1
|
Maneechotesuwan K, Aggarwal B, Garcia G, Tan D, Neffen H, Javier RJM, Al-Ahmad M, Khadada M, Quan VTT, Teerapuncharoen K, Ramos MS, Levy G, Plank M, Phansalkar A, Gibson PG. Exploring Clinical Remission in Moderate Asthma - Perspectives from Asia, the Middle East, and South America. Pulm Ther 2024:10.1007/s41030-024-00262-2. [PMID: 38833146 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-024-00262-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clinical remission is a relatively new concept in asthma but recent research initiatives suggest it could be an ambitious and achievable therapeutic target for patients with asthma. METHODS In this modified Delphi study (comprising two online surveys, completed either side of a virtual scientific workshop), the opinions of a panel of respiratory physicians were evaluated to summarize perspective statements on key therapeutic outcomes and criteria for on-treatment clinical remission in patients with moderate asthma. An agreement threshold was pre-defined as agreement by ≥ 75% of participants. RESULTS Surveys 1 and 2 were completed by 20 and 18 participants, respectively. Most participants (95%) agreed with the concept of clinical remission in moderate asthma and that this should be a desirable treatment goal (90%). Based on a composite measure of 4-6 desirable therapeutic outcomes, current understanding of clinical remission was considered as 12 months with no exacerbations, no oral corticosteroids, no daytime or night-time asthma symptoms (Asthma Control Test score ≥ 20 or Asthma Control Questionnaire score ≤ 0.75), stable lung function, and no treatment-related adverse events. No agreement was reached on the role of relievers in defining therapeutic outcomes or on the wider use of biomarkers and airway hyperresponsiveness for defining asthma remission in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS In line with recent consensus statements from the United States and Europe, there was a high level of agreement on the elements of clinical remission among a panel of respiratory physicians from Asia, the Middle East, and South America. Extension of the concept of clinical remission to patients with moderate asthma was considered aligned with the potential of clinical remission as a goal of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kittipong Maneechotesuwan
- Division of Respiratory Disease and Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | | | | | - Daniel Tan
- College of Medicine, University of the East Ramon Magsaysay, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Hugo Neffen
- Centro de Alergia, Inmunología y Enfermedades Respiratorias - Santa Fe, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Ramon Jason M Javier
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, UERM Memorial Hospital, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines
| | - Mona Al-Ahmad
- Microbiology Department, College of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Mousa Khadada
- Pulmonology Department, Mubarak Hospital, Jabriya, Kuwait
- Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Vu Tran Thien Quan
- Department of Physiology, Pathophysiology and Immunology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Department of Pulmonary Function Testing, University Medical Center, HCMC, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Krittika Teerapuncharoen
- Division of Respiratory Disease and Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Mario Soto Ramos
- Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences of the University of Chihuahua (UACH), Chihuahua, Mexico
- Hospital Ángeles Chihuahua and Children's Hospital of Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico
| | - Gur Levy
- Respiratory Medical Emerging Markets, GSK, Ciudad de Panamá, Panamá
| | | | | | - Peter G Gibson
- Dept of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia
- College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anzueto A, Cohen M, Echazarreta AL, Elassal G, Godoy I, Paramo R, Sayiner A, Torres-Duque CA, Acharya S, Aggarwal B, Erkus H, Levy G. Delphi Consensus on Clinical Applications of GOLD 2023 Recommendations in COPD Management: How Aligned are Recommendations with Clinical Practice? Pulm Ther 2024; 10:69-84. [PMID: 38112909 PMCID: PMC10881920 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-023-00248-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this Delphi study was to understand and assess the level of consensus among respiratory experts on the clinical application of GOLD 2023 recommendations in management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS The study comprised two online surveys and a participant meeting with 34 respiratory experts from 16 countries. Responses of 73 questions were recorded using a Likert scale ranging from 0 (disagreement) to 9 (agreement). The consensus threshold was 75%. RESULTS Survey 1 and survey 2 had 34 and 32 participants, respectively; and 25 attended the participant meeting. Consensus was reached on survey 1: 28/42; survey 2: 18/30 close-ended questions. A consensus was reached on the clinical relevance of most updates in definitions and diagnosis of COPD. Mixed results for the treatment recommendations by GOLD were noted: 74% agreed with the recommendation to initiate treatment with dual bronchodilators for group E patients; 63% agreed for including inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/long-acting β2 agonist(LABA)/ Long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists (LAMA) as a treatment option for GOLD B patients. Also, consensus lacked on removing ICS + LABA as an initial therapeutic option, in countries with challenges in access to other treatment option;. 88% agreed that they use GOLD recommendations in their daily clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS This Delphi study demonstrated a high level of consensus regarding key concepts of GOLD 2023 report, with most participants favoring recent updates in definitions, diagnosis, management, and prevention of COPD. More evidence on the etiotype based management and treatment options for group B and E are required which could further strengthen clinical application of the GOLD report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Anzueto
- University of Texas Health and South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| | - Mark Cohen
- Hospital Centro Medico, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | | | - Gehan Elassal
- Department of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Irma Godoy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Botucatu Medical School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu Campus, Pneumology Area, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Abdullah Sayiner
- Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | - Gur Levy
- Emerging Markets, GSK, Panama City, Panama
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sriprasart T, Siasoco MB, Aggarwal B, Levy G, Phansalkar A, Van GV, Cohen M, Seemungal T, Pizzichini MMM, Mokhtar M, Daley-Yates P. The role of modeling studies in asthma management and clinical decision-making: a Delphi survey of physician knowledge and perceptions. J Asthma 2023:1-15. [PMID: 36825839 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2180748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the knowledge and perceptions of physicians on the role of modeling studies in asthma, using a modified Delphi procedure. METHODS Group opinions among a panel of respiratory experts were obtained using two online questionnaires and a virtual scientific workshop. A consensus was pre-defined as agreement by >75% of participants. RESULTS From 26 experts who agreed to participate, 22 completed both surveys. At the end of the process, the panel rated their own understanding of modeling as good (77%) but that among physicians in general as poor (77%). Participants agreed that data from modeling studies should be used, at least sometimes, to inform treatment guidelines (91%) and could be useful for guiding clinical decisions (100%). Perceived barriers to using modeling studies were 'A lack of understanding' (81%) and 'A lack of standardized methodology' (82%). Based on data from two modeling studies, no consensus was reached on physicians recommending regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus as-needed therapy for patients with mild asthma, whereas 77% agreed that they would recommend regular ICS over maintenance and reliever therapy for ≥80% of their patients with moderate asthma. No consensus was reached on the value of modeling data in relation to empirical data. CONCLUSION There is overall support among respiratory experts for the usefulness of modeling data to guide asthma treatment guidelines and clinical decision making. More publications on modeling data using robust models and accessible terminology will aid the understanding of physicians in general and help clarify the evidence-based value of modeling studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thitiwat Sriprasart
- Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ma Bella Siasoco
- Pulmonary Division, Department of Medicine, University of the Philippines College of Medicine - Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | | | - Gur Levy
- Respiratory Medical Emerging Markets, GSK, Ciudad de Panamá, Panama
| | | | - Giap Vu Van
- Respiratory Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.,Internal Medicine Department, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Mark Cohen
- Edificio Clinicas Centro Médico 2, Guatemala city, Guatemala
| | - Terence Seemungal
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of The West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad & Tobago
| | - Marcia M M Pizzichini
- Internal Medicine Division, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil
| | - Mahmoud Mokhtar
- Respiratory Unit, Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Jabriya, Kuwait
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Domingo C, Garcia G, Gemicioglu B, Van GV, Larenas-Linnemann D, Neffen H, Poachanukoon O, Sagara H, Berend N, Pizzichini E, Irusen E, Aggarwal B, Eken V, Levy G. Consensus on mild asthma management: results of a modified Delphi study. J Asthma 2023; 60:145-157. [PMID: 35099342 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2034850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In order to understand the role of regular controller inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus as-needed ICS-formoterol in managing mild asthma, we performed a modified Delphi procedure. METHODS Opinions from 16 respiratory experts to three surveys and during a virtual scientific workshop helped to develop final consensus statements (pre-defined as 70% agreement). RESULTS Thirteen participants completed all rounds (response rate 81%). At the end of the procedure, there was final consensus on: regular daily ICS being the recommended treatment approach in mild persistent asthma, with better symptom control and robust long-term clinical data compared with as-needed ICS-formoterol (85%); to avoid noncompliance, frequently seen in mild asthma patients, regular ICS dosing should be accompanied by ongoing education on treatment adherence (100%); treatment aims should be targeting asthma control (92%) and reduction of exacerbation risk (85%). No consensus was reached on whether GINA or national guidelines most influence prescribing decisions. CONCLUSIONS It is important to encourage patients to be adherent and to target both asthma control and exacerbation risk reduction. There is robust clinical evidence to support proactive regular dosing with ICS controller therapy plus as-needed short-acting beta-agonists for the management of patients with mild asthma. ABBREVIATIONS. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2022.2034850 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabriel Garcia
- Servicio de Neumonología, Hospital Rossi La Plata, La Plata, Argentina
| | - Bilun Gemicioglu
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Giap Vu Van
- Respiratory Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | - Hugo Neffen
- Centro de Alergia e Inmunología-Santa Fe, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Orapan Poachanukoon
- Center of Excellence for Allergy, Asthma and Pulmonary Diseases, Thammasat University Hospital, Pathum Thani, Thailand
| | - Hironori Sagara
- Division of Allergology and Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Norbert Berend
- Respiratory Franchise, GlaxoSmithKline, Middlesex, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emilio Pizzichini
- Respiratory Franchise, GlaxoSmithKline, Middlesex, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Bhumika Aggarwal
- Respiratory, Global Classic & Established Products, GlaxoSmithKline, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Volkan Eken
- Respiratory Franchise, GlaxoSmithKline, Middlesex, London, United Kingdom.,Medical Department, GlaxoSmithKline, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gur Levy
- Respiratory Medical Emerging Markets, GlaxoSmithKline, Panama City, Panama
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Venkitakrishnan R, Thomas PK, Bansal A, Ghosh I, Augustine Dtcd Dnb J, Divya R, Cleetus M. Fluticasone/formoterol compared with other ICS/LABAs in asthma: a systematic review. J Asthma 2021; 59:1221-1230. [PMID: 33685323 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1900864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES An inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA) combination has become the standard of care in asthma. Various ICS-LABAs are commercially available providing the clinician with many choices. A thorough understanding of the clinical efficacy and safety of various formulations will immensely benefit the prescribing doctor to decide the choice of agent. The present systematic review was undertaken to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of formoterol fluticasone (FF) to other ICS/LABA combinations in asthmatics. METHODS The review adhered to the general principles mentioned in the CRD guidance and the PRISMA statement. We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases on the efficacy of FF in treating asthma compared with other ICS-LABAs. A total of 138 trials identified initially. Only trials comparing the efficacy and safety of FF in comparision with Salmeterol/fluticasone (SF) or Budesonide/Formoterol (BF) were selected. The outcomes compared were onset of bronchodilator action, improvement in lung function, asthma control, asthma-related quality of life and risk of pneumonia. RESULTS Sixteen studies were included in the final analysis. FF therapy provided faster onset of bronchodilatation than SF. A better improvement in lung function was seen with FF inhaler use as compared with comparators in two studies. Patients using the FF inhaler had a non-inferior asthma control and asthma-related quality of life. Pneumonia risk was least with FF usage. CONCLUSION FF provides faster onset of action, numerically superior improvement in lung function and comparable asthma control than other ICS-LABA formulations. FF has better safety evidenced by lower occurrence of pneumonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ankit Bansal
- Pulmonary Medicine, Fortis Hospital, Jaipur, India
| | - Indranath Ghosh
- Pulmonary Medicine, North Bengal Medical College, Siliguri, India
| | | | - R Divya
- Pulmonary Medicine, Rajagiri Hospital, Kochi, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hughes DA, Aguiar P, Deegan PB, Ezgu F, Frustaci A, Lidove O, Linhart A, Lubanda JC, Moon JC, Nicholls K, Niu DM, Nowak A, Ramaswami U, Reisin R, Rozenfeld P, Schiffmann R, Svarstad E, Thomas M, Torra R, Vujkovac B, Warnock DG, West ML, Johnson J, Rolfe MJ, Feriozzi S. Early indicators of disease progression in Fabry disease that may indicate the need for disease-specific treatment initiation: findings from the opinion-based PREDICT-FD modified Delphi consensus initiative. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035182. [PMID: 33039984 PMCID: PMC7549469 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The PRoposing Early Disease Indicators for Clinical Tracking in Fabry Disease (PREDICT-FD) initiative aimed to reach consensus among a panel of global experts on early indicators of disease progression that may justify FD-specific treatment initiation. DESIGN AND SETTING Anonymous feedback from panellists via online questionnaires was analysed using a modified Delphi consensus technique. Questionnaires and data were managed by an independent administrator directed by two non-voting cochairs. First, possible early indicators of renal, cardiac and central/peripheral nervous system (CNS/PNS) damage, and other disease and patient-reported indicators assessable in routine clinical practice were compiled by the cochairs and administrator from panellists' free-text responses. Second, the panel scored indicators for importance (5-point scale: 1=not important; 5=extremely important); indicators scoring ≥3 among >75% of panellists were then rated for agreement (5-point scale: 1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree). Indicators awarded an agreement score ≥4 by >67% of panellists achieved consensus. Finally, any panel-proposed refinements to consensus indicator definitions were adopted if >75% of panellists agreed. RESULTS A panel of 21 expert clinicians from 15 countries provided information from which 83 possible current indicators of damage (kidney, 15; cardiac, 15; CNS/PNS, 13; other, 16; patient reported, 24) were compiled. Of 45 indicators meeting the importance criteria, consensus was reached for 29 and consolidated as 27 indicators (kidney, 6; cardiac, 10; CNS/PNS, 2; other, 6; patient reported, 3) including: (kidney) elevated albumin:creatinine ratio, histological damage, microalbuminuria; (cardiac) markers of early systolic/diastolic dysfunction, elevated serum cardiac troponin; (CNS/PNS) neuropathic pain, gastrointestinal symptoms suggestive of gastrointestinal neuropathy; (other) pain in extremities/neuropathy, angiokeratoma; (patient-reported) febrile crises, progression of symptoms/signs. Panellists revised and approved proposed chronologies of when the consensus indicators manifest. The panel response rate was >95% at all stages. CONCLUSIONS PREDICT-FD captured global opinion regarding current clinical indicators that could prompt FD-specific treatment initiation earlier than is currently practised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derralynn A Hughes
- Lysosomal Storage Disorders Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Haematology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Patricio Aguiar
- Inborn Errors of Metabolism Reference Center, North Lisbon Hospital Center, Lisbon, Portugal
- Medicine Department, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Patrick B Deegan
- Lysosomal Disorders Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fatih Ezgu
- Department and Laboratory of Paediatric Metabolic Disorders, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Andrea Frustaci
- Department of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Nephrologic, Geriatric and Anesthesiologic Sciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Olivier Lidove
- Department of Internal Medicine-Rheumatology, Croix Saint Simon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Aleš Linhart
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jean-Claude Lubanda
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - James C Moon
- Cardiac Imaging Department, Barts Heart Centre, London, UK
| | - Kathleen Nicholls
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne - Parkville Campus, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dau-Ming Niu
- Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Albina Nowak
- Department of Endocrinology and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Psychiatry University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Uma Ramaswami
- Lysosomal Storage Disorders Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ricardo Reisin
- Department of Neurology, British Hospital of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Paula Rozenfeld
- Instituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos, UNLP - CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
| | - Raphael Schiffmann
- Institute of Metabolic Disease, Baylor Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Einar Svarstad
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Mark Thomas
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Roser Torra
- Inherited Renal Diseases Unit, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bojan Vujkovac
- Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital Slovenj Gradec, Slovenj Gradec, Slovenia
| | - David G Warnock
- Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Michael L West
- Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Jack Johnson
- Fabry Support & Information Group, Concordia, Missouri, USA
- Fabry International Network, Beveren, Belgium
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Inhaled Formoterol-Fluticasone Single Inhaler Therapy in Asthma: Real-World Efficacy, Budget Impact, and Potential to Improve Adherence. Can Respir J 2020; 2020:8631316. [PMID: 33005277 PMCID: PMC7509561 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8631316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Asthma is the commonest chronic disease affecting airways in humans and has an increasing global disease burden. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the first-line therapeutic option for asthma, and addition of a long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA) has been shown to improve asthma control. A combination of the two agents in a single inhaler is beneficial with regard to ease of administration and patient compliance. Various ICS-LABA formulations are available across various countries in the world, one among them being formoterol-fluticasone. Both formoterol and fluticasone have pharmacologic peculiarities which places the combination in a uniquely advantageous position when it comes to asthma therapy. The present review focuses on some of the, hitherto, less explored aspects of this combination inhaler such as real-world efficacy, impact on budget allocation, results of switch-over therapy, and potential to improve adherence to asthma treatment. It also provides practical recommendations on positioning it in real-world asthma management.
Collapse
|
8
|
Booth A. Prescribing inhaled therapy in asthma: health professionals' habits and beliefs. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.12968/jprp.2020.2.4.181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
National and international asthma guidelines provide the evidence base for prescribing growing array of different inhaled therapies. However, the advice given is generic. The influence of nurses in prescribing inhaled therapy continues to grow, yet there is little published to help understand how and why nurses prescribe or advise on the prescribing of inhaled therapy in asthma. The aim of the study was to gain a better understanding of how health professionals make prescribing decisions in inhaled therapy, which was done by taking a survey. The survey gathered data of the habits and beliefs on prescribing inhaled corticosteroid/inhaled long-acting B2 agonist therapy in asthma, from 100 primary healthcare professionals. As a result of the study, patient preference, dose counter and maintenance and reliever therapy were reported to be considered the most important elements by health professionals. The device was considered more important than the drug, and there is an ongoing need for further education of health professionals in this area. Comparing responses from this study with similar responses from people with asthma may bring together the thinking of patients and professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Booth
- MSc RGN (independent prescriber) Clinical Tutor, Primary Care Training Centre, Practice Nurse, Oakwood Lane Medical Practice Leeds/Bradford
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gelhorn HL, Balantac Z, Ambrose CS, Chung YN, Stone B. Patient and physician preferences for attributes of biologic medications for severe asthma. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019; 13:1253-1268. [PMID: 31440040 PMCID: PMC6667349 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s198953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite the increased availability of biologic treatments indicated for severe asthma, patient and physician preferences for these medications remains largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to understand perceptions of biologic therapies, barriers to care with biologic medications, and preferences for biologic therapy attributes. METHODS This mixed-methods study involved quantitative surveys and qualitative telephone interviews with patients and physicians from the United States. Participants described preferences for relevant attributes, and barriers to use of biologic medications. Participants rated, ranked, and indicated importance of preferences for different levels of key attributes including: mode of administration, administration setting, dosing frequency, number of injections, and time to onset of effect. Other attributes unique to each group were also included. RESULTS A total of 47 patients and 25 physicians participated. Patients ranked out-of-pocket costs, mode of administration, time to onset of efficacy, and administration setting as the most important attributes. Physicians ranked mode of administration, time to onset of efficacy, dosing frequency, and insurance reimbursement/access as most important. Both groups expressed preferences for less frequent administrations (Q8W over Q4W or Q2W) (all P<0.01) and subcutaneous (SC) over intravenous injection (both P<0.0001). Key patient barriers to biologic medications include location of treatment, administration time, scheduling, cost/insurance coverage, number of injections, and mode of administration. Physicians identified patient candidacy, convincing patients, administration setting, mode of administration, cost, and administrative burden as key barriers to initiating therapy; and efficacy, speed of onset, convenience of administration, cost, and patient compliance as barriers to staying on therapy. CONCLUSIONS Patients and physicians expressed strong preferences for less frequent dosing, SC administration, and faster onset. Cost/insurance coverage and convenience issues were key barriers to use. Increased awareness and understanding of preferences and barriers may be useful in facilitating physician-patient conversations with the goal of individualizing treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather L Gelhorn
- Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Correspondence: Heather L Gelhorn Evidera, 7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1400, Bethesda, MD20814USATel +1 970 363 7773Email
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Marziniak M, Ghorab K, Kozubski W, Pfleger C, Sousa L, Vernon K, Zaffaroni M, Meuth SG. Variations in multiple sclerosis practice within Europe – Is it time for a new treatment guideline? Mult Scler Relat Disord 2016; 8:35-44. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2016] [Accepted: 04/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
11
|
Combination treatment in asthma: Reviewing old and new options. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2015; 34:72-4. [PMID: 26365488 DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2015.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2015] [Revised: 08/28/2015] [Accepted: 08/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
12
|
Scichilone N, Rossi A, Melani A. Revising old principles of inhaled treatment in new fixed combinations for asthma. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2015; 33:32-8. [PMID: 26079566 DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2015.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2015] [Revised: 06/09/2015] [Accepted: 06/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The major influencing factors on persistent asthma control are the selected treatment(s), the drug delivery route and patient's adherence to therapy, together with the influence of lifestyle (i.e. sedentary habit), comorbid conditions and specific asthma phenotypes. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in combination with a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) are the gold standard for management of persistent asthma, with maximal local targeting and minimal systemic side effects. Several innovative inhaler devices have been developed for effective local drug administration and good patient compliance to therapy. Recently, a new ICS/LABA fixed combination, formulated with fluticasone propionate (FP) and formoterol fumarate (FF), has been proposed for maintenance treatment of asthma in adults and adolescent patients. FP/FF combines the anti-inflammatory and bronchodilating properties of powerful compounds in a single inhaler. Its pharmacological characteristics allow rapid speed of onset and dosage flexibility required for step-up and step-down strategies, improving adherence to treatment of asthmatic patients. The efficacy of the FP/FF fixed combination at all dosages in controlling asthma symptoms and the reduced rate of discontinuation have been demonstrated by all randomized trials conducted so far.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Rossi
- Pulmonary Unit, A.O.U.I and University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Melani
- Respiratory Pathophysiology, S.Maria Scotte Hospital, AOU of Siena, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Papi A, Blasi F, Canonica GW, Cazzola M, Centanni S, Foschino Barbaro MP, Melani AS, Paggiaro P, Ricciardolo F, Rossi A, Scichilone N. Fluticasone propionate/formoterol: a fixed-combination therapy with flexible dosage. Eur J Intern Med 2014; 25:695-700. [PMID: 25051902 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2014.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2014] [Revised: 06/21/2014] [Accepted: 06/24/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
International guidelines describe asthma control as the main outcome of asthma management. Prevention of symptoms, improved quality of life, and reduction of exacerbations are the main components, consequently decreasing health care costs. However, many of these objectives remain unmet in real life: several surveys show that a large proportion of asthmatic patients are not well controlled despite the efficacy of current available treatment. Several randomized controlled clinical trials indicate that combining inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists, by means of a single inhaler, greatly improves the management of the disease. The results of 9 multicenter phase III clinical studies demonstrate that the fixed combination of fluticasone propionate/formoterol in a single inhaler is effective in terms of lung function and symptom control. These studies highlight the dose flexibility, safety and tolerability of this new inhaled combination. These characteristics meet the recommendations of international guidelines, and the preferences of respiratory physicians who identified these aspects as critical components of a successful asthma therapy. Combination of fluticasone propionate/formoterol in a single inhaler provides potent anti-inflammatory activity of fluticasone propionate and rapid onset of action of the β2-agonist formoterol making this association a viable treatment option both in terms of effectiveness and compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Papi
- Head Respiratory Medicine and Research Centre on Asthma and COPD, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - F Blasi
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, IRCCS Fondazione Cà Granda, Milano, Italy.
| | - G W Canonica
- Allergy and Respiratory Disease Clinic, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - M Cazzola
- Unit of Respiratory Clinical Pharmacology, Department of System Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
| | - S Centanni
- Respiratory Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - A S Melani
- Respiratory Pathophysiology, Cardiothoracic Dept., University Hospital, Siena, Italy
| | - P Paggiaro
- Respiratory Pathophysiology and Rehabilitation Unit, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - F Ricciardolo
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - A Rossi
- Pulmonary Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - N Scichilone
- Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmunology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tan RA, Corren J. Clinical utility and development of the fluticasone/formoterol combination formulation (Flutiform(®)) for the treatment of asthma. Drug Des Devel Ther 2014; 8:1555-61. [PMID: 25328383 PMCID: PMC4196884 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s36556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Pharmacologic treatment of asthma should be done with a stepwise approach recommended in treatment guidelines. If inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) alone are not adequate, ICSs in combination with long-acting β-agonists (LABAs) are now established and widely used as the next step in effective controller therapy. Fixed-dose ICS/LABA combinations in a single device are the preferred form of delivery and improve compliance by enabling patients to get symptom relief from the LABA while receiving the anti-inflammatory benefits of ICSs. Fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate is one of the newest fixed-dose combinations. It has been in use in Europe in 2012, but is still under regulatory review in the US. Fluticasone is a synthetic ICS with potent anti-inflammatory effects, while formoterol is a selective β2-adrenergic receptor agonist with a rapid onset of bronchodilation within 5-10 minutes and a 12-hour duration of action. Fluticasone/formoterol has shown superior efficacy when compared to fluticasone or formoterol alone in multiple well-designed studies. The combination has shown comparable or "noninferior" benefits in lung function, clinical symptoms, and asthma control when compared with fluticasone and formoterol administered concurrently in separate inhalers. Fluticasone/formoterol provides similar efficacy with fluticasone/salmeterol, but with more rapid symptom relief. It has been compared directly with budesonide/formoterol with comparable results. Fluticasone/formoterol is well tolerated, with no unusual or increased safety concerns versus each individual component or other available ICS/LABA combinations. Fluticasone/formoterol is the latest entry into a relatively crowded market of branded fixed-dose preparations. Upcoming generic fixed-dose combinations and once-daily agents pose significant market challenges. In clinical practice, most practitioners consider all the currently available fixed-dose preparations to be of comparable efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jonathan Corren
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Price D, Hillyer EV. Fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate in fixed-dose combination for the treatment of asthma. Expert Rev Respir Med 2014; 8:275-91. [PMID: 24802285 DOI: 10.1586/17476348.2014.905914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
A new combination inhaler containing fluticasone, a potent inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), and formoterol, a long-acting β-agonist (LABA) with rapid onset and sustained bronchodilator effect, has been approved for treatment of persistent asthma in patients ≥12 years of age requiring combination ICS-LABA therapy. The fluticasone/formoterol combination, delivered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler and available in three dose strengths, has demonstrated a good safety and tolerability profile in trials of up to 1 year. The efficacy of fluticasone/formoterol is greater than that of fluticasone or formoterol alone and noninferior to that of fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol in tightly controlled 8-12-week clinical trials. Advantages of the fluticasone/formoterol combination aerosol include rapid onset of bronchodilation, an attribute preferred by patients, and emission of a high fine-particle fraction that is consistent at different flow rates, which may aid consistency of delivery (given patient variability in inhalation maneuvers) and provide real-life benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Price
- Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Real-world perceptions of inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combinations in the treatment of asthma. Respir Med 2013; 106 Suppl 1:S4-8. [PMID: 23273164 DOI: 10.1016/s0954-6111(12)70004-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Prescribing data for Europe show a shift from inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) prescribed alone or in free combination with long-acting β(2)-agonists (LABAs) to fixed-dose single-inhaler combinations of these agents. However, existing guidelines provide little advice on selecting a specific ICS/LABA combination therapy for the treatment of asthma. European survey data indicate that the factors physicians take into account when making prescribing decisions are broadly in line with those considered to be important by experts in a Delphi process: the availability of a range of doses, the efficacy of the combination, the long-term safety and tolerability of the ICS and LABA components, the potency of the ICS and the speed of onset of the LABA. Further research is needed to help inform physician choice of ICS/LABA combinations for patients with asthma.
Collapse
|
17
|
Fluticasone/formoterol: a new single-aerosol combination therapy for patients with asthma. Respir Med 2013; 106 Suppl 1:S20-8. [PMID: 23273163 DOI: 10.1016/s0954-6111(12)70006-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
International asthma management guidelines recommend a long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA) as add-on therapy in patients whose asthma is not controlled by low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) monotherapy. Treatment with a single inhaler containing an ICS/LABA combination is advocated because it may facilitate adherence to a regimen. When prescribing ICS/LABA combination therapy, the potency of the ICS and the speed of onset of the LABA are considered important factors; therefore, an inhaled therapy containing components with these properties may be valued by physicians. The ICS fluticasone propionate (fluticasone) has potent and sustained anti-inflammatory effects, and the LABA formoterol fumarate (formoterol) provides rapid bronchodilation; the efficacy and safety profiles of these agents have been well established in clinical practice. Fluticasone and formoterol have been combined, for the first time, in a single hydrofluoroalkane-based aerosol (flutiform®; fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate). Here, we review data from the published randomized, controlled, clinical trials that demonstrate the efficacy and tolerability of this product. It has been shown that fluticasone/formoterol is more efficacious than fluticasone or formoterol given alone, and provides similar improvements in lung function to fluticasone and formoterol administered concurrently via separate inhalers. Fluticasone/formoterol has similar efficacy and tolerability profiles to budesonide/formoterol and fluticasone/salmeterol, but with the additional benefit of more rapid bronchodilation than fluticasone/salmeterol.
Collapse
|
18
|
Aalbers R. Single inhaler as maintenance and reliever therapy--is it SMART? THE LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2013; 1:2-3. [PMID: 24321788 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(13)70020-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- René Aalbers
- Martini Hospital, Groningen 9700 RM, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Aalbers R, Brusselle G, McIver T, Grothe B, Bodzenta-Lukaszyk A. Onset of bronchodilation with fluticasone/formoterol combination versus fluticasone/salmeterol in an open-label, randomized study. Adv Ther 2012; 29:958-69. [PMID: 23081745 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-012-0058-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate (fluticasone), and the long-acting beta(2)-agonist, formoterol fumarate (formoterol), have been combined in a single aerosol inhaler (fluticasone/formoterol). In a randomized, open-label study, fluticasone/formoterol showed similar efficacy to fluticasone/salmeterol after 12 weeks of treatment. This post-hoc analysis compared the onset of bronchodilation with the two treatments. METHODS Adults with mild-to-moderate-severe persistent asthma were randomized to fluticasone/formoterol (100/10 or 250/10 μg twice daily [b.i.d.]) or fluticasone/salmeterol (100/50 or 250/50 μg b.i.d.) for 12 weeks. The onset of bronchodilation (the first post-dose time point at which the forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)] was ≥12% greater than the pre-dose value), responder rates (the proportion of patients achieving bronchodilation), and changes in FEV(1) were assessed at days 0 (baseline) and 84. RESULTS Fluticasone/formoterol (n = 101) provided more rapid onset of bronchodilation than fluticasone/salmeterol (n = 101) over the first 120 min post-dose on days 0 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.47 [95% CI 1.05-2.05]) and 84 (HR = 1.77 [95% CI 1.14-2.73]). The odds of a patient achieving bronchodilation within 5 min of dosing were almost four-times higher with fluticasone/formoterol than with fluticasone/salmeterol on day 0 (odds ratio [OR] = 3.97 [95% CI 1.96-8.03]) and almost 10-times higher on day 84 (OR = 9.58 [95% CI 2.14-42.90]); the odds of achieving bronchodilation within 120 min post-dose were approximately twofold higher with fluticasone/formoterol on both days. The overall percentage increase in least-squares (LS) mean FEV1 during the 120-min post-dose period was significantly greater with fluticasone/formoterol than fluticasone/salmeterol on days 0 (LS mean treatment difference: 4.70% [95% CI 1.57-7.83]; P = 0.003) and 84 (2.79% [95% CI 0.65-4.93]; P = 0.011). CONCLUSION These analyses showed that fluticasone/formoterol provided a faster onset of bronchodilation than fluticasone/salmeterol, which was maintained over 12 weeks of treatment. This benefit may facilitate treatment adherence among patients with asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René Aalbers
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Martini Hospital, Groningen, Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nathan RA, D'Urzo A, Blazhko V, Kaiser K. Safety and efficacy of fluticasone/formoterol combination therapy in adolescent and adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pulm Med 2012; 12:67. [PMID: 23078148 PMCID: PMC3502550 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-12-67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2011] [Accepted: 10/11/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the efficacy and safety of a new asthma therapy combining fluticasone propionate and formoterol fumarate (fluticasone/formoterol; flutiform®), administered twice daily (b.i.d.) via a single aerosol inhaler, compared with its individual components administered separately and placebo, in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. METHODS Patients aged ≥ 12 years were evenly randomised to 12 weeks of treatment with fluticasone/formoterol (100/10 μg b.i.d.), fluticasone (100 μg b.i.d.), formoterol (10 μg b.i.d.), or placebo, in this double-blind, parallel group, multicentre study. The three co-primary endpoints were: a) change in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1)) from morning pre-dose at baseline to pre-dose at week 12 for the comparison with formoterol; b) change in FEV(1) from morning pre-dose at baseline to 2 hours post-dose at week 12 for the comparison with fluticasone, and c) time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy from baseline to week 12 for the comparison with placebo. Safety was assessed based on adverse events, clinical laboratory tests and vital sign evaluations. RESULTS Statistically significant differences were demonstrated for all the three co-primary endpoints. Fluticasone/formoterol combination therapy showed significantly greater improvements from baseline to end of study in the change in pre-dose FEV(1) compared with formoterol (Least Squares (LS) mean treatment difference: 0.101 L; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.002, 0.199; p = 0.045) and the change in pre-dose compared with 2 hours post-dose FEV(1) versus fluticasone (LS mean treatment difference: 0.200 L; 95% CI: 0.109, 0.292; p < 0.001). The time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was significantly longer for patients in the combination therapy group compared with those receiving placebo (p = 0.015). Overall, the results from multiple secondary endpoints assessing lung function, asthma symptoms, and rescue medication use supported the superior efficacy of the combination product compared with fluticasone, formoterol, and placebo. The fluticasone/formoterol combination therapy had a good safety and tolerability profile over the 12 week treatment period. CONCLUSIONS Fluticasone/formoterol had a good safety and tolerability profile and showed statistically superior efficacy for the three co-primary endpoints compared to fluticasone, formoterol, and placebo, in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. EudraCT number: 2007-002866-36; US NCT number: NCT00393991.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Nathan
- Asthma and Allergy Associates PC, 2709 North Tejon Street, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|