Therapeutic Immune Recovery and Reduction of CXCR4-Tropic HIV-1

BACKGROUND

In the absence of therapy, CXCR4 (X4)-tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) increases over time, associated with accelerated disease progression. In contrast, the majority of patients receiving long-term combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) present with CCR5 (R5)-tropic HIV-1 variants. It is unclear whether cART itself mediates the reduction of X4-tropic HIV-1. The current study aimed at assessing the tropism of viral integrates in patients' blood during fully suppressive cART.

METHODS

The relative frequencies of X4-tropic proviral HIV-1 variants were determined by means of next-generation sequencing (False Positive Rate (FPR), 3.5%; R5- or X4 tropic variants occurring at less than 2% of the total virus population) for 35 treated patients in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and followed longitudinally over time. Full viral suppression and a continuous CD4 T-cell recovery during cART were documented for all patients. Viral phylogenetic changes and sequence evolution were analyzed.

RESULTS

The majority of patients (80%) experienced no frequency increase in X4-tropic proviruses during therapy. Although some proviral sequence evolution was demonstrable in >50% of these patients during therapy, this growing viral diversity was in no case paralleled by the emergence or expansion of X4-tropic provirus variants. In the remaining 20% of patients, the documented expansion of X4-tropic provirus was based on the outgrowth of single viral variants from minority populations already present before therapy initiation.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that X4-tropic HIV sharply declines in most patients during successful therapy, which indicates a preferential tropism-dependent provirus elimination in the immunocompetent host. The recently implemented World Health Organization strategies of immediate therapy initiation are fully in line with this gradual loss of X4 tropism during therapy. Moreover, the early use of coreceptor antagonists against the remaining CCR5-tropic viruses may be indicated.

Correlating HIV tropism with immunological response under combination antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVES

A significant percentage of patients infected with HIV-1 experience only suboptimal CD4 cell recovery while treated with combination therapy (cART). It is still unclear whether viral properties such as cell tropism play a major role in this incomplete immune response. This study therefore intended to follow the tropism evolution of the HIV-1 envelope during periods of suppressive cART.

METHODS

Viruses from two distinct patient groups, one with good and another one with poor CD4 recovery after 5 years of suppressive cART, were genotypically analysed for viral tropism at baseline and at the end of the study period.

RESULTS

Patients with CCR5-tropic CC-motif chemokine receptor 5 viruses at baseline tended to maintain this tropism to the study end. Patients who had a CXCR4-tropic CXC-motif chemokine receptor 4 virus at baseline were overrepresented in the poor CD4 recovery group. Overall, however, the majority of patients presented with CCR5-tropic viruses at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data lend support to the hypothesis that tropism determination can be used as a parameter for disease progression even if analysed long before the establishment of a poorer immune response. Moreover, the lasting predominating CCR5-tropism during periods of full viral control suggests the involvement of cellular mechanisms that preferentially reduce CXCR4-tropic viruses during cART.

Parameters Influencing Baseline HIV-1 Genotypic Tropism Testing Related to Clinical Outcome in Patients on Maraviroc

OBJECTIVES

We analysed the impact of different parameters on genotypic tropism testing related to clinical outcome prediction in 108 patients on maraviroc (MVC) treatment.

METHODS

87 RNA and 60 DNA samples were used. The viral tropism was predicted using the geno2pheno[coreceptor] and T-CUP tools with FPR cut-offs ranging from 1%-20%. Additionally, 27 RNA and 28 DNA samples were analysed in triplicate, 43 samples with the ESTA assay and 45 with next-generation sequencing. The influence of the genotypic susceptibility score (GSS) and 16 MVC-resistance mutations on clinical outcome was also studied.

RESULTS

Concordance between single-amplification testing compared to ESTA and to NGS was in the order of 80%. Concordance with NGS was higher at lower FPR cut-offs. Detection of baseline R5 viruses in RNA and DNA samples by all methods significantly correlated with treatment success, even with FPR cut-offs of 3.75%-7.5%. Triple amplification did not improve the prediction value but reduced the number of patients eligible for MVC. No influence of the GSS or MVC-resistance mutations but adherence to treatment, on the clinical outcome was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Proviral DNA is valid to select candidates for MVC treatment. FPR cut-offs of 5%-7.5% and single amplification from RNA or DNA would assure a safe administration of MVC without excluding many patients who could benefit from this drug. In addition, the new prediction system T-CUP produced reliable results.