EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide 2.0

Since the discovery of immunoglobulin E (IgE) as a mediator of allergic diseases in 1967, our knowledge about the immunological mechanisms of IgE-mediated allergies has remarkably increased. In addition to understanding the immune response and clinical symptoms, allergy diagnosis and management depend strongly on the precise identification of the elicitors of the IgE-mediated allergic reaction. In the past four decades, innovations in bioscience and technology have facilitated the identification and production of well-defined, highly pure molecules for component-resolved diagnosis (CRD), allowing a personalized diagnosis and management of the allergic disease for individual patients. The first edition of the "EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide" (MAUG) in 2016 rapidly became a key reference for clinicians, scientists, and interested readers with a background in allergology, immunology, biology, and medicine. Nevertheless, the field of molecular allergology is moving fast, and after 6 years, a new EAACI Taskforce was established to provide an updated document. The Molecular Allergology User's Guide 2.0 summarizes state-of-the-art information on allergen molecules, their clinical relevance, and their application in diagnostic algorithms for clinical practice. It is designed for both, clinicians and scientists, guiding health care professionals through the overwhelming list of different allergen molecules available for testing. Further, it provides diagnostic algorithms on the clinical relevance of allergenic molecules and gives an overview of their biology, the basic mechanisms of test formats, and the application of tests to measure allergen exposure.

Profilin is a marker of severity in allergic respiratory diseases

BACKGROUND

The capacity of profilin to induce allergic symptoms in patients with respiratory allergy has been questioned. In this sense, the aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between profilin exposure and induction of symptoms in a prospective case-control study.

METHODS

The concentration of profilin as well as pollen levels in the air was measured. A diary score of symptoms was collected from allergic patients. Seventy-nine individuals were included in the study; fifty cases and 28 controls were positive or negative to profilin, respectively. Conjunctival and bronchial provocation tests were performed with purified profilin (Pho d 2) in a subgroup of cases and controls.

RESULTS

Profilin was detected in the environment on 133 days (maximum peak of 0.56 ng/m³ ). A positive correlation between profilin and pollen count of Olea and Poaceae was observed (ρ = 0.24; P < .001). Intensity of total, nasal and ocular symptoms was statistically higher in cases than in controls (P < .001). The risk of suffering symptoms, measured by the percentage of patients who presented any of the symptoms each day, was also higher in cases than in controls. The provocation test was positive in 95% of bronchial and 90% of conjunctival challenges in cases, and negative in all controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Profilin was detected in the environment and had the ability to induce a specific allergen response. Patients sensitized to this panallergen showed more symptoms and were more likely to have symptoms. Therefore, sensitization to profilin seems to be a marker of severity in patients with rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma mediated by pollen.

Pollen-Food Allergy Syndrome: A not so Rare Disease in Childhood

Seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SAR) affects millions of people worldwide, particularly in childhood and adolescence. Pollen food allergy syndrome (PFAS) is a common adverse reaction occurring few minutes after the consumption of vegetable foods in patients with pollen-induced SAR. PFAS has rarely been investigated in the pediatric population, as it has been mainly examined as an adult disease. Recent studies suggested that PFAS might be more frequent in childhood than previously recognized. The present review aims to give an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, management and prognosis of PFAS in children with SAR-induced by pollens.

Strong and frequent T-cell responses to the minor allergen Phl p 12 in Spanish patients IgE-sensitized to Profilins

BACKGROUND

Profilins are dominant pan-allergens known to cause cross-sensitization, leading to clinical symptoms such as pollen-food syndrome. This study aimed to determine the T-cell response to Phl p 12 in profilin-sensitized patients, by measuring the prevalence, strength and cross-reactivity to clinically relevant profilins.

METHODS

The release of Phl p allergens from pollen was determined by mass spectrometry and immunochemistry. T-cell responses, epitope mapping and cross-reactivity to profilins (Phl p 12, Ole e 2, Bet v 2 and Mal d 4) were measured in vitro using PBMCs from 26 Spanish grass-allergic donors IgE-sensitized to profilin. Cross-reactivity was addressed in vivo using 2 different mouse strains (BALB/c and C3H).

RESULTS

Phl p 12 and Phl p 1 are released from pollen simultaneously and in similar amounts. Both T-cell response frequency (17/26 donors) and strength were comparable between Phl p 12 and Phl p 1. T-cell cross-reactivity to other profilins correlated with overall sequence homology, and 2 immunodominant epitope regions of Phl p 12 were identified. Data from mice immunized with Phl p 12 showed that cross-reactivity to Bet v 2 was mediated by conserved epitopes and further influenced by additional genetic factors, likely to be MHC II.

CONCLUSION

The strength, prevalence and cross-reactivity of T-cell responses towards Phl p 12 are comparable to the major allergen Phl p 1, which supports the hypothesis that T cells to Phl p 12 can play an important role in development of allergic symptoms, such as those associated with pollen-food syndrome.

The clinical relevance of birch pollen profilin cross-reactivity in sensitized patients

BACKGROUND

Overlapping seasons and cross-reactivity, especially to grass pollen profilin, can hamper the diagnosis of birch pollen allergy. To identify the primary sensitizing allergen and the clinical relevance of cross-sensitization, we correlated sensitization profiles with in vitro and in vivo tests, symptom scores, and pollen counts.

METHODS

A total of 433 patients with positive skin prick test (SPT) to birch pollen were analyzed regarding IgE to major birch and grass pollen allergens Bet v 1 and Phl p 1/p 5 and the profilins Bet v 2 and Phl p 12. Subgroups were analyzed by basophil activation test (BAT) and CAP-FEIA-based cross- and self-inhibition tests.

RESULTS

A total of 349 patients were sensitized to Bet v 1, 44 patients to both Bet v 1 and Bet v 2, and 15 patients to Bet v 2 only. From Bet v 2-sensitized patients, 40 were also sensitized to Phl p 12. Ex vivo, Bet v 2 and Phl p 12 induced dose-dependent activation in basophils of these patients. Cross- and self-inhibition tests with both allergens confirmed cross-reactivity. However, semiquantitative analysis of SPTs demonstrated markedly increased reactivity to grass compared to birch pollen extract in Bet v 2 only sensitized patients. Accordingly, in most of those patients, clinical symptoms precisely correlated with grass pollen counts.

CONCLUSION

Identification of the clinically relevant and sensitizing allergen needs correlation of actual pollen counts with clinical symptoms and sensitization status to major allergens. Semiquantitative analysis of SPT or BAT and determining profilin-specific IgE can contribute to making the diagnosis.

Detection of pan-allergens in commercial pollen extracts for allergen immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Up to 50% of patients with pollen allergy are sensitized to at least 1 of the 2 pollen pan-allergens profilin and polcalcin. These allergens could have clinical relevance but the content of profilin and polcalcin in commercial extracts for allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To detect these pan-allergens in commercial pollen extracts for AIT from various sources.

METHODS

Immunoglobulin E (IgE) reactivity to Phl p 7 and Bet v 2 of sera from 18 adults hypersensitive to profilin and/or polcalcin was investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay before and after absorption with grass, birch, ragweed, pellitory, and olive pollen extracts for AIT from different producers. Immunoblot inhibition experiments also were carried out using the same allergens.

RESULTS

Birch, grass, ragweed, and olive pollen extracts for AIT contained large amounts of profilin, inducing 80% to 90% inhibition in most cases; Parietaria AIT extract appeared to contain little profilin. On immunoblot, grass and birch pollen extracts for sublingual AIT completely absorbed IgE specific for rBet v 2. Interestingly, only grass pollen extracts induced a significant inhibition of IgE binding to rPhl p 7 on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblot. A grass pollen allergoid lost most of its inhibitory potency, suggesting a much weakened affinity for specific IgE.

CONCLUSION

With the exception of Parietaria, commercial extracts for AIT of most pollens are rich in profilin and, hence, potentially able to desensitize to this allergen; in contrast, only grass pollen extracts seem rich in polcalcin. These are the pollens to use in case of severe symptoms induced by pollen pan-allergens.

EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide

The availability of allergen molecules ('components') from several protein families has advanced our understanding of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated responses and enabled 'component-resolved diagnosis' (CRD). The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Molecular Allergology User's Guide (MAUG) provides comprehensive information on important allergens and describes the diagnostic options using CRD. Part A of the EAACI MAUG introduces allergen molecules, families, composition of extracts, databases, and diagnostic IgE, skin, and basophil tests. Singleplex and multiplex IgE assays with components improve both sensitivity for low-abundance allergens and analytical specificity; IgE to individual allergens can yield information on clinical risks and distinguish cross-reactivity from true primary sensitization. Part B discusses the clinical and molecular aspects of IgE-mediated allergies to foods (including nuts, seeds, legumes, fruits, vegetables, cereal grains, milk, egg, meat, fish, and shellfish), inhalants (pollen, mold spores, mites, and animal dander), and Hymenoptera venom. Diagnostic algorithms and short case histories provide useful information for the clinical workup of allergic individuals targeted for CRD. Part C covers protein families containing ubiquitous, highly cross-reactive panallergens from plant (lipid transfer proteins, polcalcins, PR-10, profilins) and animal sources (lipocalins, parvalbumins, serum albumins, tropomyosins) and explains their diagnostic and clinical utility. Part D lists 100 important allergen molecules. In conclusion, IgE-mediated reactions and allergic diseases, including allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, food reactions, and insect sting reactions, are discussed from a novel molecular perspective. The EAACI MAUG documents the rapid progression of molecular allergology from basic research to its integration into clinical practice, a quantum leap in the management of allergic patients.

Profilin desensitization: A case series

The role of profilin as an allergen has long been questioned. The capacity of profilin to induce respiratory symptoms has recently been demonstrated; moreover, over 50% of patients sensitized to profilin experienced symptoms after the ingestion of plant-derived foods, suggesting that profilin should be considered as a clinically relevant food allergen.We describe the cases of seven allergic patients with oral allergy syndrome and other adverse reactions after eating plant-derived food, that have been undergone to profilin desensitization treatment.The protocol started with a drop of profilin solution (50 µg/mL) diluted 1:10(18) in water until the highest dose of 10 drops of undiluted solution three times a week. At the end of the treatment we observed a decreased mean diameter of profilin wheal in skin prick test (SPT) in five of the seven participants and in profilin specific IgE values in six patients that repeated the test. Regarding basophil activation test (BAT) and the detection of IgG4, we do not have significant results because the tests have to be repeated in some patients. Regarding the double-blind placebo-controlled challenges, after about 10 months of induction phase all the patients showed tolerance to several foods that they previously did not tolerate.Moreover, the immunotherapy with profilin has proved to be safe because no serious adverse events have been reported in our patients.In summary, the results of this exploratory study of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for profilin allergy show that it can be a promising therapeutic option that could modify the clinical reactivity of the patients to the intake of plant-derived food.

Profilin as a severe food allergen in allergic patients overexposed to grass pollen

BACKGROUND

Profilins are ubiquitous proteins that act as panallergens in sensitized patients, considered to be mild or incomplete food allergens. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of profilins as severe food allergens in allergic patients overexposed to grass who were referred for severe food reactions and were sensitized to profilins.

METHODS

After a careful in vitro screening, 26 patients were included, classified into two groups, mild (17) and severe reactors (9), based on clinical history and subsequently provoked orally with purified profilin in a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge setup.

RESULTS

A significant number of patients presented severe positive food challenge test reactions at low doses of the allergen profilin. Patients prone to suffer from severe reactions had lower IgG4/IgE ratio to major grass allergens than those who did not.

CONCLUSION

Profilins are complete food allergens in food-allergic patient populations that are exposed to high levels of grass pollen. This type of patient constitutes an optimal model to understand the link between respiratory and food allergies. The nature of the observed reactions and the low level of allergen eliciting the reactions suggest that intake through the oral mucosa might constitute a relevant route of exposure to food allergens.

Diagnosis and allergen immunotherapy treatment of polysensitised patients with respiratory allergy in Spain: an Allergists' Consensus

BACKGROUND

Polysensitisation is common in patients with respiratory allergy in Spain. Selection of the best allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is difficult in polysensitised patients. The present study was designed to help allergists better identify relevant allergens in these patients and to improve the selection of AIT in Spain.

METHODS

Sixty-two Spanish allergists answered a survey containing 88 items divided into four groups: 1) general approach to polysensitised subjects; 2) sensitisation profile involving mite, animal dander and moulds; 3) grass and olive pollen co-sensitisation, and 4) other pollen polysensitisation profile (weed and tree pollen). The Delphi method was used.

RESULTS

A consensus was achieved for 83% of items (92%, 81%, 83% and 73% of the four groups analysed, respectively). Only polysensitised patients with clinical relevance should be considered polyallergic. A detailed medical history (clinical symptoms and medication) together with a profound knowledge of allergens present in the patient's environment are essential for diagnosis. Skin prick tests (SPTs) are not adequate to decide the clinical relevance of each allergen. Serum specific IgE against allergen sources adds value to SPT but molecular diagnosis, when possible, is strongly recommended, especially in pollen-allergic patients. Specific allergen challenge tests are difficult to perform and not recommended for daily practice. Regarding AIT composition, up to three allergens can be used in the same vaccine, but only related allergens may be mixed. In some cases more than one vaccine may be needed.

CONCLUSION

Some criteria have been established to improve diagnosis and AIT prescription in polysensitised patients.

Profilin sensitisation in a Mediterranean population

BACKGROUND

Sensitisation to pan-allergens has become an interesting tool for the study of the allergenic profile of different populations. Profilins are one of the most common pan-allergens to be studied because they are responsible for a large number of sensitisations and are clearly related to cross-reactivity and co-sensitisation.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to investigate the profile of sensitisation to profilins and to correlate it with sensitisation to foods and pollens.

METHODS

Six hundred and fifty-four consecutive patients were skin-prick tested with a battery of common allergens including pollens, epithelia, mites and moulds and profilin and divided into three groups depending on their sensitisation profile (non-atopic, atopic with pollinosis and atopic without pollinosis). Patients with symptoms were challenged and diagnosed with the offending food extracts. Profilin sensitisation was identified and analysed in detail.

RESULTS

According to the classification of the population, the prevalence of profilin sensitisation was estimated at 2.9% in patients suffering respiratory allergy, 4.2% in atopic patients, and 5.9% in pollen-sensitised individuals. Positive association was observed between pollen (except Cupressus and olive) and profilin but not with moulds, mites or epithelia. With respect to foods, positive association was only observed between profilin and melon sensitisation. Lastly, in terms of symptoms, positive association was only observed between profilin sensitisation and OAS.

CONCLUSION

Profilin sensitisation seems to be a marker of pollen-related poly-sensitisation in our area. Pan-allergen diagnosis seems to be an essential tool for developing and improving selection of the correct treatment for allergic patients.

A comprehensive analysis of middle-European molecular sensitization profiles to pollen allergens

Molecular diagnosis of allergy and microarray technology have opened a completely new avenue of insight into sensitization profiles from both the clinical and the epidemiological point of view. We used this innovative tool in the description of sensitization patterns in pollen-sensitized patients in Middle Europe. Immunoglobulin E detection using 112 different allergenic molecules was carried out employing the ImmunoCAP ISAC microarray system. Sera from 826 patients sensitized to at least one pollen-derived molecule were subjected to analysis. The highest observed sensitization rate was 81.0% to grass-specific molecules (the most frequent being Phl p 1; 69.6%). The second most frequent sensitization was 54.8% to Betulaceae-specific molecules (Bet v 1; 54.2%). Together, grasses and Betulaceae components (and their cosensitizations with other components) comprised the vast majority of pollen sensitizations. Unexpectedly frequently observed sensitizations were those to Cupressaceae-specific molecules (14.1%), Oleaceae-specific molecules (10.8%), and the plane tree-derived molecule Pla a 2 (15.5%). The sensitization rates for all other molecules were within the expected range (Art v 1, 13.6%; Pla l 1, 9.6%; Che a 1, 8.4%; Par j 2, 0.9%; Amb a 1, 0.8%, and Sal k 1, 0.5%). Cross-reacting molecule sensitization rates were found to be 12.4% for profilins, 5.0% for polcalcins, and 6.4% for lipid transfer proteins. Molecular diagnosis of allergy gives a more precise and comprehensive insight into pollen sensitization patterns than extract-based testing, allowing a better understanding of the sensitization process and regional differences. The data presented here may help to improve the diagnostic and allergen-specific treatment procedures in the respective region.

Objectifying the conjunctival provocation test: photography-based rating and digital analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis are susceptible to both nasal and ocular symptoms. The conjunctival provocation test (CPT) is an established diagnostic procedure used in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, particularly to document a patient's current reactivity to allergens. To date, there are no international guidelines defining the CPT. No approved evaluation method exists for interpreting CPT results. This paper aims to establish the digital analysis of macroimages as an objective, validated and standardized method for interpreting CPT results.

METHODS

In a clinical immunotherapy trial with 155 patients, treatment progress was documented based on the CPT. Local investigators used a symptom score to grade tearing, reddening and the patients' subjective perception of symptoms (mucosal irritation). A central observer rated conjunctival hyperemia via digital photography. Digital image analysis software was utilized to determine conjunctival hyperemia.

RESULTS

Spearman's correlation between the local investigators' and the central observer's ratings was r = 0.729 (p < 0.001); the percentage of total agreement was 48% (based on 739 photos). Digital image analysis (based on 48 photos) had a high percentage of total agreement with the central observer's ratings (69%) but a low percentage of total agreement with the investigators' ratings (38%). The corresponding correlations were r = 0.264 and 0.064, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Photography-based rating by a central observer may represent a valuable supplement to the local investigator's assessment for making an objective evaluation of CPT results. Digital image analysis possesses the potential of being an objective evaluation method compared to the wide-spread subjective evaluation by the investigators.

A molecular diagnostic algorithm to guide pollen immunotherapy in southern Europe: towards component-resolved management of allergic diseases

Correct identification of the culprit allergen is an essential part of diagnosis and treatment in immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic diseases. In recent years, molecular biology has made important advances facilitating such identification and overcoming some of the drawbacks of natural allergen extracts, which consist of mixtures of various proteins that may be allergenic or not, specific for the allergen source or widely distributed (panallergens). New technologies offer the opportunity for a more accurate component-resolved diagnosis, of benefit especially to polysensitized allergic patients. The basic elements of molecular diagnostics with potential relevance to immunotherapy prescription are reviewed here, with a focus on Southern European sensitization patterns to pollen allergens. We propose a basic algorithm regarding component-resolved diagnostic work-up for pollen allergen-specific immunotherapy candidates in Southern Europe; this and similar algorithms can form the basis of improved patient management, conceptually a 'Component-Resolved Allergy Management'.