Minimally invasive surgery for patients with bulky bladder stones and large benign prostatic hyperplasia simultaneously: a novel design

Comparison of three techniques in bladder stone surgery: Which technique is more effective and safe?

Background

In our study, we aimed to compare the success and complication rates of percutaneous cystolithotripsy (PCCL), transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL), and Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy in the surgery of bladder stones that occurred due to various reasons.

Patients and Methods

Patients diagnosed with single or multiple bladder stones with long axis larger than 2 cm, resulting for various reasons, were included in ou study. Sizes of the stones, cystolithotripsy and discharge times, catheter removal times, complications observed, and the visual pain scale (VPS) were retrospectively evaluated separately from the surgical techniques implemented for accompanying patients and their data.

Results

TUCL (group 1) was implemented in 40, PCCL (group 2) was implemented in 44, and transurethral Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy (group 3) was implemented in 30 of the 121 patients included in the study. The bladder stone long axe group 1 average was 3,7 cm (2,2-5,3), group 2 average was 3,74 cm (2,1-5,1), and group 3 average was 3,7 cm (2,3-4,7). Urethral stricture evolved in two patients who underwent TUCL. A statistically significant difference was observed on behalf of PCCL in terms of operation time. There was significance in the Ho: YAG laser cystolithotripsy group in comparison with VPS scores. No significant differences were found in terms of age, stone size, urethral catheter removal times, and discharge times. The average follow-up time was 6 months.

Conclusion

Although all three methods were quite successful in bladder stone surgery, average cystolithotripsy times were significantly low in the PCCL technique. Thinking that the most common cause of bladder stone is BPH, it is stated that the suprapubic inserted tube ease the bladder drainage during transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P). In this way, the duration of the most common accompanying surgeries is shortened and performed more safely.

Comparison of nephroscopy and cystoscopy used in the treatment of bladder stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the safety and efficiency of nephroscopy and cystoscopy in transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) for bladder stones (BS).

Methods

The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to January 2021 for studies assessing the effect of different types of endoscopes among patients who underwent TUCL. The search strategy and study selection process were in accordance with the PRISMA statement.

Results

Five randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed no difference in stone-free rate (RR = 1.00, CI = 0.98–1.02, p = 1.00) between the two groups and nonsignificant heterogeneity (I² = 0%, p = 1.00), and all patients were rendered stone free. Use of the nephroscope significantly shortened the operative time compared with the cystoscope group (RR= − 26.26, CI = − 35.84 to − 16.68, p < 0.00001), and there was significant heterogeneity (I²= 87%, p < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in mean urethral entries (RR = 0.66, CI = − 0.71 to − 2.04, p = 0.35), hospitalization (MD = 0.08, 95% CI = − 0.07 to 0.23, p = 0.31) or total complication rate (RR=1.37, 95% CI = 0.47–4.00, p = 0.56) between the two groups.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this systematic review demonstrates that both nephroscopy and cystoscopy have high stone clearance efficiency, low rates of complications and short hospitalizations. The mean urethral entries depend on the treatment method for large stone fragments. However, the use of nephroscopy can significantly reduce the operative time.

Comparison of three different modalities for the treatment of bladder calculi by size

PURPOSE

Treatment recommendations for kidney or ureteral stones are based on stone size; however, this is uncertain for bladder stones. This study aims to determine the best approach to bladder stones based on their size.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 401 patients with bladder stones. Patients were divided into three different groups according to stone size (11-20 mm, 21-30 mm, 31-40 mm as groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively). Patients had transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL), percutaneous cystolithotripsy (PCCL), and open cystolithotomy (OCL) performed.

RESULTS

Stone fragments were removed completely in all patients. When catheter time, postoperative stay, and hematocrit decrease values were compared, the results were significantly higher for OCL in all three groups (p: 0.001). When the relationship between stone sizes and operation time is evaluated, TUCL had shorter operation times (34.1 ± 10.6 min) in group 1. However, TUCL had longer operation times in group 2 and group 3 compared to OCL and PCCL.

CONCLUSION

TUCL may be preferable due to better postoperative outcomes and shorter operative time for ⩽2 cm stones. As the stone size increases, PCCL is more favorable in terms of operation time.

Simple Solution to a Difficult Problem: Removal of Large Bladder Calculi Using a Laparoscopic Entrapment Sac

Introduction and Objectives: Percutaneous management of large bladder calculi with the use of a laparoscopic entrapment sac is a minimally invasive procedure that may have advantages over open cystolithotomy and transurethral cystolithotripsy, as well as standard percutaneous cystolithotomy. We first performed this procedure in 2008, and refined it after our initial publication in 2013 by changing the position from lithotomy to supine by using a urethral catheter postoperatively instead of a suprapubic (SP) catheter, by using ultrasound guidance for access, and by changing the procedure from being inpatient to outpatient. Our objective is to assess the continued feasibility of percutaneous entrapment sac cystolithotomy (PESC) and describe modifications that simplify the technique (mPESC), comparing outcomes and complications. Methods: Forty seven male patients underwent PESC from 2008 to 2019, 16 who had PESC and 31 who had mPESC. After extraction of calculi, either an SP catheter was placed, or the wound was closed and a urethral catheter was placed. Operative and follow-up parameters were compared between the two cohorts. Results: All patients were rendered stone free. Procedure time and length of stay were both significantly shorter in the mPESC cohort. Stone burden and estimated blood loss were equivalent between cohorts. There were no complications of urethral trauma in either cohort. The PESC cohort had higher rates of leakage from the SP site (25% vs 0%), increased need for catheter over 5 days (18.8% vs 0%), and greater likelihood of recurrent retention (12.5% vs 6%). Conclusions: Modifications of PESC, mPESC, leads to fewer complications and reduced length of stay compared with the original PESC procedure. This safe and efficacious technique can reduce morbidity during the management of large bladder calculi and is well suited for an outpatient procedure.

Simultaneous antegrade and retrograde endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia with vesical calculi - A single-centre experience

Objective

To describe the effectiveness and safety of our novel technique of simultaneous percutaneous cystolithotripsy with transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) complicated with large vesical calculi.

Patients and methods

This was a retrospective analysis of 25 patients who underwent simultaneous percutaneous cystolithotripsy with TURP between January 2012 and January 2016. Technique: A 28-F Amplatz sheath was inserted percutaneously into the bladder after sequential dilatation under cystoscopic guidance. Percutaneous cystolithotripsy using a nephroscope and pneumatic lithoclast was then performed simultaneously along with monopolar TURP. Preoperative parameters reviewed included: patient’s symptoms, International Prostate Symptom Score, uroflowmetry pattern, prostate volume, and stone burden on ultrasonography of the abdomen and pelvis. Postoperative parameters analysed included: duration of irrigation, time until catheter removal, length of hospital stay, and complications.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 67.8 years. The mean prostate size was 62.28 mL and the mean stone burden was 3.18 cm. The mean operating time was 54.2 min. The mean time until catheter removal was 3.2 days.

Conclusion

Simultaneous percutaneous cystolithotripsy with TURP in patients with BPH with large bladder calculi is safe and feasible.

Adherence of Indonesian urologists to practice guidelines for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Background

Clinical guideline is built to provide consistent, efficient, and high quality of medical care based on recent evidence. This study aimed to investigate the adherence of Indonesian urologists to clinical guidelines for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Materials and methods

This was a cross-sectional study using questionnaire conducted between January and June 2017. Respondents were Indonesian urologists registered as members of Indonesia Urological Association and had already practice in urology for at least 6 months. Questionnaires were sent via e-mail and Google Form. The level of adherence was measured using scoring system decided by authors' agreement. All data were processed using SPSS, version 23, and presented in descriptive fashion.

Results

Of 352 urologists who fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria, 209 (59.4%) respondents returned the questionnaire. Most of respondents (95.2%) used Indonesia Urological Association BPH guidelines as their clinical practice guidance. Routinely performed recommended examination, such as symptom scoring system, digital rectal examination, urinalysis, uroflowmetry, postvoid residual urine, and prostate imaging were used by 89.9%, 92.5%, 70.4%, 50.8%, 53.3%, and 98.6% respondents, respectively. After patient is diagnosed with BPH, most of respondents considered medical therapy (99%), surgical therapy (93%), and watchful waiting (78.4), with alpha-blocker as the drugs most preferred by respondents. For indication to perform surgery for BPH, only bladder stones, decreased renal function, and trial without catheter failure were considered by more than 85% of respondents. Open prostate surgery was performed by 54.8% respondents for the following reasons: large prostate volume, presence of bladder stone, unavailability of endourology equipments, abnormality of bladder, and residency training program. At last, this study found median (minimum–maximum) of Indonesian urologists adherence level toward BPH guidelines is 78.5% (28.6%–100%).

Conclusions

In general, Indonesian urologists have a good adherence toward guidelines. However, there is still wide variation of their adherence to it.

Stones in special situations

There are several special situations in which urinary lithiasis presents management challenges to the urologist. An in-depth knowledge of the pathophysiology, unique anatomy, and treatment options is crucial in order to maintain good health in these patients. In this review, we summarize the current literature on the management of the following scenarios: bladder stones, stones in bowel disease, during pregnancy, in association with renal anomalies, with skeletal deformities, in urinary diversions, and in children.

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Three Endoscopic Modalities used in Treatment of Bladder Stones

Introduction

The aim of this study was to compare three endoscopic modalities used in the treatment of bladder stones: transurethral use of cystoscope or nephroscope and percutaneous cystolithotripsy (PCCL).

Methods

This study included 210 patients of bladder stone treated at a tertiary care centre in North India from January 2006 to July 2013 who were randomly assigned into three groups: group 1 (transurethral removal using cystoscope), group 2 (transurethral removal using nephroscope) and group 3 (PCCL). Baseline and perioperative data wererecorded and compared between three groups.

Results

Baseline parameters were comparable between the three groups. Operating time in group 2 was significantly less than the other two groups. Complete clearance was achieved in all the patients. Group 2 had maximum number of urethral entries. The incidence of perioperative complications (fever, transient haematuria and persistent leakage from suprapubic site) was comparable between these three groups. Till the last follow-up, 3.2% patients (n = 2) developed urethral stricture in group 1, 7.8% (n = 5) in group 2 and no patient developed urethral stricture in group 3 (p = 0.068).

Conclusions

Removal of bladder stones by the transurethral route, using a nephroscope, is the most effective treatment modality in terms of operative time with long-term urethral stricture rate similar to transurethral cystoscope technique. Comparatively, PCCL is a safe procedure with acceptable morbidity. Overall, all three techniques are equally efficacious in treating bladder stones of size 1-4 cm.

Prostate tissue retrieval after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate; assessment of non-morcellation approaches

Objectives

To review non-morcellation approaches for tissue retrieval after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and whether these approaches demolish the advantages of the HoLEP procedure.

Patients and methods

We reviewed our prospectively maintained laser prostate database for HoLEP procedures where non-morcellation approaches were used for retrieval of the enucleated adenoma. Non-morcellation approaches were adopted in cases of morcellator malfunction or whenever concomitant pathology indicated laparotomy. Patients were stratified into the laparotomy group (Group I) or the transurethral resection (TUR) group (Group II). Safety and efficacy of each approach were assessed and compared.

Results

Between August 2012 and July 2015, of 392 HoLEP procedures non-morcellation approaches were used for tissue retrieval in 37 (9.4%). In 19 procedures a laparotomy approach was adopted (17 mini-laparotomies and two conventional laparotomies for concomitant diverticulectomy). TUR of the enucleated adenoma was adopted in 18 patients. Baseline demographic data and indications for surgery were comparable between the groups. However, significantly larger prostates were treated in Group I. There were no significant differences between the groups for tissue retrieval time, histopathological findings of retrieved tissue, and peri-procedure biochemical changes. However, significantly more tissue was retrieved (median tissue weight 115 vs 38 g) and at a faster rate (4.6 vs 1.09 g/min) in Group I. The median hospital stay was similar in both groups, but the median time to catheter removal was longer in Group I (5 vs 2 days). Minimal and similar peri-procedure complications were reported in both groups and in both groups there was a significant and comparable improvement in all urinary outcome measures.

Conclusion

In the absence or malfunction of a tissue morcellator, or whenever concomitant pathology indicates laparotomy, non-morcellation tissue retrieval approaches are feasible options for endourologists practicing transurethral enucleation of prostate adenoma. These approaches are valid alternatives retaining most of the advantages of the transurethral prostate enucleation procedure.

A Modified Technique for Performing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Combined with Percutaneous Cystolithotripsy

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of a modified technique for performing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) combined with percutaneous cystolithotripsy (PCCL).

METHODS

Clinical data from 24 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and aggregate stone sizes ≥3 cm were assessed retrospectively between June 2011 and January 2014. All stones fragmented via pneumatic lithotripter were removed. An 18-F Foley catheter was inserted into the Amplatz sheath, which was then removed from the bladder. The Foley catheter balloon was inflated with 15 ml of saline, and suprapubic traction was applied to prevent extravasation. Next, TURP was performed while a suprapubic Foley catheter provided continuous drainage.

RESULTS

The mean stone size was 46.25 ± 9.51 mm. The surgical duration for stone removal was 31.25 ± 8.46 min. All patients were stone-free at the first month follow-up. None of the patients experienced extravasation or urethral stricture.

CONCLUSIONS

PCCL is a short-duration, minimally invasive surgery that avoids urethral stricture. In the presented technique, as the drainage catheter is fixed to the dome of bladder, it is not visualized in the surgical field and remains outside of the resection area, which facilitates prostate resection. It seems to be a safe and efficient technique.

Transurethral cystolitholapaxy with the AH-1 stone removal system for the treatment of bladder stones of variable size

Background

The treatment of large volume bladder stones by current equipments continues to be a management problem in both developing and developed countries. AH-1 Stone Removal System (SRS) invented by us is primarily used to crush and retrieve bladder stones. This study evaluated the safety and efficiency of transurethral cystolitholapaxy with SRS for the treatment of bladder stones of variable size.

Methods

SRS, which was invented by Aihua Li in 2007, composed by endoscope, continuous-flow component, a jaw for stone handling and retrieving, lithotripsy tube, handle, inner sheath and outer sheath. 112 patients with bladder stones were performed by transurethral cystolitholapaxy with SRS since 2008. We compare the surgical outcome to bladder stones of variable size, and evaluate the surgical efficiency and safety.

Results

Characteristics of patients and stone removal time in variable size were evaluated. To patients with single stone, stone size was 1.35 ± 0.37 cm and the operating time was 5.50 ± 3.92 min in Group A. Stone size was 2.38 ± 0.32 cm and the operating time was 11.90 ± 9.91 min in Group B. Stone size was 3.30 ± 0.29 cm and the operating time was 21.92 ± 9.44 min in Group C. Stone size was 4.69 ± 0.86 cm and the operating time was 49.29 ± 30.47 min in Group D. The difference was statistically significant between the four groups. Among them, 74 (66.07%) patients accompanied with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were treated by transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) simultaneously. Compared between the four groups, the difference of the TURP time was not statistically significant, P >0.05. No significant complication was found in the surgical procedure.

Conclusions

Transurethral cystolitholapaxy with SRS appears to be increased rapidity of the procedure with decreased morbidity. It is a safe and efficient surgical management to bladder stones. This endoscopic surgery best fits the ethics principle of no injury; meanwhile, the accompanied BPH could be effectively treated by TURP simultaneously.