1
|
Tesfaye AA, Wang H, Hartley ML, He AR, Weiner L, Gabelia N, Kapanadze L, Shezad M, Brody JR, Marshall JL, Pishvaian MJ. A Pilot Trial of Molecularly Tailored Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. J Pancreat Cancer 2019; 5:12-21. [PMID: 31065624 PMCID: PMC6503449 DOI: 10.1089/pancan.2019.0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Despite the wide adoption of tumor molecular profiling, there is a dearth of evidence linking molecular biomarkers for treatment selection to prediction of treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. We initiated a pilot study to test the feasibility of designing a larger phase II trial of molecularly tailored treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: Our study aimed to assess the feasibility of following a treatment algorithm based on the expression of three published predictive markers of response to chemotherapy: ribonucleotide reductase catalytic subunit M1 (for gemcitabine); excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (for platinum agents); and thymidylate synthase (for 5-fluorouracil) in patients with untreated, metastatic pancreatic cancer. Results of the tumor biopsy analysis were used to assign patients to one of seven doublet regimens. Key secondary objectives included response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Between December 2012 and March 2015, 30 patients were enrolled into the study. Ten patients failed screening primarily due to inadequate tumor tissue availability. Of the remaining 20 patients, 19 were assigned into 6 different chemotherapy doublets, and achieved an RR of 28%, with a DCR rate of 78%. The median PFS and OS were 5.78 and 8.21 months, respectively. Conclusions: The incorporation of biomarkers into a treatment algorithm is feasible and resulted in a PFS and OS similar to other doublet therapies for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Based on the results from this pilot study, a larger phase II randomized trial of molecularly targeted therapy versus physicians' choice of standard of care has been initiated in the second-line setting (NCT02967770).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anteneh A Tesfaye
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Hongkun Wang
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Marion L Hartley
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Aiwu Ruth He
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Louis Weiner
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Nina Gabelia
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Lana Kapanadze
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Muhammad Shezad
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Jonathan R Brody
- Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John L Marshall
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Michael J Pishvaian
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hua J, Shi S, Liang D, Liang C, Meng Q, Zhang B, Ni Q, Xu J, Yu X. Current status and dilemma of second-line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer: is there a silver lining? Onco Targets Ther 2018; 11:4591-4608. [PMID: 30122951 PMCID: PMC6084072 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s166405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most lethal malignant diseases worldwide. The majority of patients present with advanced disease and, therefore, need palliative chemotherapy. Some chemotherapeutic regimens have been well established as first-line therapies and have been shown to increase survival; however, almost all patients with advanced pancreatic cancer will experience disease progression after first-line therapy. Nevertheless, many patients who retain good performance status after initial treatment remain good candidates for additional therapy. Historically, few studies have assessed second-line therapy, with most reports representing small phase II trials with variable findings; however, clinical research for second-line treatment has increased in the past decade, and several randomized controlled trials using different regimens have been published. The current literature shows varying results on treatment efficacy and tolerability. Thus, we reviewed the published data on the use of chemotherapy in the second-line setting for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Hua
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ;
| | - Si Shi
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ;
| | - Dingkong Liang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ;
| | - Chen Liang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ;
| | - Qingcai Meng
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ;
| | - Bo Zhang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ;
| | - Quanxing Ni
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ;
| | - Jin Xu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ;
| | - Xianjun Yu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ; .,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, ;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: Which is the best option? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2017; 115:1-12. [PMID: 28602164 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Revised: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 03/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite recent biological insight and therapeutic advances, the prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer still remains poor. For more than 15 years, gemcitabine monotherapy has been the cornerstone of first-line treatment. Recently, prospective randomized trials have shown that novel upfront combination regimens tested in prospective randomized trials have resulted in improved patients' outcome increasing the proportion of putative candidate to second-line therapy. There is no definite standard of care after disease progression. A novel formulation in which irinotecan is encapsulated into liposomal-based nanoparticles may increase the efficacy of the drug without incrementing its toxicity. NAPOLI-1 was the first randomized trial to compare nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil-leucovorin (5-FU/LV) to 5-FU/LV alone after a gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. This review focuses on the current data for the management of second-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, presents the most interesting ongoing clinical trials and illustrates the biologically-driven future options beyond disease progression.
Collapse
|
4
|
Phase II trial of salvage therapy with trabectedin in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2015; 77:477-84. [PMID: 26666646 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-015-2932-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2015] [Accepted: 11/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE No standard salvage chemotherapy has been identified for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPA), and there is an urgent need for active agents against this disease. This phase II trial explored the activity of trabectedin in mPA progressing after gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy. METHODS Patients with gemcitabine-resistant disease received trabectedin 1.3 mg/m(2) as a 3-h intravenous continuous infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or for a maximum of 6 months. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFS-6). Since trabectedin modulates the production of selected inflammatory mediators, this study also aimed to identify inflammatory biomarkers predictive for response to trabectedin. RESULTS Between February 2011 and February 2012, 25 patients received trabectedin. PFS-6 was 4%, median PFS 1.9 months (range 0.8-7.4), and median overall survival 5.2 months (range 1.1-24.3). Grade >2 toxicity consisted of neutropenia in 44% of patients, febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia both in 12%, anemia in 8%, fatigue in 12%, and AST and ALT increase in 8 and 4%, respectively. Trabectedin was shown to modulate the production of inflammatory mediators, and at disease progression, levels of a subgroup of cytokines/chemokines were modified. Furthermore, tissue analysis identified 30 genes associated with better prognosis. CONCLUSIONS Although it has shown some ability to modulate inflammatory process, single-agent trabectedin had no activity as salvage therapy for mPA.
Collapse
|
5
|
Nagrial AM, Chin VT, Sjoquist KM, Pajic M, Horvath LG, Biankin AV, Yip D. Second-line treatment in inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and synthesis of all clinical trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2015; 96:483-97. [PMID: 26481952 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2014] [Revised: 05/23/2015] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
There remains uncertainty regarding the optimal second-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The current recommendation of 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin may not be relevant in current practice, as FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) has become a more popular first line therapy in fit patients. The majority of studies in this setting are single-arm Phase II trials with significant heterogeneity of patient populations, treatments and outcomes. In this review, we sought to systematically review and synthesise all prospective data available for the second-line treatment of advanced PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adnan M Nagrial
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, 370 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; The Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
| | - Venessa T Chin
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, 370 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; The Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - Katrin M Sjoquist
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Cancer Care Centre, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Marina Pajic
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, 370 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; The Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; St. Vincents's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Australia
| | - Lisa G Horvath
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, 370 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; The Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Andrew V Biankin
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, 370 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; The Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; Department of Surgery, Bankstown Hospital, Eldridge Road, Bankstown, Sydney, NSW 2200, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia; Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Garscube Estate, Switchback Road, Glasgow G61 1BD, Scotland, UK; West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland G4 0SF, UK
| | - Desmond Yip
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT, Australia; ANU Medical School, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Onesti CE, Romiti A, Roberto M, Falcone R, Marchetti P. Recent advances for the treatment of pancreatic and biliary tract cancer after first-line treatment failure. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2015; 15:1183-98. [PMID: 26325474 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2015.1081816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Here, we evaluate clinical trials on chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic or biliary tract cancer after first-line treatment failure. Clinical trials on conventional and innovative medical treatments for progressive pancreatic and biliary cancer were analyzed. Metronomic chemotherapy, which consists of the administration of continuative low-dose of anticancer drugs, was also considered. A significant extension of overall survival was achieved with second-line, regimens in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer. Moreover, many Phase II studies, including chemotherapy and target molecules and immunotherapy, have reported promising results, in both pancreatic and biliary cancer. However, data in these patients' setting are very heterogeneous, and only few randomized studies are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michela Roberto
- a Clinical and Molecular Medicine Department, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosa Falcone
- a Clinical and Molecular Medicine Department, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- a Clinical and Molecular Medicine Department, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Encapsulated cells expressing a chemotherapeutic activating enzyme allow the targeting of subtoxic chemotherapy and are safe and efficacious: data from two clinical trials in pancreatic cancer. Pharmaceutics 2014; 6:447-66. [PMID: 25116885 PMCID: PMC4190529 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics6030447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2014] [Revised: 07/02/2014] [Accepted: 07/30/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite progress in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, there is still a need for improved therapies. In this manuscript, we report clinical experience with a new therapy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer involving the implantation of encapsulated cells over-expressing a cytochrome P450 enzyme followed by subsequent low-dose ifosfamide administrations as a means to target activated ifosfamide to the tumor. The safety and efficacy of the angiographic instillation of encapsulated allogeneic cells overexpressing cytochrome P450 in combination with low-dose systemic ifosfamide administration has now been evaluated in 27 patients in total. These patients were successfully treated in four centers by three different interventional radiologists, arguing strongly that the treatment can be successfully used in different centers. The safety of the intra-arterial delivery of the capsules and the lack of evidence that the patients developed an inflammatory or immune response to the encapsulated cells or encapsulation material was shown in all 27 patients. The ifosfamide dose of 1 g/m2/day used in the first trial was well tolerated by all patients. In contrast, the ifosfamide dose of 2 g/m2/day used in the second trial was poorly tolerated in most patients. Since the median survival in the first trial was 40 weeks and only 33 weeks in the second trial, this strongly suggests that there is no survival benefit to increasing the dose of ifosfamide, and indeed, a lower dose is beneficial for quality of life and the lack of side effects. This is supported by the one-year survival rate in the first trial being 38%, whilst that in the second trial was only 23%. However, taking the data from both trials together, a total of nine of the 27 patients were alive after one year, and two of these nine patients were alive for two years or more.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the Western world. Due to lack of specific symptoms and no accessible precursor lesions, primary diagnosis is commonly delayed, resulting in the identification of only 15-20% of patients with potentially curable disease. The major limiting factor is an already locally advanced or metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Consequently, systemic therapy forms the backbone of treatment strategy for the majority of patients. SUMMARY A deeper understanding of the molecular characteristics of pancreatic cancer has led to the identification of several potential therapeutic targets. A variety of targeted therapies are currently under clinical evaluation as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy for PDAC. This review highlights the current state of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer and provides an outlook on its future perspectives. KEY MESSAGE This review focuses on the current chemotherapy regimens for the systemic treatment of PDAC. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Various neoadjuvant approaches have been explored, including chemoradiation, chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation or intensified chemotherapy without defining a standard of care so far. The standard of care is gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil. The oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 may be a promising new agent in this setting. For first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer, no targeted therapy has yet demonstrated clinical benefit apart from the combination of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib plus gemcitabine. Recently, novel chemotherapeutic regimens such as FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel have been introduced. Both combinations have proved to be superior to the standard gemcitabine regimen. For second-line treatment the combination of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin yields improved results compared to best supportive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Thomas Seufferlein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Walker EJ, Ko AH. Beyond first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: an expanding array of therapeutic options? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:2224-36. [PMID: 24605022 PMCID: PMC3942828 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i9.2224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2013] [Revised: 12/13/2013] [Accepted: 01/03/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
While an increasing number of therapeutic options are now available for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, the optimal choice for treatment in the second-line setting and beyond is less well defined. A variety of cytotoxic agents, either alone or in combination, have been evaluated, although primarily in the context of small single-arm or retrospective studies. Most regimens have been associated with median progression-free survival rates in the range of 2-4 mo and overall survival rates between 4-8 mo, highlighting the very poor prognosis of patients who are candidates for such treatment. Targeted therapies studied in this chemotherapy-refractory setting, meanwhile, have produced even worse efficacy results. In the current article, we review the clinical evidence for treatment of refractory disease, primarily in patients who have progressed on front-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. In the process, we highlight the limitations of the available data to date as well as some of the challenges in designing appropriate clinical trials in this salvage setting, including how to select an appropriate control arm given the absence of a well-established reference standard, and the importance of incorporating predictive biomarkers and quality of life measures whenever possible into study design.
Collapse
|
10
|
Reznik R, Hendifar AE, Tuli R. Genetic determinants and potential therapeutic targets for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Front Physiol 2014; 5:87. [PMID: 24624093 PMCID: PMC3939680 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2013] [Accepted: 02/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths in both men and women in the United States, carrying a 5-year survival rate of approximately 5%, which is the poorest prognosis of any solid tumor type. Given the dismal prognosis associated with PDAC, a more thorough understanding of risk factors and genetic predisposition has important implications not only for cancer prevention, but also for screening techniques and the development of personalized therapies. While screening of the general population is not recommended or practicable with current diagnostic methods, studies are ongoing to evaluate its usefulness in people with at least 5- to 10-fold increased risk of PDAC. In order to help identify high-risk populations who would be most likely to benefit from early detection screening tests for pancreatic cancer, discovery of additional pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes is crucial. Thus, specific gene-based, gene-product, and marker-based testing for the early detection of pancreatic cancer are currently being developed, with the potential for these to be useful as potential therapeutic targets as well. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the genetic basis for PDAC with a focus on germline and familial determinants. A discussion of potential therapeutic targets and future directions in screening and treatment is also provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Reznik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrew E Hendifar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Richard Tuli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rahma OE, Duffy A, Liewehr DJ, Steinberg SM, Greten TF. Second-line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive analysis of published clinical trials. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:1972-9. [PMID: 23670093 PMCID: PMC3718508 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2013] [Revised: 03/20/2013] [Accepted: 03/21/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is currently no standard of care for the second-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. The aim of this analysis was to compare the different therapeutic approaches in this setting. METHODS We carried out a systematic analysis of second-line studies in advanced pancreatic cancer that have progressed on or following gemcitabine and published or presented from 2000 to 2012. RESULTS Forty-four clinical trials (t) were identified; of which 34 met the inclusion criteria treating an aggregate total of 1503 patients (n). Patients who received treatments (t: 33; n: 1269) had a median overall survival (OS) of 6 months compared with 2.8 months for patients who received best supportive care only (t: 2; n: 234) (P = 0.013). The gemcitabine and platinum-based combination (t: 5; n: 154) provided a median progression-free survival and OS of 4 and 6 months compared with 1.6 and 5.3 for the rest of the regimens (t: 29; n: 1349) (P = 0.059 and 0.10, respectively) and 2.9 and 5.7 for the combination of 5-fluorouracil and platinum agents (t: 12; n: 450) (P = 0.60 and 0.22, respectively). CONCLUSION(S) Although not conclusive, these data showed that the advantage of second-line chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer is very limited and there is a need for more studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O. E. Rahma
- Gastrointestinal Malignancy Section, Medical Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda
| | - A. Duffy
- Gastrointestinal Malignancy Section, Medical Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda
| | - D. J. Liewehr
- Biostatistics and Data Management Section, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, USA
| | - S. M. Steinberg
- Biostatistics and Data Management Section, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, USA
| | - T. F. Greten
- Gastrointestinal Malignancy Section, Medical Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee MG, Lee SH, Lee SJ, Lee YS, Hwang JH, Ryu JK, Kim YT, Kim DU, Woo SM. 5-Fluorouracil/leucovorin combined with irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who have progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy. Chemotherapy 2013; 59:273-9. [PMID: 24457620 DOI: 10.1159/000356158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2013] [Accepted: 10/04/2013] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS There is no standard consensus on a strategy in the second-line setting for gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. This study evaluated the activity and tolerability of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) as a second-line therapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma pretreated with a gemcitabine-based regimen. METHODS A retrospective survey was carried out on 18 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had been on gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and were then treated with FOLFIRINOX as a second-line therapy. RESULTS One patient (5.6%) had a confirmed complete response, 4 (22.2%) had confirmed partial responses and 5 (27.8%) had stable disease, resulting in a rate of disease control of 55.6% (95% CI, 33.3-77.8%). The median progression-free survival and median survival were 2.8 months and 8.4 months, respectively. Seven patients (38.9%) experienced grade 3-4 neutropenia. Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic adverse events included nausea (38.9%) and vomiting (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest the modest clinical activity regarding efficacy and the acceptable toxicity profile with the FOLFIRINOX regimen as a second-line treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Geun Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Francois E, Bennouna J, Chamorey E, Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Renée N, Senellart H, Michel C, Follana P, Mari V, Douillard JY, Milano G. Phase I trial of gemcitabine combined with capecitabine and erlotinib in advanced pancreatic cancer: a clinical and pharmacological study. Chemotherapy 2012; 58:371-80. [PMID: 23235319 DOI: 10.1159/000343969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2012] [Accepted: 10/04/2012] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this phase I trial was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the recommended dose of erlotinib combined with capecitabine and gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). METHODS Gemcitabine was administered intravenously at 1,000 mg/m(2)/week (days 1, 8 and 15) and oral capecitabine from day 1 to day 21 at 1,660 mg/m(2)/day. Oral erlotinib was administered daily continuously at escalating doses (28-day cycle). Dose levels (DLs) 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 50, 75, 100 and 125 mg/day, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analysis of the three drugs was performed in the first cycle. RESULTS Nineteen patients were enrolled. At the MTD (DL4; 125 mg/day erlotinib), 100% of patients developed DLT consisting of grade 4 febrile neutropenia and nonhematological grade 3 events (vomiting, diarrhea, stomatitis, rash). The most common toxicities, regardless of grade, were neutropenia, anemia, rash and diarrhea. Erlotinib systemic exposure was significantly related to the administered dose. Of note, toxicity was significantly associated with elevated systemic exposure of capecitabine anabolites. CONCLUSION When combined concurrently with 1,000 mg/m(2)/week gemcitabine and 1,660 mg/m(2)/day capecitabine, erlotinib can be administered safely at a daily dose of 100 mg in APC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Francois
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Research Center, Nice, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Belli C, Cereda S, Reni M. Role of taxanes in pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18:4457-65. [PMID: 22969215 PMCID: PMC3435767 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i33.4457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2012] [Revised: 04/09/2012] [Accepted: 04/12/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most deadly cancers and is characterized by a poor prognosis. Single agent gemcitabine, despite its limited activity and modest impact on disease outcome, is considered as the standard therapy in pancreatic cancer. Most of the combination regimens used in the treatment of this disease, also including the targeted agents, did not improve the outcome of patients. Also, taxanes have been tested as single agent and in combination chemotherapy, both in first line and as salvage chemotherapy, as another possible option for treating pancreatic cancer. The inclusion of taxanes in combination with gemcitabine as upfront therapy obtained promising results. Accordingly, taxanes, and above all, new generation taxanes, appear to be suitable candidates for further testing to assess their role against pancreatic cancer in various clinical settings.
Collapse
|