Unilateral vitelliform phenotype in autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy

Phenotypic and Genetic Spectrum of Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy and Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy

Purpose

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) and vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD) are distinct phenotypes, typically inherited through recessive and dominant patterns, respectively. Recessively inherited VMD (arVMD) has been reported, suggesting that dominant and recessive BEST1-related retinopathies represent a single disease spectrum. This study compares adVMD, arVMD, and ARB to determine whether a continuum exists and to define clinical and genetic features to aid diagnosis and management.

Methods

One arVMD patient and nine ARB patients underwent standard ophthalmic examination, imaging, electrophysiology, and genetic assessments. A meta-analysis of reported BEST1 variants was compiled, and clinical parameters were analyzed with regard to inheritance and phenotype.

Results

Among 10 patients with biallelic BEST1 variants, three novel ARB variants (p.Asp118Ala, p.Leu224Gln, p.Val273del) were discovered. A patient with homozygous p.Glu35Lys was clinically unique, presenting with VMD, including hyperautofluorescence extending beyond the macula, peripheral punctate lesions, and shortened axial-length. A tritan-axis color vision deficit was seen in three of six (50%) of ARB patients. Attempts to distinguish recessively-inherited ARB and dominantly-inherited VMD genotypically, by variant frequency and residue location, did not yield significant differences. Literature meta-analysis with principle component analysis of clinical features demonstrated a spectrum of disease with arVMD falling between adVMD and ARB.

Conclusions

This study suggests that arVMD is part of a continuum of autosomal recessive and dominant BEST1-related retinopathies. Detailed clinical and molecular assessments of this cohort and the literature are corroborated by unsupervised analysis, highlighting the overlapping heterogeneity among BEST1-associated clinical diagnoses. Tritan-axis color vision deficit is a previously unreported finding associated with ARB.

Clinical Heterogeneity in Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy with Biallelic Mutations in the BEST1 Gene

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) has been reported as clinically heterogeneous. Eighteen patients (mean age: 22.5 years; 15 unrelated families) underwent ophthalmological examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Molecular genetic testing of the BEST1 gene was conducted by the chain-terminating dideoxynucleotide Sanger methodology. Onset of symptoms (3 to 50 years of age) and best-corrected visual acuity (0.02–1.0) were highly variable. Ophthalmoscopic and retinal imaging defined five phenotypes. Phenotype I presented with single or confluent yellow lesions at the posterior pole and midperiphery, serous retinal detachment, and intraretinal cystoid spaces. In phenotype II fleck-like lesions were smaller and extended to the far periphery. Phenotype III showed a widespread continuous lesion with sharp peripheral demarcation. Single (phenotype IV) or multifocal (phenotype V) vitelliform macular dystrophy-like lesions were observed as well. Phenotypes varied within families and in two eyes of one patient. In addition, OCT detected hyperreflective foci (13/36 eyes) and choroidal excavation (11/36). Biallelic mutations were identified in each patient, six of which have not been reported so far [c.454C>T/p.(Pro152Ser), c.620T>A/p.(Leu207His), c.287_298del/p.(Gln96_Asn99del), c.199_200del/p.(Leu67Valfs*164), c.524del/p.(Ser175Thrfs*19), c.590_615del/p.(Leu197Profs*26)]. BEST1-associated ARB presents with a variable age of onset and clinical findings, that can be categorized in 5 clinical phenotypes. Hyperreflective foci and choroidal excavation frequently develop as secondary manifestations.

UNILATERAL BEST DISEASE: A CASE REPORT

PURPOSE

To describe the multimodal imaging findings observed unilaterally in a patient with Best disease due to a p.G15D mutation in the BEST1 gene.

METHODS

The clinical history of a 62-year-old female patient with unilateral Best disease was reviewed. Retinal findings were documented by clinical examination and multimodal imaging.

RESULTS

Posterior segment examination of the patient's right eye demonstrated retinal pigment epithelium hypopigmentation and clumping in the central macula beneath a chronic shallow serous retinal detachment (SRD), confirmed by optical coherence tomography. Fluorescein angiography showed central staining with no evidence of focal leakage or choroidal neovascularization, and correlated with the hypoautofluorescence seen on fundus autofluorescence. There was no evidence of choroidal hyperpermeability on indocyanine green angiography, nor was there any neovascularization detected on optical coherence tomography-angiography. The left eye appeared normal with all imaging modalities.

CONCLUSION

Best disease is an autosomal dominant disease that is generally bilateral. We present a case of a unilateral Best disease with serous retinal detachment in a patient with a p.G15D mutation in BEST1. Best disease should be considered in the differential diagnosis of serous retinal detachment and may masquerade as central serous chorioretinopathy.

A unique case series of autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy exhibiting multigenerational inheritance

INTRODUCTION

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) is a retinal disease caused by biallelic mutations of the BEST1 gene. It has a variable phenotype with white flecks in the retina, multifocal yellow subretinal deposits, macular edema, choroidal neovascularization, hyperopia, and electrophysiological abnormalities. We describe a family with ARB and multigenerational inheritance.

METHODS

Three generations of a Middle Eastern family (a woman, one son, and two grandchildren) were evaluated by our ocular genetics team. Eye examinations, fundus photography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed. Genetic testing was obtained on examined patients and available relatives.

RESULTS

The proband demonstrated counting fingers vision and white flecks in the retinal periphery, with macular subretinal fluid (SRF), loss of outer photoreceptor segments, and epiretinal membrane (ERM) on OCT. Two grandchildren demonstrated decreased vision, multifocal yellow subretinal deposits, and SRF on OCT. Two grandchildren examined elsewhere were reported to be similarly affected. A son's examination was normal except for extra-macular scars (from prior toxoplasmosis) and ERM. Genetic history revealed consanguinity and testing showed homozygosity for BEST1 mutations in the proband and two grandchildren c.473G>A/c.473G>A (R218H /R218H) and heterozygosity in two unaffected sons and two unaffected daughters-in-law c.473G>A/WT (p.R218H/WT).

DISCUSSION

We present a consanguineous family of five affected individuals with ARB and four confirmed carriers. Their pedigree was consistent with dominant inheritance and incomplete penetrance. Genetic testing clarified the diagnosis and mode of inheritance. We describe the genetic findings, phenotypic variability, and recessive inheritance of an often dominantly inherited mutation as notable elements in their case.

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy associated with angle-closure glaucoma

PURPOSE

Abnormalities in the BEST1 gene have recently been recognised as causing autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). ARB has been noted to have a variable phenotypic presentation, distinct from that of autosomal dominant Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). Both conditions are associated with deposits in the retina, a reduced or absent electro-oculography (EOG) light rise, and the risk of developing angle-closure glaucoma. Herein, we describe the clinical and genetic characteristics of a young male diagnosed with ARB associated with angle-closure glaucoma resulting from a novel homozygous mutation in BEST1.

METHODS

All research involved in this case adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The proband underwent slitlamp examination, retinal autofluorescence imaging and optical coherence tomography after presenting with deteriorating vision. The findings prompted genetic testing with bi-directional DNA sequencing of coding and flanking intronic regions of BEST1. The proband's family members were subsequently screened.

RESULTS

A provisional diagnosis of ARB was made based on the findings of subretinal and schitic lesions on fundoscopy and retinal imaging, together with abnormal EOG and electroretinography. Genetic testing identified a novel homozygous mutation in BEST1, c.636+1 G>A. Family members were found to carry one copy of the mutation and had no clinical or electrophysiological evidence of disease. The proband was additionally diagnosed with angle-closure glaucoma requiring topical therapy, peripheral iridotomies and phacoemulsification.

CONCLUSIONS

Phenotypic overlap, reduced penetrance, variable expressivity and the ongoing discovery of new forms of bestrophinopathies add to the difficulty in distinguishing these retinal diseases. All patients diagnosed with ARB or BVMD should be examined for narrow angles and glaucoma, given their frequent association with these conditions.