Endoscopic versus open resection of tuberculum sellae meningiomas: a decision analysis

In-Hospital Cost Comparison for Open Versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Meningioma Resection

Objective

To determine the in-hospital cost implications of an endoscopic expanded endonasal approach (EEEA) for meningioma resection relative to the open transcranial approach.

Methods

All anterior skull base meningioma surgeries performed over a period from January 1st, 2015 to October 31th, 2017 were evaluated. The electronic medical record was reviewed for patient factors, tumor characteristics, and cost variables associated with each hospital stay and univariate analysis was performed using R software. All cost data were converted into August 2021-equivalent dollar amounts using the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index.

Results

Thirty-five patients met study criteria, including 27 patients undergoing an open transcranial approach and 8 undergoing an EEEA. Average length of stay for patients undergoing an open approach was 9.3 days compared to 5.6 within the EEEA group ( P = .126). The average total in-hospital cost of patient undergoing an EEEA was $35417.1 compared to $46406.9 among patients undergoing an open transcranial approach ( P = .168). On univariate analysis, the cost of an open transcranial approach relative to the EEEA was $10989.8 ( P = .411).

Conclusions

The open transcranial approach remained the dominant surgical approach to anterior skull base meningiomas over our study time period. However, despite limited patient numbers the EEEA was associated with decreased total in-hospital costs.

Transnasal Endoscopic Surgery for Suprasellar Meningiomas

Aim

Endoscopic trans-nasal surgery has evolved a long way from the days of narrow corridors with high rates of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak to the present state of HD optics with better tissue differentiation, extended approaches, and use of vascularized flaps for defect closure. Trans-nasal approach is an established technique for pituitary tumors practiced worldwide. However, trans-nasal endoscopic excision of suprasellar meningiomas provides a tougher challenge in terms of instrument manipulation, tumor excision with good visual outcome, and a robust defect closure to prevent CSF leaks.

Materials and Methods

Out of 83 cases of midline anterior cranial fossa meningiomas operated over 14 years, our experience in 12 cases of suprasellar meningiomas for radical resection via the trans-nasal endoscopic route is discussed.

Results

Amongst these, six were excised via primary extended endoscopic trans-sphenoidal surgery, four cases had a residual lesion or recurrence after primary transcranial surgery, and two cases involved a combined transcranial and extended endoscopic approach. Visual improvement along with resolution of headache was seen in all patients postoperatively. None of the patients had CSF leak requiring further repair. Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone was found in one patient, which was transient and easily corrected.

Conclusion

Trans-nasal endoscopic surgery for suprasellar meningiomas is an effective technique that provides results of tumor excision comparable to the transcranial approach in suitable cases. Visual outcome was found to be superior, and rates of CSF leak were remarkably reduced with vascularized flap. However, each case must be assessed individually and lateral extension beyond the optic canals with internal carotid artery encasement must be considered before planning surgery.

Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches for Frontobasal Meningiomas: Purely Endoscopic Endonasal, Purely Microscopic Bifrontal Transcranial, and Combined Endoscopic and Microscopic Supraorbital Transciliary Approaches

ABSTRACT

Surgical removal of frontobasal meningiomas (FBMs) can be achieved using different techniques, including endoscopic, transcranial, and combined approaches. The advantages and disadvantages of the outcomes of these approaches should be compared to provide the most convenient surgical treatment to the patient. This study aimed to compare 3 surgical approaches for FBMsin terms of outcomes and determine the superiority of each on the basis of anatomical, surgical, and clinical efficacy. Systematic review was performed to identify studies comparing techniques for the surgical removal of FBMs. Each group included 13 patients; 39 patients with FBMshad undergone surgery. These groups were endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), microscopic bifrontal transcranial approach (MTA), and endoscopic plus microscopic combined supraorbital transciliary approach (STA) groups. Data on the demographics of patient population, pre- and post-operative neurological examination, tumor properties, imaging studies, and surgical complications were extracted. The mean age at the time of surgery for the patient population was 53.2 years. Among the groups, no statistically significant differences were observed with regard to sex (P = 0.582). The mean follow-up time was 56.7 months. A statistically significant difference was observed in the mean tumor volume among the groups; the MTA group showed the highest mean tumor volume. However, no significant difference was found in the mean tumor volume between EEA and STA groups. Regarding operation duration, the STA group had the shortest operation time (mean = 281.5 minutes), whereas the average surgical duration in MTA group was the longest (mean = 443.8 minutes). The average bleeding volume was highest in the MTA group (mean = 746.2 ml) and lowest in the EEA group (mean = 320.8 ml). Tumor removal was incomplete in three patients (two in the EEA group and one in the MTA group). Recurrence was detected in two cases. One patient with recurrence was operated using the endoscopic surgical approach, whereas the other patient underwent the microscopic bifrontal approach. Post-operative hyposmia/anosmia or decreased olfactory function was the most common complication observed in 5 patients, 2 patients each in the EEA and MTA groups and one in the STA group. The second most common complication was wound infection in one patient in the MTA group and two patients in the STA group (7.7%). Both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and meningitis were present in two patients (5.1%), one patient each from the EEA and STA groups. Pre-operative visual disturbances were reported in 13 patients (33.3%), all of which resolved post-operatively No statistical differences were found among the groups. Mortality occurred in a patient in the MTA group (2.6%) caused by cardiac arrest on post-operative day 1. This is the first study comparing the surgical outcomes of three surgical approaches for FBMs. Although recent literature suggests that both endoscopic and transcranial approaches have their own advantages and disadvantages, the authors showed that none of the surgical approaches have obvious superiority over the others with regard to outcomes. Thus, the selection of the ideal surgical approach should be based on surgical experience and tumor characteristics.

The expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for treatment of tuberculum sellae meningiomas in a series of 40 consecutive cases

Compared with traditional craniotomy, the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEEA) may have some advantages for tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) treatment. We described our experience of the therapeutic effect of endoscopic TSM treatment. From August 2015 to December 2019, 40 patients with a TSM were treated by the EEEA in our institution. EEEA outcome in TSM treatment was analyzed. Among 39 patients with visual impairment, 38 (97.4%) improved their visual function to some extent after the EEEA, and one case had no significant change in visual acuity. Among all patients, 38 (95.0%) achieved gross total resection (GTR) and 2 (5.0%) achieved near-total resection (NTR). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage occurred in three patients (7.5%) and meningitis (post-CSF leakage) in two patients (5.0%). Eight patients (20.0%) suffered postoperative hyposmia, three of whom developed long-term hyposmia. One patient (2.5%) suffered from bleeding of the branch of the anterior cerebral artery intraoperatively leading to postoperative acute cerebral infarction. The EEEA is a safe and reliable minimally invasive method for TSM removal. Compared with traditional craniotomy, the EEEA may have better visual outcomes and a higher prevalence of GTR, but carries the risk of CSF leakage.

The endoscope-assisted supraorbital "keyhole" approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: an updated meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The gold-standard treatment for symptomatic anterior skull base meningiomas is surgical resection. The endoscope-assisted supraorbital "keyhole" approach (eSKA) is a promising technique for surgical resection of olfactory groove (OGM) and tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) but has yet to be compared with the microscopic transcranial (mTCA) and the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in the context of existing literature.

METHODS

An updated study-level meta-analysis on surgical outcomes and complications of OGM and TSM operated with the eSKA, mTCA, and EEA was conducted using random-effect models.

RESULTS

A total of 2285 articles were screened, yielding 96 studies (2191 TSM and 1510 OGM patients). In terms of effectiveness, gross total resection incidence was highest in mTCA (89.6% TSM, 91.1% OGM), followed by eSKA (85.2% TSM, 84.9% OGM) and EEA (83.9% TSM, 82.8% OGM). Additionally, the EEA group had the highest incidence of visual improvement (81.9% TSM, 54.6% OGM), followed by eSKA (65.9% TSM, 52.9% OGM) and mTCA (63.9% TSM, 45.7% OGM). However, in terms of safety, the EEA possessed the highest cerebrospinal fluid leak incidence (9.2% TSM, 14.5% OGM), compared with eSKA (2.1% TSM, 1.6% OGM) and mTCA (1.6% TSM, 6.5% OGM). Finally, mortality and intraoperative arterial injury were 1% or lower across all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of diverse study populations, the eSKA appeared not to be associated with increased adverse outcomes when compared with mTCA and EEA and offered comparable effectiveness. Case-selection is paramount in establishing a role for the eSKA in anterior skull base tumours.

Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Resection of Tuberculum Sellae Meningioma: A Promising Surgical Approach

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, endoscopic approaches have been increasingly successful in removing various types of extra-dural lesions from the skull base. Resection of tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) is challenging. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for the removal of TSMs is currently an acceptable surgical approach in neurosurgery and, despite the surgical results, the indications and limitations of this approach remain controversial.

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the authors' experience and outcomes with the EEA for TSM, as well as postoperative complications.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses were performed on patients who underwent endoscopic surgical resection of TSMs involving the suprasellar region between January 2018 and March 2019.

RESULTS

Three patients underwent resection of their TSM by the EEA. Tumors in the suprasellar region were completely resected. Patients recovered normally with uneventful postoperative outcomes and were followed-up for at least six months after surgery with no neurological deficits noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The EEA for resection of TSMs is feasible, safe, and effective, with fewer complications and lower mortality than other surgical methods. This a promising surgical approach.

Endoscopic endonasal approach for suprasellar meningiomas: introduction of a new scoring system to predict extent of resection and assist in case selection with long-term outcome data

OBJECTIVE

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has gained increasing popularity for the resection of suprasellar meningiomas (SSMs). Appropriate case selection is critical in optimizing patient outcome. Long-term outcome data are lacking. The authors systematically identified preoperative factors associated with extent of resection (EOR) and determined the relationship between EOR and long-term recurrence after EEA for SSMs.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, the authors identified preoperative clinical and imaging characteristics associated with EOR and built on the recently published University of California, San Francisco resectability score to propose a score more specific to the EEA. They then examined the relationship between gross-total resection (GTR; 100%), near-total resection (NTR; 95%-99%), and subtotal resection (STR; < 95%) and recurrence or progression with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients were identified. Radiographic GTR was achieved in 40 of 47 (85%) patients in whom it was the surgical goal. Significant independent risk factors for incomplete resection were prior surgery (OR 25.94, 95% CI < 2.00 to 336.49, p = 0.013); tumor lateral to the optic nerve (OR 13.41, 95% CI 1.82-98.99, p = 0.011); and complete internal carotid artery (ICA) encasement (OR 15.12, 95% CI 1.17-194.08, p = 0.037). Tumor size and optic canal invasion were not significant risk factors after adjustment for other variables. A resectability score based on the multivariable model successfully predicted the likelihood of GTR; a score of 0 had a positive predictive value of 97% for GTR, whereas a score of 2 had a negative predictive value of 87.5% for incomplete resection. After a mean follow-up of 40.6 ± 32.4 months (mean ± SD), recurrence was 2.7% after GTR (1 patient with atypical histology), 44.4% after NTR, and 80% after STR (p < 0.0001). Vision was stable or improved in 93.5% and improved in 67.4% of patients with a preoperative deficit. There were 5 (9.8%) postoperative CSF leaks, of which 4 were managed with lumbar drains and 1 required a reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

The EEA is a safe and effective approach to SSMs, with favorable visual outcomes in well-selected cases. The combination of postoperative MRI-based EOR with direct endoscopic inspection can be used in lieu of Simpson grade to predict recurrence. GTR dramatically reduces recurrence and can be achieved regardless of tumor size, proximity or encasement of the anterior cerebral artery, or medial optic canal invasion. Risk factors for incomplete resection include prior surgery, tumor lateral to the optic nerve, and complete ICA encasement.

ICAR: endoscopic skull-base surgery

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic skull-base surgery (ESBS) is employed in the management of diverse skull-base pathologies. Paralleling the increased utilization of ESBS, the literature in this field has expanded rapidly. However, the rarity of these diseases, the inherent challenges of surgical studies, and the continued learning curve in ESBS have resulted in significant variability in the quality of the literature. To consolidate and critically appraise the available literature, experts in skull-base surgery have produced the International Consensus Statement on Endoscopic Skull-Base Surgery (ICAR:ESBS).

METHODS

Using previously described methodology, topics spanning the breadth of ESBS were identified and assigned a literature review, evidence-based review or evidence-based review with recommendations format. Subsequently, each topic was written and then reviewed by skull-base surgeons in both neurosurgery and otolaryngology. Following this iterative review process, the ICAR:ESBS document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICAR:ESBS document addresses the role of ESBS in primary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea, intradural tumors, benign skull-base and orbital pathology, sinonasal malignancies, and clival lesions. Additionally, specific challenges in ESBS including endoscopic reconstruction and complication management were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

A critical review of the literature in ESBS demonstrates at least the equivalency of ESBS with alternative approaches in pathologies such as CSF rhinorrhea and pituitary adenoma as well as improved reconstructive techniques in reducing CSF leaks. Evidence-based recommendations are limited in other pathologies and these significant knowledge gaps call upon the skull-base community to embrace these opportunities and collaboratively address these shortcomings.

Quality of life and emotional burden after transnasal and transcranial anterior skull base surgery

OBJECTIVE

To analyze psychopathological outcome and health-related quality of life (QOL) for cohorts of patients undergoing transcranial or transnasal anterior skull base surgery.

METHODS

A prospective study of patients undergoing elective surgery for various entities of the anterior skull base was performed. Evaluation for depression (ADS-K score) and anxiety (PTSS, STAI-S, STAI-T, and ASI-3 scores) was done before surgery, at 3 and 12 months after surgery. The correlation between preoperative psychological burden and postoperative quality of life as measured by the SF-36 and EuroQol questionnaires was analyzed. Incidence and influence of these psychiatric comorbidities on clinical outcome were examined and compared between transnasal and transcranial subgroups.

RESULTS

We included 54 patients scheduled for surgery of a pituitary adenoma or meningioma of the anterior skull base between January 2013 and July 2017. Of these, a cohort of 40 (74.1%) completed follow-up interviews after 3 and 12 months. There were 60.0% female patients, median age was 57 years. 57.5% of patients had a meningioma and were operated transcranially, while 42.5% of patients received transnasal surgery for pituitary adenoma. The proportion of pathological anxiety scores significantly decreased from 75.0 to 45.0% (p = 0.002), without difference between transnasal and transcranial subgroups. After 3 months, mean EuroQol VAS score non-significantly increased by 0.07 (p = 0.236) across the entire cohort without significant difference between transcranial and transnasal subgroups (p = 0.478). The transnasal cohort tended to score higher in anxiety scores, whereas the transcranial cohort demonstrated higher depression scores without significant difference, respectively. The individually declared emotional burden significantly decreased from 6.7 to 4.0 on the ten-point Likert scale (p < 0.001) equally for both subgroups (transnasal, - 2.3; transcranial, - 3.0; p = 0.174). On last examination, about half of the patients in each subgroup (41.2% vs. 52.2%; p = 0.491) expressed a considerable recovery of preoperative bodily complaints such as headaches, dizziness, and unrest defined as a score of at least 8 on the Likert scaled item.

CONCLUSION

Both transnasal and transcranial approaches yield favorable postoperative QOL and psychopathological outcomes. The postoperative increase in QOL is partly influenced by preoperative expression of mental distress, which tends to resolve postoperatively.

Clinical Outcome after Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Tuberculum Sella Meningiomas

BACKGROUND

In select cases, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has distinct advantages for resection of tuberculum sella meningiomas (TSM).

OBJECTIVE

To report the extent of resection (EOR), complication rates, and outcomes in a large series of TSM treated by the EEA.

METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive TSM cases treated by EEA from 2008 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient history, imaging, volumetric EOR, complications, and outcomes are presented.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 53.9 yr, with female predominance (84%). Preoperatively, 84% of patients had vision impairment and 68% had optic canal tumor invasion. The tumor was abutting or partially encasing the anterior cerebral artery in 14 (56%) and 3 (12%) patients, respectively. The supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) was partially or completely encased in 4 (16%) and 4 (16%) patients, respectively. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 19/25 (76%) cases. Complete ICA encasement was the most common reason for subtotal resection. Among patients without complete ICA encasement, GTR was achieved in 19/20 (95%) patients. Optic canal invasion, tumor volume, intratumoral calcifications, and partial vascular encasement were not limiting factors for GTR. Eighty-eight percent of patients with preoperative visual impairment had improvement or normalization of vision. No patient experienced permanent visual deterioration or new permanent pituitary dysfunction. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 2 (8%) cases.

CONCLUSION

The EEA for resection of TSM provides high rates of GTR and visual improvement with a low rate of complications. Direct contact or partial encasement of the ICA and anterior cerebral artery does not limit the EOR.

Endoscopic Transnasal Resection of Solitary Fibrous Tumor in the Optic Canal

BACKGROUND

Tumors extending into the optic canal can cause progressive visual impairment because of optic nerve compression. Prompt surgical resection is often necessary. When the tumor is located medially in the optic canal, endoscopic transnasal surgery provides a safer, less invasive alternative to a transcranial approach.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We recently encountered a case of small solitary fibrous tumor in the optic canal causing rapid visual deterioration. The radiographic findings of preoperative imaging studies were compatible with those of meningioma; however, unlike meningioma, bleeding from the tumor was profuse during the operation. The endoscopic transnasal approach was effective for handling the highly vascularized tumor in this delicate region, and gross total removal was achieved with postoperative gradual improvement in his visual function. Nevertheless, the tumor recurred after 6 months, and re-resection was performed using the same surgical corridor, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic transnasal surgery is a valuable option for aggressive lesions in the optic canal. Although the efficacy of radiotherapy for solitary fibrous tumor remains controversial, it should be considered when the tumor shows progressive features.

The endoscopic endonasal approach is not superior to the microscopic transcranial approach for anterior skull base meningiomas-a meta-analysis

Object

In the past decade, the endonasal transsphenoidal approach (eTSA) has become an alternative to the microsurgical transcranial approach (mTCA) for tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) and olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate which approach offered the best surgical outcomes.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature from 2004 and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Pooled incidence was calculated for gross total resection (GTR), visual improvement, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, intraoperative arterial injury, and mortality, comparing eTSA and mTCA, with p-interaction values.

Results

Of 1684 studies, 64 case series were included in the meta-analysis. Using the fixed-effects model, the GTR rate was significantly higher among mTCA patients for OGM (eTSA: 70.9% vs. mTCA: 88.5%, p-interaction < 0.01), but not significantly higher for TSM (eTSA: 83.0% vs. mTCA: 85.8%, p-interaction = 0.34). Despite considerable heterogeneity, visual improvement was higher for eTSA than mTCA for TSM (p-interaction < 0.01), but not for OGM (p-interaction = 0.33). CSF leak was significantly higher among eTSA patients for both OGM (eTSA: 25.1% vs. mTCA: 10.5%, p-interaction < 0.01) and TSM (eTSA: 19.3%, vs. mTCA: 5.81%, p-interaction < 0.01). Intraoperative arterial injury was higher among eTSA (4.89%) than mTCA patients (1.86%) for TSM (p-interaction = 0.03), but not for OGM resection (p-interaction = 0.10). Mortality was not significantly different between eTSA and mTCA patients for both TSM (p-interaction = 0.14) and OGM resection (p-interaction = 0.88). Random-effect models yielded similar results.

Conclusion

In this meta-analysis, eTSA was not shown to be superior to mTCA for resection of both OGMs and TSMs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-017-3390-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Endoscopic Assisted Supraorbital Keyhole Approach or Endoscopic Endonasal Approach in Cases of Tuberculum Sellae Meningioma: Which Surgical Route Should Be Favored?

OBJECTIVE

Keyhole approaches are under investigation for skull base tumor surgery. They are expected to have a low complication rate with the same successful resection rate compared with endoscopic endonasal procedures. In this study, we compare our current series of tuberculum sellae meningiomas resected via an endoscopic endonasal or microsurgical supraorbital keyhole approach.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2016, 16 patients were treated using the supraorbital keyhole procedure and 6 patients received an endoscopic endonasal procedure. Both surgical techniques were analyzed and compared concerning complications, surgical radicality, endocrinologic, and ophthalmologic outcome and recurrences in patients' follow-up.

RESULTS

The 2 different approaches yielded similar rates of gross total resection (endonasal 83% [5 of 6] vs. supraorbital 87% [14 of 16]), near total resection (17% [1 of 6] vs. 13% [2 of 16]), and visual recovery (endonasal 66% [2 of 3] vs. supraorbital 60% [3 of 5]). An extension lateral to the internal carotid artery was noted in 81% (13 of 16) of the supraorbital cases and in none of the endonasal cases. Tumor volume was 14.9 cm³ (±8.2 cm³) for supraorbital tumors versus 2.1 cm³ (±0.8 cm³) for the endonasal approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Both approaches provide minimally invasive surgical routes accessing meningiomas of the sellar region. The ideal approach should be tailored to the individual patient considering the tumor anatomy, lateral extension, and the experience of the surgeon with both surgical approaches. We suggest using the supraorbital approach for larger meningiomas of sellar region with far lateral extension or broad vascular encasement.

The value of endoscope assistance during transcranial surgery for tuberculum sellae meningiomas

OBJECTIVE In tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) surgery, endonasal approaches are claimed to have a superior visual outcome compared with transcranial approaches. The authors question whether this is always true and analyze their series of cases of endoscope-assisted transcranial TSM surgery with special regard to the postoperative visual outcome in order to explore this issue. METHODS All surgical procedures for TSM performed between 2003 and 2015 in the Department of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, were retrospectively analyzed. Special attention was paid to the postoperative visual outcome. RESULTS During the study period, 15 patients (12 female and 3 male) underwent surgery for TSM. Gross-total resection was achieved in 14 cases (93.3%) and near-total resection in 1. One patient suffered from a major stroke during surgery and had to be excluded from further analyses. No other complications occurred. Preoperatively, visual acuity was disturbed in 12 patients (80%) and visual field deficits were present in 11 patients (73.3%). In 3 patients (20%), the TSM was an incidental finding. Postoperatively, ophthalmological examination revealed an improvement of visual acuity in 10 (90.9%) of 11 patients and improvement of visual field deficits in 9 (90%) of 10 patients; no deterioration of visual acuity or visual field was seen in any patient. Visual acuity and visual field improvement was observed in all patients who had surgery within 3 years after the onset of visual disturbances. No tumor recurrence was observed during follow-up (mean 32 months, range 3-134 months). TSMs were approached via a frontolateral craniotomy in 7 patients and via a supraorbital craniotomy in 8. The use of the endoscope as an assistive device led to improved tumor visualization and consequent removal in areas that were hidden in the microscopic view in 6 patients (40%). CONCLUSIONS The present series confirms a favorable visual outcome after TSM surgery via supraorbital or frontolateral endoscope-assisted approaches. With endoscopic visualization, major manipulation of the optic apparatus could be avoided, perhaps affecting the favorable visual outcome.

Current Status of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Skull Base Meningiomas: Review of the Literature

Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is expected to be ideal for the paramedian ventral skull base meningiomas, allowing wide access to the ventral skull base regions and realizing early devascularization of the tumor without retraction of the brain. We searched clinical reports of EEA for skull base meningiomas, written in English language, published before October 2014, using the PubMed literature search on the website. Skull base meningiomas are subdivided by the site of occurrence, olfactory groove (8 articles including 80 cases), tuberculum sellae (14 articles, 153 cases), cavernous sinus (2 articles, 8 cases), petroclival region (4 articles, 10 cases), and craniofacial region (2 articles, 5 cases), and the surgical outcomes of EEA were analyzed. In anterior skull base regions, EEA contributed to effective improvement of the symptoms in small and round-shaped meningiomas, but 25% of the patients had postoperative cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. In cavernous sinus and petroclival regions, successful surgical removal largely depended on tumor consistency, and the extent of the surgical resection proportionally increased the risks of serious complications. Thus, judicious endoscopic resection with adjuvant radiotherapy or radiosurgery remains to be the most reasonable treatment option. To decrease the risks of surgical complications, the surgeons must master the closure techniques of dural defect and meticulous microsurgical procedure under endoscopic vision. Further progress will depend on the progresses of surgical technique in neurosurgeons engaging this potentially “minimally invasive” surgery.

Comparison of endoscopic endonasal and bifrontal craniotomy approaches for olfactory groove meningiomas: A matched pair analysis of outcomes and frontal lobe changes on MRI

We compare the outcomes and postoperative MRI changes of endoscopic endonasal (EEA) and bifrontal craniotomy (BFC) approaches for olfactory groove meningiomas (OGM). All patients who underwent either BFC or EEA for OGM were eligible. Matched pairs were created by matching tumor volumes of an EEA patient with a BFC patient, and matching the timing of the postoperative scans. The tumor dimensions, peritumoral edema, resectability issues, and frontal lobe changes were recorded based on preoperative and postoperative MRI. Postoperative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensity and residual cystic cavity (porencephalic cave) volume were compared using univariable and multivariable analyses. From a total of 70 patients (46 EEA, 24 BFC), 10 matched pairs (20 patients) were created. Three patients (30%) in the EEA group and two (20%) in the BFC had postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks (p=0.61). Gross total resections were achieved in seven (70%) of the EEA group and nine (90%) of the BFC group (p=0.26), and one patient from each group developed a recurrence. On postoperative MRI, there was no significant difference in FLAIR signal volumes between EEA and BFC approaches (6.9 versus 13.3 cm(3); p=0.17) or in porencephalic cave volumes (1.7 versus 5.0 cm(3); p=0.11) in univariable analysis. However, in a multivariable analysis, EEA was associated with less postoperative FLAIR change (p=0.02) after adjusting for the volume of preoperative edema. This study provides preliminary evidence that EEA is associated with quantifiable improvements in postoperative frontal lobe imaging.

Reconstructive challenges in the extended endoscopic transclival approach

OBJECTIVE

We wanted to present our experience with the extended endoscopic approach to clival pathology, focusing on cerebrospinal fluid leak and reconstruction challenges.

METHODS

We examined a consecutive series of 37 patients undergoing the extended endoscopic approach for skull base tumours, 9 patients with clival pathology. Patients were examined for the incidence of post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak in relation to tumour pathology, location, size, reconstruction and lumbar drain.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak was 10.8 per cent. Seventy-five per cent of patients who had a post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak underwent a transclival approach (p < 0.05). All patients with clival pathology who underwent an intradural dissection had a post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak rates after the extended endoscopic approach have improved significantly after advancements including the vascularised nasoseptal flap. Despite this, transclival approaches continue to pose much difficulty. Further investigation is necessary to develop technical improvements that can meet the unique challenges associated with this region.

Pediatric intracranial arachnoid cysts: comparative effectiveness of surgical treatment options

PURPOSE

A variety of surgical approaches for the treatment of pediatric intracranial arachnoid cysts exist. In an effort to identify the optimal surgical treatment for this disorder, we developed a decision analytic model to evaluate outcomes of four surgical approaches in children. These included open craniotomy for cyst excision, open craniotomy for cyst fenestration, endoscopic cyst fenestration, and cystoperitoneal shunting.

METHODS

Pooled data were used to create evidence tables, from which we calculated incidence, relative risks, and summary outcomes in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for the four surgical treatments. Our study incorporated data up to 5 years postsurgery.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1,324 cases from 36 case series. There were no significant differences in outcome among the four surgical strategies. The QALYs (maximum of 5) for surgical approaches resulted in a range from 4.79 (for open craniotomy and excision) to 4.92 (for endoscopic fenestration).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall quality of life is comparable between patients undergoing open craniotomy for cyst excision or fenestration, endoscopic fenestration, and cystoperitoneal shunting up to 5 years after surgery. While each approach offers unique advantages and disadvantages, an individualized treatment strategy should be employed in the setting of surgical outcome equipoise.

Comparative effectiveness of treatment options for pediatric craniopharyngiomas

OBJECT

No clear treatment guidelines for pediatric craniopharyngiomas exist. The authors developed a decision analytical model to evaluate outcomes of 4 surgical approaches for craniopharyngiomas in children, including attempted gross-total resection (GTR), planned subtotal removal plus radiotherapy, biopsy plus radiotherapy, and endoscopic resections of all kinds.

METHODS

Pooled data, including the authors' own experience, were used to create evidence tables, from which incidence, relative risks, and summary outcomes in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated for the 4 management strategies.

RESULTS

Quality-adjusted life years at the 5-year follow-up were 2.3 ± 0.1 for attempted GTR, 2.9 ± 0.2 for planned subtotal removal plus radiotherapy, 3.9 ± 0.2 for biopsy plus radiotherapy, and 3.7 ± 0.2 for endoscopic resection (F = 17,150, p < 0.001). Similarly, QALYs at 10-year follow-up were 4.5 ± 0.2 for attempted GTR, 5.7 ± 0.5 for planned subtotal removal plus radiotherapy, and 7.8 ± 0.5 for biopsy plus radiotherapy (F = 6,173, p < 0.001). On post hoc pairwise comparisons, the differences between all pairs compared were also highly significant (p < 0.001). Since follow-up data at 10 years are lacking for endoscopic cases, this category was excluded from 10-year comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Biopsy with subsequent radiotherapy is the preferred approach with respect to improved overall quality of life. While endoscopic approaches also show promise in preserving quality of life at five-year follow-up, there are not sufficient data to draw conclusions about this comparison at 10 years.

Quality-of-Life after Anterior Skull Base Surgery: A Systematic Review

Background Improved treatment and survival of patients with skull base tumors has made the assessment of quality-of-life (QoL) in this population increasingly important. This article provides a comprehensive systematic review pertaining to QoL assessment in adults undergoing anterior skull base surgery. Methods We performed a literature search using the electronic databases of Ovid Medline and Embase. Additional articles were identified through a search using the phrase anterior skull base. Further articles were sought through hand-searching relevant journals and reference lists of identified articles. Results Our search strategy identified 29 articles for inclusion in our systematic review, with considerable variation between studies in population characteristics, methodological design and quality, follow-up length, and outcome assessment. The most commonly used QoL tools were the Karnofsky Performance Status and the Anterior Skull Base Questionnaire. QoL following anterior skull base surgery appears to improve beyond preoperative levels in the months after surgery. For patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery, the gain in QoL appears to be greater and may manifest earlier, with no clear long-term deleterious effect on sinonasal outcomes compared with open surgery. Conclusions QoL after anterior skull base surgery in adults appears to improve within several months of surgery, but earlier and to a larger extent if the endoscopic approach is used. Given the relative paucity and heterogeneity of anterior skull base tumors, large-scale prospective multicentre studies utilizing valid and reliable multidimensional QoL tools are required. This may result in improved patient care, by understanding patients' needs better and facilitating the provision of reliable outcome data for clinical trials.

Endoscopic extended transsphenoidal resection of tuberculum sellae meningiomas: nuances of neurosurgical technique

Over the past decade, advances in endoscopic microsurgical techniques have resulted in an increasingly aggressive endonasal approach to tumors of the midline skull base. Meningiomas of the tuberculum sellae are often closely associated with cerebrovascular structures, and their removal has traditionally required a transcranial approach. An endonasal approach offers many advantages, including early tumor devascularization and tumor debulking (without manipulation of the optic apparatus), direct access to the medial optic canal, and a minimal-access corridor.

Although recent articles have focused on techniques for reaching and approaching the area of the pathology (how to get there), the authors of this report discuss the technical nuances of endoscopic microsurgery when the operator is already “there.” They describe their 6-step technique for endoscopic skull base bone removal, tumor dissection/resection, and closure. They also augment their description with elaborate illustrations.

Pure endoscopic expanded endonasal approach for olfactory groove and tuberculum sellae meningiomas

The expanded endoscopic endonasal (EEE) approach for the removal of olfactory groove (OGM) and tuberculum sellae (TSM) meningiomas is currently becoming an acceptable surgical approach in neurosurgical practice, although it is still controversial with respect to its outcomes, indications and limitations. Here we provide a review of the available literature reporting results with use of the EEE approach for these lesions together with our experience with the use of the endoscope as the sole means of visualization in a series of patients with no prior surgical biopsy or resection. Surgical cases between May 2006 and January 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-three patients (OGM n=6; TSM n=17) were identified. In our series gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 4/6 OGM (66.7%) and 11/17 (64.7%) TSM patients. Vision improved in the OGM group (2/2) and 8/11 improved in the TSM group with no change in visual status in the remaining three patients. Post-operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak occurred in 2/6 (33%) OGM and 2/17 (11.8%) TSM patients. The literature review revealed a total of 19 OGM and 174 TSM cases which were reviewed. GTR rate was 73% for OGM and 56.3% for TSM. Post-operative CSF leak was 30% for OGM and 14% for TSM. With careful patient selection and a clear understanding of its limitations, the EEE technique is both feasible and safe. However, longer follow-ups are necessary to better define the appropriate indications and ideal patient population that will benefit from the use of these newer techniques.

The Supraorbital Keyhole Craniotomy through an Eyebrow Incision: Its Origins and Evolution

In the modern era of neurosurgery, the use of the operative microscope, rigid rod-lens endoscope, and neuronavigation has helped to overcome some of the previous limitations of surgery due to poor lighting and anatomic localization available to the surgeon. Over the last thirty years, the supraorbital craniotomy and subfrontal approach through an eyebrow incision have been developed and refined to play a legitimate role in the armamentarium of the modern skull base neurosurgeon. With careful patient selection, the supraorbital "keyhole" approach offers a less invasive but still efficacious approach to a number of lesions along the subfrontal corridor. Well over 1000 cases have been reported in the literature utilizing this approach establishing its safety and efficacy. This paper discusses the nuances of this approach, including the benefits and limitations of its use described through our technique, review of the literature, and case illustration.