Laparoscopic ligation of bilateral spermatic varices under epidural anesthesia

Regional anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery: a narrative review

Laparoscopic surgery has advanced remarkably in recent years, resulting in reduced morbidity and shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. Despite challenges from the expanding array of laparoscopic procedures performed with the use of pneumoperitoneum on increasingly sick patients, anesthesia has remained largely unchanged. At present, most laparoscopic operations are usually performed under general anesthesia, except for patients deemed "too sick" for general anesthesia. Recently, however, several large, retrospective studies questioned the widely held belief that general anesthesia is the best anesthetic method for laparoscopic surgery and suggested that regional anesthesia could also be a reasonable choice in certain settings. This narrative review is an attempt to critically summarize current evidence on regional anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. Because most available data come from large, retrospective studies, large, rigorous, prospective clinical trials comparing regional vs. general anesthesia are needed to evaluate the true value of regional anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery.

Laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy with epidural vs. general anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery involves a single umbilical incision, lending itself to epidural anesthesia. This prospective, randomized study was undertaken to evaluate epidural anesthesia for patients undergoing LESS cholecystectomy, to assess the feasibility, and to analyze all intraoperative and postoperative complications. The secondary objectives were to determine differences in postoperative pain and time until PACU discharge-to-home readiness between patients.

METHODS

With institutional review board approval, 20 patients with chronic cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, and/or biliary dyskinesia were randomized to receive spinal epidural anesthesia (n = 10) or general anesthesia (n = 10). Postoperative pain at rest was recorded in the PACU every 10 min, and at rest and walking at discharge using the visual analog scale (VAS). Operative time and time until PACU discharge-to-home readiness were recorded. Results are expressed as mean ± SD.

RESULTS

Patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and body mass index were similar. There were no additional ports/incisions, conversions to "open" operations, or conversions to general anesthesia. There were no differences in operative duration. Time until postanesthesia care unit discharge-to-home ready was not significantly different. The most common postoperative adverse event was urinary retention (1 epidural and 3 general anesthesia patients). Resting postoperative VAS pain score at discharge was 4.7 ± 2.5 vs. 2.2 ± 1.6 (p = 0.02, general versus epidural anesthesia respectively); the stressed VAS pain score at discharge was 6.1 ± 2.3 vs. 3.1 ± 2.8 (p = 0.02, general versus epidural anesthesia respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LESS cholecystectomy with epidural anesthesia was completed with no operative or anesthetic conversions, and less postoperative pain at discharge. Epidural anesthesia appears to be a preferable alternative to general anesthesia for patients undergoing LESS cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under epidural anesthesia: a clinical feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has traditionally been performed under general anesthesia, however, owing in part to the advancement of surgical and anesthetic techniques, many laparoscopic cholecystectomies have been successfully performed under the spinal anesthetic technique. We hoped to determine the feasibility of segmental epidural anesthesia for LC.

METHODS

Twelve American Society of Anesthesiologists class I or II patients received an epidural block for LC. The level of epidural block and the satisfaction score of patients and the surgeon were checked to evaluate the efficacy of epidural block for LC.

RESULTS

LC was performed successfully under epidural block, with the exception of 1 patient who required a conversion to general anesthesia owing to severe referred pain. There were no special postoperative complications, with the exception of one case of urinary retention.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidural anesthesia might be applicable for LC. However, the incidence of intraoperative referred shoulder pain is high, and so careful patient recruitment and management of shoulder pain should be considered.

Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia: a study of 480 patients

OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) is conventionally performed under general anesthesia (GA), and regional anesthesia is usually preferred in patients where GA is contraindicated. In this paper, we present our experience of over 8 years of using spinal anesthesia (SA) as the first choice with the contention that it is a better alternative to GA.

METHODS

SA was used in 480 patients over the last 8 years, and 464 patients underwent unilateral TEP. Strangulated and obstructed hernia patients were excluded, but irreducible hernia patients were included. Sedation was given if required, and the conversion to GA was done in patients not responding to sedation or with failure of SA. Comparative control included TEP performed under GA in our initial 49 patients.

RESULTS

Three (0.63%) patients required a conversion to GA. Hypotension requiring support was recorded in 75 (15.63%) patients. Postoperatively, 2.08% (10) patients had vomiting, as compared to 30.61% (15 patients) in patients administered GA. In all, 35.83% (172) of patients required injectable diclofenac for their abdominal pain within 2 hours postoperatively, and oral analgesic was required in 301 (62.71%) patients within the first 24 hours, while 89.80% (44) patients operated an under GA required injectable analgesics in the immediate postoperative period and subsequent oral analgesia request was the same as in patients with SA. Postural headache, persisting for an average of 2.6 days, was seen in 25 (5.21%) patients postoperatively. Average time to discharge was 2.3 days. Kernofsky's performance status showed a 98.6% satisfaction level in patients.

CONCLUSIONS

TEP done under SA has a number of advantages over GA and should be used routinely.

[Laparoscopy under local anaesthesia and hypnoanaesthesia about 35 cholecystectomies and 15 inguinal hernia repair]

OBJECTIVE

To present hypnosedation and the feasibility of this technique performed for laparoscopic procedure.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective and descriptive study of feasibility.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Hypnosis can significantly reduce intraoperative requirements of intravenous sedation for surgery under local anaesthesia. Modifications of surgical procedure: laparoscopic surgery under local anaesthesia and hypnosis is performed using a subcutaneous lifting of anterior abdominal wall. Insufflation is only use to push out smoke. If patient or surgical uncomfort happens, moral contract with patient includes convert to general anaesthesia.

RESULTS

We performed 35 cholecystectomies; 13 needed convert to general anaesthesia, mainly for peritoneal pain induced by CO(2) insufflation; 22 procedures were completed with patients' satisfaction. Upon 15-hernia repairs, only one patient needed convert to general anaesthesia, for dissection difficulty.

CONCLUSION

Probably hypnosis can't be extent to intraperitoneal laparoscopic procedures. On the other hand interest of hypnosis performed for extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair must be explore.

Regional anesthesia for laparoscopy

A variety of laparoscopic procedures can be performed on patients under regional anesthesia. Diagnostic laparoscopy in elective and emergency patients, pain mapping, laparoscopy for infertility, and tubal sterilization are some examples. The key benefits of regional anesthesia include less emesis, less postoperative pain, shorter postoperative stay, improved patient satisfaction, and overall safety. Regional techniques, such as rectus sheath blocks, inguinal blocks, and caudal blocks, are useful adjuncts to general anesthesia and facilitate postoperative analgesia. Other techniques, such as spinal and epidural anesthesia, and combination of the two, are suitable as a sole anesthetic technique for laparoscopy. The physiologic changes during laparoscopy in the awake patient appear to be tolerated well under regional anesthesia. It is reasonable to assume that with advances in instrumentation and surgical techniques, the role of laparoscopy will increase in the future. The benefits conferred by regional anesthesia make it an attractive option to general anesthesia for many patients and procedures. Successful implementation of regional anesthesia is an important determinant of how anesthesiologists, surgeons, and surgical facilities cope with new challenges. In the future, it could be possible to provide "walk-in/walk-out" regional anesthesia with a real possibility of fast tracking patients through the recovery process after ambulatory surgery. For maximal patient safety, however, facilities offering regional anesthesia must have appropriately trained anesthesia personnel and the equipment necessary for monitoring and providing full resuscitation in the event of complications or a need to convert to general anesthesia.