2
|
Sampurno F, Kowalski C, Connor SE, Nguyen AV, Acuña ÀP, Ng CF, Foster C, Feick G, Boronat OG, Dieng S, Brglevska S, Ferrante S, Leung S, Villanti P, Moore CM, Graham ID, Millar JL, Litwin MS, Papa N. Knowledge and insights from a maturing international clinical quality registry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29:964-969. [PMID: 35048976 PMCID: PMC9006702 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Since 2017, the TrueNTH Global Registry (TNGR) has aimed to drive improvement in patient outcomes for individuals with localized prostate cancer by collating data from healthcare institutions across 13 countries. As TNGR matures, a systematic evaluation of existing processes and documents is necessary to evaluate whether the registry is operating as intended. The main supporting documents: protocol and data dictionary, were comprehensively reviewed in a series of meetings over a 10-month period by an international working group. In parallel, individual consultations with local institutions regarding a benchmarking quality-of-care report were conducted. Four consensus areas for improvement emerged: updating operational definitions, appraisal of the recruitment process, refinement of data elements, and improvement of data quality and reporting. Recommendations presented were drawn from our collective experience and accumulated knowledge in operating an international registry. These can be readily generalized to other health-related reporting programs beyond clinical registries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanny Sampurno
- Corresponding Author: Fanny Sampurno, BA, BSc (Hons), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia;
| | | | - Sarah E Connor
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Anissa V Nguyen
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Àngels Pont Acuña
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Chi-Fai Ng
- SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Claire Foster
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Günter Feick
- Patient Support Association Bundesverband Prostatakrebs Selbsthilfe, Bonn, Germany
| | - Olatz Garin Boronat
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Stephanie Ferrante
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan (on behalf of MUSIC), Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Steven Leung
- SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Caroline M Moore
- Department of Urology, Division of Surgical and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ian D Graham
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeremy L Millar
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Connor MJ, Shah TT, Smigielska K, Day E, Sukumar J, Fiorentino F, Sarwar N, Gonzalez M, Falconer A, Klimowska-Nassar N, Evans M, Naismith OF, Thippu Jayaprakash K, Price D, Gayadeen S, Basak D, Horan G, McGrath J, Sheehan D, Kumar M, Ibrahim A, Brock C, Pearson RA, Anyamene N, Heath C, Shergill I, Rai B, Hellawell G, McCracken S, Khoubehi B, Mangar S, Khoo V, Dudderidge T, Staffurth JN, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. Additional Treatments to the Local tumour for metastatic prostate cancer-Assessment of Novel Treatment Algorithms (IP2-ATLANTA): protocol for a multicentre, phase II randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e042953. [PMID: 33632752 PMCID: PMC7908915 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Survival in men diagnosed with de novo synchronous metastatic prostate cancer has increased following the use of upfront systemic treatment, using chemotherapy and other novel androgen receptor targeted agents, in addition to standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Local cytoreductive and metastasis-directed interventions are hypothesised to confer additional survival benefit. In this setting, IP2-ATLANTA will explore progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes with the addition of sequential multimodal local and metastasis-directed treatments compared with standard care alone. METHODS A phase II, prospective, multicentre, three-arm randomised controlled trial incorporating an embedded feasibility pilot. All men with new histologically diagnosed, hormone-sensitive, metastatic prostate cancer, within 4 months of commencing ADT and of performance status 0 to 2 are eligible. Patients will be randomised to Control (standard of care (SOC)) OR Intervention 1 (minimally invasive ablative therapy to prostate±pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND)) OR Intervention 2 (cytoreductive radical prostatectomy±PLND OR prostate radiotherapy±pelvic lymph node radiotherapy (PLNRT)). Metastatic burden will be prespecified using the Chemohormonal Therapy Versus Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial for Extensive Disease (CHAARTED) definition. Men with low burden disease in intervention arms are eligible for metastasis-directed therapy, in the form of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) or surgery. Standard systemic therapy will be administered in all arms with ADT±upfront systemic chemotherapy or androgen receptor agents. Patients will be followed-up for a minimum of 2 years. PRIMARY OUTCOME PFS. Secondary outcomes include predictive factors for PFS and overall survival; urinary, sexual and rectal side effects. Embedded feasibility sample size is 80, with 918 patients required in the main phase II component. Study recruitment commenced in April 2019, with planned follow-up completed by April 2024. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approved by the Health Research Authority (HRA) Research Ethics Committee Wales-5 (19/WA0005). Study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03763253; ISCRTN58401737.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin John Connor
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Taimur Tariq Shah
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Katarzyna Smigielska
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Emily Day
- Imperial College Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Johanna Sukumar
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Naveed Sarwar
- Department of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Michael Gonzalez
- Department of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alison Falconer
- Department of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Natalia Klimowska-Nassar
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Martin Evans
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Olivia Frances Naismith
- Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA), Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Derek Price
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Shiva Gayadeen
- Department of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Dolan Basak
- Department of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Gail Horan
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - John McGrath
- Department of Urology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Denise Sheehan
- Department of Oncology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Manal Kumar
- Department of Urology, Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK
| | - Azman Ibrahim
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Bebington, Wirral, UK
| | - Cathryn Brock
- Department of Oncology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rachel A Pearson
- Department of Oncology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nicola Anyamene
- Department of Oncology, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Catherine Heath
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Iqbal Shergill
- Department of Urology, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, UK
| | - Bhavan Rai
- Department of Urology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Giles Hellawell
- Department of Urology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Stuart McCracken
- Department of Urology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK
| | - Bijan Khoubehi
- Department of Urology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephen Mangar
- Department of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Department of Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - John Nicholas Staffurth
- Research, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moreira DM, Gershman B, Rangel LJ, Boorjian SA, Thompson RH, Frank I, Tollefson MK, Gettman MT, Karnes RJ. Evaluation of pT0 prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2015; 118:379-83. [PMID: 26305996 DOI: 10.1111/bju.13266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the incidence, predictors and oncological outcomes of pT0 prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 20 222 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for PCa at the Mayo Clinic between 1987 and 2012. Disease recurrence was defined as follow-up PSA >0.4 ng/mL or biopsy-proven local recurrence. Systemic progression was defined as development of metastatic disease on imaging. Comparisons of baseline characteristics between pT0 and non-pT0 groups were carried out using chi-squared tests. Recurrence-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS A total of 62 patients (0.3%) had pT0 disease according to the RP specimen. In univariable analysis, pT0 disease was significantly associated with older age (P = 0.045), lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA; P = 0.002), lower clinical stage (P < 0.001), lower biopsy Gleason score (P = 0.042), and receipt of preoperative transurethral resection, hormonal and radiation therapies (all P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, lower PSA levels, lower Gleason score, and receipt of preoperative treatment were independently associated with pT0 (all P < 0.05). Seven patients (11%) with pT0 PCa developed disease recurrence over a median follow-up of 10.9 years. All seven patients had preoperative treatment(s) and three had recurrence with a PSA doubling time of <9 months. Compared with non-pT0 disease, pT0 disease was associated with longer recurrence-free survival (P < 0.05). Only one (1.6%) patient with pT0 disease developed systemic progression. CONCLUSIONS pT0 stage PCa is a rare phenomenon and is associated with receipt of preoperative treatment and features of low-risk PCa. Although pT0 has a very favourable prognosis, some men, especially those who received preoperative treatment, experience a small but non-negligible risk of disease recurrence and systemic progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Moreira
- Department of Urology, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Boris Gershman
- Department of Urology, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Laureano J Rangel
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Stephen A Boorjian
- Department of Urology, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Robert Houston Thompson
- Department of Urology, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Igor Frank
- Department of Urology, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew K Tollefson
- Department of Urology, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew T Gettman
- Department of Urology, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Robert Jeffrey Karnes
- Department of Urology, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|