Paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin (TIP) beyond its original indication for salvage treatment of germ cell tumors

Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) as salvage and consolidation chemotherapy for advanced germ cell tumor

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of TIP as salvage chemotherapy for germ cell tumor (GCT) patients with relapsed disease or cisplatin (CDDP)-refractory disease and consolidation chemotherapy for patients who responded unfavorably to first-line chemotherapy.

Methods

Forty-three patients with advanced GCT were treated with TIP. Eleven with relapsed disease and five with CDDP-refractory disease received TIP as salvage chemotherapy. The remaining 27 received TIP as consolidation chemotherapy following initial induction chemotherapy. All patients received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Results

In total, 116 cycles of TIP were administered with a median of three cycles (range 1–4 cycles) per patient. Before TIP, 33 patients showed elevated tumor marker and 23 patients (70 %) achieved marker normalization with the chemotherapy. One of six (17 %) patients with refractory disease and 5 of 10 (50 %) patients with relapsed disease achieved durable complete response (CR) after TIP with or without surgery. Eighteen of 27 (67 %) patients receiving TIP as consolidation chemotherapy achieved durable CR. Five additional patients were given further chemotherapy and achieved durable CR. Grade 4 leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 91 and 42 % of patients, respectively; all were managed with routine supportive care. Grade 2 and grade 3 sensory neuropathy was observed in 37 and 2 % of patients, respectively.

Conclusions

The TIP was effective for relapsed patients with favorable risk features and selected CDDP-refractory GCT patients. Results of TIP as consolidation for patients with unfavorable response to the initial chemotherapy were also encouraging. The toxicities were mainly myelosuppression and sensory neuropathy.

A phase I safety and pharmacokinetic study of ABT-263 in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with solid tumors

Bcl-2 family proteins are the key regulators of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, controlling the point-of no-return and setting the threshold to engage the death machinery in response to chemical damage. Bcl-2 proteins have emerged as attractive targets for anti-cancer drug development. Navitoclax is a selective, potent, orally bioavailable, small molecule Bcl-2 inhibitor. Primary endpoints assessed the safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between navitoclax in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel or paclitaxel alone in patients with solid tumors The study comprised two arms, one a combination of navitoclax with paclitaxel and carboplatin, the second with navitoclax and paclitaxel alone. Nineteen patients were enrolled in this study. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent AEs were alopecia (57.9 %), anemia (52.6 %), nausea (52.6 %), constipation (42.1 %), diarrhea (42.1 %), fatigue (42.1 %), neutropenia (36.8 %), thrombocytopenia (36.8 %), vomiting (31.6 %), decreased appetite (31.6 %), dehydration (26.3 %), and hypomagnesaemia (26.3 %). In the light of significant hematological and non-hematological toxicity the study was ended before de-escalation of navitoclax. Only one partial response was obtained at any dose tested, thus lowering doses could not have increased efficacy. It is the combination of toxicity with modest efficacy that led to discontinuation. No apparent PK interaction was observed between navitoclax and carboplatin or paclitaxel and the combination of navitoclax and paclitaxel had modest anti-tumor activity.