Quality of care and analysis of surgical complications

Quality Care Alleviates Behavioral Cognitive Impairment and Reduces Complications in Elderly Patients with Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Objective

Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease (CCVD) remains the most common factor of death around the world. Nursing care plays a key role in the recovery of patients with CCVD. This study was to explore the application of quality care in aged patients with CCVD.

Methods

Totally, 74 aged CCVD patients admitted from June 2018 to June 2019 in Dongying People's Hospital were randomly assigned in 2 groups with the same treatment. The control group was treated with routine care intervention, and the observation group was treated with quality care intervention for 12 weeks. Meanwhile, the frequency of agitation behaviors and cognitive ability were assessed, and complication was counted.

Results

The observation group showed decreased Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CAMI) scores from 47.31 ± 8.27 to 38.73 ± 6.94, raised Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores from 15.01 ± 3.9 to 19.34 ± 3.15 and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores from 16.92 ± 5.48 to 20.37 ± 4.16, and reduced complications after quality care intervention.

Conclusion

Quality care intervention exerted a better application effect on aged CCVD patients, along with reduction of agitation, improvement of mental condition and behavioral cognitive function, and reduced complications.

Postoperative Outcomes of Enucleation and Standard Resections in Patients with a Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor

Background

Either enucleation or more extended resection is performed to treat patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET). Aim was to analyze the postoperative complications for each operation separately. Furthermore, independent risk factors for complications and incidence of pancreatic insufficiency were analyzed.

Methods

Retrospective all resected patients from two academic hospitals in The Netherlands between 1992 and 2013 were included. Postoperative complications were scored by both ISGPS and Clavien–Dindo criteria. Based on tumor location, operations were compared. Independent risk factors for overall complications were identified. During long-term follow-up, pancreatic insufficiency and recurrent disease were analyzed.

Results

Tumor enucleation was performed in 60/205 patients (29 %), pancreatoduodenectomy in 65/205 (31 %), distal pancreatectomy in 72/205 (35 %) and central pancreatectomy in 8/205 (4 %) patients. Overall complications after tumor enucleation of the pancreatic head and pancreatoduodenectomy were comparable, 24/35 (69 %) versus 52/65 (80 %). The same was found after tumor enucleation and resection of the pancreatic tail (36 vs.58 %). Number of re-interventions and readmissions were comparable between all operations. After pancreatoduodenectomy, 33/65 patients had lymph node metastasis and in patients with tumor size ≤2 cm, 55 % had lymph node metastasis. Tumor in the head and BMI ≥25 kg/m² were independent risk factors for complications after enucleation. During follow-up, incidence of exocrine and endocrine insufficiency was significant higher after pancreatoduodenectomy (resp. 55 and 19 %) compared to the tumor enucleation and distal pancreatectomy(resp. 5 and 7 % vs.8 and 13 %). After tumor enucleation 19 % developed recurrent disease.

Conclusion

Since the complication rate, need for re-interventions and readmissions were comparable for all resections, tumor enucleation may be regarded as high risk. Appropriate operation should be based on tumor size, location, and functional status of the pNET.

Which clinical scenarios do surgeons record as complications? A benchmarking study of seven hospitals

OBJECTIVES

To investigate agreement and potential differences in the application and interpretation of the definition among surgical departments of various hospitals.

DESIGN

24 cases were formulated including general, trauma, gastrointestinal and vascular surgery, and based on points of discussion about the definition and ambiguities regarding complication registration as encountered in daily practice. The cases were presented to the surgical staff and residents in seven Dutch hospitals, using the national registration system of complications and an electronic response system.

RESULTS

In total, 134 participants responded. Interpretation differences were particularly found regarding: (1) complications considered as logical consequences of a surgical procedure; (2) complications occurring after radiological interventions; (3) severity criteria such as when to consider a complication as a '(probably) permanent damage or function loss'; (4) registering a cancelled operation as a complication and (5) patients with serial complications during hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The definition of surgical complications as currently applied in the Netherlands does not ensure a uniform complication registration. Improvement of this registration system is mandatory before benchmarking of these findings in the public domain is appropriate. Modifications of the current definition of a surgical complication, and improved consensus about specific clinical situations and training of surgeons might improve the quality of benchmarking.

Systematic review on bedside electromagnetic-guided, endoscopic, and fluoroscopic placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes

BACKGROUND

Nasoenteral tube feeding is frequently required in hospitalized patients to either prevent or treat malnutrition, but data on the optimal strategy of tube placement are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of bedside electromagnetic (EM)-guided, endoscopic, and fluoroscopic placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes in adults.

DESIGN

Systematic review of the literature.

PATIENTS

Adult hospitalized patients requiring nasoenteral feeding.

INTERVENTIONS

EM-guided, endoscopic, and/or fluoroscopic nasoenteral feeding tube placement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Success rate of tube placement and procedure- or tube-related adverse events.

RESULTS

Of 354 screened articles, 28 studies were included. Data on 4056 patients undergoing EM-guided (n = 2921), endoscopic (n = 730), and/or fluoroscopic (n = 405) nasoenteral feeding tube placement were extracted. Tube placement was successful in 3202 of 3789 (85%) EM-guided procedures compared with 706 of 793 (89%) endoscopic and 413 of 446 (93%) fluoroscopic procedures. Reinsertion rates were similar for EM-guidance (270 of 1279 [21%] patients) and endoscopy (64 of 394 [16%] patients) or fluoroscopy (10 of 38 [26%] patients). The mean (standard deviation) procedure time was shortest with EM-guided placement (13.4 [12.9] minutes), followed by endoscopy and fluoroscopy (14.9 [8.7] and 16.2 [23.6] minutes, respectively). Procedure-related adverse events were infrequent (0.4%, 4%, and 3%, respectively) and included mainly epistaxis. The tube-related adverse event rate was lowest in the EM-guided group (36 of 242 [15%] patients), followed by fluoroscopy (40 of 191 [21%] patients) and endoscopy (115 of 384 [30%] patients) and included mainly dislodgment and blockage of the tube.

LIMITATIONS

Heterogeneity and limited methodological quality of the included studies.

CONCLUSION

Bedside EM-guided placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes appears to be as safe and effective as fluoroscopic or endoscopic placement. EM-guided tube placement by nurses may be preferred over more costly procedures performed by endoscopists or radiologists, but randomized studies are lacking.

Electromagnetic guided bedside or endoscopic placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes in surgical patients (CORE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Gastroparesis is common in surgical patients and frequently leads to the need for enteral tube feeding. Nasoenteral feeding tubes are usually placed endoscopically by gastroenterologists, but this procedure is relatively cumbersome for patients and labor-intensive for hospital staff. Electromagnetic (EM) guided bedside placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes by nurses may reduce patient discomfort, workload and costs, but randomized studies are lacking, especially in surgical patients. We hypothesize that EM guided bedside placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes is at least as effective as endoscopic placement in surgical patients, at lower costs.

Methods/Design

The CORE trial is an investigator-initiated, parallel-group, pragmatic, multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. A total of 154 patients admitted to gastrointestinal surgical wards in five hospitals, requiring nasoenteral feeding, will be randomly allocated to undergo EM guided or endoscopic nasoenteral feeding tube placement. Primary outcome is reinsertion of the feeding tube, defined as the insertion of an endoscope or tube in the nose/mouth and esophagus for (re)placement of the feeding tube (e.g. after failed initial placement or dislodgement or blockage of the tube). Secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcomes, costs and tube (placement) related complications.

Discussion

The CORE trial is designed to generate evidence on the effectiveness of EM guided placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes in surgical patients and the impact on costs as compared to endoscopic placement. The trial potentially offers a strong argument for wider implementation of this technique as method of choice for placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes.

Trial registration

Dutch Trial Register: NTR4420, date registered 5-feb-2014

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0633-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Endoscopic versus bedside electromagnetic-guided placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes in surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Nasoenteral tube feeding is often required in surgical patients, mainly because of delayed gastric emptying. Bedside electromagnetic (EM)-guided tube placement by specialized nurses might offer several advantages (e.g., reduced patient discomfort and costs) over conventional endoscopic placement. The aim of this study was to compare the success rate of EM-guided to endoscopic placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes in surgical patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in 267 adult patients admitted to two gastrointestinal surgical wards who received a nasoenteral feeding tube by EM-guidance or endoscopy. Eighteen patients were excluded because of insufficient data. Patients were categorized according to the primary tube placement method. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients with altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy. Primary endpoint was successful tube placement at or beyond the duodenojejunal flexure.

RESULTS

A total of 249 patients were included, of which 90 patients underwent EM-guided and 159 patients underwent endoscopic tube placement. Both groups were comparable for baseline characteristics. Primary tube placement was successful in 74/90 patients (82 %) in the EM-guided group versus 140/159 patients (88 %) in the endoscopic group (P = 0.20). In patients with altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy, success rates were significantly lower in the EM-guided group (58 vs. 86 %, P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in tube-related complications such as dislodgement or tube blockage.

CONCLUSIONS

Bedside EM-guided placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes by specialized nurses did not differ from endoscopic placement by gastroenterologists regarding feasibility and safety in surgical patients with unaltered upper gastrointestinal anatomy.