 2005), the Global Resource of EczemA Trials (GREAT database), and five trials databases. We searched abstracts from recent European and North American allergy meetings and checked the references of included studies and review articles for further references to relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of specific allergen immunotherapy that used standardised allergen extracts in people with AE.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently undertook study selection, data extraction (including adverse effects), assessment of risk of bias, and analyses. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 12 RCTs for inclusion in this review; the total number of participants was 733. The interventions included SIT in children and adults allergic to either house dust mite (10 trials), grass pollen, or other inhalant allergens (two trials). They were administered subcutaneously (six trials), sublingually (four trials), orally, or intradermally (two trials). Overall, the risk of bias was moderate, with high loss to follow up and lack of blinding as the main methodological concern.Our primary outcomes were 'Participant- or parent-reported global assessment of disease severity at the end of treatment'; 'Participant- or parent-reported specific symptoms of eczema, by subjective measures'; and 'Adverse events, such as acute episodes of asthma or anaphylaxis'. SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) is a means of measuring the effect of atopic dermatitis by area (A); intensity (B); and subjective measures (C), such as itch and sleeplessness, which we used.For 'Participant- or parent-reported global assessment of disease severity at the end of treatment', one trial (20 participants) found improvement in 7/9 participants (78%) treated with the SIT compared with 3/11 (27%) treated with the placebo (risk ratio (RR) 2.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 7.96; P = 0.04). Another study (24 participants) found no difference: global disease severity improved in 8/13 participants (62%) treated with the SIT compared with 9/11 (81%) treated with the placebo (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.26; P = 0.38). We did not perform meta-analysis because of high heterogeneity between these two studies. The quality of the evidence was low.For 'Participant- or parent-reported specific symptoms of eczema, by subjective measures', two trials (184 participants) did not find that the SIT improved SCORAD part C (mean difference (MD) -0.74, 95% CI -1.98 to 0.50) or sleep disturbance (MD -0.49, 95% CI -1.03 to 0.06) more than placebo. For SCORAD part C itch severity, these two trials (184 participants) did not find that the SIT improved itch (MD -0.24, 95% CI -1.00 to 0.52). One other non-blinded study (60 participants) found that the SIT reduced itch compared with no treatment (MD -4.20, 95% CI -3.69 to -4.71) and reduced the participants' overall symptoms (P < 0.01), but we could not pool these three studies due to high heterogeneity. The quality of the evidence was very low.Seven trials reported systemic adverse reactions: 18/282 participants (6.4%) treated with the SIT had a systemic reaction compared with 15/210 (7.1%) with no treatment (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.49; the quality of the evidence was moderate). The same seven trials reported local adverse reactions: 90/280 participants (32.1%) treated with the SIT had a local reaction compared with 44/204 (21.6%) in the no treatment group (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.81). As these had the same study limitations, we deemed the quality of the evidence to also be moderate.Of our secondary outcomes, there was a significant improvement in 'Investigator- or physician-rated global assessment of disease severity at the end of treatment' (six trials, 262 participants; RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.88). None of the studies reported our secondary outcome 'Parent- or participant-rated eczema severity assessed using a published scale', but two studies (n = 184), which have been mentioned above, used SCORAD part C, which we included as our primary outcome 'Participant- or parent-reported specific symptoms of eczema, by subjective measures'.Our findings were generally inconclusive because of the small number of studies. We were unable to determine by subgroup analyses a particular type of allergen or a particular age or level of disease severity where allergen immunotherapy was more successful. We were also unable to determine whether sublingual immunotherapy was associated with more local adverse reactions compared with subcutaneous immunotherapy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the quality of the evidence was low. The low quality was mainly due to the differing results between studies, lack of blinding in some studies, and relatively few studies reporting participant-centred outcome measures. We found limited evidence that SIT may be an effective treatment for people with AE. The treatments used in these trials were not associated with an increased risk of local or systemic reactions. Future studies should use high quality allergen formulations with a proven track record in other allergic conditions and should include participant-reported outcome measures.

Virus associated immune and pharmacologic mechanisms in disorders of respiratory and cutaneous atopy

Anaphylaxis represents non-atopic immediate hypersensitivity, whereas manifestations of atopic immediate hypersensitivity include bronchial asthma, hay fever, allergic rhinitis, chronic urticaria, and atopic dermatitis. In spite similar antigen exposure, only a minority of the population shown some form of atopic disease. Atopic disease with its spontaneous pattern of familial occurrence cannot be induced at will.

The exact pathogenesis of atopy is yet to be elucidated. Two theories prevail: 1) atopy is a primary disorder of the immune system with sequelae in the various effector tissues; and 2) a concept of atopy as a primary autonomic imbalance, essentially beta adrenergic in character, with sequelae in effector cells, including those engaged in the production of antibodies. The autonomic imbalance is perceived as caused not by some disorder of the autonomic nervous system itself but by a defector functioning of its effector cells. These two concepts are not mutually exclusive. The IgE antibody, which mediates allergic reactions, is essentially identical with atopic reagin in various animal species.

The beta adrenergic theory regards atopic disorders (i.e., perennial and seasonal allergic rhinitis, bronchial asthma, and atopic dermatitis) not as immunologic diseases but as unique patterns of altered reactivities to a broad spectrum of immunologic, psychic, infectious, chemical and physical stimuli. The antigen-antibody interaction is given the same role as that of a broad category of nonspecific stimuli that function only to trigger the same defective homeostatic mechanism in the various effector cells involved in immediate hypersensitivities. Current evidence favors the possibility that there are inherited and/or acquired multiple abnormalities in the receptor—adenylate cyclase—cyclic AMP system of all effector cells that are critical in the organization of immune reactivities.

Atopic abnormality may be 1) acquired by functional receptor regulatory shifts caused by hormonal changes, infection (viral, bacterial, etc), allergic tissue injury or other event; 2) genetically determined; or 3) caused by autoimmune disease. One, two or all three of these effector mechanisms may be operative in a particular disease.

There is an important relationship between asthma and viral respiratory infection. A history of childhood viral respiratory illness is a risk factor for the development of chronic obstructive airway syndromes in later life. Asthmatic attacks occurred only when the infection produced fever, malaise, cough or coryza. The dominant role of fever in these episodes immediately suggests the profound involvement of adrenergic effector mechanisms. The presence of autoantibodies to beta-adrenoceptors in patients correlated well with a reduced beta—and an increased alpha-adrenergic responsiveness. Virus infections can elicit autoantibody formation.

In patients with atopic dermatitis an increased susceptibility and abnormal host response to viral infections in general. Defective cytotoxic T cells, abnormally functioning macrophages and natural killer cells, a reduced production of IFNα in children, and of IFNγ in atopic patients with food allergy has recently been demonstrated. Lymphocytic cyclic AMP-phosphodiesterase, that destroys cyclic AMP, is increased in atopic dermatitis and in allergic respiratory disease of adults, and this increased activity correlated closely with histamine release from basophils. Peripheral blood leukocytes and lymphocytes in atopic dermatitis have frequently demonstrated impaired beta adrenergic reactivity.

Allergic tissue injury may be initiated by antigen-specific IgE antibodies that combine with Fcε receptors on various cell types and trigger mediator release upon encounter with the antigen. Various noxious agents that are capable of triggering asthma are capable of releasing inflammatory mediators from the same target cells. Accounting only for those pharmacologic mediators where the cell-type has been identified, the spectrum of mediator-storing, synthesizing, or transporting cells includes neutrophil leucocytes, basophilic leucocytes eosinophilic leucocytes; mast cells, “chromaffin-positive” mast cells, enterochromaffin cells, chromaffin cells; platelets, neurosecretory cells and nerve cells that potentially produce all amine-mediators as well as prostaglandins and kinins.

Thymopentin and splenopentin as immunomodulators. Current status

Splenopentin (SP-5, Arg-Lys-Glu-Val-Tyr) and thymopentin (TP-5, Arg-Lys-Asp-Val-Tyr) are synthetic immunomodulating peptides corresponding to the region 32-34 of a splenic product called splenin (SP) and the thymic hormone thymopoietin (TP), respectively. TP was originally isolated as a 5-kDa (49-amino acids) protein from bovine thymus while studying effects of the thymic extracts on neuromuscular transmission and was subsequently observed to affect T cell differentiation and function. TP I and II are two closely related polypeptides isolated from bovine thymus. A radioimmunoassay for TP revealed a crossreaction with a product found in spleen and lymph node. This product, named splenin, differs from TP only in position 34, aspartic acid for bovine TP and glutamic acid for bovine splenin and it was called TP III as well. Synthetic pentapeptides (TP-5) and (SP-5), reproduce the biological activities of TP and SP, respectively. It is now evident that various forms of TPs were created by proteolytic cleavage of larger proteins during isolation. cDNA clones have been isolated for three alternatively spliced mRNAs that encodes three distinct human T cell TPs. The immunomodulatory properties of TP, SP, TP-5, SP-5 and some of their synthetic analogs reported in the literature have been briefly reviewed.

Altered spontaneous and histamine-induced in vitro suppressor-cell function in dogs with atopic dermatitis

Spontaneous, histamine-induced and Concanavalin A (Con A)-induced suppression of Con A mitogenesis of autologous responder cells was studied in normal dogs and in dogs with atopic dermatitis. Histamine-induced suppression was significantly decreased in the atopic dogs, as was the Con A-induced suppression, at supraoptimal concentration of Con A, to a lesser extent. Total numbers of histamine type 1 or type 2 receptors were not different for cells from atopic or normal dogs. The spontaneous suppression was significantly greater for the atopic dogs and this was not accounted for by the effect of non-specific dermatitis, increased macrophage-induced suppression or increased induction by mitogenic factors in the culture medium. Some possible mechanisms for these results are discussed, and the similarities to suppressor cell function in humans with atopic disease are noted.

A double-blind placebo-controlled study of thymostimulin (TP-1) for the treatment of atopic eczema

Twenty-nine patients with severe atopic eczema were entered into a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the polypeptide thymus extract, thymostimulin (TP-1). The treatment period was 10 weeks with a subsequent follow-up period of up to 1 year. Of the 18 patients receiving TP-1 and the 11 patients on the placebo, 15 and 11 patients, respectively, were fully evaluable. There was no significant difference in either clinical or immunological status between the two treatment groups at baseline. At the 3-month follow-up clinic visit there was a statistically significant difference in the total clinical score, calculated as a percentage of baseline, in favour of the TP-1-treated patients. This difference was not maintained in the subsequent follow-up period and was not accompanied by an improvement in the patient's subjective well-being. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups with respect to the immunological parameters as measured at the 3-month clinic visit.

T cell responses in allergic rhinitis, asthma and atopic dermatitis

Although clinical responses to allergens have been shown to primarily involve IgE antibodies, there is often no clear correlation between the amount of allergen-specific IgE present in the serum and the nature and severity of allergic symptoms. This observation raises the question of the possible role of non-IgE mediated types of immune responses in this reaction. It is not known to what extent components of T cell-mediated immunity are involved in IgE-mediated reactions but several observations suggest an association between atopic disease and alterations in cellular immune function. These include the frequent association of high serum IgE levels with: (i) several of the primary and acquired immunodeficiencies characterized by partial T cell deficiency; (ii) the defective cell-mediated immunity and resultant recurrent infections seen in the hyper-IgE syndrome; and (iii) the sudden rise in serum IgE levels associated with reduced numbers of suppressor T cells in bone marrow transplant recipients during the acute graft vs host disease. In this review, we will examine the recent evidence suggesting that the T lymphocyte may play a primary role in the pathogenesis of atopic disorders.

Immunophenotyping of the cutaneous infiltrate and of the mononuclear cells in the peripheral blood in patients with atopic dermatitis

Fourteen adult patients with chronic atopic dermatitis and active skin lesions had a skin biopsy and venous blood sample taken on the same day. Absolute numbers of circulating lymphocytes were normal in all patients. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis revealed normal numbers of total T lymphocytes and T-helper and T-suppressor subsets (helper:suppressor ratio, 2:1) in the atopic patients' peripheral blood, but an increase in circulating B lymphocytes and in HLA-D-related antigen-bearing cells. The skin biopsy showed a dermal infiltrate of predominantly T-helper lymphocytes (helper:suppressor ratio, 7:1). These cells showed strong HLA-DR plasma membrane staining. There was no HLA-DR staining in the membranes of epidermal keratinocytes. Using a monoclonal antihuman IgE, positive staining was observed in the dermis, though none was identified in the epidermis. The dermal anti-IgE staining was concentrated around clusters of T lymphocytes.

Immunoregulating peptides II. In vitro effects of TP5 analogs on E-rosette formation and cell division

The effects of seventeen synthetic analogs of thymopentin (TP-5) have been studied in the active and azathioprine-inhibited E-rosette tests. Thymopentin was gradually shortened from the C terminus to peptides and single amino acids. Thymopoietin 32-34 (Arg-Lys-Asp-RGH-0205-TP-3) (II) and thymopoietin 32-35 (Arg-Lys-Asp-Val-RGH-0206-TP-4) (I) were the most active peptides. Dipeptide Arg-Lys produced significant stimulatory effect on azathioprine (ED75) inhibited E-receptor. Treatment of azathioprine (ED75)-inhibited E-rosette forming cells (ERFC) with arginine or especially lysine increased the number of ERFC. Some of TP-4 analogs decreased further the number of ERFC decreased by azathioprine ED30. These "suppressive" peptides as well as TP-3 caused a partial arrest of K 562 cell proliferation up to 96 hours. Results suggest that TP-5 is not the smallest active fragment of thymopoietins, since peptides (TP-3 and TP-4) exhibit similar or higher T-cell membrane activation on E-receptor. Arginine, lysine, and acidic aspartyl residue seem to be a necessary basic structure to produce a cumulative chemical signal on the activity of T-lymphocytes.

Fc receptor--more answers, more questions

Fc receptors, belonging to the most important surface structures of a number of cells participating in the immune processes, have been intensely studied during the past decade. The present review summarizes the contemporary knowledge of the specificity and heterogeneity of Fc receptors and of factors influencing their expression, and includes some views on their function. In addition, it mentions their relationship to other cell surface structures, expression of Fc receptors during ontogeny of the organism and in certain diseases. Finally, data concerning the isolation and biochemical characterization of the Fc receptor molecule are presented.