1
|
Ngoumou RD, Feudjio YBD. The management of rare disease patients from a grassroot perspective: the role of patients' organizations in the global recognition of rare diseases in Cameroon. Pan Afr Med J 2024; 47:64. [PMID: 38681114 PMCID: PMC11055193 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2024.47.64.38226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction rare diseases (RD) are extremely complex health conditions. Persons affected by these conditions in Cameroon are often neglected in society and health systems through the inexistence of policies and programs. In Cameroon, there exists no program or policy conceived to address their needs in terms of access to quality health care, timely and reliable diagnosis, treatments, education, etc. The consequence is that persons living with a RD (PLWRD) and their families do not participate in social life. The unique fate of PLWRD reveals that the principle of social justice and equity is flawed in Cameroon. However, patients, in order to survive in society, rely on patients' organizations (PO) to improve their quality of life (QoL) and advocate for a better consideration in the society. The aim of this paper is to highlight how initiatives from a grassroot perspective like POs can inform decision-makers to address the needs of PLWRD and their families. Methods the study associated a systematic literature review and semi-structured interviews with parents of children suffering from a RD and who are members of a PO. Through the systematic literature review we highlighted the impact POs have in the development of research on RDs, patient literacy, patient empowerment and advocacy while semi-structured interviews brought out the needs of patients and their families. Results findings, on the one hand show that, in Cameroon PLWRD face a number of challenges like the incurability of their condition, catastrophic medical expenses, stigmatization and marginalization, etc. and though in POs their QoL still remains poor. On the other hand, where POs are empowered they are key actors in research on RDs and help decision-makers on having a better insight into the type of RD that exists across a geographical area, the sociodemographic profile of patients, etc. for a better management of PLWRD. Conclusion the study suggests that the ministry of public health should create a network with existing RD POs to adequately meet the needs of PLWRD.
Collapse
|
2
|
Valle-Simón P, Borobia AM, Pérez-Martínez A. Clinical research with targeted drugs in paediatric oncology. Drug Discov Today 2023; 28:103672. [PMID: 37330039 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
The development of targeted drugs in paediatric oncology has been notoriously slow, in part due to the peculiarities of this rare and highly heterogeneous population. To provide therapeutic breakthroughs for the highest risk subgroups of childhood cancer, innovative research solutions have been implemented in the last several years by different international collaborative groups and regulators. Here, we discuss and summarise some of these approaches, as well as challenges and unmet needs that are still being addressed. A wide range of topics were covered in this review including molecular diagnosis optimisation, innovative research methodologies, big data approaches, trial enrolment strategies, and improvements in regulation and preclinical research platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Valle-Simón
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
| | - Alberto M Borobia
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, La Paz University Hospital, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Pérez-Martínez
- Paediatric Haemato-Oncology Department, La Paz University Hospital, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gentilini A, Parvanova I. Industry funding of patient organisations in the UK: a retrospective study of commercial determinants, funding concentration and disease prevalence. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071138. [PMID: 37369404 PMCID: PMC10410975 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the relationship between UK-based patient organisation funding and companies' commercial interests in rare and non-rare diseases in 2020. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of the value and volume of payments from pharmaceutical companies to patient organisations in the UK matched with data on the conditions supported by patient organisations and drugs in companies' approved portfolios and research and development pipelines. SETTING UK. PARTICIPANTS 74 pharmaceutical companies making payments to 341 UK-based patient organisations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Alignment between the commercial interests of pharmaceutical companies and the disease area focus of patient organisations; difference in the volume and value of payments to patient organisations broken down by prevalence of conditions; industry funding concentration, measured as the number of companies funding each patient organisation, the share of overall industry funding coming from each contributing company and the share of industry funding of each organisation comprised by the single highest payments. RESULTS 1422 payments were made by 74 companies to 341 patient organisations. Almost all funds (90%) from pharmaceutical companies were directed to patient organisations that are aligned with companies' approved drug portfolios and research and development pipelines. Despite rare diseases affecting less than 5% of the UK population, more than 20% of all payments were directed to patient organisations which target such conditions. Patient organisations focusing on rare diseases relied on payments from fewer companies (p value=0.0031) compared to organisations focusing on non-rare diseases. CONCLUSIONS Companies predominantly funded patient organisations operating in therapeutic areas relevant to companies' portfolio or drug development pipeline. Patient organisations focusing on rare diseases received more funding relative to the number of patients affected by these conditions and relied more heavily on payments from fewer companies compared to organisations targeting non-rare diseases. Increased independence of patient organisations could help avoid conflicts of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianna Gentilini
- Department of Health Policy, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Iva Parvanova
- Department of Health Policy, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nguyen CQ, Kariyawasam D, Alba‐Concepcion K, Grattan S, Hetherington K, Wakefield CE, Woolfenden S, Dale RC, Palmer EE, Farrar MA. ‘Advocacy groups are the connectors’: Experiences and contributions of rare disease patient organization leaders in advanced neurotherapeutics. Health Expect 2022; 25:3175-3191. [DOI: 10.1111/hex.13625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Q. Nguyen
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of Neurology Sydney Children's Hospital Network Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Didu Kariyawasam
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of Neurology Sydney Children's Hospital Network Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Kristine Alba‐Concepcion
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of Neurology Sydney Children's Hospital Network Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Sarah Grattan
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of Neurology Sydney Children's Hospital Network Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Kate Hetherington
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Susan Woolfenden
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Sydney Institute Women Children and their Families Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Russell C. Dale
- Department of Neurology Sydney Children's Hospital Network Randwick New South Wales Australia
- Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School University of Sydney Westmead New South Wales Australia
| | - Elizabeth E. Palmer
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Clinical Genetics Sydney Children's Hospital Network Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Michelle A. Farrar
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of Neurology Sydney Children's Hospital Network Randwick New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lanar S, Acquadro C, Seaton J, Savre I, Arnould B. To what degree are orphan drugs patient-centered? A review of the current state of clinical research in rare diseases. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2020; 15:134. [PMID: 32493385 PMCID: PMC7268539 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-01400-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the past 30 years, the healthcare industry has increasingly turned its attention to rare diseases. Regulators have emphasized the need for clinical research in this area to be patient-centered. However, there is a lack of evidence concerning whether this need is actually met. In this paper, we aim to address this gap. METHODS First, we describe the state of patient-centricity in clinical research in rare diseases based on a targeted literature review. Second, we discuss recommendations from scientific bodies on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in rare diseases. Third, we analyze data collected from EMA's and FDA's websites concerning rare disease labeling claims and data from Clinicaltrials.gov concerning the use of PRO measures in rare disease pivotal trials. Fourth, we perform an exhaustive literature review on the use of PRO measures in the pharmaceutical industry, including all phases of clinical research, observational/registry studies, and instrument development and validation. RESULTS There is limited information on rare disease patient engagement in study design, recruitment, and retention. None of the initiatives describing methods for developing PRO measures in rare diseases provide the clear guidance clinical researchers need. Only 17.4% of orphan drug labels contain a PRO measure. Less than half of pivotal trials in orphan drugs have a PRO measure as a primary or a secondary endpoint. Although the number of publications about PRO measures in rare diseases has risen in the past fifteen years, our results indicate that substantial improvements are needed to achieve patient-centricity. CONCLUSIONS The nature and extent of patient engagement in rare disease research is under-documented. The current paradigm for developing and using PRO measures in clinical research is failing to meet the needs of rare disease patients. Not only are PROs rarely used as high-level endpoints in clinical trials or taken into account in labeling claims, they are also under-researched overall - there are too few measures for the multitude of rare diseases. We call for a clear guidance on patient engagement and suggest a realistic approach to the adaptation of PRO strategy to the specific context of clinical research in rare diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Lanar
- ICON plc, Patient-Centered Outcomes, 27 rue de la Villette, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - Catherine Acquadro
- ICON plc, Patient-Centered Outcomes, 27 rue de la Villette, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - James Seaton
- Seaton Associates, LLC, 9039 Sligo Creek Parkway #1408, Silver Spring, MD 20901 USA
| | - Isabelle Savre
- Mapi Research Trust, 27 rue de la Villette, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - Benoit Arnould
- ICON plc, Patient-Centered Outcomes, 27 rue de la Villette, 69003 Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Härmark L, Weits G, Meijer R, Santoro F, Norén GN, van Hunsel F. Communicating Adverse Drug Reaction Insights Through Patient Organizations: Experiences from a Pilot Study in the Netherlands. Drug Saf 2020; 43:745-749. [PMID: 32418193 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-00932-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To improve therapeutic decision making, it is crucial that information regarding adverse drug reactions reaches patients. It is not enough to disseminate such findings through regulatory and scientific channels; targeted efforts to reach patients are necessary. One possible avenue is to collaborate with patient organizations. OBJECTIVES The aim of this pilot study was to explore how adverse drug reactions can be communicated through patient organizations. METHODS A text describing a signal of levothyroxine and panic attacks was tailored to patients' needs, in terms of language, style and content, with emphasis placed on what to do when experiencing the symptoms described. The signal was communicated via the Dutch thyroid organization's digital newsletter, social media channels, website and print magazine. RESULTS The digital newsletter was distributed to around 5000 subscribers. On Facebook, 13,820 people viewed the message, with 2346 clicks in the message, indicating an intention to read the whole post. The interactions on social media were positive, and the tone was respectful. CONCLUSION Patient organizations can help enable effective communication of adverse drug reactions to a relevant audience. The social media post generated more engagement than other communications from the patient organization, indicating a strong interest in this information. The additional patient experiences that were shared in the comments on social media further strengthened the original signal and its relevance to patients, creating an interesting feedback loop. The favourable experiences in this study support further consideration and exploration of this approach to communicate adverse drug reactions to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Härmark
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
| | - Gerda Weits
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Rietje Meijer
- Netherlands Thyroid Organization, Stationsstraat 79 G, 3811 MH, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Florence van Hunsel
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bhattacharya A, Bhattacharya S. Patient-driven initiatives for prioritizing drug discovery for rare diseases. Indian J Med Res 2020; 149:326-328. [PMID: 31249196 PMCID: PMC6607820 DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_499_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alok Bhattacharya
- Department of Biology, Ashoka University, National Capital Region, Sonepat 131 029, Haryana, India
| | - Sudha Bhattacharya
- School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110 067, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
In recent years, there has been an increase in therapeutic options and treatment strategies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, patients still report delays in receiving a diagnosis, which is a significant burden associated with the disease, and which shows a general lack of disease awareness. This review has been written by two PAH patients to describe the patient experience and explore the ways in which patients are increasingly being given a voice in developing approaches to treatment. As patients with PAH are living longer, it is important that they work with healthcare professionals to develop treatment strategies that improve and maintain quality of life. Healthcare professionals should consider a holistic approach to disease management, including dietary recommendations, individually adapted exercise, and options for counselling where available, alongside therapeutic treatments. The experiences of patients with PAH are important not just for individual patient treatment but should also be considered in clinical trial design and guideline development. Patient representatives and patient associations can play an influential role in improving the treatment and management of PAH. In this review, we use our experiences as patient representatives to describe the current situation of patients with PAH from first experiencing symptoms to receiving treatment, using two patient cases as examples. We also discuss the role of patient advocacy in improving PAH care and future roles for patient associations and patient representatives in the design of clinical trials and development of new treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pisana Ferrari
- Italian PH Association AIPI, Associazione Ipertensione Polmonare Italiana Onlus, Via Enrico Mattei, 92 - 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Hall Skåra
- Pulmonary Hypertension Association Europe, Wilhelmstraße 19, A - 1120 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brasil S, Pascoal C, Francisco R, dos Reis Ferreira V, A. Videira P, Valadão G. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Rare Diseases: Is the Future Brighter? Genes (Basel) 2019; 10:genes10120978. [PMID: 31783696 PMCID: PMC6947640 DOI: 10.3390/genes10120978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The amount of data collected and managed in (bio)medicine is ever-increasing. Thus, there is a need to rapidly and efficiently collect, analyze, and characterize all this information. Artificial intelligence (AI), with an emphasis on deep learning, holds great promise in this area and is already being successfully applied to basic research, diagnosis, drug discovery, and clinical trials. Rare diseases (RDs), which are severely underrepresented in basic and clinical research, can particularly benefit from AI technologies. Of the more than 7000 RDs described worldwide, only 5% have a treatment. The ability of AI technologies to integrate and analyze data from different sources (e.g., multi-omics, patient registries, and so on) can be used to overcome RDs’ challenges (e.g., low diagnostic rates, reduced number of patients, geographical dispersion, and so on). Ultimately, RDs’ AI-mediated knowledge could significantly boost therapy development. Presently, there are AI approaches being used in RDs and this review aims to collect and summarize these advances. A section dedicated to congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG), a particular group of orphan RDs that can serve as a potential study model for other common diseases and RDs, has also been included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Brasil
- Portuguese Association for CDG, 2820-381 Lisboa, Portugal; (S.B.); (C.P.); (R.F.); (P.A.V.)
- CDG & Allies—Professionals and Patient Associations International Network (CDG & Allies—PPAIN), Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Carlota Pascoal
- Portuguese Association for CDG, 2820-381 Lisboa, Portugal; (S.B.); (C.P.); (R.F.); (P.A.V.)
- CDG & Allies—Professionals and Patient Associations International Network (CDG & Allies—PPAIN), Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Lisboa, Portugal
- UCIBIO, Departamento Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Rita Francisco
- Portuguese Association for CDG, 2820-381 Lisboa, Portugal; (S.B.); (C.P.); (R.F.); (P.A.V.)
- CDG & Allies—Professionals and Patient Associations International Network (CDG & Allies—PPAIN), Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Lisboa, Portugal
- UCIBIO, Departamento Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Vanessa dos Reis Ferreira
- Portuguese Association for CDG, 2820-381 Lisboa, Portugal; (S.B.); (C.P.); (R.F.); (P.A.V.)
- CDG & Allies—Professionals and Patient Associations International Network (CDG & Allies—PPAIN), Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Lisboa, Portugal
- Correspondence:
| | - Paula A. Videira
- Portuguese Association for CDG, 2820-381 Lisboa, Portugal; (S.B.); (C.P.); (R.F.); (P.A.V.)
- CDG & Allies—Professionals and Patient Associations International Network (CDG & Allies—PPAIN), Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Lisboa, Portugal
- UCIBIO, Departamento Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Gonçalo Valadão
- Instituto de Telecomunicações, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal;
- Departamento de Ciências e Tecnologias, Autónoma Techlab–Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, 1169-023 Lisboa, Portugal
- Electronics, Telecommunications and Computers Engineering Department, Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, 1959-007 Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ambrosini A, Quinlivan R, Sansone VA, Meijer I, Schrijvers G, Tibben A, Padberg G, de Wit M, Sterrenburg E, Mejat A, Breukel A, Rataj M, Lochmüller H, Willmann R. "Be an ambassador for change that you would like to see": a call to action to all stakeholders for co-creation in healthcare and medical research to improve quality of life of people with a neuromuscular disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2019; 14:126. [PMID: 31174585 PMCID: PMC6555994 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-019-1103-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patient and public involvement for co-creation is increasingly recognized as a valuable strategy to develop healthcare research targeting patients’ real needs. However, its practical implementation is not as advanced and unanimously accepted as it could be, due to cultural differences and complexities of managing healthcare programs and clinical studies, especially in the rare disease field. Main body The European Neuromuscular Centre, a European foundation of patient organizations, involved its key stakeholders in a special workshop to investigate the position of the neuromuscular patient community with respect to healthcare and medical research to identify and address gaps and bottlenecks. The workshop took place in Milan (Italy) on January 19–20, 2018, involving 45 participants who were mainly representatives of the patient community, but also included experts from clinical centers, industry and regulatory bodies. In order to provide practical examples and constructive suggestions, specific topics were identified upfront. The first set of issues concerned the quality of life at specific phases of a patient’s life, such as at the time of diagnosis or during pediatric to adult transition, and patient involvement in medical research on activities in daily living including patient reported outcome measures. The second set of issues concerned the involvement of patients in the management of clinical research tools, such as registries and biobanks, and their participation in study design or marketing authorization processes. Introductory presentations were followed by parallel working group sessions, to gain constructive contributions from all participants. The concept of shared decision making was used to ensure, in discussions, a partnership-based identification of the wishes and needs of all stakeholders involved, and the “ladder of participation” tool served as a model to evaluate the actual and the desired level of patients’ involvement in all topics addressed. A general consensus on the outcome of the meeting was collected during the final plenary session. This paper reports the outcome of the workshop and the specific suggestions derived from the analysis of the first set of topics, related to quality of life. The outcomes of the second set of topics are reported elsewhere and are only briefly summarized herein for the sake of completeness. Conclusions The neuromuscular community proved to be very active and engaged at different levels in the healthcare initiatives of interest. The workshop participants critically discussed several topics, providing practical examples where different stakeholders could play a role in making a change and bridging gaps. Overall, they indicated the need for education of all stakeholders for better communication, where everyone should become an ambassador to promote real change. Support should also come from institutions and healthcare bodies both at structural and economic level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ambrosini
- Fondazione Telethon, Via Poerio 14, 20129, Milan, Italy.
| | - Ros Quinlivan
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Valeria A Sansone
- NEuroMuscular Omnicentre (NEMO), Neurorehabilitation Unit, University of Milan, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Fondazione Serena Onlus, Milan, Italy
| | - Ingeborg Meijer
- Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Spierziekten Nederland, Baarn, the Netherlands
| | | | - Aad Tibben
- Centre for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - George Padberg
- Centre for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten de Wit
- Department of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alexandre Mejat
- University of Lyon, University of Lyon1 Claude Bernard Lyon1, Institut NeuroMyoGene, CNRS UMR5310, INSERM U1217, Lyon, France
| | | | - Michal Rataj
- Polish Neuromuscular Diseases Association (PTCHNM), Warszawa, Poland
| | - Hanns Lochmüller
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Raffaella Willmann
- Swiss Foundation for Research on Muscle Diseases, Cortaillod, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Preston J, Stones SR, Davies H, Preston J, Phillips B. How to involve children and young people in what is, after all, their research. Arch Dis Child 2019; 104:494-500. [PMID: 31000534 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Revised: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Third in a series of four articles addressing ethical approaches and issues in undertaking clinical research with children and young people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Preston
- NIHR Alder Hey Clinical Research Facility, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | | | - Bob Phillips
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
From Rare to Neglected Diseases: A Sustainable and Inclusive Healthcare Perspective for Reframing the Orphan Drugs Issue. SUSTAINABILITY 2019. [DOI: 10.3390/su11051289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This work is about how healthcare issues can be reframed from a sustainable and inclusive development perspective. Focusing on the case of orphan drugs and rare diseases, first, a country-based review of the main regulatory approaches to orphan drugs is conducted; then, the main contributions of the literature are reviewed to identify dominant views and the way the problem is more commonly framed. The main findings reveal that the dominant regulatory approaches and theoretical interpretations of the problem are mainly based on economic considerations. However, this does not seem to have led to very satisfactory results. Reflecting upon what the sustainability perspective can highlight with reference to healthcare, substantial connections between the orphan drugs issue and that of neglected diseases are highlighted. These connections suggest reframing the orphan drugs issue as a social equality and inclusiveness problem, hence the need to adopt a sustainable and inclusive development perspective. As a key sustainable development goal (SGD) to be shared by all nations, healthcare should always be approached by putting the principles of sustainable and inclusive development at the core of policy makers’ regulatory choices. Accordingly, we think that the orphan drugs issue, like that of neglected diseases, could be better faced by adopting a social equality and inclusiveness perspective.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient organizations have a privileged position to be active agents for promoting pharmacovigilance and patient engagement, encouraging direct patient reporting and improving the awareness of pharmacovigilance. AIM The objective of this study was to understand the role of European patient organizations as stakeholders to optimize patient involvement in pharmacovigilance. METHODS A descriptive correlational study was conducted to investigate the opinions and attitudes of patient organizations regarding general patient involvement in pharmacovigilance, and their initiatives to support drug safety through a web-based questionnaire during the months of March and April 2018. RESULTS A total of 1898 patient organizations were invited to participate in the survey, including 89 pan-European organizations. In total, 337 questionnaires (17.76%) were collected from 31 countries, including 297 complete answers (88.31%). A large number of organizations stated that they would like to increase the awareness of patients regarding specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to their medicines (43.19%, n = 130); however, 38.54% (n = 116) declared they do not have any pharmacovigilance goals. Barriers to supporting pharmacovigilance activities include low budget to promote pharmacovigilance among members (45.45%, n = 135), lack of resources to participate in pharmacovigilance activities (43.77%, n = 130), or lack of support from the National Competent Authorities (33.33%, n = 99). Organizations inform patients to report ADRs (40.40%; n = 120), information regarding new ADRs related to their medicines (40.07%; n = 119), or when a new drug is marketed (30.98%; n = 92); however, more than one-third indicated that they never had any involvement in pharmacovigilance (34.68%; n = 103). CONCLUSION Bringing pharmacovigilance stakeholders and patient organizations together could create a more optimal reporting culture. Patient organizations appear to have an important role in encouraging patients to talk with their doctors/pharmacists about ADRs experienced, or to help him/her report the ADRs to the pharmacovigilance systems. Lack of resources, budget, and support from NCAs are seen as the main barriers to being involved in pharmacovigilance awareness.
Collapse
|
14
|
Engagement of Canadian Patients with Rare Diseases and Their Families in the Lifecycle of Therapy: A Qualitative Study. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2018; 11:353-359. [PMID: 29299833 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0293-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient involvement is increasingly recognized as critical to the development, introduction and use (i.e. the lifecycle) of new and effective therapies, particularly those for rare diseases, where natural histories and the impact on patients and families are less well-understood than for common diseases. However, little is known about how patients and families would like to be involved during the lifecycle. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore ways in which Canadian patients with rare diseases and their families would like to be involved in the lifecycle of therapies and identify their priorities for involvement. METHODS Patients with rare diseases and their families were recruited to participate in two deliberative sessions, during which concepts related to decision-making uncertainty and the technology lifecycle were introduced before eliciting input around ways in which they could be involved. This was followed by a webinar, which was used to further identify opportunities for involvement. The data were then analyzed qualitatively using eclectic coding. RESULTS Patients and families identified opportunities that fell into three goals: (1) incorporation of their 'lived experience' in coverage decision making (i.e. decisions by governments on funding new therapies); (2) improved care for patients; and (3) greater awareness of rare diseases, with the first being a priority. CONCLUSIONS Opportunities for patients and families to contribute their 'lived experience' are needed throughout the orphan drug lifecycle, but the ideal mechanisms for providing this input have yet to be determined.
Collapse
|
15
|
The POWER-tool: Recommendations for involving patient representatives in choosing relevant outcome measures during rare disease clinical trial design. Health Policy 2018; 122:1287-1294. [PMID: 30274934 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Revised: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
In clinical trials, it is relevant to ask patients and/or their caregivers which aspects concerning their disease they consider important to measure when a new intervention is being investigated. Those aspects, useful as outcome measures in a trial, are of pivotal importance for the result of the trial and the subsequent decision-making. In rare diseases the choice of outcome measures may be even more important, due to the small numbers and heterogeneity of the patients that are included. We have developed a tool to involve patients in the determination of outcome measures and the choice of measurement instruments. This tool was developed together with a patient think tank, consisting of a group of rare disease patient representatives, and by interviewing end users. We have road-tested our tool in an ongoing trial, and evaluated it during a focus group meeting. The tool consists of three steps: 1) Preparation, 2) Consultation of patients, 3) Follow-up during which the consultation results are implemented in the trial design. The tool provides guidelines for researchers to include the patient's opinion in the choice of outcome measures in the trial design stage. We describe the development of the POWER-tool (Patient participation in Outcome measure WEighing for Rare diseases), and first experiences of the tool in an ongoing trial.
Collapse
|
16
|
Moving from Patient Advocacy to Partnership: A Long and Bumpy Road. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2018; 10:271-276. [PMID: 28097637 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0216-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Real-life experiences of grassroots patient organizations across a variety of diseases, countries and contexts have been used to develop a four-mode framework of the transition from patient advocacy to partnership, defined by one axis as individual versus collective action and the other axis as activities 'outside' or 'inside' the system. The four quadrants are labeled as advocacy, activism, reform and broker, and engagement is further refined by whether the participation is 'pushed' by the group or 'pulled' by the system. There are many examples of patient advocacy groups transitioning through the four quadrants; however, depending on other factors of culture, opportunity and their own preferences, groups may work primarily through one or two quadrants.
Collapse
|
17
|
Skinner MW, Chai-Adisaksopha C, Curtis R, Frick N, Nichol M, Noone D, O'Mahony B, Page D, Stonebraker JS, Iorio A. The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Project: development and evaluation of a questionnaire assessing patient reported outcomes in people with haemophilia. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4:58. [PMID: 29497561 PMCID: PMC5828307 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0253-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2017] [Accepted: 02/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The interest of health care agencies, private payers and policy makers for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) is continuously increasing. There is a substantial need to improve capacity to collect and interpret relevant PRO data to support implementation of patient-centered research and optimal care in haemophilia. The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Project aims to develop a patient-led research network, to develop a standardized questionnaire to gather patient-reported outcomes and to perform a feasibility study of implementing the PROBE questionnaire. Methods A pilot questionnaire was developed using focus group methodology. Content and face validity were assessed by a pool of persons living with haemophilia (PWH) and content experts through interactive workshops. The PROBE questionnaire was translated with the forward-backward approach. PROBE recruited national haemophilia patient non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to administer the questionnaire to people with and without haemophilia. PROBE measured the time to complete the questionnaire and gathered feedback on its content and clarity; staff time and cost required to implement the questionnaire were also collected. Results The PROBE questionnaire is comprised of four major sections (demographic data, general health problems, haemophilia-related health problems and health-related quality of life using EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS). Seventeen NGOs participated in the pilot study of the PROBE Project, recruiting 656 participants. Of these, 71% completed the questionnaire within 15 min, and all participants completed within 30 min. The median total staff and volunteer time required for the NGOs to carry out the study within their country was 9 h (range 2 to 40 h). NGO costs ranged from $22.00 to $543.00 USD per country, with printing and postage being the most commonly reported expenditures. Conclusions The PROBE questionnaire assesses patient-important reported outcomes in PWH and control participants, with a demonstrated short completion time. PROBE proved the feasibility to engage diverse patient communities in the structured generation of real-world outcome research at all stages. Trial registration Trial registration: NCT02439710. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-018-0253-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M W Skinner
- Institute for Policy Advancement Ltd, 1155 23rd Street NW #3A, Washington, DC 20037 USA
| | - C Chai-Adisaksopha
- 2Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,10Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - R Curtis
- Factor VIII Computing, Berkeley, USA
| | - N Frick
- 4National Hemophilia Foundation, New York, USA
| | - M Nichol
- 5Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - D Noone
- Irish Haemophilia Society, Dublin, Ireland
| | - B O'Mahony
- Irish Haemophilia Society, Dublin, Ireland.,7Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - D Page
- 8Canadian Hemophilia Society, Montreal, Canada
| | - J S Stonebraker
- 9Poole College of Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA
| | - A Iorio
- 2Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,10Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Young A, Menon D, Street J, Al-Hertani W, Stafinski T. Exploring patient and family involvement in the lifecycle of an orphan drug: a scoping review. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2017; 12:188. [PMID: 29273068 PMCID: PMC5741909 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-017-0738-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2017] [Accepted: 12/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients and their families have become more active in healthcare systems and research. The value of patient involvement is particularly relevant in the area of rare diseases, where patients face delayed diagnoses and limited access to effective therapies due to the high level of uncertainty in market approval and reimbursement decisions. It has been suggested that patient involvement may help to reduce some of these uncertainties. This review explored existing and proposed roles for patients, families, and patient organizations at each stage of the lifecycle of therapies for rare diseases (i.e., orphan drug lifecycle). METHODS A scoping review was conducted using methods outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. To validate the findings from the literature and identify any additional opportunities that were missed, a consultative webinar was conducted with members of the Patient and Caregiver Liaison Group of a Canadian research network. RESULTS Existing and proposed opportunities for involving patients, families, and patient organizations were reported throughout the orphan drug lifecycle and fell into 12 themes: research outside of clinical trials; clinical trials; patient reported outcomes measures; patient registries and biorepositories; education; advocacy and awareness; conferences and workshops; patient care and support; patient organization development; regulatory decision-making; and reimbursement decision-making. Existing opportunities were not described in sufficient detail to allow for the level of involvement to be assessed. Additionally, no information on the impact of involvement within specific opportunities was found. Based on feedback from patients and families, documentation of existing opportunities within Canada is poor. CONCLUSIONS Opportunities for patient, family, and patient organization involvement exist throughout the orphan drug lifecycle. However, based on the information found, it is not possible to determine which opportunities would be most effective at each stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Young
- Health Technology & Policy Unit, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada
| | - Devidas Menon
- Health Technology & Policy Unit, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada
| | - Jackie Street
- School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Walla Al-Hertani
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Tania Stafinski
- Health Technology & Policy Unit, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pogue RE, Cavalcanti DP, Shanker S, Andrade RV, Aguiar LR, de Carvalho JL, Costa FF. Rare genetic diseases: update on diagnosis, treatment and online resources. Drug Discov Today 2017; 23:187-195. [PMID: 29129805 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Rare genetic diseases collectively impact a significant portion of the world's population. For many diseases there is limited information available, and clinicians can find difficulty in differentiating between clinically similar conditions. This leads to problems in genetic counseling and patient treatment. The biomedical market is affected because pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries do not see advantages in addressing rare disease treatments, or because the cost of the treatments is too high. By contrast, technological advances including DNA sequencing and analysis, together with computer-aided tools and online resources, are allowing a more thorough understanding of rare disorders. Here, we discuss how the collection of various types of information together with the use of new technologies is facilitating diagnosis and, consequently, treatment of rare diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert E Pogue
- Genomic Sciences and Biotechnology Program, Catholic University of Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
| | | | - Shreya Shanker
- Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy (IMSA), IL, USA
| | - Rosangela V Andrade
- Genomic Sciences and Biotechnology Program, Catholic University of Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
| | - Lana R Aguiar
- Genomic Sciences and Biotechnology Program, Catholic University of Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
| | - Juliana L de Carvalho
- Genomic Sciences and Biotechnology Program, Catholic University of Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil; OneSkin Technologies, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Fabrício F Costa
- Genomic Sciences and Biotechnology Program, Catholic University of Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil; MATTER, Chicago, IL, USA; The Founder Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Stones SR. Making the Dream a Reality: The Evolving Landscape of Family-Focused Research Inspired by Empowered Patients and Their Families. JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING 2017; 23:307-318. [PMID: 28795853 DOI: 10.1177/1074840717716986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
|
21
|
Moffat JG, Vincent F, Lee JA, Eder J, Prunotto M. Opportunities and challenges in phenotypic drug discovery: an industry perspective. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2017; 16:531-543. [PMID: 28685762 DOI: 10.1038/nrd.2017.111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 506] [Impact Index Per Article: 72.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Phenotypic drug discovery (PDD) approaches do not rely on knowledge of the identity of a specific drug target or a hypothesis about its role in disease, in contrast to the target-based strategies that have been widely used in the pharmaceutical industry in the past three decades. However, in recent years, there has been a resurgence in interest in PDD approaches based on their potential to address the incompletely understood complexity of diseases and their promise of delivering first-in-class drugs, as well as major advances in the tools for cell-based phenotypic screening. Nevertheless, PDD approaches also have considerable challenges, such as hit validation and target deconvolution. This article focuses on the lessons learned by researchers engaged in PDD in the pharmaceutical industry and considers the impact of 'omics' knowledge in defining a cellular disease phenotype in the era of precision medicine, introducing the concept of a chain of translatability. We particularly aim to identify features and areas in which PDD can best deliver value to drug discovery portfolios and can contribute to the identification and the development of novel medicines, and to illustrate the challenges and uncertainties that are associated with PDD in order to help set realistic expectations with regard to its benefits and costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John G Moffat
- Biochemical &Cellular Pharmacology, Genentech, South San Francisco, California 94080, USA
| | - Fabien Vincent
- Discovery Sciences, Primary Pharmacology Group, Pfizer, Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA
| | - Jonathan A Lee
- Department of Quantitative Biology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, USA
| | - Jörg Eder
- Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, 4002 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marco Prunotto
- Phenotype and Target ID, Chemical Biology, pRED, Roche, 4070 Basel, Switzerland. Present address: Office of Innovation, Immunology, Infectious Diseases &Ophthalmology (I2O), Roche Late Stage Development, 124 Grenzacherstrasse, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Geissler J, Ryll B, di Priolo SL, Uhlenhopp M. Improving Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development:: A Practical Roadmap. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2017; 51:612-619. [PMID: 30231692 DOI: 10.1177/2168479017706405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The value of patient involvement (PI) in medicines research and development (R&D) is increasingly recognized by all health stakeholders. Despite numerous ongoing PI initiatives, PI so far lacks structure and consistency in approach. Limited formal documentation of PI activities further hampers the sharing of experience and learnings, preventing timely and systematic implementation. This article summarizes the outcomes of several multistakeholder discussions during 2013-2016 in a practical roadmap for PI in medicines R&D. The roadmap highlights specific opportunities for PI along the 4 key stages of the medicines R&D life cycle and is illustrated with concrete examples. This roadmap's aim is to provide a tool to facilitate PI during medicines research and development and is being shared to encourage implementation and further refinement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Geissler
- 1 European Patients' Academy on Therapeutic Innovation, Riemerling, Germany
| | - Bettina Ryll
- 2 Melanoma Patient Network Europe, Uppsala, Sweden.,3 Uppsala University, EBC, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Susanna Leto di Priolo
- 4 Patient Strategy, Haematology and Professional Relations, Novartis Oncology Region Europe, Italy
| | - Mary Uhlenhopp
- 5 Amgen Europe GmbH, Zug, Switzerland.,Mary Uhlenhopp is currently at Global Advocacy, Oncology and Immunology, Shire, Zug, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Building the patient community. Gene Ther 2017; 24:547-550. [PMID: 28467403 DOI: 10.1038/gt.2017.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Revised: 04/19/2017] [Accepted: 04/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
There are many challenges in conducting rare disease research. The conditions are often poorly understood, small patient populations are dispersed around the world, and there are limited funding opportunities. Patient groups can serve as a key partner in overcoming these challenges, as they understand the impact of rare conditions on patients' lives. This gives patient groups valuable scientific insights into the disease. This can be used to create research strategies, address research bottlenecks and directly fund research that appropriately addresses patient needs. Patient groups can also play a critical role in recruiting and retaining patients for clinical trials, which reduces time and resource waste. By partnering with patient groups, research teams can improve efficiency of research and best meet the needs of patients. Researchers can also play an important role in building and supporting patient groups to unlock these benefits.
Collapse
|
24
|
Prioritizing research topics: a comparison of crowdsourcing and patient registry. Qual Life Res 2017; 27:41-50. [PMID: 28382522 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1566-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/24/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A cornerstone of patient-centered outcome research is direct patient involvement throughout the research process. Identifying and prioritizing research topics is a critical but often overlooked point for involvement, as it guides what research questions are asked. We assess the feasibility of involving individuals with low back pain in identifying and prioritizing research topics using two approaches: an existing patient registry and an online crowdsourcing platform. We compare and contrast the diversity of participants recruited, their responses, and resources involved. METHODS Eligible participants completed a survey ranking their five highest priority topics from an existing list and supplying additional topics not previously identified. We analyzed their responses using descriptive statistics and content analysis. RESULTS The patient registry yielded older (mean age 72.4), mostly White (70%), and well-educated (95% high school diploma or higher) participants; crowdsourcing yielded younger (mean age 36.6 years), mostly White (82%), and well-educated (98% high school diploma or higher) participants. The two approaches resulted in similar research priorities by frequency. Both provided open-ended responses that were useful, in that they illuminate additional and nuanced research topics. Overall, both approaches suggest a preference towards topics related to diagnosis and treatment over other topics. CONCLUSION Using a patient registry and crowdsourcing are both feasible recruitment approaches for engagement. Researchers should consider their approach, community, and resources when choosing their recruitment approach, as each approach has its own strengths and weaknesses. These approaches are likely most appropriate to supplement or to complement in-person and ongoing engagement strategies.
Collapse
|
25
|
An Asia pacific alliance for rare diseases. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2016; 8:11-7. [PMID: 25520006 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-014-0103-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
26
|
Menon D, Stafinski T, Dunn A, Short H. Involving patients in reducing decision uncertainties around orphan and ultra-orphan drugs: a rare opportunity? PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2016; 8:29-39. [PMID: 25516506 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-014-0106-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Uncertainty influences the amount of risk in decision making, and is typically related to clinical benefit, value for money, affordability, and/or adoption/diffusion of the technology (e.g., drug, device, procedure, etc.). Although evidence-based review processes within each stage of the technology lifecycle have been implemented to minimize uncertainty, high-quality information addressing that related to orphan and ultra-orphan drugs is often unavailable. The role that patients, as experts in their disease, may play in providing such information has yet to be fully explored. OBJECTIVE The objective of this systematic review was to identify existing and proposed opportunities for patients with rare diseases and their families to provide input aimed at reducing decision uncertainties throughout the lifecycle of an orphan or ultra-orphan drug. METHODS A comprehensive review of published and gray literature describing roles for patients and families in activities related to orphan and ultra-orphan drugs was conducted. In addition, the websites of regulatory and centralized reimbursement decision-making bodies in the top 22 OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries by gross domestic product (GDP) were scanned to identify current opportunities for patients with rare diseases in both stages. The websites of umbrella patient organizations for rare diseases in these countries were also scanned. These roles were then mapped onto a matrix to determine the stage in the technology lifecycle and types of uncertainties they directly or indirectly addressed. RESULTS Across the 22 countries, nine roles for patients within regulatory related processes were identified, with at least one in each country. These roles were not specific to patients with rare diseases. Similarly, six different opportunities for patient input in centralized drug review processes were identified, all of which applied to patients, in general, rather than just those with rare diseases. 'Real-world' examples of patient involvement explicitly related to rare diseases centered around 11 different themes. Seven fell within the research and development or clinical trial stages of a drug's lifecycle. Of the remaining four, three were associated with education and advocacy. All of the proposed roles identified focused on greater involvement in (1) the design and conduct of clinical trials, or (2) the 'valuation' of evidence during reimbursement decision making. When mapped onto the matrix of decision uncertainties, almost all of the existing and proposed roles addressed 'clinical benefit'. Roles for patients in reducing 'value for money', affordability, or adoption/diffusion uncertainties were mainly indirect, and a result of patient involvement in activities aimed at generating information on clinical benefit, which is then used to inform discussions around these uncertainties. CONCLUSIONS While patient involvement in activities that directly address uncertainties in clinical benefit may not be 'rare', opportunities for reducing those related to 'value for money', affordability, and adoption/diffusion remain scarce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devidas Menon
- Health Technology and Policy Unit, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 3021 Research Transition Facility, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2V2, Canada,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Castillo-Esparcia A, López-Villafranca P. Las estrategias de comunicación de las organizaciones de pacientes con enfermedades raras (ER) en España. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA 2016; 21:2423-36. [DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232015218.19852015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2015] [Accepted: 01/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumen El presente estudio se centra en la estrategia de comunicación de las organizaciones de pacientes con enfermedades raras. Los objetivos de estas organizaciones son: educar e informar sobre estas patologías, sensibilizar sobre sus problemáticas y obtener legitimación social para hacer visibles sus demandas. Para llevar a cabo esta investigación, se ha analizado el impacto de este colectivo en los medios de comunicación con mayor difusión y audiencia en España: prensa, (El País, El Mundo, La Vanguardia, ABC y El Periódico), radio (Cadena Ser, Onda Cero, Cope y RNE) y televisión (Telecinco, Antena 3, La 1, La Sexta, Cuatro), de 2012 a 2014. En segundo lugar, se ha realizado un estudio descriptivo de la comunicación en la web y redes sociales de 143 organizaciones nacionales. Y por último, se han elaborado encuestas telefónicas a una muestra representativa, 90 organizaciones, para relacionar la presencia mediática con la mejora de su situación económica e imagen social. Esta triangulación metodológica nos permite alcanzar los objetivos de la investigación. Se destaca mayor visibilidad social del colectivo merced a un número creciente de apariciones mediáticas, lo que propicia un aumento del número de miembros, pero no de donaciones y una mejora del conocimiento sobre estas patologías.
Collapse
|
28
|
Budin-Ljøsne I, Harris JR. Patient and interest organizations' views on personalized medicine: a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics 2016; 17:28. [PMID: 27178188 PMCID: PMC4866041 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0111-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2015] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Personalized medicine (PM) aims to tailor disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment to individuals on the basis of their genes, lifestyle and environments. Patient and interest organizations (PIOs) may potentially play an important role in the realization of PM. This paper investigates the views and perspectives on PM of a variety of PIOs. Methods Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted among leading representatives of 13 PIOs located in Europe and North-America. The data collected were analysed using a conventional content analysis approach. Results The PIO representatives supported the realization of PM but feared that many financial, structural and organizational challenges may delay its realization. They encouraged strategies to modernize drug licencing mechanisms, develop research and data sharing infrastructures, and educate patients and health care professionals in PM. Notably, they emphasized the importance of developing PM in an equitable way and taking into consideration the patients’ needs, values and personal situation. Despite varying levels of awareness regarding PM, the PIO representatives expressed willingness to engage in the PM agenda and recommended that PIOs work closely with policy-makers to design PM in a way that truly addresses the needs and concerns of patients. Conclusions PIOs have the potential to become central drivers of the PM agenda. Collaborations should be further developed between PIOs, researchers, drug developers and health care authorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O Box 1130, Blindern, NO-0318, Oslo, Norway. .,Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, kreftgenomikk.no, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Jennifer R Harris
- Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wagner M, Khoury H, Willet J, Rindress D, Goetghebeur M. Can the EVIDEM Framework Tackle Issues Raised by Evaluating Treatments for Rare Diseases: Analysis of Issues and Policies, and Context-Specific Adaptation. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2016; 34:285-301. [PMID: 26547306 PMCID: PMC4766242 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-015-0340-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The multiplicity of issues, including uncertainty and ethical dilemmas, and policies involved in appraising interventions for rare diseases suggests that multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) based on a holistic definition of value is uniquely suited for this purpose. The objective of this study was to analyze and further develop a comprehensive MCDA framework (EVIDEM) to address rare disease issues and policies, while maintaining its applicability across disease areas. METHODS Specific issues and policies for rare diseases were identified through literature review. Ethical and methodological foundations of the EVIDEM framework v3.0 were systematically analyzed from the perspective of these issues, and policies and modifications of the framework were performed accordingly to ensure their integration. RESULTS Analysis showed that the framework integrates ethical dilemmas and issues inherent to appraising interventions for rare diseases but required further integration of specific aspects. Modification thus included the addition of subcriteria to further differentiate disease severity, disease-specific treatment outcomes, and economic consequences of interventions for rare diseases. Scoring scales were further developed to include negative scales for all comparative criteria. A methodology was established to incorporate context-specific population priorities and policies, such as those for rare diseases, into the quantitative part of the framework. This design allows making more explicit trade-offs between competing ethical positions of fairness (prioritization of those who are worst off), the goal of benefiting as many people as possible, the imperative to help, and wise use of knowledge and resources. It also allows addressing variability in institutional policies regarding prioritization of specific disease areas, in addition to existing uncertainty analysis available from EVIDEM. CONCLUSION The adapted framework measures value in its widest sense, while being responsive to rare disease issues and policies. It provides an operationalizable platform to integrate values, competing ethical dilemmas, and uncertainty in appraising healthcare interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Wagner
- LASER Analytica, 1405 Transcanadienne, Suite 310, Montreal, QC, H9P 2V9, Canada.
| | - Hanane Khoury
- LASER Analytica, 1405 Transcanadienne, Suite 310, Montreal, QC, H9P 2V9, Canada
| | | | - Donna Rindress
- LASER Analytica, 1405 Transcanadienne, Suite 310, Montreal, QC, H9P 2V9, Canada
| | - Mireille Goetghebeur
- LASER Analytica, 1405 Transcanadienne, Suite 310, Montreal, QC, H9P 2V9, Canada
- University of Montreal, School of Public Health, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pinto D, Martin D, Chenhall R. The involvement of patient organisations in rare disease research: a mixed methods study in Australia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2016; 11:2. [PMID: 26754025 PMCID: PMC4709899 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-016-0382-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2015] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report here selected findings from a mixed-methods study investigating the role of Australian rare disease patient organisations (RDPOs) in research. Despite there being many examples of RDPOs that have initiated and supported significant scientific advances, there is little information - and none at all in Australia - about RDPOs generally, and their research-related goals, activities, and experiences. This information is a pre-requisite for understanding what RDPOs bring to research and how their involvement could be strengthened. METHODS We reviewed 112 RDPO websites, conducted an online survey completed by 61 organisational leaders, and interviewed ten leaders and two key informants. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using basic descriptive statistics and content analysis, respectively. RESULTS Although most are small volunteer-based groups, more than 90% of the surveyed RDPOs had a goal to promote or support research on the diseases affecting their members. Nearly all (95 %) had undertaken at least one research-related activity - such as providing funding or other support to researchers - in the previous five years. However, RDPO leaders reported considerable challenges in meeting their research goals. Difficulties most frequently identified were insufficient RDPO resources, and a perceived lack of researchers interested in studying their diseases. Other concerns included inadequate RDPO expertise in governing research "investments", and difficulty engaging researchers in the organisation's knowledge and ideas. We discuss these perceived challenges in the light of two systemic issues: the proliferation of and lack of collaboration between RDPOs, and the lack of specific governmental policies and resources supporting rare disease research and patient advocacy in Australia. CONCLUSION This study provides unique information about the experiences of RDPOs generally, rather than experiences retrospectively reported by RDPOs associated with successful research. We describe RDPOs' valuable contributions to research, while also providing insights into the difficulties for small organisations trying to promote research. The study is relevant internationally because of what it tells us about RDPOs; however, we draw attention to specific opportunities in Australia to support RDPOs' involvement in research, for the benefit of current and future generations affected by rare diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre Pinto
- Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
| | - Dominique Martin
- Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
| | - Richard Chenhall
- Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Big Data Governance: Solidarity and the Patient Voice. LAW, GOVERNANCE AND TECHNOLOGY SERIES 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33525-4_10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
32
|
Gutierrez L, Patris J, Hutchings A, Cowell W. Principles for consistent value assessment and sustainable funding of orphan drugs in Europe. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2015; 10:53. [PMID: 25935555 PMCID: PMC4433088 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-015-0269-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2015] [Accepted: 04/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Orphan Medicinal Products (OMP) Regulation has successfully encouraged research to develop treatments for rare diseases resulting in the authorisation of new OMPs in Europe. While decisions on OMP designation and marketing authorisation are made at the European Union level, reimbursement decisions are made at the national level. OMP value and affordability are high priority issues for policymakers and decisions regarding their pricing and funding are highly complex. There is currently no European consensus on how OMP value should be assessed and inequalities of access to OMPs have previously been observed. Against this background, policy makers in many countries are considering reforms to improve access to OMPs. This paper proposes ten principles to be considered when undertaking such reforms, from the perspective of an OMP manufacturer. We recommend the continued prioritisation of rare diseases by policymakers, an increased alignment between payer and regulatory frameworks, pricing centred on OMP value, and mechanisms to ensure long-term financial sustainability allowing a continuous and virtuous development of OMPs. Our recommendations support the development of more consistent frameworks and encourage collaboration between all stakeholders, including research-based industry, payers, clinicians, and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Gutierrez
- Celgene International Sàrl, Route de Perreux 1, Boudry, Switzerland.
| | - Julien Patris
- Celgene bvba/sarl Parc de l'Alliance, Boulevard de France 9, Braine L'Alleud, Belgium.
| | | | - Warren Cowell
- Celgene Ltd, 1 Longwalk Road, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Paulden M, Stafinski T, Menon D, McCabe C. Value-based reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs: a scoping review and decision framework. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2015; 33:255-69. [PMID: 25412735 PMCID: PMC4342524 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-014-0235-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rate of development of new orphan drugs continues to grow. As a result, reimbursing orphan drugs on an exceptional basis is increasingly difficult to sustain from a health system perspective. An understanding of the value that societies attach to providing orphan drugs at the expense of other health technologies is now recognised as an important input to policy debates. OBJECTIVES The aim of this work was to scope the social value arguments that have been advanced relating to the reimbursement of orphan drugs, and to locate these within a coherent decision-making framework to aid reimbursement decisions in the presence of limited healthcare resources. METHODS A scoping review of the peer reviewed and grey literature was undertaken, consisting of seven phases: (1) identifying the research question; (2) searching for relevant studies; (3) selecting studies; (4) charting, extracting and tabulating data; (5) analyzing data; (6) consulting relevant experts; and (7) presenting results. The points within decision processes where the identified value arguments would be incorporated were then located. This mapping was used to construct a framework characterising the distinct role of each value in informing decision making. RESULTS The scoping review identified 19 candidate decision factors, most of which can be characterised as either value-bearing or 'opportunity cost'-determining, and also a number of value propositions and pertinent sources of preference information. We were able to synthesize these into a coherent decision-making framework. CONCLUSION Our framework may be used to structure policy discussions and to aid transparency about the values underlying reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs. These values ought to be consistently applied to all technologies and populations affected by the decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Paulden
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, 736 University Terrace, 8303 112 St, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2T4, Canada,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mathieu M, Hammond C, Karlin DG. An innovative lab-based training program to help patient groups understand their disease and the research process. PLoS Biol 2015; 13:e1002067. [PMID: 25668201 PMCID: PMC4323103 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Genuine partnership between patient groups and medical experts is important but challenging. Our training program meets this challenge by organizing hands-on, lab-based training sessions for members of patient groups. These sessions allow “trainees” to better understand their disease and the biomedical research process, and strengthen links between patients and local researchers. Over the past decade, we and our partner institutes have received more than 900 French patients, with the participation of over 60 researchers and clinicians. Lab-based mini-research projects allow members of patient groups to understand the scientific method and how research works in practice, thereby fostering genuine partnership between patient groups and medical experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Mathieu
- Tous Chercheurs, Marseille, France
- * E-mail: (MM); (CH); (DGK)
| | - Constance Hammond
- Tous Chercheurs, Marseille, France
- Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée, INMED UMR 901 Inserm, Marseille, France
- Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
- * E-mail: (MM); (CH); (DGK)
| | - David G. Karlin
- Tous Chercheurs, Marseille, France
- * E-mail: (MM); (CH); (DGK)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Žnidar I, Collin-Histed T, Niemeyer P, Parkkinen J, Lauridsen AG, Zariņa S, Cohen Y, Manuel J. The European Gaucher Alliance: a survey of member patient organisations' activities, healthcare environments and concerns. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014; 9:134. [PMID: 25178161 PMCID: PMC4158124 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-014-0134-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2014] [Accepted: 08/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The European Gaucher Alliance (EGA) was established in 1994 and constituted in 2008 as an umbrella group supporting patient organisations for Gaucher disease. Every two years, the EGA conducts a questionnaire survey of member associations to help develop its priorities and annual work programme. Results of the latest survey are presented. Methods Between June 2012 and April 2013, the 36 members and associate members of the EGA were asked to complete a questionnaire detailing membership numbers, disease specific treatments used by patients, means of access to treatment, availability of treatment centres and home infusions, sources of support for patients with Gaucher disease, patient organisations’ activities, collaborations, funding sources and any issues of concern. Questionnaires completed in 2012 were revised in January 2013 and responses analysed between July and September 2013. Results Thirty three members returned data on one or more questions. Findings identified inequalities in access to treatment both within and between members’ countries. Three of 27 countries, for which data were available, relied totally on humanitarian aid for treatment and 6% of untreated patients in 20 countries were untreated because of funding issues, a situation many feared would worsen with deteriorating economic climates. Access to treatment and reimbursement represented 45% of members’ concerns, while 35% related to access to specialist treatment centres, home infusions and doctors with expertise in Gaucher disease. Member associations’ main activities centred on patient support (59% of responses) and raising awareness of Gaucher disease and patients’ needs amongst the medical community, government and healthcare decision makers and the general public (34% of responses). Twenty one (78% of respondents) indicated they were the only source of help for Gaucher disease patients in their country. For many, activities were constrained by funds; two members had no external funding source. Activities were maximised through collaboration with other patient organisations and umbrella organisations for rare diseases. Conclusion The survey provided a ‘snapshot’ of the situation for patients and families affected by Gaucher disease, helping the EGA direct its activities into areas of greatest need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeremy Manuel
- European Gaucher Alliance, Evesham House Business Centre, 48-52 Silver Street, Dursley GL11 4ND, Gloucestershire, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with rare diseases have limited access to useful information to guide treatment decisions. Engagement of patients and other stakeholders in clinical research may help to ensure that research efforts in rare diseases address relevant clinical questions and patient-centered health outcomes. Rare disease organizations may provide an effective means to facilitate patient engagement in research. However, the effectiveness of patient-engagement approaches, particularly for the study of rare diseases, has not been well studied. OBJECTIVES To synthesize evidence about engagement of patients and other stakeholders in research on rare diseases, including the role of rare disease organizations in facilitating patient-centered research. METHODS/RESEARCH DESIGN A systematic review and gray literature search were guided by a technical expert panel composed of patient representatives, clinicians, and researchers. English-language studies that engaged patients or other stakeholders in research on rare diseases or evaluated engagement were included. Studies were assessed on how well key research questions were answered, based on the level of detail describing engagement activities and whether outcomes from engagement were assessed. RESULTS Thirty-five studies were included, although many reported minimal information on engagement. Patients and other stakeholders were most commonly engaged to identify patient-centered research agendas, to select which study outcomes were important to patients, to provide input on study design, and to identify strategies for increasing enrollment in trials. Rare disease organizations mainly helped provide access to patients and communicated research opportunities and findings. They also helped promote collaborative networks and provided financial support for research infrastructures. Although authors reported benefits of engagement and identified changes to their research processes, no empirical assessments of engagement practices and their effectiveness were found. CONCLUSIONS Researchers studying rare diseases can obtain patient input regarding which research questions and health outcomes to study; however, the most effective approaches to engagement have not been well defined.
Collapse
|