Prognostic significance of pretreatment ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated by radioimmunotherapy using ¹³¹I-rituximab

The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after radioimmunotherapy using 131I-rituximab as consolidation therapy

Purpose

To evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT after consolidation therapy of ¹³¹I-rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who had acquired complete remission after receiving chemotherapy.

Methods

Patients who were diagnosed with DLBCL via histologic confirmation were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had achieved complete remission after 6 to 8 cycles of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisolone) chemotherapy after which they underwent consolidation treatment with ¹³¹I-rituximab. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed before R-CHOP for initial staging. The largest diameter of tumor, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were obtained from pretreatment ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans. Receiver-operating characteristic curves analysis was introduced for assessing the optimal criteria. Kaplan-Meier curve survival analysis was performed to evaluate both relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 15 patients (12 males and 3 females) with a mean age of 56 (range, 30–73) years were enrolled. The median follow-up period of these patients was 73 months (range, 11–108 months). Four (27%) patients relapsed. Of them, three died during follow-up. Median values of the largest tumor size, highest SUVmax, MTV, and TLG were 5.3 cm (range, 2.0–16.4 cm), 20.2 (range, 11.1–67.4), 231.51 (range, 15–38.34), and 1277.95 (range, 238.37–10341.04), respectively. Patients with SUVmax less than or equal to 16.9 showed significantly worse RFS than patients with SUVmax greater than 16.9 (5-year RFS rate: 60% vs. 100%, p = 0.008). Patients with SUVmax less than or equal to 16.9 showed significantly worse OS than patients with SUVmax greater than 16.9 (5-year OS rate: 80% vs. 100% p = 0.042).

Conclusion

Higher SUVmax at pretreatment ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was associated with better relapse free survival and overall survival in DLBCL patients after consolidation therapy with ¹³¹I-rituximab. However, because this study has a small number of patients, a phase 3 study with a larger number of patients is needed for clinical application in the future.

Radioimmunotherapy Combined With Low-Intensity Ultrasound and Microbubbles: A Potential Novel Strategy for Treatment of Solid Tumors

The prognosis of advanced malignant tumors is very poor, and effective treatment is limited. Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a novel treatment method. However, its anti-tumor effect is relatively low in solid tumors, which is mainly due to the blood-tumor barrier preventing RIT from penetrating the tumor, resulting in an insufficient dose. Low-intensity ultrasound with microbubbles (USMB) has proven capable of opening the blood-tumor barrier. The combination of the two technologies may overcome the poor anti-tumor effect of RIT and promote the clinical application of RIT in solid tumors. In this article, we reviewed the current research status of RIT in the treatment of solid tumors and the opportunities and challenges of USMB combined with RIT.

Combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C enhanced therapeutic efficacy in HER2 positive tumor model

Lanatoside C has a promising anti-tumor activity and is a potential candidate for radiosensitizers. In this study, we have investigated the therapeutic efficacy of the combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C for inhibition of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive tumor progression in NCI-N87 xenograft model. The combination treatment (131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C) showed highest cytotoxicity when compared to non-treated control or trastuzumab alone or 131I alone or 131I-trastuzumab alone in vitro. Biodistribution studies using 131I-trastuzumab or combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C showed tumor uptake in BALB/c nude mice bearing HER2 positive NCI-N87 tumor xenograft model. The higher tumor uptake was observed in 131I-trastuzumab (19.40 ± 0.04% ID/g) than in the combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C (14.02 ± 0.02% ID/g) at 24 h post-injection. Most importantly, an antitumor effect was observed in mice that received the combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C (p = 0.009) when compared to control. In addition, mice received lanatoside C alone (p = 0.085) or 131I-trastuzumab alone (p = 0.160) did not significantly inhibit tumor progression compared with control. Taken together, our data suggest that combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C might be a potential synergistic treatment for radioimmunotherapy to control the HER2 positive tumor.

Targeted alpha immunotherapy of CD20-positive B-cell lymphoma model: dosimetry estimate of 225Ac-DOTA-rituximab using 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiation dosimetry of alpha-emitter 225Ac-DOTA-rituximab using Monte Carlo simulation of 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab.

METHODS

CD20 expression was evaluated in lymphoma cell lines (Jurkat and Raji). DOTA-rituximab was conjugated and then chelated by 64Cu. Tumor xenograft models were established in BALB/c-nu mice. Animal PET/CT imaging was obtained after tail vein injection with and without a pre-dose of 2 mg of cold rituximab. Specific binding of tumors was evaluated by an organ distribution assay and autoradiography. CD20 expression in tumor tissues was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The residence time was calculated using 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab PET/CT acquisition data using OLINDA/EXM software. 225Ac-DOTA-rituximab tumor dosimetry was performed using Monte Carlo simulation with 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab PET/CT images.

RESULTS

Specific binding of Raji cells (CD20 positive) was 90 times that of Jurkat cells (CD20 negative) (p < 0.0001). Immunoreactivity was more than 75%. PET/CT imaging with 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab was specifically observed in tumors. The radioactivity of the tumor was much higher than that of other organs, and tumor uptake was related to CD20 expression. The predicted human dose for the administration of 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab was measured as the effective dose (1.07E-02 mSv/MBq). In the tumor region, equivalent doses of 225Ac-DOTA-rituximab (14 SvRBE5/MBq) were much higher (74-fold) than those of 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab (0.19 SvRBE5/MBq) (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Tumor dosimetry of 225Ac-DOTA-rituximab can be estimated via the Monte Carlo simulation of 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab. 225Ac-DOTA-rituximab can be employed for lymphoma as targeted alpha therapy.

Combination Radioimmunotherapy Strategies for Solid Tumors

Combination radioimmunotherapy is an emerging approach for the treatment of solid tumors where radio immunotherapy alone has proven to be reasonably ineffective. Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) labeled with radionuclides is an attractive approach for cancer treatment because tumor-associated mAbs with cytotoxic radionuclides can selectively bind to tumor antigens. However, due to various limitations, mAbs cannot reach solid tumors, consequently reducing RIT efficacy. Combination RIT is a pragmatic approach through which the addition of drugs or other agents not only help mAbs to reach the targeted site but also improves its efficacy. Thus, the combination of drugs or moieties with RIT can be applied to overcome the barriers that RIT faces for solid tumors. This review covers the RIT approach, along with the mechanism of action of mAb used in RIT, limitations of solid tumors, and strategies that can be used in combination RIT to enhance the treatment regimen for solid tumors.

Early evaluation of tumor response to 90Y-ibritumomab radioimmunotherapy in relapsed/refractory B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: what is the optimal timing for FDG-PET/CT?

PURPOSE

To determine the earliest optimal timing for assessment of early response following radioimmunotherapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients using FDG-PET/CT.

METHODS

FDG-PET/CT was performed prior to treatment (PET1), at 2 (PET2) weeks, and at 6 (PET3) weeks after ⁹⁰Y-ibritumomab radioimmunotherapy in 55 patients. Response was evaluated based on the Deauville 5-point scale and Lugano criteria as well as semiquantitative analysis and compared with progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

PET 2 showed complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), stable metabolic disease (SMD), and progressive metabolic disease (PMD) in 33, 13, 6, and 3 patients, respectively, while PET 3 in 41, 8, 3, and 3 patients, respectively. Mean SUV_max of 168 target lesions decreased over time (PET1, 2, 3; 5.58 ± 2.58, 1.87 ± 1.78, 1.75 ± 2.25, respectively). Progression or recurrence after a median of 12.6 months (range 2.6-72.0 months) was seen in 44 patients. Patients with CMR or metabolic response (CMR + PMR) on PET2 showed significantly longer PFS as compared to those who did not (p = 0.00028 and p = 0.029, respectively). A similar significant difference was observed based on PET3 (p = 0.00013 and p = 0.017, respectively). The same trend was observed when analyzing only the subgroup of patients with follicular lymphoma (N = 43/55) (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Use of FDG-PET/CT findings with Lugano criteria for assessing early response to radioimmunotherapy after 6 weeks allowed for accurate evaluation and prognostic stratification, though scanning after 2 weeks was too soon to precisely evaluate response.

KEY POINTS

• The optimal timing of FDG-PET/CT to obtain a suitable tool for assessment of response after ⁹⁰ Y-ibritumomab radioimmunotherapy of lymphoma has not yet been defined. • Assessment after 6 weeks by FDG-PET/CT using the Lugano criteria accurately evaluates treatment response and prognosis. • FDG-PET/CT performed 2 weeks after radioimmunotherapy is too early as it significantly misses objective responses.

DVH- and NTCP-based dosimetric comparison of different longitudinal margins for VMAT-IMRT of esophageal cancer

Purpose

To cover the microscopic tumor spread in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCC), longitudinal margins of 3–4 cm are used for radiotherapy (RT) protocols. However, smaller margins of 2–3 cm might be reasonable when advanced diagnostic imaging is integrated into target volume delineation. Purpose of this study was to compare the dose distribution and deposition to the organs at risk (OAR) for different longitudinal margins using a DVH- and NTCP-based approach.

Methods

Ten patients with SCC of the middle or lower third were retrospectively selected. Three planning target volumes (PTV) with longitudinal margins of 4 cm, 3 cm and 2 cm and an axial margin of 1.5 cm to the gross target volume (GTV) were defined for each patient. For each PTV two treatment plans with total doses of 41.4 Gy (neoadjuvant treatment) and 50.4 Gy (definite treatment) were calculated. Dose to the lungs, heart, myelon and liver were then evaluated and compared between different PTVs.

Results

When using a longitudinal margin of 3 cm instead of 4 cm, all dose parameters (Dmin, Dmean, Dmedian and V5-V35), except Dmax could be significantly reduced for the lungs. Regarding the heart, a significant reduction was seen for Dmean and V5, but not for Dmin, Dmax, Dmedian and V10-V35. When comparing a longitudinal margin of 4 cm to a longitudinal margin of 2 cm, a significant difference was calculated for Dmin, Dmean, Dmedian and V5-V35 of the lungs and for Dmax, Dmean and V5-V35 of the heart. Nevertheless, no difference was seen for median heart dose. An additional dose reduction for V10 of the heart was achieved for definite treatment plans when using a longitudinal margin of 3 cm. The NTCP-based risk of pneumonitis was significantly reduced by a margin reduction to 2 cm for neoadjuvant and definite treatment plans.

Conclusion

Reduction of longitudinal margins from 4 cm to 3 cm can significantly reduce the dose to lungs and Dmean of the heart. Despite clinical benefit and oncologic outcome remain unclear, reduction of the longitudinal margins might provide the opportunity to reduce side effects of chemoradiation (CRT) for SCC in upcoming studies.

Drug Discovery by Molecular Imaging and Monitoring Therapy Response in Lymphoma

Molecular imaging allows a noninvasive assessment of biochemical and biological processes in living subjects. Treatment strategies for malignant lymphoma depend on histology and tumor stage. For the last two decades, molecular imaging has been the mainstay diagnostic test for the staging of malignant lymphoma and the assessment of response to treatment. This technology enhances our understanding of disease and drug activity during preclinical and clinical drug development. Here, we review molecular imaging applications in drug development, with an emphasis on oncology. Monitoring and assessing the efficacy of anti-cancer therapies in preclinical or clinical models are essential and the multimodal molecular imaging approach may represent a new stage for pharmacologic development in cancer. Monitoring the progress of lymphoma therapy with imaging modalities will help patients. Identifying and addressing key challenges is essential for successful integration of molecular imaging into the drug development process. In this review, we highlight the general usefulness of molecular imaging in drug development and radionuclide-based reporter genes. Further, we discuss the different molecular imaging modalities for lymphoma therapy and their preclinical and clinical applications.

Maximum standardized uptake value on positron emission tomography/computed tomography predicts clinical outcome in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Background

Few clinical studies have clarified the prognostic factors that affect clinical outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after immunochemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 158 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL were enrolled. All patients underwent positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) before and after salvage therapy. All enrolled patients previously received the ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide regimen. Clinical outcomes were compared according to several factors (age ≥ 65 years, low age-adjusted International Prognostic Index [aa-IPI], maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] <6.0 on PET/CT, time to relapse ≥12 months, complete response after salvage therapy). A low aa-IPI, SUVmax <6.0, and time to relapse ≥ 12 months were independent prognostic factors for survival.

Results

In univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, SUVmax below 6.0 (P<0.001 for progression-free survival (PFS), P<0.001 for overall survival (OS)) and low aa-IPI (P<0.001 for PFS, P<0.001 for OS) were independent prognostic factors associated with favorable outcome.

Conclusion

The aa-IPI and initial SUVmax were powerful prognostic factors in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL.

Trial Watch: Radioimmunotherapy for oncological indications

During the past two decades, it has become increasingly clear that the antineoplastic effects of radiation therapy do not simply reflect the ability of X-, β- and γ-rays to damage transformed cells and directly cause their permanent proliferative arrest or demise, but also involve cancer cell-extrinsic mechanisms. Indeed, among other activities, radiotherapy has been shown to favor the establishment of tumor-specific immune responses that operate systemically, underpinning the so-called 'out-of-field' or 'abscopal' effect. Thus, ionizing rays appear to elicit immunogenic cell death, a functionally peculiar variant of apoptosis associated with the emission of a particularly immunostimulatory combination of damage-associated molecular patterns. In line with this notion, radiation therapy fosters, and thus exacerbates, the antineoplastic effects of various treatment modalities, including surgery, chemotherapy and various immunotherapeutic agents. Here, we summarize recent advances in the use of ionizing rays as a means to induce or potentiate therapeutically relevant anticancer immune responses. In addition, we present clinical trials initiated during the past 12 months to test the actual benefit of radioimmunotherapy in cancer patients.