Comparative pharmacodynamics and dose optimization of liposomal amphotericin B against Candida species in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

As comparative pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) against Candida spp. are lacking, we explored L-AMB pharmacodynamics against different Candida species in an in vitro PK/PD dilution model. Eight Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida krusei isolates (EUCAST/CLSI AMB MIC 0.125-1 mg/L) were studied in the in vitro PK/PD model simulating L-AMB Cmax = 0.25-64 mg/L and t1/2 = 9 h. The model was validated with one susceptible and one resistant Candida albicans isolate. The Cmax/MIC-log10CFU/mL reduction from the initial inoculum was analyzed with the Emax model, and Monte Carlo analysis was performed for the standard (3 mg/kg with Cmax = 21.87 ± 12.47 mg/L) and higher (5 mg/kg with Cmax = 83 ± 35.2 mg/L) L-AMB dose. A ≥1.5 log10CFU/mL reduction was found at L-AMB Cmax = 8 mg/L against C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei isolates (MIC 0.25-0.5 mg/L) whereas L-AMB Cmax ≥ 32 mg/L was required for C. glabrata isolates. The in vitro PK/PD relationship followed a sigmoidal pattern (R2 ≥ 0.85) with a mean Cmax/MIC required for stasis of 2.1 for C. albicans (close to the in vivo stasis), 24/17 (EUCAST/CLSI) for C. glabrata, 8 for C. parapsilosis, and 10 for C. krusei. The probability of target attainment was ≥99% for C. albicans wild-type (WT) isolates with 3 mg/kg and for wild-type isolates of the other species with 5 mg/kg. L-AMB was four- to eightfold less active against the included non-C. albicans species than C. albicans. A standard 3-mg/kg dose is pharmacodynamically sufficient for C. albicans whereas our data suggest that 5 mg/kg may be recommendable for the included non-C. albicans species.

Echinocandins versus Amphotericin B Against Candida tropicalis Fungemia in Adult Hematological Patients with Neutropenia: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Candida tropicalis is the most common non-albicans Candida species identified in immunocompromised patients, which often appears with high mortality. However, data on the outcomes of treatment for Candida tropicalis fungemia in patients with neutropenia remain limited.

Methods

In the present study, 90 neutropenic adult patients with proven Candida tropicalis fungemia, who received initial antifungal therapy, were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

These results revealed that the overall 8-day and 30-day mortality among patients in the entire data set were 22.2% and 33.3%, respectively. However, there was no significant difference between the survival and death group, in terms of baseline characteristics. The univariate analysis of risk factors identified the treatment with azole as a predictor of mortality, while treatments that containing amphotericin B were associated with reduced mortality. In addition, the survival rate on day 30 was observed in 60.7% (17/28) of patients who were initially treated with echinocandins, while this was observed in 86.4% (19/22, P=0.039) and 100% (13/13, P=0.024) of patients treated with amphotericin B plus echinocandins and amphotericin B, respectively.

Conclusion

These data indicate for the first time that the initial therapy with amphotericin B-based agents was associated with a better survival rate and could be assessed as the optimal strategy for the treatment of Candida tropicalis fungemia in patients with neutropenia.

Echinocandins in antifungal pharmacotherapy

Objectives

Echinocandins are the newest addition of the last decade to the antifungal armamentarium, which, owing to their unique mechanism of action, selectively target the fungal cells without affecting mammalian cells. Since the time of their introduction, they have come to occupy an important niche in the antifungal pharmacotherapy, due to their efficacy, safety, tolerability and favourable pharmacokinetic profiles. This review deals with the varying facets of echinocandins such as their chemistry, in-vitro and in-vivo evaluations, clinical utility and indications, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and pharmacoeconomic considerations.

Key findings

Clinical studies have demonstrated that the echinocandins – caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin – are equivalent, if not superior, to the mainstay antifungal therapies involving amphotericin B and fluconazole. Moreover, echinocandin regimen has been shown to be more cost-effective and economical. Hence, the echinocandins have found favour in the management of invasive systemic fungal infections.

Conclusions

The subtle differences in echinocandins with respect to their pharmacology, clinical therapy and the mechanisms of resistance are emerging at a rapid pace from the current pool of research which could potentially aid in extending their utility in the fungal infections of the eye, heart and nervous system.