Appendiceal mucocele in an elderly patient: how much surgery?

Multiple intestinal hemangioma concurrent with low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm presenting as intussusception-a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Cases with intussusception caused by either intestinal hemangiomas or appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are extremely rare.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this study, we reported a 47-year-old male presented with paroxysmal abdominal pain and postprandial bloating for 3 days. CT results indicated a high possibility of secondary intussusception in ascending colon. Histopathology indicated a mixed type of cavernous and capillary hemangioma, combined with low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) and intestinal obstruction. The patient underwent laparotomy and right hemicolectomy. Finally, the patient was followed up for 4 months with no disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Rare studies reported the intestine hemangiomas coincided with appendix low-grade mucinous tumor. Its manifestations are not specific, which is a challenge in the preoperative diagnosis. For cases with intussusception that was not observed in time, it may lead to intestinal necrosis and diffuse peritonitis. Additionally, the ruptured mucinous tumor in the appendix may lead to pathogenesis of pseudomyxoma peritonei. Therefore, accurate diagnosis and appropriate surgery-based treatment contribute to the improvement of prognosis and severe outcomes among these patients.

The Investigation of 14 Appendiceal Mucocele Cases Encountered in 4850 Appendectomy Patients

BACKGROUND

Appendiceal mucocele is a rarely seen disease which occurs when the appendix lumen is filled and obstructed by mucous. In our study, we aimed to reveal the surgical approach of our clinic, features of tumors, and clinical presentations in line with literature in cases of appendix mucocele.

METHODS

Fourteen appendix mucocele patients who were admitted in our hospital between 2012 and 2019 were examined retrospectively in the electronic recording medium. Our patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, clinical status, operation, imaging results, and pathology results.

RESULTS

Of the fourteen patients, 12 applied to the emergency department and 2 to the general surgery clinic. All of our patients had abdominal pain at the time of admission. In the physical examination, 5 (35%) patients had defenses, 10 (71%) patients had rebound tenderness, and 12 (85%) patients had tenderness. In preoperative imaging studies, 11 patients were interpreted as having acute appendicitis and 3 patients were evaluated as having appendix mucocele. The pathological results were reported as 6 patients had appendiceal mucocele and 8 patients had appendiceal mucocele together with acute appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

Appendiceal mucocele is a disease which generally causes similar clinical findings of acute appendicitis. Ultrasound and CT may be useful in preoperative diagnosis. Surgical treatment options of mucocele are open or laparoscopic appendectomy, cecum resection, and right hemicolectomy. Although its incidence is low, due to pseudomyxoma peritonei, it is a pathology that requires careful surgery.

Long-Term Outcomes after Surgery for Appendiceal Mucinous Tumours

Background

Appendiceal mucinous tumour (AMT) is a very uncommon disease. We aimed to evaluate preoperative and postoperative characteristics as well as long-term outcomes of patients with appendiceal mucinous adenomas and peritoneal pseudomyxoma (PMP).

Methods

A consecutive cohort of patients diagnosed with AMT were included in the study. Tumour recurrence and the development of PMP was diagnosed based on the patients' complaints, physical examination, imaging studies, and biopsy results. The calculation of survival rates was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Between January 2003 and February 2013, 25 patients had AMT. 15 patients underwent appendectomy only (60%), 5 patients (20%) right hemicolectomy, 4 patients (16%) cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and 1 patient (4%) appendectomy with caecal resection. Another 2 patients underwent CRS and HIPEC 4 days and 3 years, respectively, following initial appendectomy. In the histopathologic examination, adenoma was diagnosed in 12 patients (48%); among these, low-grade PMP was found in 1 patient (4%). Low-grade appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma (AMCa) was diagnosed in 11 patients (44%); among these, low-grade PMP was found in seven cases (28%) and high-grade AMCa was diagnosed in 2 patients (8%). 2 of 8 PMP patients did not undergo CRS ± HIPEC because of comorbidities. The 5-year overall survival was 100% for the adenomas and 62% for PMP patients.

Conclusion

AMT is a very rare entity with a considerably good outcome even in disseminated disease. CRS and HIPEC is a gold standard treatment for PMP with excellent prognosis. However, our results could still be improved in the future.

Mucus containing cystic lesions "mucocele" of the appendix: the unresolved issues

Background. Mucocele of the appendix is a rare condition, the pathological classification and management strategy of which have not been standardized yet. Aim. To report on our management of appendiceal mucocele, highlighting the pitfalls and possible means for avoiding them. Materials and Methods. Our registries were reviewed to retrieve cases of appendiceal mucocele, encountered in the period from July 2008 to May 2013. Results. We had 9 cases, three males and sex females, with a median age of 62 years. Abdominal ultrasound (US) and computerized axial tomography scan (CT) suspected the diagnosis in only one case each. Open appendectomy was done in two cases of mucinous cystadenoma with no further surgery performed, despite the positive margin in one. Laparoscopic appendectomy was done in three cases: mucinous cystadenoma in one case which needed no further surgery, mucinous cystadenocarcinoma with pseudomyxoma peritonei in another, and low grade mucinous tumour in a third case, and all needed subsequent right hemicolectomy. Exploratory laparotomy was done in three cases: of these, synchronous right hemicolectomy was done in one case of mucinous cystadenoma/?mucinous tumour of uncertain malignant potential; in the other two cases, appendectomy only was done for mucinous hyperplasia with carcinoid tumour of the appendix in one case and mucinous cystadenoma/?mucinous tumour of uncertain malignant potential in another. The 9th case was discovered upon laparoscopy for cholecystectomy; when pseudomyxoma peritonei arising from an appendiceal mucocele was found, laparoscopic appendectomy with peritoneal biopsy was then performed instead. Histopathologic diagnostic uncertainty was present in two cases of mucinous cystadenoma where mucinous tumour of uncertain malignant potential was an alternative possibility. Perioperative colonoscopy was performed in only one case and our follow-up programme was defective, with the longest period being 180 days. Conclusion. Mucocele of the appendix should be considered in the differential diagnosis of cystic lesions in the right lower abdomen. Owing to its rarity, it continues to intrigue the surgeon as well as the radiologist and pathologist alike. For mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, right hemicolectomy is usually needed, whereas for hyperplasia and cystadenoma, appendectomy usually suffices if the resection margins are free. For mucinous tumours of uncertain malignant potential and low grade mucinous tumours as well as pseudomyxoma peritonei, the decision is not as simple. As for laparoscopic surgery, no solid proof exists with or against its safety. Although not yet standardized, perioperative colonoscopy and regular follow-up to detect early recurrences should probably be part of the management plan.

Mucocele of the appendix: case report and review of literature

Appendiceal mucocele is a rare disease. Sometimes it is discovered accidentally and sometimes it resembles acute appendicitis. Correct diagnosis before surgery is very important for the selection of adequate surgical treatment to avoid intraoperative and postoperative complications. Ultrasonography, and particularly computed tomography, should be used extensively for this purpose. If mucocele is treated incorrectly pseudomyxoma peritonei, which is characterized by malignant process, may develop. We present a case of a 54-year-old man who was admitted to the emergency department with the signs of acute appendicitis. Open surgery was performed. At the time of surgery, a cystic mass of the appendix with dimensions 7 × 4 ×3 cm, with inflamed walls, but without perforation was discovered in the right iliac fossa. No discharge was found in the peritoneal cavity. Diagnosis of mucocele was suspected. Only appendectomy was performed because no pathologic process was found in the base of the appendix and lymph nodes were not increased in size. Hystopathologic diagnosis was mucinous cystadenoma. After 2 years, the patient is feeling well.

Molecular analysis of appendiceal mucinous cystadenoma and rectal adenocarcinoma in a patient with urothelial carcinoma: a case report

Introduction

In this report, we present the case of a patient affected by appendiceal cystadenoma, a colorectal adenocarcinoma, and a concomitant bladder carcinoma, as well as the results of the molecular study of the most relevant mutational pathways involved in these tumors.

Case presentation

A 68-year-old Italian man was admitted to our unit complaining of macrohematuria, rectorrhagia, and rectal tenesmus for about 2 months. A colonoscopy showed the presence of a rectal lesion at 11cm from the anal margin; multiple biopsies were performed and a diagnosis of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma was made. Abdominal ultrasonography and total body computed tomography performed subsequently to stage the rectal cancer showed the presence of two round nodules, interpreted as swollen lymph nodes of neoplastic origin, at the anterior aspect of the iliopsoas muscle and a budding lesion affecting the bladder. The patient underwent transurethral biopsy of the lesion in the right retrotrigonal region; the diagnosis was grade II urothelial carcinoma. The patient underwent an open anterior rectal resection with loco-regional lymphadenectomy. An enlarged appendix and a voluminous whitish soft-tissue lesion requiring an appendicectomy were detected perioperatively. Transurethral resection of the bladder lesion was also performed. The histological examination revealed that the nodular lesions in the appendix were due to a cystadenoma. For mutation analysis, genomic deoxyribonucleic acid was isolated from tumor tissue samples; for PIK3CA mutations, screening revealed that all three samples analyzed carried mutations in exon 9.

Conclusions

Appendiceal mucoceles are rare but require adequate surgical treatment, given their malignant potential and the possibility of causing peritoneal pseudomyxoma. It is essential to make a correct preoperative evaluation based on a colonoscopy rather than ultrasound and computed tomography to exclude synchronous neoplasias often associated with mucoceles and to plan the optimum surgical strategy. The association between appendiceal mucoceles and other neoplasias is relatively frequent, especially with colorectal cancer. Oncogenic activation in the PIK3CA-depending pathway may contribute substantially to the pathogenesis of the different solid tumors in the same patient.