1
|
Ozyurt H, Ozden AS, Ozgen Z, Gemici C, Yaprak G. Pre- and post-surgery treatments in rectal cancer: a long-term single-centre experience. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 24:e24-e34. [PMID: 28270729 DOI: 10.3747/co.24.3229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our study evaluated long-term survival outcomes in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy, and the impact on survival of concomitant and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (ctx), among other prognostic factors. METHODS The study included 196 patients [median age: 58 years (range: 20-86 years); 63.0% men] with locally advanced rectal carcinoma and, in some cases, resectable liver metastasis. Rates of distant metastasis and local recurrence and of 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (dmfs) and overall survival (os) were determined. RESULTS The 5-year os rate was 57.0%, with a median duration of 81.5 months (95% confidence interval: 73.7 months to 89.4 months), and the 5-year dmfs rate was 54.1%, with a median duration of 68.4 months (95% confidence interval: 40.4 months to 96.4 months). Prognostic factors for higher os and dmfs rates were downstaging (p = 0.013 and p = 0.005 respectively), radiotherapy dose (50 Gy vs. 56 Gy or 45-46 Gy, both p = 0.002), and concomitant ctx use (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001) and type (5-fluorouracil-leucovorin-folinic acid vs. tegafur-folinic acid, p = 0.034 and p = 0.043). Adjuvant ctx after neoadjuvant long-term concomitant chemoradiotherapy (ccrt) and surgery was associated with better 5-year os rates for postoperative T0-T3 disease (p = 0.003) and disease at all lymph node stages (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our findings revealed a favourable survival outcome with long-term fractionated irradiation and concomitant 5-fluorouracil-based ctx, achieving 5-year os and dmfs rates of 57.0% and 54.1% respectively. Preoperative administration of radiotherapy (50 Gy) and postoperative adjuvant ctx were associated with a significant survival benefit. Radiation doses above 50 Gy and the interval between ccrt and surgery had no significant effect on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Ozyurt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, and
| | - A S Ozden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, and
| | - Z Ozgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - C Gemici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, and
| | - G Yaprak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, and
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Donati M, Stavrou GA, Stang A, Basile F, Oldhafer KJ. 'Liver-first' approach for metastatic colorectal cancer. Future Oncol 2016; 11:1233-43. [PMID: 25832880 DOI: 10.2217/fon.14.316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The liver-first approach was proposed for the first time in 2006 to obtain resectability of stage IV colorectal cancer patients and complete the therapeutic plan. From then some groups have used this new revolutionary approach reporting promising results. Other alternative strategies have been proposed for metastatic patients. The authors reviewed the literature weighing the pros and cons of each strategy proposed to manage these advanced tumor stages. The therapeutic options are analyzed in the light of oncologic problems and evidence. Also problems, questions and perspectives are given. Even if the 'liver-first' approach seems to be a promising strategy, the ideal diagnostic-therapeutic flowchart for metastatic colorectal cancer is still difficult to standardize. The great heterogeneity of this population of patients is one of the main problems. A 'tailored approach' philosophy is necessary to calibrate, in a multidisciplinary setting, a case-by-case choice of therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Donati
- Department of Surgery & Medical-Surgical Specialties, General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, Vittorio-Emanuele University Hospital, University of Catania, 95122 Catania, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee JH, Kim JG, Oh ST, Lee MA, Chun HG, Kim DY, Kim TH, Kim SY, Baek JY, Park JW, Oh JH, Park HC, Choi DH, Park YS, Kim HC, Chie EK, Jang HS. Two-week course of preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by delayed surgery for rectal cancer: a phase II multi-institutional clinical trial (KROG 11-02). Radiother Oncol 2014; 110:150-4. [PMID: 24411228 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2013] [Revised: 10/16/2013] [Accepted: 11/09/2013] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a two-week schedule of radiotherapy with oral capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eighty patients with rectal cancer located in the mid to low rectum, staged cT3-4N0-2M0, were prospectively enrolled. They underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy and delayed surgery 6-8 weeks after the completion of radiation therapy. A radiation dose of 33 Gy in 10 fractions was delivered to the pelvis for 2 weeks. One cycle of oral capecitabine was administered at a dose of 1650 mg/m(2)/day during radiotherapy. Tumor response and toxicity were the study endpoints. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number, NCT01431599). RESULTS All included patients underwent total mesorectal excisions including 12 cases of robot assisted surgery and 50 cases of laparoscopic surgery. Of the 80 patients, 27 (33.8%) achieved downstaging (ypT0-2N0) of a rectal tumor and 11 (13.8%) had a pathologically complete response (ypCR). Downstaging rates were 45% for T classification and 65% for N classification. Sphincter saving was achieved in 73 (91.3%) of the 80 patients. Of the 80 patients, 3 (3.8%) experienced grade 3 hematologic toxicity, and 2 (2.5%) had grade 3 postoperative complications such as ileus and wound dehiscence. There was no grade 4 toxicity. CONCLUSION A two-week schedule of radiotherapy with oral capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer patients showed low toxicity profiles and promising results in terms of tumor response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Hoon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun-Gi Kim
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Taek Oh
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
| | - Myung Ah Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
| | - Hoo Geun Chun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Yong Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Go-Yang, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Go-Yang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Young Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Go-Yang, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Baek
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Go-Yang, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Won Park
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Go-Yang, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hwan Oh
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Go-Yang, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Doo Ho Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Suk Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Cheol Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eui Kyu Chie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Hong Seok Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|