Grading follicular lymphoma. The Achilles heel of diagnosis by cytology

Diagnostic Discrepancies in Small-volume Biopsy for the Initial Diagnosis, Recurrence, and Transformation of Follicular Lymphoma: A Multi-Institutional Collaborative Study

Small-volume biopsies (SVBs) including fine-needle aspiration (FNA), cell block, and needle core biopsies (NCB) are increasingly utilized to diagnose and guide the clinical management of lymphoma. We established a multi-institutional interdisciplinary collaboration of cytopathologists, hematopathologists, and oncologists focused on the role of SVB in the management of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). To assess the performance characteristics of SVB in this setting, we evaluated all consecutive SVBs performed for clinical indications of initial diagnosis, recurrence, or transformation of FL over a 5-year period and focused on the 182 that had at least one subsequent biopsy within 3 months as part of the same clinical work-up. The most common outcome of a subsequent biopsy as part of the same clinical work-up was a more specific diagnosis usually assigning the pathologic grade (111/182, 61%), followed by a complete agreement with the SVB (24/182, 13%), and change from nondiagnostic on initial biopsy to diagnostic on subsequent biopsy (21/182, 12%). A minority resulted in a diagnostic change from benign to lymphoma (17/182, 9%), a change in FL grade (5/182, 3%), or change in the lymphoma diagnostic category (4/182, 2%). There were no cases where an initial diagnosis of lymphoma was overturned. The distribution of discrepancies was similar across initial SVB types (FNA, FNA + cell block, NCB with or without FNA). Tissue limitations were noted in a minority of cases (53/182, 29%) and were enriched among initially nondiagnostic biopsies (16/21, 76%). Flow cytometry immunophenotyping was performed in the majority of cases both at the first and last biopsy (147/182, 81%). SVB can be a powerful method to detect FL in various clinical indications, with discrepant cases mostly resulting from a refinement in the initial diagnosis.

Classifying B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma by using MIB-1 proliferative index in fine-needle aspirates

BACKGROUND

MIB-1 proliferation index (PI) has proven helpful for diagnosis and prognosis in non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). However, validated cutoff values for use in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples are not available. We investigated MIB-1 immunocytochemistry as an ancillary technique for stratifying NHL and attempted to establish PI cutpoints in cytologic samples.

METHODS

B-cell NHL FNA cases with available cytospins (CS) MIB-1 immunocytochemistry results were included. Demographic, molecular, immunophenotyping and MIB-1 PI data were collected from cytologic reports. Cases were subtyped according to the current World Health Organization classification and separated into indolent, aggressive, and highly aggressive groups. Statistical analysis was performed with pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test and linear discriminant analysis to suggest appropriate PI cutpoints.

RESULTS

Ninety-one NHL cases were subdivided in 56 (61.5%) indolent, 30 (33%) aggressive, and 5 (5.5%) highly aggressive lymphomas. The 3 groups had significantly different MIB-1 PIs from each other. Cutpoints were established for separating indolent (<38%), aggressive (> or =38% to < or =80.1%) and highly aggressive (>80.1%). The groups were adequately predicted in 76 cases (83.5%) using the cutpoints and 15 cases showed discrepant PIs.

CONCLUSIONS

MIB-1 immunohistochemistry on CS can help to stratify B-cell NHL and showed a significant increase in PI with tumor aggressiveness. Six misclassified cases had PIs close to the cutpoints. Discrepant MIB-1 PIs were related to dilution of positive cells by non-neoplastic lymphocytes and to the overlapping continuum of features between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma. Validation of our approach in an unrelated, prospective dataset is required.

Grading follicular lymphoma on fine-needle aspiration specimens-A practical approach

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) is a useful tool for evaluating and staging follicular lymphoma (FL) without subjecting patients to multiple excisional biopsies. The relative lack of architecture in FNA is a limitation in grading FL. Recognizing the various cellular components in aspirates of FL, correlating with flow cytometry, using other ancillary tests, and preparing cell blocks can help overcome difficulties in the grading process. Understanding the clinical relevance of distinguishing the various grades of FL is important in determining whether an aspiration biopsy is adequate or whether additional sampling by surgical biopsy is indicated.