Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy for stroke patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: the Stroke Acute Management with Urgent Risk-Factor Assessment and Improvement (SAMURAI) rt-PA registry

Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease on Hemodialysis: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a significant and devastating complication in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis (ESRD/HD). Since one-third of AIS in ESRD/HD patients occurs during or soon after dialysis, patients are more likely to present within the time window when intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) can be performed. IVT may improve prognosis in ESRD/HD patients with AIS. However, ESRD/HD patients have been excluded from large trials and may have been withheld from IVT due to concerns about bleeding complications. To date, there is no clear evidence and firm guidance on the safety and efficacy of IVT in ESRD/HD patients with AIS. This narrative review aimed to evaluate critical scientific data on the benefits and risks of IVT use in patients with ESRD/HD and AIS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the electronic database of PubMed for studies evaluating the relationship between AIS, ESRD/HD, and IVT. Reference sections and additional publications were also searched manually. Studies on AIS in patients with ESRD/HD requiring maintenance dialysis that referred to IVT were included.

RESULTS

In total, 560 studies were found in the PubMed electronic database during the period covered, of which 10 met the selection criteria. IVT for AIS in ESRD/HD patients could improve neurological outcomes and be safely performed even with the possibility of hemorrhagic complications associated with hypertension. Despite the high complication and mortality rates in ESRD/HD patients with AIS after IVT, the association with IVT was unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

IVT for AIS in ESRD/HD patients may improve outcomes and should not be withheld based solely on ESRD/HD status.

Endovascular therapy for hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation and cerebral thromboembolism: A case series

INTRODUCTION

Hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation are at high risk for stroke. Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator is considered for acute ischemic stroke. However, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy is contraindicated for some hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. These patients and those who have received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy without blood flow recovery are candidates for endovascular therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation received endovascular therapy for acute cerebral infarction. Cerebrovascular incident occurred during or after hemodialysis in two of these patients. All three patients achieved successful recanalization after endovascular therapy.

CONCLUSION

In this series, endovascular therapy showed good results without complications. More cases should be investigated to obtain more evidence of successful endovascular therapy for hemodialysis patients.

Serum creatinine may indicate risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA)

Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) is a known complication following administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) for acute ischemic stroke. sICH results in high rates of death or long-term disability. Our ability to predict its occurrence is important in clinical decision making and when counseling families. The initial National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) investigators developed a list of relative contraindications to IV tPA meant to decrease the risk of subsequent sICH. To date, the impact of renal impairment has not been well studied. In the current study we evaluate the potential association between renal impairment and post-tPA intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Admission serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were recorded in 224 patients presenting within 4.5 hours from symptom onset and treated with IV tPA based on NINDS criteria. Neuroimaging was obtained 1 day post-tPA and for any change in neurologic status to evaluate for ICH. Images were retrospectively evaluated for hemorrhage by a board-certified neuroradiologist and 2 reviewers blinded to the patient's neurologic status. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively for evidence of neurologic decline indicating a "symptomatic" hemorrhage. sICH was defined as subjective clinical deterioration (documented by the primary neurology team) and hemorrhage on neuroimaging that was felt to be the most likely cause. Renal impairment was evaluated using both serum creatinine and eGFR in a number of ways: 1) continuous creatinine; 2) any renal impairment by creatinine (serum creatinine >1.0 mg/dL); 3) continuous eGFR; and 4) any renal impairment by eGFR (eGFR <60 mL/min per 1.73 m²). Student paired t tests, Fisher exact tests, and multivariable logistic regression (adjusted for demographics and vascular risk factors) were used to evaluate the relationship between renal impairment and ICH. Fifty-seven (25%) of the 224 patients had some evidence of hemorrhage on neuroimaging. The majority of patients were asymptomatic. Renal impairment (defined by serum creatinine >1.0 mg/dL) was not associated with combined symptomatic and asymptomatic intracranial bleeding (p = 0.359); however, there was an adjusted 5.5-fold increased odds of sICH when creatinine was >1.0 mg/dL (95% confidence interval, 1.08-28.39), and the frequency of sICH for patients with elevated serum creatinine was 10.6% (12/113), versus 1.8% (2/111) in those with normal renal function (p = 0.010). Our study suggests that renal impairment is associated with higher risk of sICH after administration of IV tPA. As IV tPA is an important and effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke, a multicenter study is needed to determine whether the observation that renal dysfunction is associated with sICH from this retrospective study holds true in a larger prospective trial.

Intravenous rt-PA in patients with ischaemic stroke and renal dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

Renal dysfunction (RD) increases risk for ischaemic stroke (IS). The impact of RD on the effects of iv-thrombolysis in the Caucasian population has not been fully determined.

AIMS

To evaluate the associations between RD and the outcome of iv-thrombolysis in Caucasian patients with IS.

METHODS

The observational, multicentre study included 404 patients with IS who were treated with iv-thrombolysis. RD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Outcome was assessed with modified Rankin Score at 3 months after the stroke onset.

RESULTS

Medians baseline NIHSS score did not differ between groups of patients with and without RD (12.0 vs. 11.0 pts, p=0.33). Unfavourable outcome was found in 52.1% of patients with and in 41.2% of patients without RD (p=0.05), mortality was higher in patients with RD (29.9% vs. 14.3%, p<0.001), and the presence of haemorrhagic transformation (HT) did not differ between the groups (17.1% vs. 17.1% respectively, p=0.996). A multivariate analysis showed no impact of RD on the unfavourable outcome (OR 0.98; 95%CI 0.88-1.10), mortality (OR 0.92; 95%CI 0.81-1.05) or presence of HT (OR 1.03; 95%CI 0.90-1.18).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no impact of RD on the safety and efficacy of iv-thrombolysis in Caucasian patients with IS.