Fibrin-sealant-delivered cisplatin chemotherapy versus cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer without peritoneal metastases: a randomized phase-II clinical trial with a 40-month follow-up

A new intraoperative cisplatin administration method for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and without peritoneal metastasis, fibrin-sealant-delivered cisplatin chemotherapy, was reported, and its safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy were compared with cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy. Forty-two AGC patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: fibrin-sealant-delivered cisplatin chemotherapy (FS) (n = 21) and cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (CHIC) (n = 21). Both groups received 120 mg cisplatin after complete cytoreductive surgery. At different time points, cisplatin concentrations in patients' sera and urine samples were measured to determine time-dependent maximal concentration (Cmax) and the area under the curve (AUC). The primary and secondary end-points were overall survival (OS) and safety profiling, respectively. Occurrence of grade-3 to grade-4 liver or kidney dysfunction was less frequent in the FS group than in the CHIC group (28.6 % vs 47.6 %). Cisplatin Cmax and AUC for the serum and urine of the FS patients were significantly lower than that of the CHIC patients. Elimination half-life of cisplatin in the FS group was significantly longer than in the CHIC group (24.1 h vs 14.2 h). After a median follow-up of 40 months, 1-, 2-, and 3-years OS were 90.5 %, 71.4 %, and 61.9 % in the FS group, and 61.9 %, 47.6 %, and 42.8 % in the CHIC group, respectively. The median OS was 35.9 months in the FS group and 29.1 months in the CHIC group. Fibrin-sealant-delivered cisplatin chemotherapy was as effective and had a favorable pharmacokinetic profile with similar survival outcomes as cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy following complete cytoreductive surgery of locally advanced GC without peritoneal metastases.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil in patients at high risk of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer: A preliminary clinical study

Although hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been extensively used to treat patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC), a standard protocol has not yet been established. The aim of this preliminary clinical study was to confirm in vitro the efficacy of mitomycin C combined with 5-fluorouracil (MMC-5FU) under hyperthermic conditions in CRC and investigate the pharmacokinetics and feasibility of HIPEC with MMC-5FU for patients at high risk of PM from CRC. To simulate HIPEC in vitro, we used the collagen gel droplet-embedded culture drug sensitivity test with the HCT166 colorectal cell line to assess the antitumor efficacy of MMC and 5FU as single-agent and combination treatments following incubation with HCT116 cells for 30 min at either 37 or 42°C. In addition, five patients at high risk of PM from CRC underwent surgical tumor resection followed by HIPEC with MMC-5FU. Our results demonstrated that the combined administration of MMC-5FU suppressed tumor cell proliferation more efficiently compared to either agent used alone. In addition, hyperthermia at 42°C significantly enhanced drug sensitivity. During the clinical application of HIPEC with MMC-5FU, no grade 4 hematological toxicities or surgical adverse events were recorded. In addition, there was no evidence of peritoneal recurrence during a median observational period of 38 months. Of note, two patients with positive intraoperative peritoneal cytology at the first surgery developed no peritoneal recurrence and exhibited negative peritoneal cytology at the second surgery. In conclusion, HIPEC using MMC-5FU was shown to be a feasible therapeutic option, with an acceptable toxicity profile, for patients at high risk of PM from CRC. Therefore, HIPEC with MMC-5FU may be a promising novel therapeutic option for such patients, which merits further verification of its safety and efficacy in large-scale clinical trials.