The Fate of Cervical Dysplastic Lesions during Pregnancy and the Impact of the Delivery Mode: A Review

Cervical dysplasia, also referred to as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL), is the precursor lesion of cervical carcinoma. Therefore, its diagnosis is vital for early detection and inhibiting the development of cervical carcinogenesis. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common aetiology of cervical cancer and this infection mainly affects young women of childbearing age, thus affecting pregnant women as well. It is essential to know how CIN progresses in pregnant patients because the management of pregnant and non-pregnant patients is different (considering the safety of both mother and child in pregnancy). This review intends to highlight the studies which have assessed the rates of progression of CIN diagnosed in pregnancy throughout the antenatal period and the impact of the mode of delivery on CIN outcomes. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases for relevant articles. Many studies indicate that the rate of progression of these lesions is very slow during the tenure of pregnancy; many also report postpartum regression of these lesions. Thus, in most of these patients, management can be safely implemented in the postpartum period while just keeping them under observation in the antenatal period. However, patients with high-grade CIN have a higher chance of developing invasive cancer and, therefore, require careful monitoring. There is a dispute regarding the role of the mode of delivery in determining the fate of cervical dysplasia. While some studies supported vaginal births over caesarean sections, others did not find any difference between the two in defining the outcome of the dysplastic lesions.

Predictive Factors Involved in Postpartum Regressions of Cytological/Histological Cervical High-Grade Dysplasia Diagnosed during Pregnancy

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the evolution of high-grade cervical dysplasia during pregnancy and the postpartum period and to determine factors associated with dysplasia regression. Methods: Pregnant patients diagnosed with high-grade lesions were identified in our tertiary hospital center. High-grade lesions were defined either cytologically, by high squamous intraepithelial lesion/atypical squamous cells being unable to exclude HSIL (HSIL/ASC-H), or histologically, with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ (all CIN 2 and CIN 3) during pregnancy. Postpartum regression was defined cytologically or histologically by at least a one-degree reduction in severity from the antepartum diagnosis. A logistic regression model was applied to determine independent predictive factors for high-grade cervical dysplasia regression after delivery. Results: Between January 2000 and October 2017, 79 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. High-grade cervical lesions were diagnosed by cytology in 87% of cases (69/79) and confirmed by histology in 45% of those (31/69). The overall regression rate in our cohort was 43% (34/79). Univariate analysis revealed that parity (p = 0.04), diabetes (p = 0.04) and third trimester cytology (p = 0.009) were associated with dysplasia regression. Nulliparity (OR = 4.35; 95%CI = (1.03–18.42); p= 0.046) was identified by multivariate analysis as an independent predictive factor of high-grade dysplasia regression. The presence of HSIL on third-trimester cervical cytology (OR = 0.17; 95%CI = (0.04–0.72); p = 0.016) was identified as an independent predictive factor of high-grade dysplasia persistence at postpartum. Conclusion: Our regression rate was high, at 43%, for high-grade cervical lesions postpartum. Parity status may have an impact on dysplasia regression during pregnancy. A cervical cytology should be performed at the third trimester to identify patients at risk of CIN persistence after delivery. However, larger cohorts are required to confirm these results.

Natural history of histologically confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of estimates of the natural history of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) during pregnancy.

SETTING

Studies examining the clinical courses of histologically confirmed high-grade CIN during pregnancy.

PARTICIPANTS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Embase for eligible studies. Studies were included if they reported the data regarding the natural history of histologically confirmed high-grade CIN during pregnancy. Final estimates were from the meta-analysis of 10 eligible studies.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The regression rate, persistence rate and progression rate of histologically proven untreated high-grade CIN during pregnancy.

RESULTS

A total of 10 original studies were included in this meta-analysis. During pregnancy, the regression rate, persistence rate and progression rate of high-grade CIN were 40% (95% CI 35% to 45%), 59% (95% CI 54% to 64%) and 1% (95% CI 0% to 2%), respectively. There was moderate heterogeneity among the studies. The results of the subgroup meta-analysis show that the pooled rates of regression and persistence during pregnancy were 59% (95% CI 54% to 65%) and 40% (95% CI 35% to 45%) for CIN2, and 29% (95% CI 25% to 33%) and 70% (95% CI 65% to 73%) for CIN3.

CONCLUSIONS

During pregnancy, the majority of histologically confirmed high-grade CIN would be persistent or regressed to lower grade CIN or normal. However, it is still worth noting that a small percentage of high-grade CIN would progress to cervical cancer during pregnancy.

Comparison of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cytology in women using copper-containing and levonorgestrel-containing intrauterine devices

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether there is a difference in cervical cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection clearance between levonorgestrel- and copper-containing intrauterine device (IUD) users.

METHODS

The electronic medical record system was searched by the appropriate procedural code for IUD insertion for all patients undergoing IUD placement during the study period (January 31, 2005 to January 31, 2012). Patients who received treatment for cervical dysplasia, had their IUDs removed, or conceived during the study period were excluded. High-risk HPV and cervical cytology results immediately preceding and after IUD placement were obtained.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty patients had a copper-containing and 152 patients a levonorgestrel-containing IUD placed. The groups were comparable in terms of age, body mass index, duration of follow-up, and percentage of smokers. Sixty-six patients were high-risk HPV-positive before IUD insertion (30 in copper compared with 36 in the levonorgestrel IUD group, P=.4), and the groups had similar follow-up times (364.1±26.3 compared with 357.2±29.7 days, respectively, between the IUD placement and a repeat Pap test with high-risk HPV cotesting, P=.2). Of those, 21 (70%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 53.6-86.4%) cleared the infection after copper-containing IUD placement compared with 15 (42%; 95% CI 25.6-57.8%) in the levonorgestrel group (P=.04). There were only two (1.7%) new high-risk HPV infections in the copper compared with eight (6.9%) in the levonorgestrel group (P=.056).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that levonorgestrel-containing IUD could be associated with decreased high-risk HPV infection clearance and possibly increased acquisition compared with the copper-containing IUD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.