1
|
Labree B, Sereda M, Cullington H, Johnson S, Church P, Dunster J, Hoare DJ. Evaluation of factors predicting tinnitus outcomes following cochlear implantation: Protocol for a prospective quasi-experimental study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302790. [PMID: 38885210 PMCID: PMC11182524 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implantation is an effective intervention to restore useful aspects of hearing function in adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Tinnitus, the perception of sound in the absence of an external source, is common in people with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Existing evidence suggests cochlear implantation may be effective in reducing the negative impact of tinnitus in this population. However, this is contradicted by data suggesting that up to half of cochlear implant recipients experience tinnitus, and that some of these patients who did not have tinnitus before cochlear implantation experience it after surgery or cochlear implant activation. Most evidence on the effects of cochlear implantation on tinnitus comes from secondary data in cochlear implant studies primarily concerned with hearing-related outcomes. Hence, the quality of the evidence for effects on tinnitus is low and not suitable to inform clinical recommendations or decision-making. This study will systematically collect data on tinnitus and tinnitus-related outcomes from patients at multiple points during the cochlear implant pathway to characterise changes in tinnitus. This will improve our understanding of the effects of cochlear implantation for tinnitus in adults with severe to profound hearing loss and inform the design of clinical trials of cochlear implantation for tinnitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas Labree
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Hearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Magdalena Sereda
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Hearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Cullington
- Auditory Implant Service, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Johnson
- Nottingham Auditory Implant Programme, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Paige Church
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- NIHR Clinical Research Network (CRN) East Midlands, Nottingham Health Science Partners, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Derek J. Hoare
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Hearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Genuchten S, Gilles A, Mertens G, Andries E, Cardon E, Van Rompaey V, Lammers M, Vanderveken OM, Jacquemin L. Tinnitus suppression by means of cochlear implantation: does it affect cognition? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281:2281-2291. [PMID: 38052757 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08339-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent literature suggests that tinnitus can impact cognition, but results were varied due to a diversity in investigated aspects of cognition and utilized tests, as well as the possible influence of confounding factors. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of tinnitus loudness on cognition by use of a within-subjects design in patients with a cochlear implant (CI). In this population, tinnitus loudness can be modulated by switching the CI on or off as CI is known to highly suppress tinnitus. METHODS A total of 18 CI users completed two versions of the Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status for Hearing Impaired individuals (RBANS-H), once in unaided condition and once in best aided condition. Tinnitus suppression was defined as a difference in score on a visual-analogue scale (VAS) of at least one point out of ten between these two conditions. RESULTS No significant differences in RBANS-H scores were found between the suppression and no suppression group, nor for the suppression group alone. No significant correlations between tinnitus loudness and RBANS-H were found, neither for the suppression group alone, nor for the group as a whole. CONCLUSION The current study shows no significant effect of tinnitus loudness on cognition, which contradicts previous literature. This discrepancy could be explained by the use of a within-subjects design, which controls for confounding factors. Future research should include a larger and more diverse study sample to draw definitive conclusions on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah van Genuchten
- Department of Education, Health and Social Work, University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Annick Gilles
- Department of Education, Health and Social Work, University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Ellen Andries
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Emilie Cardon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Marc Lammers
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Olivier M Vanderveken
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Laure Jacquemin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lailach S, Stephan P, Martin J, Zahnert T, Neudert M. Influence of depressive disorders, stress, and personality traits on quality of life after cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281:1717-1734. [PMID: 37917166 PMCID: PMC10942889 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08284-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to determine whether preoperative depressiveness, stress, and personality influence quality of life (QOL) after cochlear implant (CI) surgery. METHODS In this prospective study, 79 patients undergoing CI surgery were evaluated preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Disease-specific QOL was assessed with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) and general QOL with the WHOQOL-BREF. Depressiveness and stress were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-D). The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to classify comorbidities. The Big Five Personality Test (B5T) was used to assess the basic personality dimensions. Speech comprehension was evaluated in quiet with the Freiburg monosyllable test and in noise with the Oldenburg sentence test. RESULTS After CI surgery, the total NCIQ score improved significantly (Δ 17.1 ± 14.7, p < 0.001). General QOL (WHOQOL-BREF, Δ 0.4 ± 9.9, p = 0.357), stress (Δ 0.25 ± 3.21, p = 0.486), and depressiveness (Δ 0.52 ± 3.21, p = 0.121) were unaffected by CI surgery. Patients without elevated depressiveness (p < 0.01) or stress (p < 0.001) had significantly better total NCIQ scores. The results of the multiple regression analyses show that, after adjusting for the CCI, personality, age, and mental health stress (ß = - 0.495, p < 0.001) was significantly associated with postoperative NCIQ outcome scores. Depressiveness and neuroticism had the strongest influence on the generic QOL (ß = - 0.286 and ß = - 0.277, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Stress symptoms and personality traits are significant predictive factors for disease-specific QOL, as well as hearing status. This should be considered in the preoperative consultation and in optimizing the rehabilitation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susen Lailach
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
| | - Paula Stephan
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| | - Johanna Martin
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| | - Thomas Zahnert
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| | - Marcus Neudert
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Olze H, Vater J, Gröschel M, Szczepek AJ. [Cochlear implant and tinnitus]. HNO 2023; 71:693-701. [PMID: 37815555 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-023-01376-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
Cochlear implant (CI) treatment is now established as a successful standard of care for auditory rehabilitation of profoundly deaf or severe hearing loss patients. CI candidates with tinnitus also benefit from improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and tinnitus burden. Current CI indications include bilateral (double-sided) profound hearing loss and deafness (DSD), unilateral (single-sided) deafness (SSD), and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). The new and expanded indications for cochlear implants result in different healthcare situations, which may also be associated with differences in tinnitus burden before and after CI treatment. In this article, we discuss the prevalence of tinnitus in different patient groups and the influence of CI on tinnitus prevalence and severity in these groups. In addition, further therapeutic options for tinnitus suppression based on the CI principle are presented, including the development of an anti-tinnitus implant (proof of concept).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Olze
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - Jana Vater
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Moritz Gröschel
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Agnieszka J Szczepek
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Park KW, Kullar P, Malhotra C, Stankovic KM. Current and Emerging Therapies for Chronic Subjective Tinnitus. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6555. [PMID: 37892692 PMCID: PMC10607630 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12206555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Chronic subjective tinnitus, the perception of sound without an external source for longer than six months, may be a greatly debilitating condition for some people, and is associated with psychiatric comorbidities and high healthcare costs. Current treatments are not beneficial for all patients and there is a large need for new therapies for tinnitus. OBSERVATIONS Unlike rarer cases of objective tinnitus, chronic subjective tinnitus often has no obvious etiology and a diverse pathophysiology. In the absence of objective testing, diagnosis is heavily based on clinical assessment. Management strategies include hearing aids, sound masking, tinnitus retraining therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and emerging therapies including transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrical stimulation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Although current treatments are limited, emerging diagnostics and treatments provide promising avenues for the management of tinnitus symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ki Wan Park
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 801 Welch Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
| | - Peter Kullar
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 801 Welch Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
| | - Charvi Malhotra
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 801 Welch Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
| | - Konstantina M. Stankovic
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 801 Welch Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 453 Quarry Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, 290 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rasmussen KD, West NC, Bille M, Cayé-Thomasen P. Tinnitus suppression in a prospective cohort of 45 cochlear implant recipients: occurrence, degree and correlates. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:4073-4082. [PMID: 37099145 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-07921-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine tinnitus prevalence and severity in a cohort of unselected first-time cochlear implant (CI) recipients whose primary motive for CI was sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and to evaluate the effect of CI on tinnitus after cochlear implantation. METHODS Prospective longitudinal study of 45 adult CI recipients with moderate to profound SNHL. Patients completed the Danish version of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for tinnitus burden before implantation, 4 months after implantation and 14 months after implantation. RESULTS The study included 45 patients, of which 29 (64%) had pre-implant tinnitus. Median THI score (IQR) significantly decreased from 20 (34) to 12 (24) at first follow-up (p < 0.05) and to 6 points (17) at second follow-up (p < 0.001). Median VAS (IQR) for tinnitus burden decreased from 33 (62) to 17 (40; p = 0.228) and 12 (27, p < 0.05) at the first and second follow-ups, respectively. Tinnitus was totally suppressed in 19% of patients, improved in 48%, remained unchanged in 19% and worsened in 6%. 2 patients reported new tinnitus. At the second follow-up, 74% of patients had slight or no tinnitus handicap, 16% had mild handicaps, 6% had moderate handicaps, and 3% had severe handicaps. High pre-implant THI and VAS scores correlated with greater decrease in THI scores over time. CONCLUSION 64% of the patients with SNHL had pre-implant tinnitus, which was decreased 4 and 14 months after implantation. Overall, 68% of patients with tinnitus improved their tinnitus handicap after CI. Patients with higher THI and VAS scores had a larger decline and the highest benefits in terms of tinnitus handicap improvement. The study findings demonstrate that the majority of patients with moderate to profound SNHL eligible for cochlear implantation benefit from complete or partial tinnitus suppression and improved quality of life after implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasper Dyre Rasmussen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Niels Cramer West
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Bille
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per Cayé-Thomasen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dixon PR, Shapiro J, Tomlinson G, Cottrell J, Lui JT, Falk L, Chen JM. Health State Utility Values Associated with Cochlear Implants in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Ear Hear 2023; 44:244-253. [PMID: 36303282 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The cost-effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implants in adults remains uncertain despite established clinical benefits. In cost-effectiveness studies, benefit is often measured by change in health state utility value (HSUV), a single number summary of health-related quality of life anchored at 0 (state of being dead) and 1 (perfect health). Small differences in bilateral cochlear implant HSUV change conclusions of published models, and invalid estimates can therefore mislead policy and funding decisions. As such, we aimed to review and synthesize published HSUV estimates associated with cochlear implants. DESIGN We included observational or experimental studies reporting HSUV for adult patients (age ≥18 years) with at least moderate-profound sensorineural hearing loss in both ears who received unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 1, 2021. Study and participant characteristics and HSUV outcomes were extracted. Narrative synthesis is reported for all studies. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to generate pooled estimates for the mean difference in HSUV for three comparisons: (1) unilateral cochlear implant versus preimplant, (2) bilateral cochlear implants versus preimplant, (3) bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants. Our principal measure was pooled mean difference in HSUV. RESULTS Thirty-six studies reporting unique patient cohorts were identified. Health Utilities Index, 3 (HUI-3) was the most common HSUV elicitation method. HSUV from 19 preimplant mean estimates (1402 patients), 19 unilateral cochlear implant mean estimates (1701 patients), and 5 bilateral cochlear implants mean estimates (83 patients) were pooled to estimate mean differences in HUI-3 HSUV by network meta-analysis. Compared with preimplant, a unilateral cochlear implant was associated with a mean change in HSUV of +0.17 (95% credible interval [CrI] +0.12 to +0.23) and bilateral cochlear implants were associated with a mean change of +0.25 (95% CrI +0.12 to +0.37). No significant difference in HSUV was detected for bilateral compared with unilateral cochlear implants (+0.08 [95% CrI -0.06 to +0.21]). Overall study quality was moderate. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this review and network meta-analysis comprise the best-available resource for parameterization of cost-utility models of cochlear implantation in adults and highlight the need to critically evaluate the validity of available HSUV instruments for bilateral cochlear implant populations.Protocol registration: PROSPERO (CRD42018091838).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter R Dixon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Justin Shapiro
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
| | - George Tomlinson
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, Toronto, Canada
| | - Justin Cottrell
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Justin T Lui
- Section of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Lindsey Falk
- Evidence, Development and Standards, Health Quality Ontario
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Joseph M Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Olze H, Ketterer MC, Péus D, Häußler SM, Hildebrandt L, Gräbel S, Szczepek AJ. Effects of auditory rehabilitation with cochlear implant on tinnitus prevalence and distress, health-related quality of life, subjective hearing and psychological comorbidities: Comparative analysis of patients with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL), double-sided (bilateral) deafness (DSD), and single-sided (unilateral) deafness (SSD). Front Neurol 2023; 13:1089610. [PMID: 36712436 PMCID: PMC9877424 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1089610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Auditory rehabilitation with a cochlear implant (CI), in many cases, positively impacts tinnitus. However, it is unclear if the tinnitus-related benefit of CI is equal for patients with various indications for CI. Therefore, this study aimed to determine differences in tinnitus prevalence and distress, health-related quality of life, subjective hearing, perceived stress, and psychological comorbidities between patients diagnosed with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL), single-sided (unilateral) deafness (SSD), and double-sided (bilateral) deafness (DSD) before and six months after cochlear implantation. Methods One hundred-one CI candidates were included in this prospective study (39 AHL patients, 23 DSD patients, and 39 SSD patients). The patients completed questionnaires measuring tinnitus distress, health-related quality of life, subjective hearing, perceived stress, and psychological comorbidities before and 6 months after CI. Results The prevalence of tinnitus in the entire cohort (80.2% before CI) decreased 6 months after CI to 71.3%. The DSD group had the lowest tinnitus prevalence at both time points. The degree of tinnitus-induced distress decreased significantly in all three groups after CI. Differences in quality of life, subjective hearing, and psychological comorbidities between the groups at the study onset disappeared after CI. Significant correlations existed between anxiety, depression, and tinnitus distress in AHL and SSD but not in DSD patients before and after CI. Discussion Our results demonstrate significant differences between the three groups of CI candidates, which might affect the implantation outcome. These differences suggest a need for personalized psychological counseling during the auditory rehabilitation process, focusing on anxiety and depressive symptoms for SSD and AHL patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Olze
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany,*Correspondence: Heidi Olze ✉
| | - Manuel Christoph Ketterer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dominik Péus
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Sophia Marie Häußler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Skull Base Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lynn Hildebrandt
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Gräbel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Agnieszka J. Szczepek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mazurek B, Hesse G, Sattel H, Kratzsch V, Lahmann C, Dobel C. S3 Guideline: Chronic Tinnitus : German Society for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery e. V. (DGHNO-KHC). HNO 2022; 70:795-827. [PMID: 36227338 PMCID: PMC9581878 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-022-01207-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit Mazurek
- Tinnituszentrum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Gerhard Hesse
- Tinnitus-Klinik, KH Bad Arolsen, Große Allee 50, 34454, Bad Arolsen, Germany.
- Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
| | - Heribert Sattel
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Technical University of Munich, Langerstr. 3, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Volker Kratzsch
- Abt. Hörbehinderung, Tinnitus und Schwindelerkrankungen, VAMED Rehaklinik Bad Grönenbach, Sebastian-Kneipp-Allee 3-5, 87730, Bad Grönenbach, Germany
| | - Claas Lahmann
- Klinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Hauptstr. 8, 79104, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Dobel
- Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alzahrani L, Sereda M, Chamouton CS, Haider H, Dewey RS, Hoare DJ. Experience of tinnitus in adults who have severe-to-profound hearing loss: A scoping review. Front Neurol 2022; 13:1004059. [DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1004059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundTinnitus is defined as the subjective perception of sound in the absence of an external stimulus, and tinnitus disorder becomes relevant when it is associated with emotional distress, cognitive dysfunction, and/or autonomic arousal. Hearing loss is recognized as the main risk factor for the pathogenesis of tinnitus. However, clinical guidelines for tinnitus disorder provide little direction for those who have severe-to-profound hearing loss including those who are pre-lingually Deaf. The aim of this scoping review was to catalogue what is known from the existing literature regarding the experience and management of tinnitus in adults who have a severe-to-profound hearing loss.SummaryA scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews. Records were included if they reported an evaluation of tinnitus in adults who had severe-to-profound hearing loss. The online databases Ovid (MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO), CINAHL, ProQuest, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched using the search terms ‘tinnitus’ (as a MESH term) and ‘deaf’ OR ‘profound hearing loss. Thirty-five records met the inclusion criteria for this review and were cataloged according to three major themes: Impact of tinnitus in deaf adults; Primary treatment of tinnitus in deaf adults; and Cochlear implant studies where tinnitus was a secondary outcome. Tinnitus symptom severity was assessed before and after intervention using tinnitus validated questionnaires in 29 records, with six further records using other assessment tools to measure tinnitus severity. Participants using cochlear implants were included in 30 studies. Medication, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), electrical promontory stimulation, and behavioral self-control therapy were each reported in single records.Key messagesThis scoping review cataloged the experience, assessment, and treatment of tinnitus in adults who have severe-to-profound hearing loss. It is shown that there is very limited research reported in this field. Although this review included many records, most focused on the provision of cochlear implants for severe-to-profound hearing loss, with assessment and measurement of tinnitus as a baseline or secondary outcome. Largely missing in the literature are empirical studies that seek firstly to understand the nature of the experience of tinnitus by people with no or little residual access to external sound.
Collapse
|
11
|
Assouly KKS, Arts RAGJ, Graham PL, van Dijk B, James CJ. Influence of tinnitus annoyance on hearing-related quality of life in cochlear implant recipients. Sci Rep 2022; 12:14423. [PMID: 36002556 PMCID: PMC9402917 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18823-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Tinnitus is a common symptom in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. There is no clear evidence of the influence of tinnitus on hearing-related quality of life (QoL) in this population. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between hearing-related QoL measured by the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12) and tinnitus annoyance or perceived change in tinnitus annoyance after cochlear implantation. The study sample consisted of 2322 implanted adults across France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Information relating to QoL measured using the SSQ12 and tinnitus annoyance and change in tinnitus annoyance, assessed using single-item questions, were collected one or more years post-implantation. The relationship between SSQ12 score and tinnitus annoyance or change in tinnitus annoyance was analysed using linear models adjusted for age and unilateral versus bilateral implants. Tukey pairwise tests were used to compare mean SSQ12 scores across levels of tinnitus annoyance and changes. Tinnitus prevalence was 33.9% post-implantation. Recipients with tinnitus had a significantly lower SSQ12 score than recipients without tinnitus. SSQ scores varied significantly with tinnitus annoyance, age and unilateral versus bilateral implants. Overall, CI recipients who experienced less bothersome tinnitus reported better hearing-related QoL. Healthcare professionals should be aware of the influence of tinnitus on CI recipients' hearing to manage patient expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly K S Assouly
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Cochlear Technology Centre Belgium, Mechelen, Belgium.
| | | | - Petra L Graham
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Bas van Dijk
- Cochlear Technology Centre Belgium, Mechelen, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cochlear Implantation Improves Both Speech Perception and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Prospective Follow-Up Study of Treatment Benefits among Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11082257. [PMID: 35456353 PMCID: PMC9032498 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11082257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implantation is considered the best treatment option for patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss for whom conventional hearing aids are insufficient. We used a repeated measures longitudinal approach to evaluate speech recognition and patient-reported outcomes after cochlear implantation in an unbiased cohort of Danish adult patients in a prospective cohort study. We assessed 39 recipients before and two times after implantation using a battery of tests that included Dantale I, the Danish Hearing in Noise Test, the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale. The study group improved significantly on all outcome measures following implantation. On average, Dantale I scores improved by 29 percentage points and Hearing in Noise Test scores improved by 22 percentage points. Most notably, the average Dantale score improved from 26 to 70% in the CI in quiet condition and from 12 to 42% in the cochlear implantation in noise condition when tested monaurally. Dantale demonstrated a significant positive correlation with Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire and Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale scores, while Hearing in Noise Test had no significant correlation with the patient-reported outcome measures. Patients improved significantly at 4 months and marginally improved further at 14 months, indicating that they were approaching a plateau. Our study’s use of audiometric and patient-reported outcome measures provides evidence of the treatment benefits of cochlear implantation in adults, which may help physicians advise patients on treatment decisions and align treatment benefit expectations, as well as serve as a foundation for the development of new cochlear implantation selection criteria.
Collapse
|
13
|
Long-term effects on the quality of life following cochlear implant treatment in older patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 279:5135-5144. [PMID: 35366712 PMCID: PMC9519647 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07354-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Even in older patients, hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant has become an established method for deafened or severely hearing-impaired patients. In addition to the hearing improvement, numerous other effects of CI treatment can be observed in clinical routine. In the literature, there is multiple evidence for a rapid and significant improvement in quality of life with CI treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of hearing rehabilitation using CI on the quality of life in older patients (≥ 65 years). Methods This prospective cross-sectional study examined 84 patients between the age of 65 and 101 years who received unilateral CI treatment for the first time between one and 10 years ago. The World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale-Old (WHOQL-OLD) was used to determine the quality of life. The study cohort was divided into three groups to compare the quality of life over time: group I (1–3 years after CI treatment), group II (4–6 years after CI treatment), and group III (7–10 years after CI treatment). In addition, the data from this study were compared with the results of our previous study (Issing et al. 2020) in which we focused on the first 6 months after CI treatment. Results In all three groups, there was a significant improvement in monosyllabic discrimination within 1 year after CI fitting (p > 0.001). No significant differences were found between the three groups. There were no significant differences between the three groups in the WHOQOL-OLD total score (p = 0.487) or any of the other six facets. Moreover, no significant differences were found compared to the study group of our previous study 6 months after CI treatment. Conclusion This study demonstrates the long-term stability of the improved quality of life following unilateral CI treatment in patients aged 65 years or older.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mazurek B, Hesse G, Dobel C, Kratzsch V, Lahmann C, Sattel H. Clinical practice guideline: Chronic tinnitus—diagnosis and treatment. DEUTSCHES ÄRZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2022; 119:219-225. [PMID: 35197187 PMCID: PMC9342131 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic tinnitus is a commonly occurring symptom of the auditory system. Epidemiological studies assume a lifetime prevalence in men and women of 3.5% for chronic tinnitus requiring treatment. Almost 25% of all Germans have experienced at least one episode of tinnitus. No causal therapy is yet available, but numerous treatment strategies are being pursued. Rigorous scientific assessment of these procedures is essential. METHODS For this exhaustive revision of the German clinical practice guideline, the literature in the medical databases PubMed and Cochrane Library, including existing guidelines from various countries, was systematically searched using keywords on the topic of chronic tinnitus. On the basis of the revised guideline, a separate guideline was written in language accessible to patients. RESULTS Chronic tinnitus is often associated with hearing loss, but the mental distress caused by the ear noise is another crucial element. Apart from expert counseling, the recommended treatment comprises psychotherapeutic interventions, particularly cognitive behavioral therapy (with effect sizes of 0.54 to 0.91 for reduction of the tinnitus-related distress), and measures to improve the hearing. There is insufficient evidence regarding the effects of drug treatment, sound and music therapy, and neuromodulation (magnetic stimulation or electrostimulation). CONCLUSION Alongside thorough and sound diagnosis and counseling, the principal treatment options for chronic tinnitus are specific cognitive behavioral therapy and expert psychotherapeutic interventions on an individual or group basis. Future-preferably interdisciplinary-research should evaluate the long-term effects of the treatment options, with particular attention to psychosomatic comorbidity.
Collapse
|
15
|
Jedrzejczak WW, Pilka E, Ganc M, Kochanek K, Skarzynski H. Ultra-High Frequency Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions for Detection of Hearing Loss and Tinnitus. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19042123. [PMID: 35206311 PMCID: PMC8872281 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Several studies have suggested that distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) may be an early marker not only of hearing loss (HL) but also of tinnitus. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether DPOAEs measured up to 16 kHz are affected by the presence of tinnitus. Pure tone thresholds and DPOAEs were measured in two groups: 55 patients with tinnitus and 63 subjects without tinnitus. The subjects were divided into three groups according to their audiometric results-better than 25 dB HL at all tested frequencies from 0.125 to 16 kHz, better than 25 dB up to 8 kHz, and hearing impaired. Receiver operator characteristics (ROCs) were used to test whether DPOAEs could differentiate between normal hearing, hearing loss, and tinnitus. Comparison of tinnitus subjects with the control group, matched accurately according to thresholds, did not yield any significant difference in DPOAEs. However, in both these groups hearing loss was accompanied by a decrease in DPOAEs, specifically, at 2-6 kHz and 16 kHz. The results suggest that any decrease in DPOAEs seems to be related only to hearing loss and there is no additional effect from tinnitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W. Wiktor Jedrzejczak
- Department of Experimental Audiology, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland; (E.P.); (M.G.)
- World Hearing Center, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, 05-830 Nadarzyn, Poland; (K.K.); (H.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-22-356-0-384
| | - Edyta Pilka
- Department of Experimental Audiology, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland; (E.P.); (M.G.)
- World Hearing Center, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, 05-830 Nadarzyn, Poland; (K.K.); (H.S.)
| | - Malgorzata Ganc
- Department of Experimental Audiology, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland; (E.P.); (M.G.)
- World Hearing Center, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, 05-830 Nadarzyn, Poland; (K.K.); (H.S.)
| | - Krzysztof Kochanek
- World Hearing Center, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, 05-830 Nadarzyn, Poland; (K.K.); (H.S.)
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Henryk Skarzynski
- World Hearing Center, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, 05-830 Nadarzyn, Poland; (K.K.); (H.S.)
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngosurgery, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yuen E, Ma C, Nguyen SA, Meyer TA, Lambert PR. The Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Tinnitus and Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:1113-1122. [PMID: 33973951 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To ascertain the effect of cochlear implantation (CI) on tinnitus and quality of life. DATABASES SOURCES PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched through August 21, 2020. Search strategies used a combination of subject headings (e.g., MeSH in PubMed) and keywords for the following two concepts: cochlear implantation and tinnitus. STUDY SELECTION English articles reporting on pre-intervention tinnitus-related patient-reported outcome measures (e.g., Tinnitus Handicap Inventory [THI], Tinnitus Questionnaire [TQ], Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] for loudness) and quality of life measures (e.g., Nijmegen Cochlear Implantation Questionnaire [NCIQ] and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]) for CI recipients were included. DATA EXTRACTION Demographics, baseline, and follow-up data. DATA SYNTHESIS Total of 27 articles reporting on 1,285 patients (mean age 54.5 years, range 14-81) were included. Meta-analysis of all tinnitus-related measures demonstrated improvement following implantation, with a mean difference of -23.2 [95% CI: -28.8 to -17.7], -12.6 [95% CI: -17.5 to -7.8], and -4.5 [95% CI: -5.5 to -3.4] (p < 0.05 for all) for THI, TQ, and VAS, respectively. NCIQ increased by 12.2 points [95% CI: 8.2-16.2] (p < 0.05), indicating improved quality of life among CI recipients. Psychological comorbidities were also ameliorated, as evidenced by reductions in HADS depression (-1.7 [95% CI: -2.4 to -0.9]) and anxiety (-1.3 [95% CI: -2.1 to -0.5]) (p < 0.05 for both) scores. CONCLUSION Following CI, patients reported significant improvement in tinnitus via several validated questionnaires. Additional benefits include improved quality of life and reduction in psychological comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erick Yuen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jiménez-Arberas E, Díez E. Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices and Other Technologies on Deaf and Hard of Hearing People. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18147259. [PMID: 34299710 PMCID: PMC8303859 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18147259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Revised: 07/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Deaf and hard of hearing people use a variety of assistive devices and technologies as a strategy to mitigate, counter or compensate for life difficulties resulting from hearing loss. Although outcome measures are commonly used with hearing aids, few studies have explored the perceived psychosocial impact of other assistive devices and technologies or the factors leading to their abandonment or lack of use. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to assess the psychosocial impact of different assistive devices on deaf and hard of hearing people using the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale. The sample was made up of 291 individuals, 176 women and 115 men, with an average age of 56.12 years (standard deviation (SD) = 25.11), who were all users of different assistive devices. Overall, the results of the study showed that the use of assistive devices had a positive psychosocial impact, although this impact varied slightly depending on the specific type of device. Moreover, a relationship was identified between the psychosocial impact and the probability of future abandonment of a hearing aid or a cochlear implant. The results point to the importance of considering the psychosocial impact derived from the use of a device as a relevant variable in the adoption process of assistive technologies for deaf and hard of hearing people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estíbaliz Jiménez-Arberas
- Faculty Padre Ossó (Asociated Center of the University of Oviedo), Degree in Occupational Therapy, University of Oviedo, 33008 Oviedo, Spain;
| | - Emiliano Díez
- Institute for Community Inclusion (INICO), University of Salamanca, 37005 Salamanca, Spain
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Explore patient characteristics associated with tinnitus improvement after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Tertiary referral. PATIENTS Adults with bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss and tinnitus. INTERVENTIONS Unilateral cochlear implantation. RESULTS From 1996 to 2018, 358 patients endorsed pre-implant tinnitus and had ascertainable tinnitus status at 1-year. Clinically significant improvement in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) (reduction by at least 7-points) was observed in 262 (73.2%) patients, of whom 155 (59.2%) reported complete resolution. Of the 24 characteristics explored, four were identified as independent predictors of improved tinnitus in logistic regression models. In a multivariable model including identified independent predictors, each 10-percentage point increase in baseline hearing in noise test was associated with an 14% reduction in odds of tinnitus resolution or clinically significant improvement (odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% confidence limits [CL] 0.77, 0.96) and preoperative use of a hearing aid in the contralateral ear was associated with a 72% reduction (OR 0.28; 95% CL 0.11, 0.73). Each 10-point increase in baseline Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHI) score was associated with a 28% increase in odds of tinnitus improvement (OR 1.28; 95% CL 1.07, 1.54). Higher baseline burden of tinnitus was associated with higher odds of tinnitus improvement (OR 1.21 per 10-point THI increase, 95% CL 1.04, 1.40). CONCLUSIONS Worse residual hearing and higher baseline hearing and tinnitus handicap are associated with higher odds of tinnitus improvement. Expectations of patients seeking reduced tinnitus burden following cochlear implantation should be managed by counselling regarding odds of tinnitus improvement compared to those with similar residual hearing and tinnitus burden.
Collapse
|
19
|
Opperman E, le Roux T, Masenge A, Eikelboom RH. The effect of tinnitus on hearing-related quality of life outcomes in adult cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol 2020; 60:246-254. [PMID: 33100038 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1828633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the effect of tinnitus distress on the hearing-related quality of life (QoL) outcomes over time in adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients. DESIGN A retrospective, longitudinal study of adult CI recipients was conducted. Hearing-related QoL and tinnitus distress were assessed using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and the Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire (TRQ) preoperatively and at 6-months, 12-months and >24-month postoperatively. The association between tinnitus distress and hearing-related QoL outcomes over time was investigated. Furthermore, 13 potential predictive factors were identified from the retrospective dataset. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify variables that influence hearing-related QoL outcomes over time. STUDY SAMPLE The study sample included 210 adult (≥18 years) CI recipients implanted between 2001 and 2017. RESULTS Lower tinnitus distress and younger age at implantation were significant predictors of better hearing-related QoL in adult CI recipients. A significant reduction in tinnitus distress up to two years post-implantation was found, as well as greater tinnitus distress correlating with poorer hearing-related QoL outcomes. CONCLUSION Tinnitus distress negatively affects the hearing-related QoL outcomes of adult CI recipients. Tinnitus distress and age at implantation were found to be significant predictors of hearing-related QoL when controlling for other predictive factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elmien Opperman
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa
| | - Talita le Roux
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa
| | - Andries Masenge
- Department of Statistics, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa
| | - Robert H Eikelboom
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa.,Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,Ear Sciences Centre, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Assouly KKS, van Heteren JAA, Stokroos RJ, Stegeman I, Smit AL. Cochlear implantation for patients with tinnitus - A systematic review. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2020; 260:27-50. [PMID: 33637223 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cochlear implantation (CI) is used in patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss when hearing aids provide limited or no benefit for speech perception. Studies on this topic reported tinnitus reduction as a common side effect of the electrical activation after cochlear implantation. So far, it is unclear what the effect is when patients do receive their implant primarily because of tinnitus complaints. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of the electrical stimulation with a cochlear implant in patients with tinnitus as a primary complaint, by systematically reviewing the literature. METHODS Two independent authors identified studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Original studies reporting outcomes of electrical stimulation by cochlear implantation for primarily tinnitus (defined as severe or incapacitating distress levels) were included, if they reported a follow-up of at least three months. The pre- and post-implantation tinnitus distress scores on single and/or multi-item questionnaires of the included studies were extracted. RESULTS In total, 4091 unique articles were retrieved. After screening titles, abstracts and full texts, we included seven prospective cohort studies (105 subjects in total, range: 10-26). All studies had considerable risks of bias. All tinnitus patients in the included studies had asymmetrical hearing loss or single-sided deafness. A statistically significant tinnitus distress improvement based on tinnitus questionnaire scores was found in every study. CONCLUSION Our systematic review reveals that electrical stimulation by cochlear implants in patients with a primary complaint of tinnitus has a positive impact on tinnitus distress. Nevertheless, only small sample sizes were found and studies showed considerable risks of bias.a.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly K S Assouly
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical and Experimental Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Cochlear Technology Center, Mechelen, Belgium.
| | - Jan A A van Heteren
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical and Experimental Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Stokroos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical and Experimental Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Stegeman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical and Experimental Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adriana L Smit
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical and Experimental Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Elarbed A, Fackrell K, Baguley DM, Hoare DJ. Tinnitus and stress in adults: a scoping review. Int J Audiol 2020; 60:171-182. [PMID: 33000672 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1827306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Tinnitus and stress are recurrently reported together. The strength and direction of this relationship is not clear. The aim of this review is to catalogue the evidence of this relationship, how it has been described in adults and which instruments were used. DESIGN Five-stage framework was followed. An online search of databases and published journals were conducted. The main inclusion criteria were original studies published in English and conducted in an adult human population, in which both tinnitus and stress were measured using different instruments. STUDY SAMPLES 5699 records were identified in the searching stage and 50 studies were eligible for data extraction. RESULTS Measurements of perceived stress were most frequently used. Tinnitus patients tend to report louder and more bothersome tinnitus when they are stressed, but not all tinnitus patients associated stress with the onset or the severity of their tinnitus. Any positive correlation reported between stress and tinnitus levels varied in strength according to the used instrument. Post-intervention changes in stress and tinnitus levels showed inconsistency. CONCLUSION There is considerable room for further research to study the relationship between stress and tinnitus. We highlight principal issues that should be considered in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asma Elarbed
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK.,Hearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kathryn Fackrell
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK.,Hearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David M Baguley
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK.,Hearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Derek J Hoare
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK.,Hearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Issing C, Baumann U, Pantel J, Stöver T. [Hearing rehabilitation using a cochlear implant - a way of reducing tinnitus in the elderly]. Laryngorhinootologie 2020; 100:285-290. [PMID: 32575139 DOI: 10.1055/a-1190-4992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tinnitus is a common symptom of severe hearing loss or deafness especially in older people. Hearing rehabilitation for these patients is usually only possible with a cochlear implant (CI). In recent years, an increasing number of old and very old patients have been treated with a CI. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of hearing rehabilitation with a CI on the tinnitus of older people. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective study 34 patients between the age of 65 and 86 were included, who were unilaterally treated with a CI for the first time. 16 patients (47.1 %) had tinnitus preoperatively. At three time points (preoperative, on initial fitting and six months postoperatively), tinnitus severity was assessed in addition to speech discrimination in patients with tinnitus using the mini-tinnitus questionnaire (Mini-TF12). RESULTS Six month postoperatively we found a highly significant improvement of speech discrimination (preoperatively 11.5 ± 17.4, six-month visit 54.4 ± 28.1 %, p = 0.001) that was accompanied by a highly significant reduction in tinnitus severity according to Mini-TF12 scores (preoperatively 6.9 ± 6.5, six-month visit 4.3 ± 3.3, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Hearing rehabilitation by means of CI leads to a highly significant reduction of tinnitus severity of pre-operatively existing tinnitus in the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Issing
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Uwe Baumann
- Audiologische Akustik, Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Johannes Pantel
- Arbeitsbereich Altersmedizin, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Timo Stöver
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Binaural Hearing Rehabilitation Improves Speech Perception, Quality of Life, Tinnitus Distress, and Psychological Comorbidities. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:e563-e574. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
24
|
Hoffmann KP, Ruff R, Droste W, Rupp R, Olze H, Kneist W, Schiemer JF, Kruger T, Somerlik-Fuchs KH, Gottschalk M, Kostelnik J, Schreivogel A. Technical, Medical and Ethical Challenges in Networks of Smart Active Implants. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2020; 2019:1484-1487. [PMID: 31946174 DOI: 10.1109/embc.2019.8856977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Networks of distributed interactive micro-implants could enhance the treatment of otoneurological conditions such as tinnitus or restore impaired complex physiological/ motor functions such as gastrointestinal motility or grasping. For this, an electrical stimulation of neural and muscular tissue is a key prerequisite. Challenges in the development of such interactive micro-implants are the complex human-machine interface, the wireless power supply, and the long-term stability of implants as well as secure and safe signal transmission. This paper addresses all these topics as well as the ethical, legal and social implications of smart implant networks in general. First achievements of the German innovation cluster INTAKT will be presented.
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
The relevance of assessing cognitive functioning is increasing against the background of the continuing demographic changes. Up to a few years ago the focus was on the effects of cochlear implantation in children born deaf in comparison to healthy individuals. Currently, the question arises whether hearing rehabilitation in the elderly, e.g. by postlingual cochlear implantation, has a protective effect on cognitive functioning and therefore on the risk of onset of dementia. This review describes the association of cognitive functioning with hearing disorders and cochlear implantation. Historical aspects of intelligence testing are illustrated. Knowledge on cognitive aspects in elderly persons with hearing disorders and cochlear implants is rare in the currently available literature. Initial findings indicate a positive correlation between hearing improvement and cognitive functioning. Further studies are urgently required in order to elucidate appropriate guidelines for the treatment of patients with cognitive deficits and hearing impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Knopke
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - H Olze
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.,Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte, Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Age-Dependent Psychological Factors Influencing the Outcome of Cochlear Implantation in Elderly Patients. Otol Neurotol 2019; 40:e441-e453. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
27
|
Kloostra F, Verbist J, Hofman R, Free R, Arnold R, van Dijk P. A Prospective Study of the Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Tinnitus. Audiol Neurootol 2019; 23:356-363. [DOI: 10.1159/000495132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous studies have shown diverse and sometimes even contrary results concerning the effect of cochlear implantation on tinnitus and the factors that can influence this effect. The aim of this prospective questionnaire study was to determine the effects of cochlear implantation on tinnitus and explore which factors can influence the effect of cochlear implantation on tinnitus. Forty-four of the patients implanted in our hospital returned 2 questionnaire packages, i.e., one before the cochlear implantation and one 6 months after implantation. Before implantation, 66% of the patients experienced tinnitus. This study shows that cochlear implantation could help to reduce tinnitus and the tinnitus handicap in at least 28% of the patients with preoperative tinnitus. In 72% of the patients the tinnitus remained after implantation. None of the patients developed tinnitus after implantation. A shorter duration of tinnitus prior to implantation, a more fluctuating type of tinnitus, a higher tinnitus handicap prior to implantation, and a round-window surgical approach might have a positive influence on the effect of cochlear implantation on tinnitus, but further research is necessary to confirm these findings.
Collapse
|
28
|
Kloostra FJJ, Arnold R, Hofman R, Burgerhof JGM, van Dijk P. Models to predict positive and negative effects of cochlear implantation on tinnitus. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2018; 4:138-142. [PMID: 30828631 PMCID: PMC6383300 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Revised: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The effect of cochlear implantation on tinnitus is heterogeneous: implantation does not always reduce tinnitus and may even worsen tinnitus. Therefore, it is important to know which factors influence the consequences of cochlear implantation for tinnitus. To date, no consensus has been reached regarding the factors that influence tinnitus. This study aimed to create prognostic models, using binary logistic regression analyses to predict positive or negative changes in tinnitus after cochlear implantation. Methods For this study we retrospectively sent two questionnaire packages to 117 cochlear implant patients. Results In the binary logistic regression analyses of the responses to the questionnaires, it was not possible to create a significant model to predict a positive effect of cochlear implantation on tinnitus. However, a negative effect of cochlear implantation on tinnitus was predictable, using a backward stepwise selection method in a model including the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ) (P < .001, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.529). Conclusions Our results suggest that the lower the preoperative tinnitus handicap and the preoperative hearing handicap, the higher the chance that cochlear implantation will worsen tinnitus. More research needs to be done, preferable in a big prospective study, to make this model instrumental for clinical decision making and preoperative patient counselling. However, our results might suggest that preoperative THQ and APHAB screening could be meaningful. Especially in patients who are afraid to develop tinnitus or tinnitus worsening as complication of cochlear implantation. Level of Evidence 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F J J Kloostra
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery University Medical Center Groningen Groningen the Netherlands
| | - R Arnold
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery University Medical Center Groningen Groningen the Netherlands
| | - R Hofman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery University Medical Center Groningen Groningen the Netherlands
| | - J G M Burgerhof
- Department of Epidemiology University Medical Center Groningen Groningen the Netherlands
| | - P van Dijk
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery University Medical Center Groningen Groningen the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Asymmetric hearing loss and the benefit of cochlear implantation regarding speech perception, tinnitus burden and psychological comorbidities: a prospective follow-up study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 275:2683-2693. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-5135-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 09/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
30
|
Tyler RS, Owen RL, Bridges J, Gander PE, Perreau A, Mancini PC. Tinnitus Suppression in Cochlear Implant Patients Using a Sound Therapy App. Am J Audiol 2018; 27:316-323. [PMID: 30105356 DOI: 10.1044/2018_aja-17-0105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of acoustic stimuli to reduce the prominence of tinnitus has been used for decades. Counseling and tinnitus sound therapy options are not currently widespread for cochlear implant (CI) users. The goal of this study was to determine whether tinnitus therapy sounds created for individuals with acoustic hearing may also benefit CI users. METHOD Sixteen sounds from the ReSound Relief app (Version 3.0) were selected for the study. Sixteen participants were asked to rate the overall acceptability of each sound and to write the description of the sound they perceived. Sounds were streamed from an Apple™ iPod (6th generation) to the CI using a Cochlear™ Wireless Mini Microphone 2+. Thirteen participants then completed a 5-min trial where they rated their pretrial and posttrial tinnitus and the acceptability of a subset of preferred sounds. Ten out of these 13 participants completed a 2-week home trial with a preferred sound after which they answered an online tinnitus questionnaire and rated the effectiveness of the sound therapy. RESULTS Individual differences were large. Results from the 5-min trial showed that sounds perceived as rain, music, and waves were rated the most acceptable. For all of the participants, the posttrial tinnitus loudness rating was lower than the pretrial rating, with some participants experiencing greater difference in their tinnitus loudness than others. At the end of the 2-week home trial, 3 of 10 participants rated the effectiveness of sound therapy 70% or higher. CONCLUSION The results suggest that the use of tinnitus therapy sounds delivered through a CI can be acceptable and provides relief for some tinnitus sufferers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard S. Tyler
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City
| | - Rachael L. Owen
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City
| | | | - Phillip E. Gander
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City
| | - Ann Perreau
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Augustana College, Rock Island, IL
| | - Patricia C. Mancini
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Quality of life and cochlear implant: results in adults with postlingual hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 84:494-499. [PMID: 28728951 PMCID: PMC9449166 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Accepted: 06/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
32
|
Hoppe U, Hesse G. Hearing aids: indications, technology, adaptation, and quality control. GMS CURRENT TOPICS IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD AND NECK SURGERY 2017; 16:Doc08. [PMID: 29279726 PMCID: PMC5738937 DOI: 10.3205/cto000147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Hearing loss can be caused by a number of different pathological conditions. Some of them can be successfully treated, mainly by surgery, depending on the individual's disease process. However, the treatment of chronic sensorineural hearing loss with damaged cochlear structures usually needs hearing rehabilitation by means of technical amplification. During the last two decades tremendous improvements in hearing aid technology led to a higher quality of the hearing rehabilitation process. For example, due to sophisticated signal processing acoustic feedback could be reduced and hence open fitting options are available even for more subjects with higher degrees of hearing loss. In particular for high-frequency hearing loss, the use of open fitting is an option. Both the users' acceptance and the perceived sound quality were significantly increased by open fittings. However, we are still faced with a low level of readiness in many hearing impaired subjects to accept acoustic amplification. Since ENT specialists play a key-role in hearing aid provision, they should promote early hearing aid rehabilitation and include this in the counselling even in subjects with mild and moderate hearing loss. Recent investigations demonstrated the benefit of early hearing aid use in this group of patients since this may help to reduce subsequent damages as auditory deprivation, social isolation, development of dementia, and cognitive decline. For subjects with tinnitus, hearing aids may also support masking by environmental sounds and enhance cortical inhibition. The present paper describes the latest developments of hearing aid technology and the current state of the art for amplification modalities. Implications for both hearing aid indication and provision are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Hoppe
- Section of Audiology, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Erlangen, Germany
| | - Gerhard Hesse
- Tinnitus Department, Hospital of Bad Arolsen, University of Witten-Herdecke, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wang Q, Li JN, Lei GX, Chen DS, Wang WZ, Chen AT, Mong MD, Li S, Jiao QS, Yang SM. Interaction of tinnitus suppression and hearing ability after cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 2017. [PMID: 28641038 DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1336283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To study the postoperative impact of cochlear implants (CIs) on tinnitus, as well as the impact of tinnitus on speech recognition with CI switched on. METHODS Fifty-two postlingual deafened CI recipients (21 males and 31 females) were assessed using an established Tinnitus Characteristics Questionnaire and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) before and after cochlear implantation. The tinnitus loudness was investigated when CI was switched on and off in CI recipients with persistent tinnitus. The relation between tinnitus loudness and recipients' satisfaction of cochlear implantation was analyzed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) score. RESULTS With CI 'OFF', 42 CI recipients experienced tinnitus postimplant ipsilaterally and 44 contralaterally. Tinnitus was totally suppressed ipsilateral to the CI with CI 'ON' in 42.9%, partially suppressed in 42.9%, unchanged in 11.9% and aggravated in 2.4%. Tinnitus was totally suppressed contralaterally with CI 'ON' in 31.8% of CI recipients, partially suppressed in 47.7%, unchanged in 20.5%. Pearson correlation analysis showed that tinnitus loudness and the results of cochlear implant patients satisfaction was negatively correlated (r = .674, p < .001). CONCLUSION The study suggests six-month CI activation can be effective for suppressing tinnitus. The tinnitus loudness may affect patients' satisfaction with the use of CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Wang
- Auditory Implantation Center, Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Prevention and Treatment, Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Science, Ministry of Education, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Jia-Nan Li
- Auditory Implantation Center, Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Prevention and Treatment, Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Science, Ministry of Education, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Guan-Xiong Lei
- Auditory Implantation Center, Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Prevention and Treatment, Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Science, Ministry of Education, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Dai-Shi Chen
- Auditory Implantation Center, Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Prevention and Treatment, Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Science, Ministry of Education, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Wei-Ze Wang
- Auditory Implantation Center, Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Prevention and Treatment, Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Science, Ministry of Education, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Ai-Ting Chen
- Auditory Implantation Center, Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Prevention and Treatment, Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Science, Ministry of Education, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Meng-Di Mong
- Auditory Implantation Center, Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Prevention and Treatment, Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Science, Ministry of Education, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Sun Li
- Auditory Implantation Center, Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Prevention and Treatment, Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Science, Ministry of Education, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Qing-Shan Jiao
- Auditory Implantation Center, Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Prevention and Treatment, Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Science, Ministry of Education, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Shi-Ming Yang
- Auditory Implantation Center, Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Prevention and Treatment, Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Science, Ministry of Education, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Brüggemann P, Szczepek AJ, Klee K, Gräbel S, Mazurek B, Olze H. In Patients Undergoing Cochlear Implantation, Psychological Burden Affects Tinnitus and the Overall Outcome of Auditory Rehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci 2017; 11:226. [PMID: 28529479 PMCID: PMC5418338 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implantation (CI) is increasingly being used in the auditory rehabilitation of deaf patients. Here, we investigated whether the auditory rehabilitation can be influenced by the psychological burden caused by mental conditions. Our sample included 47 patients who underwent implantation. All patients were monitored before and 6 months after CI. Auditory performance was assessed using the Oldenburg Inventory (OI) and Freiburg monosyllable (FB MS) speech discrimination test. The health-related quality of life was measured with Nijmegen Cochlear implantation Questionnaire (NCIQ) whereas tinnitus-related distress was measured with the German version of Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ). We additionally assessed the general perceived quality of life, the perceived stress, coping abilities, anxiety levels and the depressive symptoms. Finally, a structured interview to detect mental conditions (CIDI) was performed before and after surgery. We found that CI led to an overall improvement in auditory performance as well as the anxiety and depression, quality of life, tinnitus distress and coping strategies. CIDI revealed that 81% of patients in our sample had affective, anxiety, and/or somatoform disorders before or after CI. The affective disorders included dysthymia and depression, while anxiety disorders included agoraphobias and unspecified phobias. We also diagnosed cases of somatoform pain disorders and unrecognizable figure somatoform disorders. We found a positive correlation between the auditory performance and the decrease of anxiety and depression, tinnitus-related distress and perceived stress. There was no association between the presence of a mental condition itself and the outcome of auditory rehabilitation. We conclude that the CI candidates exhibit high rates of psychological disorders, and there is a particularly strong association between somatoform disorders and tinnitus. The presence of mental disorders remained unaffected by CI but the degree of psychological burden decreased significantly post-CI. The implants benefitted patients in a number of psychosocial areas, improving the symptoms of depression and anxiety, tinnitus, and their quality of life and coping strategies. The prevalence of mental disorders in patients who are candidates for CI suggests the need for a comprehensive psychological and psychosomatic management of their treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Brüggemann
- Tinnitus Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlin, Germany
| | - Agnieszka J Szczepek
- Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlin, Germany
| | - Katharina Klee
- Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Gräbel
- Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlin, Germany
| | - Birgit Mazurek
- Tinnitus Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlin, Germany
| | - Heidi Olze
- Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Knopke S, Szczepek AJ, Häussler SM, Gräbel S, Olze H. Cochlear Implantation of Bilaterally Deafened Patients with Tinnitus Induces Sustained Decrease of Tinnitus-Related Distress. Front Neurol 2017; 8:158. [PMID: 28487670 PMCID: PMC5403821 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Tinnitus is a common symptom of hearing impairment. Patients who are bilaterally hard of hearing are often affected by tinnitus. However, they cannot undergo any of the standard tinnitus therapies, since they rely on hearing. Cochlear implantation (CI) used to treat severe hearing disabilities, such as bilateral hearing loss, was also shown to reduce tinnitus. Our goal was to determine if CI induces sustained reduction of tinnitus. We performed prospective, longitudinal analyses of tinnitus-related distress in a uniform group of bilaterally deafened patients after CI. Patients and Methods The homogenous sample consisted of 41 patients who met the inclusion criteria and were consecutively included in this study. The impact of unilateral CI on tinnitus-related distress, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and hearing abilities was studied with validated instruments. The follow-up appointments were scheduled at 6, 12, and 24 months after CI surgery. During the appointments, hearing abilities were estimated with monosyllabic Freiburg test, whereas the tinnitus-related distress, the HRQoL, and the subjective hearing were measured with standard questionnaires [Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), Nijmegen Cochlear Implantation Questionnaire, and Oldenburg Inventory, respectively]. Results Tinnitus-related distress decreased significantly from the mean TQ score of 35.0 (SD = 19.6) prior to surgery to the mean TQ = 27.54 (SD = 20.0) 6 months after surgery and remained sustained low until the end of follow-up period. In addition, CI significantly improved the hearing abilities and the HRQoL of all patients. Conclusion The results from our prospective study suggest that in a homogenous sample of bilaterally deafened, implanted patients who report having tinnitus prior to surgery, CI alone not only improves the hearing abilities but also significantly reduces the tinnitus-related distress and improves the HRQoL in a sustained way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Knopke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - University Hospital Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Agnieszka J Szczepek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - University Hospital Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sophia Marie Häussler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - University Hospital Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Gräbel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - University Hospital Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heidi Olze
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - University Hospital Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Richter K, Acker J, Miloseva L, Peter L, Niklewski G. Management of Chronic Tinnitus and Insomnia with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - a Combined Approach. Front Psychol 2017; 8:575. [PMID: 28484405 PMCID: PMC5399016 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
It has been estimated that up to 80% of people will experience symptoms of tinnitus over the courses of their lives, with rates of comorbid sleeping problems ranging from 50 to 77%. Because of a potential connection between tinnitus and sleep disorders as well as high rates of comorbid psychiatric disorders, interdisciplinary approaches to treatment seem to be the most efficient option. In this study, we present the case of a 53-year-old male patient, who started to experience symptoms of tinnitus at the age of 49, most likely caused by work-related stress. Over the course of his illness, the patient developed comorbid insomnia. He consulted us for treatment of both conditions and we developed a treatment plan with ten sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) followed by 10 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). We used the Tinnitus Fragebogen (TF) to assess the severity of the tinnitus, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) for depressive symptoms, and the WHO Well-being Index (WHO-5) for subjective well-being. Improvements could be achieved with regard to both diagnoses and the patient went from severe (48) to clinically negligible (12) TF scores, from minimal (BDI-II score 10) to no (0) depressive symptoms, and from just above critical (WHO-5 percentile 52) to above average (84) well-being. The combination of technological and psychological approaches to treat tinnitus and insomnia thus proved successful in this case. One may therefore conclude that rTMS may be considered an effective first therapeutic step for tinnitus treatment prior to CBT. To our knowledge this is the first published case in which rTMS and CBT were combined for tinnitus therapy. The approach proved successful since it led to a considerable increase in well-being and everyday functioning. To gauge the effect on a more general level, large-scale studies are still needed to cancel out potential placebo effects. Likewise, the importance of the order of the two treatments, and the possibility of using other therapies in combination with CBT to address certain tinnitus subtypes and different etiologies must be studied in greater detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kneginja Richter
- University Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Paracelsus Private Medical UniversityNuremberg, Germany.,Faculty of Social Sciences, Georg Simon Ohm University of Applied SciencesNuremberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine Sciences, Goce Delcev UniversityŠtip, Macedonia
| | - Jens Acker
- Clinic for Sleep Medicine ZurzachBad Zurzach, Switzerland
| | - Lence Miloseva
- Faculty of Medicine Sciences, Goce Delcev UniversityŠtip, Macedonia
| | - Lukas Peter
- University Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Paracelsus Private Medical UniversityNuremberg, Germany
| | - Günter Niklewski
- University Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Paracelsus Private Medical UniversityNuremberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine Sciences, Goce Delcev UniversityŠtip, Macedonia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pre- and post-operative dizziness, tinnitus, and taste disturbances among cochlear implant recipients. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2017; 131:309-315. [DOI: 10.1017/s0022215116010008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractObjective:To determine the pre- and post-operative prevalence of dizziness, tinnitus and taste disturbances in adult cochlear implant recipients.Methods:A questionnaire regarding pre- and post-operative dizziness, tinnitus and taste disturbances was sent to 170 cochlear implant recipients implanted between January 2003 and March 2009. Seventy-seven patients (41 per cent) responded.Results:Pre-operatively, 20 per cent of the participants experienced dizziness, 52 per cent experienced tinnitus and 3 per cent experienced taste disturbances. Post-operative dizziness developed in 46 per cent of patients and resolved in the majority of these; however, 15 per cent reported dizziness more than six months after implantation. Tinnitus worsened in 25 per cent of patients, whereas 73 per cent reported attenuation or termination of tinnitus. Post-operatively, tinnitus developed in 12 per cent and taste disturbances developed in 17 per cent of the patients.Conclusion:The high prevalence of dizziness, tinnitus and taste disturbances reported by cochlear implant recipients necessitates that assessment of symptoms related to inner ear and chorda tympani damage are included when evaluating operative results.
Collapse
|
38
|
Zenner HP, Delb W, Kröner-Herwig B, Jäger B, Peroz I, Hesse G, Mazurek B, Goebel G, Gerloff C, Trollmann R, Biesinger E, Seidler H, Langguth B. A multidisciplinary systematic review of the treatment for chronic idiopathic tinnitus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 274:2079-2091. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4401-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2016] [Accepted: 11/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
39
|
Hesse G. Evidence and evidence gaps in tinnitus therapy. GMS CURRENT TOPICS IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD AND NECK SURGERY 2016; 15:Doc04. [PMID: 28025604 PMCID: PMC5169077 DOI: 10.3205/cto000131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
A nearly endless number of procedures has been tried and in particular sold for the treatment of tinnitus, unfortunately they have not been evaluated appropriately in an evidence-based way. A causal therapy, omitting the tinnitus still does not exist, actually it cannot exist because of the various mechanisms of its origin. However or perhaps because of that, medical interventions appear and reappear like fashion trends that can never be proven by stable and reliable treatment success. This contribution will discuss and acknowledge all current therapeutic procedures and the existing or non-existing evidence will be assessed. Beside external evidence, the term of evidence also encompasses the internal evidence, i.e. the experience of the treating physician and the patient's needs shall be included. While there is no evidence for nearly all direct procedures that intend modulating or stimulating either the cochlea or specific cervical regions such as the auditory cortex, there are therapeutic procedures that are acknowledged in clinical practice and have achieved at least a certain degree of evidence and generate measurable effect sizes. Those are in particular habituation therapy and psychotherapeutic measures, especially if they are combined with concrete measures for improved audio perception (hearing aids, CI, hearing therapies).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerhard Hesse
- Tinnitus-Klinik, Bad Arolsen, Germany; University of Witten-Herdecke, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Gubbels SP, Gartrell BC, Ploch JL, Hanson KD. Can routine office-based audiometry predict cochlear implant evaluation results? Laryngoscope 2016; 127:216-222. [PMID: 27797418 DOI: 10.1002/lary.26066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Revised: 03/17/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS Determining cochlear implant candidacy requires a specific sentence-level testing paradigm in best-aided conditions. Our objective was to determine if findings on routine audiometry could predict the results of a formal cochlear implant candidacy evaluation. We hypothesize that findings on routine audiometry will accurately predict cochlear implant evaluation results in the majority of candidates. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective, observational, diagnostic study. METHODS The charts of all adult patients who were evaluated for implant candidacy at a tertiary care center from June 2008 through June 2013 were included. Routine, unaided audiologic measures (pure-tone hearing thresholds and recorded monosyllabic word recognition testing) were then correlated with best-aided sentence-level discrimination testing (using either the Hearing in Noise Test or AzBio sentences test). RESULTS The degree of hearing loss at 250 to 4,000 Hz and monosyllabic word recognition scores significantly correlated with sentence-level word discrimination test results. Extrapolating from this association, we found that 86% of patients with monosyllabic word recognition scores at or below 32% (or 44% for patients with private insurance) would meet candidacy requirements for cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS Routine audiometric findings can be used to identify patients who are likely to meet cochlear implant candidacy upon formal testing. For example, patients with pure-tone thresholds (250, 500, 1,000 Hz) of ≥75 dB and/or a monosyllabic word recognition test score of ≤40% have a high likelihood of meeting candidacy criteria. Utilization of these predictive patterns during routine audiometric evaluation may assist hearing health professionals in deciding when to refer patients for a formal cochlear implant evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 127:216-222, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel P Gubbels
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.,Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Brian C Gartrell
- Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.,Department of Family Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Jennifer L Ploch
- Department of Surgery, Division of Audiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Kevin D Hanson
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hall DA, Haider H, Szczepek AJ, Lau P, Rabau S, Jones-Diette J, Londero A, Edvall NK, Cederroth CR, Mielczarek M, Fuller T, Batuecas-Caletrio A, Brueggemen P, Thompson DM, Norena A, Cima RFF, Mehta RL, Mazurek B. Systematic review of outcome domains and instruments used in clinical trials of tinnitus treatments in adults. Trials 2016; 17:270. [PMID: 27250987 PMCID: PMC4888312 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1399-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2016] [Accepted: 05/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no evidence-based guidance to facilitate design decisions for confirmatory trials or systematic reviews investigating treatment efficacy for adults with tinnitus. This systematic review therefore seeks to ascertain the current status of trial designs by identifying and evaluating the reporting of outcome domains and instruments in the treatment of adults with tinnitus. METHODS Records were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE CINAHL, EBSCO, and CENTRAL clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN, ICTRP) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Eligible records were those published from 1 July 2006 to 12 March 2015. Included studies were those reporting adults aged 18 years or older who reported tinnitus as a primary complaint, and who were enrolled into a randomised controlled trial, a before and after study, a non-randomised controlled trial, a case-controlled study or a cohort study, and written in English. Studies with fewer than 20 participants were excluded. RESULTS Two hundred and twenty-eight studies were included. Thirty-five different primary outcome domains were identified spanning seven categories (tinnitus percept, impact of tinnitus, co-occurring complaints, quality of life, body structures and function, treatment-related outcomes and unclear or not specified). Over half the studies (55 %) did not clearly define the complaint of interest. Tinnitus loudness was the domain most often reported (14 %), followed by tinnitus distress (7 %). Seventy-eight different primary outcome instruments were identified. Instruments assessing multiple attributes of the impact of tinnitus were most common (34 %). Overall, 24 different patient-reported tools were used, predominantly the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (15 %). Loudness was measured in diverse ways including a numerical rating scale (8 %), loudness matching (4 %), minimum masking level (1 %) and loudness discomfort level (1 %). Ten percent of studies did not clearly report the instrument used. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate poor appreciation of the basic principles of good trial design, particularly the importance of specifying what aspect of therapeutic benefit is the main outcome. No single outcome was reported in all studies and there was a broad diversity of outcome instruments. PROSPERO REGISTRATION The systematic review protocol is registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews): CRD42015017525 . Registered on 12 March 2015 revised on 15 March 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah A Hall
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, UK.
- Otology and Hearing Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | - Haula Haider
- ENT Department of Hospital Cuf Infante Santo - Nova Medical School, Travessa do Castro 3, 1350-070, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Agnieszka J Szczepek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Charite University Hospital, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pia Lau
- Institute of Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital Münster, Malmedyweg 15, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - Sarah Rabau
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Julie Jones-Diette
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, UK
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Alain Londero
- Service ORL et CCF, Consultation Acouphène et Hyperacousie, Hôpital Européen G. Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Niklas K Edvall
- Experimental Audiology, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Von Eulers väg 8, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christopher R Cederroth
- Experimental Audiology, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Von Eulers väg 8, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marzena Mielczarek
- Department of Otolaryngology, Laryngological Oncology, Audiology and Phoniatrics, |Medical University of Lodz, 90-549 Lodz, 113 Zeromskiego Street, Lodz, Poland
| | - Thomas Fuller
- Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, PO Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Adelante, Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology, Zandbergsweg 111, 6432 CC, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands
| | - Angel Batuecas-Caletrio
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, IBSAL, University Hospital of Salamanca, Paseo San Vicente 58-182, 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Petra Brueggemen
- Tinnitus Center, Charite University Hospital, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dean M Thompson
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, UK
- Otology and Hearing Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Arnaud Norena
- Laboratory of Adaptive and Integrative Neuroscience, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fédération de Recherche 3C, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Rilana F F Cima
- Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, PO Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Adelante, Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology, Zandbergsweg 111, 6432 CC, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands
| | - Rajnikant L Mehta
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, UK
- Otology and Hearing Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Birgit Mazurek
- Tinnitus Center, Charite University Hospital, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Arts RAGJ, George ELJ, Janssen M, Griessner A, Zierhofer C, Stokroos RJ. Tinnitus Suppression by Intracochlear Electrical Stimulation in Single Sided Deafness - A Prospective Clinical Trial: Follow-Up. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0153131. [PMID: 27111333 PMCID: PMC4844154 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2015] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Earlier studies show that a Cochlear Implant (CI), capable of providing intracochlear electrical stimulation independent of environmental sounds, appears to suppress tinnitus at least for minutes. The current main objective is to compare the long-term suppressive effects of looped (i.e. repeated) electrical stimulation (without environmental sound perception) with the standard stimulation pattern of a CI (with environmental sound perception). This could open new possibilities for the development of a “Tinnitus Implant” (TI), an intracochlear pulse generator for the suppression of tinnitus. Materials and Methods Ten patients with single sided deafness suffering from unilateral tinnitus in the deaf ear are fitted with a CI (MED-EL Corporation, Innsbruck, Austria). Stimulation patterns are optimized for each individual patient, after which they are compared using a randomized crossover design, with a follow-up of six months, followed by a 3 month period using the modality of patient’s choice. Results Results show that tinnitus can be suppressed with intracochlear electrical stimulation independent of environmental sounds, even long term. No significant difference in tinnitus suppression was found between the standard clinical CI and the TI. Conclusion It can be concluded that coding of environmental sounds is no requirement for tinnitus suppression with intracochlear electrical stimulation. It is therefore plausible that tinnitus suppression by CI is not solely caused by an attention shift from the tinnitus to environmental sounds. Both the standard clinical CI and the experimental TI are potential treatment options for tinnitus. These findings offer perspectives for a successful clinical application of the TI, possibly even in patients with significant residual hearing. Trial Registration TrialRegister.nl NTR3374
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remo A. G. J. Arts
- Department of ENT/Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, MHeNS School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Erwin L. J. George
- Department of ENT/Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, MHeNS School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Miranda Janssen
- Department of ENT/Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, MHeNS School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Andreas Griessner
- Institute of Mechatronics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Clemens Zierhofer
- Institute of Mechatronics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Robert J. Stokroos
- Department of ENT/Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, MHeNS School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Knopke S, Gräbel S, Förster-Ruhrmann U, Mazurek B, Szczepek AJ, Olze H. Impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life and mental comorbidity in patients aged 80 years. Laryngoscope 2016; 126:2811-2816. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.25993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2015] [Revised: 02/10/2016] [Accepted: 02/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Knopke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-University Medical Center Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | - Stefan Gräbel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-University Medical Center Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | - Ulrike Förster-Ruhrmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-University Medical Center Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | - Birgit Mazurek
- Tinnitus Center, Campus Charité Mitte; Charité-University Medical Center Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | - Agnieszka J. Szczepek
- Tinnitus Center, Campus Charité Mitte; Charité-University Medical Center Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | - Heidi Olze
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-University Medical Center Berlin; Berlin Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Charité-University Medical Center Berlin; Berlin Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mulders WHAM, Spencer TC, Robertson D. Effects of pulsatile electrical stimulation of the round window on central hyperactivity after cochlear trauma in guinea pig. Hear Res 2016; 335:128-137. [PMID: 26970475 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2016] [Revised: 02/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Partial hearing loss induced by acoustic trauma has been shown in animal models to result in an increased spontaneous firing rate in central auditory structures. This so-called hyperactivity has been suggested to be involved in the generation of tinnitus, a phantom auditory sensation. Although there is no universal cure for tinnitus, electrical stimulation of the cochlea, as achieved by a cochlear implant, can result in significant reduction of the tinnitus percept. However, the mechanism by which this tinnitus suppression occurs is as yet unknown and furthermore cochlear implantation may not be an optimal treatment option for tinnitus sufferers who are not profoundly deaf. A better understanding of the mechanism of tinnitus suppression by electrical stimulation of the cochlea, may lead to the development of more specialised devices for those for whom a cochlear implant is not appropriate. This study aimed to investigate the effects of electrical stimulation in the form of brief biphasic shocks delivered to the round window of the cochlea on the spontaneous firing rates of hyperactive inferior colliculus neurons following acoustic trauma in guinea pigs. Effects during the stimulation itself included both inhibition and excitation but spontaneous firing was suppressed for up to hundreds of ms after the cessation of the shock train in all sampled hyperactive neurons. Pharmacological block of olivocochlear efferent action on outer hair cells did not eliminate the prolonged suppression observed in inferior colliculus neurons, and it is therefore likely that activation of the afferent pathways is responsible for the central effects observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W H A M Mulders
- The Auditory Laboratory, School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia.
| | - T C Spencer
- The Auditory Laboratory, School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia
| | - D Robertson
- The Auditory Laboratory, School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
The cochlear implant became a very successful method of hearing rehabilitation for patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss. The benefits of the CI extend beyond the medical success and positively influence social and psychosocial areas, reflected by an improved HRQoL. Furthermore, variety of studies demonstrated that the tinnitus severity improves in 46-95 % of cases following the cochlear implantation. However, the parameters investigated in such studies are not always standardized or addressed by validated questionnaires, which explains the high outcome variation between the studies. The relationships between HRQoL and tinnitus distress before and after cochlear implantation have not been well studied. Nevertheless, it is believed that the improvement in HRQoL following CI affects particularly tinnitus.However, an existing tinnitus can also worsen or occur for the first time after the surgery. Since neither tinnitus frequency nor tinnitus loudness correlate with the tinnitus-induced distress, the measurement of HRQoL, distress factors, stress reactions and psychiatric comorbidities appears to be the meaningful assessment of positive or negative effects of CI on tinnitus.Initial studies demonstrated that also patients with unilateral hearing loss may benefit from CI supply, as shown by an improvement in HRQoL and reduction of tinnitus-induced distress. For those patients, who despite CI implantation experience severe tinnitus, there is an option of tinnitus-specific CI-fitting and tinnitus-specific therapy with psychosomatic and psychological approaches, and- in addition- a treatment of possible mental comorbidities.
Collapse
|
46
|
Arts R, Netz T, Janssen A, George E, Stokroos R. The occurrence of tinnitus after CI surgery in patients with severe hearing loss: A retrospective study. Int J Audiol 2015; 54:910-7. [DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1079930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
47
|
Tyler RS, Keiner AJ, Walker K, Deshpande AK, Witt S, Killian M, Ji H, Patrick J, Dillier N, van Dijk P, Lai WK, Hansen MR, Gantz B. A Series of Case Studies of Tinnitus Suppression With Mixed Background Stimuli in a Cochlear Implant. Am J Audiol 2015; 24:398-410. [PMID: 26001407 DOI: 10.1044/2015_aja-15-0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2015] [Accepted: 05/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Background sounds provided by a wearable sound playback device were mixed with the acoustical input picked up by a cochlear implant speech processor in an attempt to suppress tinnitus. METHOD First, patients were allowed to listen to several sounds and to select up to 4 sounds that they thought might be effective. These stimuli were programmed to loop continuously in the wearable playback device. Second, subjects were instructed to use 1 background sound each day on the wearable device, and they sequenced the selected background sounds during a 28-day trial. Patients were instructed to go to a website at the end of each day and rate the loudness and annoyance of the tinnitus as well as the acceptability of the background sound. Patients completed the Tinnitus Primary Function Questionnaire (Tyler, Stocking, Secor, & Slattery, 2014) at the beginning of the trial. RESULTS Results indicated that background sounds were very effective at suppressing tinnitus. There was considerable variability in sounds preferred by the subjects. CONCLUSION The study shows that a background sound mixed with the microphone input can be effective for suppressing tinnitus during daily use of the sound processor in selected cochlear implant users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jim Patrick
- Cochlear Limited, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Pim van Dijk
- University Medical Center, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Arts RAGJ, George ELJ, Griessner A, Zierhofer C, Stokroos RJ. Tinnitus Suppression by Intracochlear Electrical Stimulation in Single-Sided Deafness: A Prospective Clinical Trial - Part I. Audiol Neurootol 2015; 20:294-313. [PMID: 26227468 DOI: 10.1159/000381936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2014] [Accepted: 03/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implantation is a viable treatment option for tinnitus, but the underlying mechanism is yet unclear. Is the tinnitus suppression due to the reversal of the assumed maladaptive neuroplasticity or is it the shift in attention from the tinnitus to environmental sounds and therefore a reduced awareness that reduces tinnitus perception? In this prospective trial, 10 patients with single-sided deafness were fitted with a cochlear implant to investigate the effect of looped intracochlear electrical stimulation (i.e. stimulation that does not encode environmental sounds) on tinnitus, in an effort to find optimal stimulation parameters. Variables under investigation were: amplitude (perceived stimulus loudness), anatomical location inside the cochlea (electrode/electrodes), amplitude modulation, polarity (cathodic/anodic first biphasic stimulation) and stimulation rate. The results suggest that tinnitus can be reduced with looped electrical stimulation, in some cases even with inaudible stimuli. The optimal stimuli for tinnitus suppression appear to be subject specific. However, medium-to-loud stimuli suppress tinnitus significantly better than soft stimuli, which partly can be explained by the masking effect. Although the long-term effects on tinnitus would still have to be investigated and will be described in part II, intracochlear electrical stimulation seems a potential treatment option for tinnitus in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remo A G J Arts
- Department of ENT/Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ramakers GGJ, van Zon A, Stegeman I, Grolman W. The effect of cochlear implantation on tinnitus in patients with bilateral hearing loss: A systematic review. Laryngoscope 2015; 125:2584-92. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.25370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 03/31/2015] [Accepted: 04/14/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Geerte G. J. Ramakers
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; University Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht the Netherlands
- Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht the Netherlands
| | - Alice van Zon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; University Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht the Netherlands
- Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht the Netherlands
| | - Inge Stegeman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; University Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht the Netherlands
- Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht the Netherlands
| | - Wilko Grolman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; University Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht the Netherlands
- Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mistry D, Ryan J, Maessen H, Bance M. Differences in perception of hearing handicap between cochlear implant users and their spouses. Laryngoscope 2013; 124:1199-203. [PMID: 24114999 DOI: 10.1002/lary.24404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2013] [Revised: 07/19/2013] [Accepted: 08/26/2013] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To examine the relationship between patient and proxy ratings of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with cochlear implants. STUDY DESIGN Prospective survey. METHODS Eighty-two adult cochlear implant recipients and their spouses/partners were asked to complete the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) and the Hearing Participation Scale (HPS) that were mailed to them. RESULTS For the NCIQ, there were 38 useable responses from recipients and 31 useable responses from the partners. There were 27 paired and useable questionnaires (i.e., from both the recipient and his/her partner). For the HPS, there were 42 useable responses from recipients and 36 useable responses from the partners. Of these, there were 35 paired questionnaires. There was good agreement between partners and patients with both the HPS (r = 0.62) and the NCIQ (r = 0.80). There was a significant statistical difference in the scoring of the Basic Sound Perception subscale between the two groups (P = .039), with spouses under-rating performance in this subscale. CONCLUSIONS For patients with cochlear implants, patients' partners corroborate patients' self-reported HRQL. In cases in which patients have sensory impairment, there may be an additional role for proxy ratings of HRQL to give a more complete assessment of functional limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dipan Mistry
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|