Multivisceral resection for T4 or recurrent colorectal cancer

The use of laparoscopy for T4a and T4b colon cancer: are we playing with fire?

BACKGROUND

The laparoscopic approach for colon cancer has become widely accepted. However, its safety for T4 tumors, and particularly for T4b tumors when local invasion to adjacent structures occurs, remains controversial. This study aimed to compare short and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic vs. open resection for T4a and T4b colon cancers.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained, single-institution database was queried to identify patients with pathological stage T4a and T4b colon adenocarcinomas electively operated on between 2000 and 2012. Patients were divided into two groups based on the use of laparoscopy. Patient characteristics, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred and nineteen patients [41 laparoscopic (L), 78 open surgeries (O)] met the inclusion criteria. No difference was observed in age, gender, BMI, ASA, and procedure between groups. Tumors treated by L were smaller than O (p = 0.003). No difference was observed in morbidity, mortality, reoperation, or readmission between the groups. Length of hospital stay was shorter in L than O (6 vs. 9 days, p = 0.005). Conversion to open was necessary in 22% of all T4 tumors laparoscopic cases. However, when tumors were subdivided by pT4 classification, conversion was necessary for 4 of 34 (12%) pT4a patients vs. 5 of 7 (71%) pT4b patients (p = 0.003). In the pT4b cohort (n = 37), more tumors were treated by the open approach (30 vs. 7). For pT4b tumors, the R0 resection rate was 94% (86% in L vs. 97% in O, p = 0.249). The use of laparoscopy did not impact overall survival, disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, or tumor recurrence overall in all T4 or T4a and T4b tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery can be safely performed in pT4 tumors with similar oncologic outcomes as compared to open surgery. However, for pT4b tumors, the conversion rate is very high. The open approach may be preferable.

Laparoscopic and robotic multivisceral resection in colorectal cancer: A case series and systematic review

PURPOSE

Multivisceral resection (MVR) with open approach is the standard surgical treatment for locally advanced colorectal cancer. However, the medical literature concerning the practice of minimally invasive MVR in order to reduce postoperative complications and hospital stay has been growing exponentially over the last years. The present study aimed to examine our experience and to provide a systematic review about the results and complications of minimally invasive MVR.

METHODS

Data of patients that underwent minimally invasive MVR for locally advanced colorectal cancer from 2015 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The literature was searched for studies concerning minimally invasive MVR for colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 39 laparoscopic MVR were performed in our department. Complications occurred in 14 patients (35.9%) with major complications in five patients (18.82%) according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Conversion was required in one case (2.56%) with subsequent mortality (2.56%). Pathologic adjacent organs or structures invasion was observed in 30 patients (76.9%) and positive resection margin occurred in two cases (5.2%). Twenty-two studies including 1055 patients were identified after literature search. In these studies, laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery were performed in 90.15% and 9.85% of the patients, respectively. R0 resection was established in 95% of cases, conversion rate varied between 0% and 41.7%, and postoperative mortality ranged between 0% and 7.7% in the included articles.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive approach may be a safe option for patients requiring MVR for locally advanced colorectal cancer, with equivalent oncological results and could result in better early postoperative outcomes to open approach. However, further studies on this topic are needed to confirm the results of the current study.

Understanding the Philosophy, Anatomy, and Surgery of the Extra-TME Plane of Locally Advanced and Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer; Single Institution Experience with International Benchmarking

Simple Summary

Worldwide there is still unwarranted variation in peri-operative management and subsequently oncological outcome following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. The major contributing factor seems to be a difference in treatment strategy with many centres aiming for more neoadjuvant treatment and less radical surgery. However, a radical resection with clear operative margins remains the single most important prognostic factor for survival and therefore an aggressive, radical approach is justified for an optimal oncological outcome and remains the gold standard of care.

Abstract

Pelvic exenteration surgery has become a widely accepted procedure for treatment of locally advanced (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). However, there is still unwarranted variation in peri-operative management and subsequently oncological outcome after this procedure. In this article we will elaborate on the various reasons for the observed differences based on benchmarking results of our own data to the data from the PelvEx collaborative as well as findings from 2 other benchmarking studies. Our main observation was a significant difference in extent of resection between exenteration units, with our unit performing more complete soft tissue exenterations, sacrectomies and extended lateral compartment resections than most other units, resulting in a higher R0 rate and longer overall survival. Secondly, current literature shows there is a tendency to use more neoadjuvant treatment such as re-irradiation and total neoadjuvant treatment and perform less radical surgery. However, peri-operative chemotherapy or radiotherapy should not be a substitute for adequate radical surgery and an R0 resection remains the gold standard. Finally, we describe our experiences with standardizing our surgical approaches to the various compartments and the achieved oncological and functional outcomes.

Surgical technique for the successful curative resection of locally advanced caecal cancer invading the external iliac artery: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Curative resection generally has a good prognosis if the tumor is a locally advanced colorectal tumor. However, resection of a primary tumor that has invaded the aortoiliac artery is controversial. Herein, we report a case of successful resection of advanced cecal cancer invading the external iliac artery.

CASE REPORT

A 29-year-old male patient had advanced cecal cancer invading the right external iliac artery and vein, right ureter, iliopsoas muscle, and sigmoid colon. We collected the patient's pre-/intra-/postoperative, clinical, and histological data. We reviewed the factors that may have contributed to curative resection without complications. We performed a palliative terminal ileum-sigmoid anastomosis for the prevention of intestinal obstruction. The patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the tumor patently regressed. After arterial reconstruction was performed with a femoral-femoral bypass, we performed radical resection: right hemicolectomy; partial sigmoidectomy; and partial resection of the right ureter, iliopsoas muscle, right testicular, and external iliac vessels. Pathologically, 99% of the tumor cells disappeared after chemotherapy. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 9. No recurrence has been noted 24 months after surgical resection, and the patient is receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, we successfully resected advanced cecal cancer without complications. Reconstruction with femoral-femoral arterial bypass and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are useful methods for curative resection without complications.

Does preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy impact short-term surgical outcomes in patients with locally advanced colon cancer?

BACKGROUND

Preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for colon cancer in advanced stages is associated with improved outcomes and tumor regression. The aim of our study was to identify outcomes in patients with colon cancer who received preoperative NAC.

METHODS

A 4-year analysis of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was performed. We included patients with locally advanced colon cancer (non-metastatic T3, T4 with or without nodal involvement) who underwent colon cancer resection. Patients were stratified into two groups (NAC and No-NAC). Our outcome measures were anastomotic leaks, hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day complications, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmissions. We performed a multi-variable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

We analyzed 90,055 patients of which 7694 (NAC: 7.8 % (n = 599) and No-NAC: 92.2% (n = 7095)) met the inclusion criteria and included in the analysis. Mean age was 67 ± 13 years, 51% were males, and 72% were whites. Patients in the NAC group were more likely to be younger (60 ± 12 years vs. 68 ± 13 years, p < 0.01) and males (62% vs. 50%, p < 0.01) compared to No-NAC. On regression analysis, preoperative NAC was independently associated with higher odds of anastomotic leak (OR 1.35 [1.05-1.97], p = 0.03) and 30-day readmission (OR 1.54 [1.24-2.05], p < 0.01) in reference to No-NAC. However, no association was found between NAC and 30-day complications and 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative NAC might be associated with adverse outcomes of anastomotic leaks and 30-day readmissions, however does not appear to impact 30-day complications nor 30-day mortality.

Laparoscopic versus open resection in patients with locally advanced colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) is challenging due to tumor size and the frequent need for multivisceral resection. The role of laparoscopic resection in LACC is controversial. This study aims to compare outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery in LACC.

METHODS

A population-based retrospective review was conducted of patients treated at a Provincial Cancer Center for LACC from 2005 to 2015. Patients with non-metastatic T4 colon cancers were included. Descriptive, survival, and recurrence analyses were used.

RESULTS

In all, 1,328 patients were reviewed, 23% of whom had laparoscopic surgery. A greater number of T4b tumors were removed via an open approach (35.9% vs 12.7%, P < .001). Positive resection margins occurred in 7.5% of laparoscopic and 16.5% of open cases (P < .001), and multivisceral resection was required in 11.0% and 27.7% (P < .001), respectively. Median follow-up was 37 months (interquartile range [IQR] 17-64) during which 48.6% patients died and 42.1% developed recurrence: locoregional (15.0%), distant (35.3%), peritoneal (11.4%). Age, right-sided tumors, nodal status, and laparoscopic approach were independent predictors of peritoneal recurrence. Overall survival (OS) (73 vs 61 months, P = .188) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (39 vs 31 months, P = .288) were similar with both approaches. Age, nodal, and margin status were predictive of OS and RFS.

CONCLUSION

Open surgical approach is used more frequently when tumors invade adjacent organs or require multivisceral resections. When employed, laparoscopic approach had similar rates of survival and recurrence compared with open approach, but was an independent predictor of peritoneal recurrence. Careful patient selection in operative approach is suggested.

Therapeutic effects and limitations of chemoradiotherapy in advanced lower rectal cancer focusing on T4b

PURPOSE

This study aimed to elucidate the benefits and limitations of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in rectal cancer treatment, specifically in T4b rectal cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study reviewed 1014 consecutive patients with clinical T3/4a/T4b adenocarcinomas of the lower rectum, who underwent total mesorectal excision at the Department of Surgical Oncology of the University of Tokyo Hospital and 22 referral institutions affiliated with the Japanese Study Group for Postoperative Follow-up of Colorectal Cancer. Patients were divided into two cohorts: cohort 1 comprised 298 consecutive patients who underwent CRT followed by radical surgery and cohort 2 comprised 716 consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery without preoperative therapy. We assessed the prognostic differences between the two cohorts, focusing particularly on T stages.

RESULTS

In T3/4a patients, cohort 1 showed a significantly lower local recurrence rate than cohort 2 (4.8% vs. 9.4%, p=0.024), but not in T4b patients (23.5% vs. 16.0%, p=0.383). In contrast, no significant differences in survival were observed between T3/4a and T4b patients. T4b classification was found to be an independent predictive factor of local recurrence in cohort 1, but not in cohort 2.

CONCLUSION

In T4b rectal cancer, preoperative CRT demonstrated a limited benefit for local control and survival. In cases of suspected T4b rectal tumors, additional therapies such as induction chemotherapy to conventional CRT may contribute to better outcomes.

ERCC overexpression associated with a poor response of cT4b colorectal cancer with FOLFOX-based neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation

Colorectal cancer (CRC) of the clinical tumor stage T4b (cT4b) refers to advanced tumors with direct invasion of adjacent structures and the tumors are considered unresectable. Despite advancements in aggressive surgery and combination chemotherapy, the prognosis of cT4b CRC remains poor. Optimizing the therapeutic sequence administered to patients with cT4b CRC to improve clinical outcomes is crucial. In the present study, patients with unresectable cT4b and nodal stage N1-2 CRC were investigated at a single institution. A total of 20 consecutive patients were treated with pre-operative concurrent chemoradiation by using 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) since February 2015 and were regularly followed up until March 2020. Due to their poor response to concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) with FOLFOX, the chemotherapy regimen was changed to irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as the second-line neoadjuvant treatment. Genetic alterations, such as microsatellite instability (MSI), were documented, and the expression levels of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) and ERCC2 were examined. Of the 20 patients, the tumors of 14 patients (70%) became resectable after FOLFIRI administration. The median duration between the last date of radiotherapy and surgery was 32.7 weeks (range, 10.1–59.3 weeks). Of note, 4 of the 14 patients with resectable tumors (28.6%) achieved a pathologic complete response. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 27.5 months (range, 12–39 months) and 27.5 months (range, 8–39 months), respectively. The cancerous specimens of all of the patients (100%) exhibited ERCC2 overexpression and 18 specimens (90%) had ERCC1 overexpression. Only one tumor (5%) exhibited high MSI. The present study indicated that ERCC overexpression associated with the poor response of FOLFOX-based CCRT and FOLFIRI after FOLFOX-based CCRT failure may have a potential role in conversion to resectable tumors by neoadjuvant treatment in cT4b CRC. However, a further prospective study with more patients is required to improve the precision of the conclusions.

Prognostic factors and patterns of failure after surgery for T4 rectal cancer in the beyond total mesorectal excision era

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in the rates of total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery, decreased local recurrence rates and increased 5-year survival, there still exists large variation in the quality of treatment received. Up to 30 per cent of rectal cancers are locally advanced at presentation and approximately 5-10 per cent still breach the mesorectal plane and invade adjacent structures despite neoadjuvant therapy. With the evolution of extended resections for rectal cancers beyond the TME plane, proponents advocate that these resections should be performed only in specialist centres. The aim was to assess the prognostic factors and patterns of failure after beyond TME surgery for T4 rectal cancers.

METHODS

Data were collected from prospective databases at three high-volume institutions specializing in beyond TME surgery for T4 rectal cancers between 1990 and 2013. The primary outcome measures were overall survival, local recurrence and patterns of first failure.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty patients were identified. The negative resection margin (R0) rate was 82·8 per cent (298 patients) and the local recurrence rate was 12·5 per cent (45 patients). The type of surgical procedure (Hartmann's: hazard ratio (HR) 4·49, 95 per cent c.i. 1·99 to 10·14; P = 0·002) and lymphovascular invasion (HR 2·02, 1·08 to 3·77; P = 0·032) were independent predictors of local recurrence. The 5-year overall survival rate for all patients was 61 (95 per cent c.i. 55 to 67) per cent. The 5-year cumulative incidence of first failure was 8 per cent for local recurrence, 6 per cent for local and distant disease, and 18 per cent for distant disease.

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated that a coordinated approach in specialist centres for beyond TME surgery can offer good oncological and long-term survival in patients with T4 rectal cancers.

Right and Transverse Colonic Multi-Visceral Resections for Locally Advanced Cancers-a Single-Center Experience

Locally advanced colorectal tumors constitute to about 5-22% of all colorectal cancers at the time of presentation. Multi-visceral resection is usually required for such cases in order to achieve curative resection (R0). We aim to present our experience of right and transverse colonic en bloc resections and their outcomes. Retrospective review of a prospective database between February 2008 and December 2014. Case notes, operative findings, histopathology results, and follow-up records were analyzed. A total of 23 patients underwent en bloc multi-visceral resections for locally advanced right-sided or transverse colonic cancers. There were 11 males and 12 females. The mean age was 75 years. Fifteen patients were operated electively and eight were done as emergency. Median follow-up was 36 months. Eleven out of 23 (47%) had more than one organ resected. 78.3% had R0 resections, 17.4% were R1, and 4.3% were indeterminate. The average lymph node yield was 22 [range 5-45]. Senior trainees under supervision did 65% of procedures. Twelve-month disease-free survival was 90% and the 5-year survival was 65%. Right-sided and transverse colonic tumors have a propensity to become locally advanced making curative resections challenging. This is especially relevant when these patients present as an emergency or if the surgeon is less experienced and may opt for a palliative procedure, thus leading to suboptimal outcomes. Multi-visceral resections for locally advanced tumors can be feasible in the district general hospital setting with acceptable outcomes. Multi-disciplinary meeting (MDM) process, adequate training, and experience are vital.

Prognostic factors affecting outcomes in multivisceral en bloc resection for colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES:

This study sought to determine the clinical and pathological factors associated with perioperative morbidity, mortality and oncological outcomes after multivisceral en bloc resection in patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS:

Between January 2009 and February 2014, 105 patients with primary colorectal cancer selected for multivisceral resection were identified from a prospective database. Clinical and pathological factors, perioperative morbidity and mortality and outcomes were obtained from medical records. Estimated local recurrence and overall survival were compared using the log-rank method, and Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independence of the studied parameters. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02859155.

RESULTS:

The median age of the patients was 60 (range 23-86) years, 66.7% were female, 80% of tumors were located in the rectum, 11.4% had stage-IV disease, and 54.3% received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The organs most frequently resected were ovaries and annexes (37%). Additionally, 30.5% of patients received abdominoperineal resection. Invasion of other organs was confirmed histologically in 53.5% of patients, and R0 resection was obtained in 72% of patients. The overall morbidity rate of patients in this study was 37.1%. Ureter resection and intraoperative blood transfusion were independently associated with an increased number of complications. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.9%. After 27 (range 5-57) months of follow-up, the mortality and local recurrence rates were 23% and 15%, respectively. Positive margins were associated with a higher recurrence rate. Positive margins, lymph node involvement, stage III/IV disease, and stage IV disease alone were associated with lower overall survival rates. On multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with reduced survival was lymph node involvement.

CONCLUSIONS:

Multivisceral en bloc resection for primary colorectal cancer can be performed with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality and may lead to favorable oncological outcomes.

Time trends, improvements and national auditing of rectal cancer management over an 18-year period

AIM

The main aims were to explore time trends in the management and outcome of patients with rectal cancer in a national cohort and to evaluate the possible impact of national auditing on overall outcomes. A secondary aim was to provide population-based data for appraisal of external validity in selected patient series.

METHOD

Data from the Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Registry with virtually complete national coverage were utilized in this cohort study on 29 925 patients with rectal cancer diagnosed between 1995 and 2012. Of eligible patients, nine were excluded.

RESULTS

During the study period, overall, relative and disease-free survival increased. Postoperative mortality after 30 and 90 days decreased to 1.7% and 2.9%. The 5-year local recurrence rate dropped to 5.0%. Resection margins improved, as did peri-operative blood loss despite more multivisceral resections being performed. Fewer patients underwent palliative resection and the proportion of non-operated patients increased. The proportions of temporary and permanent stoma formation increased. Preoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy became more common as did multidisciplinary team conferences. Variability in rectal cancer management between healthcare regions diminished over time when new aspects of patient care were audited.

CONCLUSION

There have been substantial changes over time in the management of patients with rectal cancer, reflected in improved outcome. Much indirect evidence indicates that auditing matters, but without a control group it is not possible to draw firm conclusions regarding the possible impact of a quality control registry on faster shifts in time trends, decreased variability and improvements. Registry data were made available for reference.

Therapeutic management and outcome of locoregional recurrence after curative colorectal cancer therapy-a single-center analysis

Locoregional tumor recurrence after curative therapy for colorectal cancer is therapeutically challenging and associated with poor prognosis. Goal of this single-center study was to analyze patients with locoregional recurrence with regard to therapeutic strategies and outcome for colon and rectal cancer each. Charts of all patients surgically treated for colorectal cancer in the period from 2000 to 2011 (n = 1296) were examined; patients with locoregional recurrence (n = 86) were then further analyzed. Fifty-three (10.2%) patients with rectal and 33 (5.6%) patients with colon cancer developed a locoregional recurrence, median 24.5 months after first diagnosis. Recurrence-specific therapy was applied in the majority of the patients (84.8% colon, 90.7% rectum); a surgical approach was undertaken in 82.1% (colon) and in 56.3% (rectum). Five-year overall survival after locoregional recurrence was 13% for rectal cancer and 9% for colon cancer. Itemized analysis for the approached therapeutic regimens revealed that radical recurrence resection (R0) significantly prolongs overall survival (p = 0.003) in rectal cancer, as does a surgical approach itself, as compared to conservative treatment modalities. If feasible, oncologic radical resection of the relapse (R0) significantly influences patient outcome and overall survival in rectal cancer.