Carcinoma of the prostate in young patients: a report of two cases

Impact of age at diagnosis on overall and disease-free survival in men with prostate cancer following conformal 3D radiation therapy

Aims and background

The impact of age on prostate cancer outcome has been controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of age on overall survival and disease-free survival in patients affected by prostate cancer when treated with 3D conformal radiation therapy.

Methods and study design

From 1999 to 2005, 1002 patients with T1–T3 prostate cancer were treated with 3D conformal radiation therapy, delivering a median dose of 75.6, 66.6 and 45 Gy to the prostate, seminal vesicles and pelvic nodes (if necessary), respectively. Patients were divided into four groups (<65, 65–70, 70–75, >75 years) according to age at diagnosis. The relationship between age and both overall survival and disease-free survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and the comparison between curves was performed by the logrank test. ROC analysis allowed assessment of the best age cutoff.

Results

Mean age was 71 ± 6 years (median, 72). Median and mean follow-up was 71.4 and 69 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in the distribution of disease risk between age groups. Analysis demonstrated that older age is a strong positive predictor of survival (odds ratio for stratified patients older than 70 years was <1). In fact, at the 90 month follow-up, overall survival and disease-free survival varied with age, increasing from 85% to 95% and from 78% to 94%, respectively. ROC curve analysis yielded a cutoff age value discriminating overall survival and disease-free survival of 72 years.

Conclusions

Age is a strong positive predictor of overall survival and disease-free survival, playing a protective role for stratified patients up to 72 years of age.

Advanced age at diagnosis is an independent predictor of time to death from prostate carcinoma for patients undergoing external beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Whether age at diagnosis is predictive of time to prostate carcinoma specific death after external beam radiation therapy (RT) for patients who are diagnosed with clinically localized prostate carcinoma during the prostate specific antigen (PSA) era has not been investigated previously.

METHODS

A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the ability of pretreatment risk group and age at diagnosis to predict time to all causes of death and time to death from prostate carcinoma for 381 patients who underwent RT for clinically localized prostate carcinoma.

RESULTS

Age at diagnosis, as a continuous variable (P(continuous) = 0.04), and risk group (P(categorical) = 0.02) were independent predictors of time to death from prostate carcinoma, whereas only age at diagnosis (P(continuous) = 0.01) was a predictor of time to all causes of death. When analyzed as a categorical variable, beginning at age 73 years, age at diagnosis was an independent predictor (P(categorical) < 0.04) of time to death from prostate carcinoma. Upon further analysis, this finding was limited to high-risk patients. For example, age > or = 75 years at diagnosis predicted for a shorter median time to death from prostate carcinoma (6.3 years vs. 9.7 years; P = 0.002) in high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with clinically localized, high-risk prostate carcinoma who were diagnosed at age > or = 73 years and were treated with RT had a worse prognosis compared with patients who were diagnosed age < 73 years, raising the possibility that a more aggressive prostate carcinoma biology may develop during andropause.

Clinical features of prostate cancer patients younger than 50 years: report of seven cases

BACKGROUND

The incidence of prostate cancer increases with age and latent cancer is common in older men. But clinical prostate cancer is rare in men aged < 50 years.

METHODS

Between 1988 and 2000, we studied seven cases of prostate cancer in men aged under 50 years. The clinicopathological results included: the first sign or symptom; prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at the time of diagnosis; existence of abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE); the differentiation of the cancer and Gleason score; and the outcome of treatment.

RESULTS

Six cases were diagnosed as stage D2. One case was diagnosed as stage B2 and the patient underwent radical prostatectomy. None of the cases were detected by mass screening. The PSA at diagnosis was < 10 ng/mL in only one case and that patient underwent radical prostatectomy. Six cases were diagnosed pathologically as poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The only patient who survived more than 5 years underwent radical prostatectomy.

CONCLUSION

Six of seven cases of prostate cancer were detected at advanced stage. Only one case was thought to be curable and this patient's cancer was detected by chance occult blood test. Because young prostate cancer patients are potential candidates for radical prostatectomy and the sensitivity of PSA might be higher in young men, high-risk groups could be screened by PSA.

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate in men younger than 40 years of age: diagnosis and treatment with emphasis on radical prostatectomy findings

OBJECTIVES

Prostate cancer is rarely diagnosed in men younger than 40 years of age. It is thought, although not documented, that these tumors behave particularly aggressively.

METHODS

We studied 87 men younger than 40 years old who underwent prostate needle biopsy and were from three populations: (a) 71 cases (63 benign, 7 cancer) from Dianon Systems; (b) 9 needle biopsies with cancer sent to one of us (J.I.E.) in consultation; and (c) 7 men with cancer who came to Johns Hopkins for consultation.

RESULTS

The median age of men with a benign biopsy was 35 years (mean 33.9, range 22 to 39); the median age of men with cancer was 38 years (mean 35.9, range 22 to 39) (P = 0.004). The most common indications for biopsy were abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) (n = 61); elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (n = 14), and inflammatory symptoms (n = 12). Other reasons cited included hematuria, abnormal ultrasound, pain, ejaculatory problems, obstructive symptoms, and family history of prostate cancer. The median PSA was 2.6 ng/mL (mean 4.8, range 0.3 to 66) for all men, 1.2 ng/mL (mean 3.4, range 0.3 to 19.9) for benign cases, and 4.4 ng/mL (mean 8.7, range 2.1 to 66) for cancer (P = 0.0004). Abnormal DRE was not predictive of cancer. Of the 55 patients whose family history was known, 40 men had no family history of prostate cancer, and of those, only 6 (15%) had cancer. Of the 1 5 patients with a family history of cancer, 6 (40%) were found to have cancer on biopsy (P = 0.05). Of the 23 patients with cancer, 3 were lost to follow-up, 1 was treated with hormones, and 3 chose watchful waiting. The remaining 16 patients underwent radical prostatectomy and had diverse pathologic findings. Tumor volume ranged from 0.01 to 6.35 cc. Pathologic stage was pT2 in 9 cases and pT3 in 7 cases (2 with positive pelvic lymph nodes). In 14 men, serum PSA values were available: of 4 men with PSA greater than 10 ng/mL, all had Stage pT3, and of 10 men with PSA less than 10 ng/mL, 3 had Stage pT3.

CONCLUSIONS

Young men who are candidates for radical prostatectomy have potentially curable disease, particularly if PSA at the time of diagnosis is less than 10 ng/mL.