Anticoagulation for people receiving long-term haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Haemodialysis (HD) requires safe and effective anticoagulation to prevent clot formation within the extracorporeal circuit during dialysis treatments to enable adequate dialysis and minimise adverse events, including major bleeding. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) may provide a more predictable dose, reliable anticoagulant effects and be simpler to administer than unfractionated heparin (UFH) for HD anticoagulation, but may accumulate in the kidneys and lead to bleeding.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation strategies (including both heparin and non-heparin drugs) for long-term HD in people with kidney failure. Any intervention preventing clotting within the extracorporeal circuit without establishing anticoagulation within the patient, such as regional citrate, citrate enriched dialysate, heparin-coated dialysers, pre-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF), and saline flushes were also included.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to November 2023 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised controlled studies (quasi-RCTs) evaluating anticoagulant agents administered during HD treatment in adults and children with kidney failure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool and extracted data. Treatment effects were estimated using random effects meta-analysis and expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 113 studies randomising 4535 participants. The risk of bias in each study was adjudicated as high or unclear for most risk domains. Compared to UFH, LMWH had uncertain effects on extracorporeal circuit thrombosis (3 studies, 91 participants: RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.46 to 5.42; I2 = 8%; low certainty evidence), while major bleeding and minor bleeding were not adequately reported. Regional citrate anticoagulation may lower the risk of minor bleeding compared to UFH (2 studies, 82 participants: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.85; I2 = 0%; low certainty evidence). No studies reported data comparing regional citrate to UFH on risks of extracorporeal circuit thrombosis and major bleeding. The effects of very LMWH, danaparoid, prostacyclin, direct thrombin inhibitors, factor XI inhibitors or heparin-grafted membranes were uncertain due to insufficient data. The effects of different LMWH, different doses of LMWH, and the administration of LMWH anticoagulants using inlet versus outlet bloodline or bolus versus infusion were uncertain. Evidence to compare citrate to another citrate or control was scant. The effects of UFH compared to no anticoagulant therapy or different doses of UFH were uncertain. Death, dialysis vascular access outcomes, blood transfusions, measures of anticoagulation effect, and costs of interventions were rarely reported. No studies evaluated the effects of treatment on non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospital admissions. Adverse events were inconsistently and rarely reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulant strategies, including UFH and LMWH, have uncertain comparative risks on extracorporeal circuit thrombosis, while major bleeding and minor bleeding were not adequately reported. Regional citrate may decrease minor bleeding, but the effects on major bleeding and extracorporeal circuit thrombosis were not reported. Evidence supporting clinical decision-making for different forms of anticoagulant strategies for HD is of low and very low certainty, as available studies have not been designed to measure treatment effects on important clinical outcomes.

Evaluation with micro-CT of different anticoagulation strategies during hemodialysis in patients with thrombocytopenia: A randomized crossover study

In patients with enhanced risk for bleeding, heparin-free hemodialysis (HD) with conventional dialyzers is routinely used. To explore the potential benefit of using heparin-coated dialyzers, we used a reference CT-scanning technique and registered different clotting parameters to quantify coagulation with heparin-coated versus non-coated dialyzers. Six HD patients with thrombocytopenia were dialyzed 240 min in a randomized crossover study with Evodial 1.3 or FX600 Cordiax, each without anticoagulation. Blood samples were taken from the vascular access predialysis, and from the dialyzer inlet and outlet at 5 and 240 min after dialysis start. Predialysis blood samples were analyzed for hemoglobin, hematocrit, thrombocytes, fibrinogen, and activated partial thromboplastin time. On dialyzer inlet and outlet blood samples, a viscoelastic measurement of blood coagulation was performed using a Sonoclot analyzer. After dialysis, dialyzers were visually scored, subsequently dried for 24 h, weighed, and scanned with micro-CT at a resolution of 25 µm. After image reconstruction, the open, non-coagulated fibers were counted in a representative cross-section at the dialyzer outlet. No sessions were terminated prematurely for circuit clotting. Heparin-coated dialyzers had more patent fibers on micro-CT versus non-coated dialyzers and also had a better score of subjective visual assessment of fiber clotting. There was no difference in subjective assessment of clotting at the venous drip chamber. With both dialyzers, all ACT values remained in the normal range, and were lower at the dialyzer outlet versus inlet. In conclusion, dialysis with a heparin-coated versus non heparin-coated membrane results in substantially less coagulated fibers during 4 h hemodialysis without systemic anticoagulation. Eventual leaching of heparin, immobilized on the fiber membrane, does not result in measurable systemic anticoagulation.

Antithrombotic properties of hemofilter coated with polymer having a hydrophilic blood-contacting layer

OBJECTIVE:

Extracorporeal circulation devices are coated with a biocompatible polymer coating agent (BPCA) that has a hydrophilic blood-contacting layer, but hemofilters are not. We aimed to investigate the antithrombotic properties of a BPCA-coated hemofilter.

METHODS:

Four experiments using BPCA-coated circuits and non-coated hemofilters and four experiments using BPCA-coated circuits and BPCA-coated hemofilters were performed with whole human blood and compared by measuring the circuit pressure every 5 min, antithrombin activity every 40 min, and thrombin-antithrombin complex every 40 min, for a total of 240 min of recirculation.

RESULTS:

The mean time required for the pressure at the inlet of the hemofilter to increase sharply was longer in BPCA-coated than in non-coated hemofilters (66 ± 11 min vs 25 ± 9 min, p < 0.01). The mean antithrombin activity value at 200 and 240 min of recirculation was significantly higher in the experiments with BPCA-coated versus non-coated hemofilters (43.3 ± 2.87 vs 33.3 ± 5.74, p = 0.04; 42.8 ± 3.59 vs 31.0 ± 5.35, p = 0.01, respectively); the antithrombin activity values at the other time points were not significantly different. Furthermore, all thrombin-antithrombin complex values in experiments with the BPCA-coated hemofilters achieved overrange at 80 min of recirculation, whereas those with the non-coated hemofilter achieved overrange at 40 min.

CONCLUSION:

This study suggests that BPCA-coated hemofilters can inhibit antithrombin consumption, contributing to antithrombotic effects in extracorporeal circulation circuits.

Heparin-free renal replacement therapy for chronic hemodialyzed patients at high risk for bleeding: a comparison of on-line predilution hemodiafiltration with conventional hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

In chronic hemodialysis patients with high risk of bleeding, optimal anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit is challenging. Heparin-free hemodialysis (HD) with heparin-coated AN69ST dialyzer is now considered as a good option and recommended by experts. Predilutional hemodiafiltration (HDF) may represent also a feasible alternative but has been poorly investigated. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the performance of on-line automated predilution heparin-free HDF as compared to conventional heparin-free HD with a heparin-coated membrane.

METHODS

We prospectively studied chronic hemodialysis patients at high risk of bleeding consecutively admitted to hospital who underwent heparin-free renal replacement therapy (RRT) in our nephrology department. During 1 year, we routinely used heparin-free HD and on-line HDF in these settings. By using a propensity score, we compared HDF to HD regarding to session failure and efficiency.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-nine patients were included in the study. Clotting phenomena necessitating premature termination of RRT sessions were encountered in 19% of them. After propensity score matching, the comparison of 77 HD and 77 HDF sessions showed no significant differences in duration of the sessions and in dialyzer clotting. By multivariate analysis, a blood flow less than 250 mL/min and recent surgery were the only parameters associated with extracorporeal circuit thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

Heparin-free on-line predilutional HDF is a safe and effective technique for chronic hemodialysis patients with increased bleeding risk. The use of an automatic substitution volume that avoids filters hemoconcentration and of a blood flow above 250 mL/min strongly contribute to the observed performance. Further studies are, however, intended to confirm these results.

Synthesis and biocompatibility of an argatroban-modified polysulfone membrane that directly inhibits thrombosis

Anticoagulation therapy plays a vital role in the prevention of blood clot formation during hemodialysis and hemofiltration, especially for critical care patients. Here, we synthesized a novel argatroban (Arg)-modified polysulfone (PSf) membrane for anticoagulation. Arg was grafted onto the PSF membrane via chemical modification to increase membrane hydrophilicity. Protein adsorption, coagulation, as well as activation of platelets and complement systems were greatly reduced on the Arg-modified PSf membrane. Thus, the recalcification time and the activated partial thrombin time (APTT) were increased after the modification. In comparison with the pristine PSf membrane, the Arg-modified PSf membrane showed better hemocompatibility and anticoagulation properties, indicating its potential for applications in hemodialysis and hemofiltration. Modification of the PSf membrane has been investigated in attempts to further enhance the anticoagulation properties of the hemodialysis membranes, including a heparin-modified PSf membrane. However, heparin can inhibit plasma-free thrombin, and cause the occurrence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which increases the risk of bleeding during dialysis in critical care patients. To address this problem, we modified PSf membrane with as a novel direct thrombin inhibitors, argatroban (Arg). It can reversibly bind to thrombin, inhibiting not only the plasma-free thrombin in the blood, but also clot-bound thrombin.

An evaluation of four modes of low-dose anticoagulation during intermittent haemodialysis

Introduction

Intensive care participants that need dialysis frequently suffer from increased risk of bleeding. Standard intermittent haemodialysis (SHD) includes anticoagulation to avoid clotting of the dialysis system. The aim of this study was to clarify which of four different low-dose anticoagulant modes was preferable in reducing the exposure to i.v. unfractionated heparin (heparin) and maintaining patency of the dialysis circuit.

Methods

Twenty-three patients on SHD were included to perform haemodialysis with four modes of low-dose anticoagulation. For comparative analyses, patients served as their own control. Haemodialysis with a single bolus of tinzaparin at the start was compared to haemodialysis initiated without i.v. heparin but priming with (1) heparin in saline (H), (2) heparin and albumin in saline (HA), (3) heparin and albumin in combination with a citrate-containing dialysate (HAC), (4) saline and usinga heparin-coated filters (Evodial®). The priming fluid was discarded before dialysis started. Blood samples were collected at 0, 30 and 180 min during haemodialysis. Smaller bolus doses of heparin (500 Units/dose) were allowed during the modes to avoid interruption by clotting.

Findings

The mean activated partial thromboplastin (APTT) time as well as the doses of anticoagulation administered was highest with SHD and least with HAC and Evodial®. Mode H versus SHD had the highest rate of prematurely interrupted dialyses (33%, p = 0.008). The urea reduction rate was less with Evodial® vs. SHD (p < 0.01). One hypersensitivity reaction occurred with Evodial®. Changes in blood cell concentrations and triglycerides differed between the modes.

Discussion

If intermittent haemodialysis is necessary in patients at risk of bleeding, anticoagulation using HAC and Evodial® appeared most preferable with least administration of heparin, lowest APTT increase and lowest risk for prematurely clotted dialyzers in contrast to the least plausible H mode.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-017-2389-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

β-Thromboglobulin may not reflect platelet activation during haemodialysis with the HeprAN membrane

BACKGROUND

When blood passes through the extracorporeal circuit during haemodialysis (HD) undesirable effects including platelet degranulation and coagulation activation take place. β-thromboglobulin (β-TG) is a sensitive marker of platelet activation. The aim of this study was to investigate platelet degranulation and coagulation activation during HD with the heparin-coated dialysis membrane HeprAN.

METHODS

Four HD sessions were evaluated in each of 12 chronic HD patients. None of the patients used oral warfarin, other anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs. In the first session the HeprAN membrane or a conventional polyflux membrane was used in a randomized manner and thereafter alternately in a cross-over design, and 50% of the conventional dalteparin dose was given at start of HD. Prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (PF1 + 2), β-TG and anti-factor Xa activity were measured repeatedly.

RESULTS

No dialysis sessions were terminated early due to clotting of the extracorporeal system. Activation of intravascular coagulation as assessed by change in PF1 + 2 during 4 hours of HD was the same with the two membranes. β-TG concentration decreased significantly during 4 hours of HD with the HeprAN membrane but remained stable with the polyflux membrane.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in clotting scores or coagulation activation with the two membranes. The decrease in β-TG during HD with the HeprAN membrane suggests β-TG to be an inferior marker of platelet degranulation when using a heparin-coated dialysis membrane. A possible mechanism for the decline in β-TG concentration may be adherence of this heparin-binding protein to the heparin-coated dialysis membrane.

Heparin albumin priming in a clinical setting for hemodialysis patients at risk for bleeding

INTRODUCTION

Intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) is sometimes necessary in patients with a bleeding risk, i.e., before/after surgery or brain hemorrhage. In such case IHD has to be modified to limit the conventional anticoagulation used to avoid clotting of the extracorporeal circuit (ECC). We evaluated if priming using a heparin and albumin (HA) mixture could minimize the exposure to heparin.

METHODS

Retrospective data from 1995 to 2013 were collected from 1408 acute dialysis treatment protocols that included 321 patients. Comparisons were made between IHD patients that had increased risk for bleeding and were treated by standard anticoagulation (Group-S), and patients at increased risk of bleeding (Group-HA). The ECC in Group-HA was primed with a solution of unfractioned heparin (UFH) (5000 Units/L) and albumin (1 g/L) in saline that was discarded after priming. There were 16 different dialyzers in the material.

FINDINGS

Comparing Group-S (n = 883) with Group-HA (n = 221), the mean age was 61.6 vs. 62.2 years (P = 0.8), dialysis time was 197 vs. 190 minutes (P = 0.002), and total dose of intravenous anticoagulant/IHD was at median 5000 Units vs. 1200 Units (P = 0.001). Twenty-four percent of patients were treated without any additional heparin. Clotting resulting in interrupted dialysis was similar in both groups (0.8% for Group-S vs. 1.0% for Group-HA, P = 0.8). No secondary bleeding was reported in either group.

DISCUSSION

HA priming minimized the risk of clotting and enabled acute IHD in vulnerable patients without increased bleeding, thus allowing completion of IHD to the same extent as for standard HD.

Anticoagulation in Chronic Hemodialysis: Progress Toward an Optimal Approach

Appropriate anticoagulation for hemodialysis (HD) requires a subtle balance between under- and over-heparinization to prevent extracorporeal circuit (ECC) clotting and bleeding, respectively. We discuss five key issues relating to anticoagulation therapy for chronic HD in adults following a review of relevant literature published since 2002: (i) options for standardization of anticoagulation in HD settings. The major nephrology societies have issued low evidence level recommendations on this subject. Interventional studies have generally investigated novel low-molecular weight heparins and provided data on safety of dosing regimens that cannot readily be extrapolated to clinical practice; (ii) identification of clinical and biological parameters to aid individualization of anticoagulation treatment. We find that use of clinical and biological monitoring of anticoagulation during HD sessions is currently not clearly defined in routine clinical practice; (iii) role of ECC elements (dialysis membrane and blood lines), dialysis modalities, and blood flow in clotting development; (iv) options to reduce or suppress systemic heparinization during HD sessions. Alternative strategies have been investigated, especially when the routine mode of anticoagulation was not suitable in patients at high risk of bleeding or was contraindicated; (v) optimization of anticoagulation therapy for the individual patient. We conclude by proposing a standardized approach to deliver anticoagulation treatment for HD based on an individualized prescription prepared according to the patient's profile and needs.

Surface modification of polysulfone based hemodialysis membranes with layer by layer self assembly of polyethyleneimine/alginate-heparin: a simple polyelectrolyte blend approach for heparin immobilization

This study intends to improve blood compatibility of polysulfone (PSF) membranes by generating a nonthrombogenic surface through heparin immobilization. To achieve this task, the support membrane prepared from a blend of PSF and sulfonated polysulfone (SPSF) was modified with layer by layer (LBL) deposition of polyethyleneimine (PEI) and alginate (ALG) and heparin blended with ALG was immobilized only on the outermost surface of the LBL assembly. The results have shown that the adsorption of human plasma proteins and platelet activation on the LBL modified membranes decreased significantly compared with the unmodified PSF and PSF-SPSF blend membranes. Furthermore, blending ALG with a small amount of heparin remarkably prolonged the APTT values of heparin free PEI/ALG coated membranes. It is envisaged that the use of a blend of HEP and ALG only in the terminating layer of the LBL assembly can be an economical and alternative modification technique to create nonthrombogenic surfaces.

Does the surface-treated AN69 membrane prolong filter survival in CRRT without anticoagulation?

PURPOSE

The need for continuous anticoagulation remains a significant drawback in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), especially in patients with increased bleeding risk. Polyethyleneimine treatment of the AN69 membrane (AN69ST) reduces thrombogenicity through decreased contact activation and promotion of heparin binding. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether this membrane prolongs filter survival in CRRT without anticoagulation.

METHODS

A single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial with cross-over design comparing filter survival with the AN69ST membrane and the original AN69 membrane in 39 patients treated with continuous venovenous hemofiltraton (CVVH) without additional heparin.

RESULTS

Filter survival with the AN69ST membrane (n = 75) was 14.2 ± 8.2 h, which is not significantly different from the 13.3 ± 10.3 h for the original AN69 membrane (n = 76; p = 0.59). Limiting the analysis to those treatments that were interrupted for filter clotting yielded similar results: 14.4 ± 8.2 h for the AN69 ST membrane (n = 62) versus 14.1 ± 7.5 h for the original AN69 membrane (n = 56) (p = 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the original AN69 membrane, the surface-treated AN69ST membrane does not prolong filter survival during CVVH without systemic anticoagulation and with the CRRT settings used in this study.