Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis Reveals a Novel Genetic Variant in MYO6 Gene in an Indian Family with Postlingual Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss

Background: Hereditary nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) is an extremely heterogeneous disorder, both genetically and clinically. Myosin VI (MYO6) pathogenic variations have been reported to cause both prelingual and postlingual forms of NSHL. Postlingual autosomal dominant cases are often overlooked for genetic etiology in clinical setups. In this study, we used next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based targeted deafness gene panel assay to identify the cause of postlingual hearing loss in an Indian family. Methods: The proband and his father from a multigenerational Indian family affected by postlingual hearing loss were examined via targeted capture of 129 deafness genes, after excluding gap junction protein beta 2 (GJB2) pathogenic variants by Sanger sequencing. NGS data analysis and co-segregation of the candidate variants in the family were carried out. The variant effect was predicted by in silico tools and interpreted following American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines. Results: A novel heterozygous transversion c.3225T>G, p.(Tyr1075*) in MYO6 gene was identified as the disease-causing variant in this family. This stop-gained variant is predicted to form a truncated myosin VI protein, which is devoid of crucial cargo-binding domain. PCR-RFLP screening in 200 NSHL cases and 200 normal-hearing controls showed the absence of this variant indicating its de novo nature in the population. Furthermore, we reviewed MYO6 variants reported from various populations to date. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first family with MYO6-associated hearing loss from an Indian population. The study also highlights the importance of deafness gene panels in molecular diagnosis of GJB2-negative pedigrees, contributing to genetic counseling in the affected families.

Autosomal Dominant Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss (DFNA): A Comprehensive Narrative Review

Autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing loss (HL) typically occurs when only one dominant allele within the disease gene is sufficient to express the phenotype. Therefore, most patients diagnosed with autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL have a hearing-impaired parent, although de novo mutations should be considered in all cases of negative family history. To date, more than 50 genes and 80 loci have been identified for autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL. DFNA22 (MYO6 gene), DFNA8/12 (TECTA gene), DFNA20/26 (ACTG1 gene), DFNA6/14/38 (WFS1 gene), DFNA15 (POU4F3 gene), DFNA2A (KCNQ4 gene), and DFNA10 (EYA4 gene) are some of the most common forms of autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL. The characteristics of autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL are heterogenous. However, in most cases, HL tends to be bilateral, post-lingual in onset (childhood to early adulthood), high-frequency (sloping audiometric configuration), progressive, and variable in severity (mild to profound degree). DFNA1 (DIAPH1 gene) and DFNA6/14/38 (WFS1 gene) are the most common forms of autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL affecting low frequencies, while DFNA16 (unknown gene) is characterized by fluctuating HL. A long audiological follow-up is of paramount importance to identify hearing threshold deteriorations early and ensure prompt treatment with hearing aids or cochlear implants.

Genetic etiology of non-syndromic hearing loss in Europe

Hearing impairment not etiologically associated with clinical signs in other organs (non-syndromic) is genetically heterogeneous, so that over 120 genes are currently known to be involved. The frequency of mutations in each gene and the most frequent mutations vary throughout populations. Here we review the genetic etiology of non-syndromic hearing impairment (NSHI) in Europe. Over the years, epidemiological data were scarce because of the large number of involved genes, whose screening was not cost-effective until implementation of massively parallel DNA sequencing. In Europe, the most common form of autosomal recessive NSHI is DFNB1, which accounts for 11-57% of the cases. Mutations in STRC account for 16% of the recessive cases, and only a few more (MYO15A, MYO7A, LOXHD1, USH2A, TMPRSS3, CDH23, TMC1, OTOF, OTOA, SLC26A4, ADGRV1 and TECTA) have contributions higher than 2%. As regards autosomal-dominant NSHI, DFNA22 (MYO6) and DFNA8/12 (TECTA) represent the most common forms, accounting for 21% and 18% of elucidated cases, respectively. The contribution of ACTG1 and WFS1 drops to 9% in both cases, followed by POU4F3 (6.5%), MYO7A (5%), MYH14 and COL11A2 (4% each). Four additional genes contribute 2.5% each one (MITF, KCNQ4, EYA4, SOX10) and the remaining are residually represented. X-linked hearing loss and maternally-inherited NSHI have minor contributions in most countries. Further knowledge on the genetic epidemiology of NSHI in Europe needs a standardization of the experimental approaches and a stratification of the results according to clinical features, familial history and patterns of inheritance, to facilitate comparison between studies.

Myosin VI Haploinsufficiency Reduced Hearing Ability in Mice

In human, myosin VI (MYO6) haploinsufficiency causes postlingual progressive hearing loss. Because the usefulness of mouse models remains unclear, we produced novel Myo6 null (-/-) mutant mice and analyzed the hearing phenotypes of Myo6^+/- (+/-) heterozygous mutants. We first recorded and compared the auditory brainstem responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in control Myo6^+/+ (+/+) wild-type and +/- mice. These hearing phenotypes of +/- mice were mild; however, we confirmed that +/- mice developed progressive hearing loss. In particular, the hearing loss of female +/- mice progressed faster than that of male +/- mice. The stereocilia bundles of +/- mice exhibited progressive taper loss in cochlear inner hair cells (IHCs) and outer hair cells (OHCs). The loss of OHCs in +/- heterozygotes occurred at an earlier age than in +/+ mice. In particular, the OHCs at the basal area of the cochlea were decreased in +/- mice. IHC ribbon synapses from the area at the base of the cochlea were significantly reduced in +/- mice. Thus, our study indicated that MYO6 haploinsufficiency affected the detection of sounds in mice, and we suggest that +/- mice with Myo6 null alleles are useful animal models for gene therapy and drug treatment in patients with progressive hearing loss due to MYO6 haploinsufficiency.

High Prevalence of MYO6 Variants in an Austrian Patient Cohort With Autosomal Dominant Hereditary Hearing Loss

INTRODUCTION

Genetic hearing loss (HL) is often monogenic. Whereas more than half of autosomal recessive (AR) cases in Austria are caused by mutations in a single gene, no disproportionately frequent contributing genetic factor has been identified in cases of autosomal dominant (AD) HL. The genetic characterization of HL continues to improve diagnosis, genetic counseling, and lays a foundation for the development of personalized medicine approaches.

METHODS

Diagnostic HL panel screening was performed in an Austrian multiplex family with AD HL, and segregation was tested with polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. In an independent approach, 18 unrelated patients with AD HL were screened for causative variants in all known HL genes to date and segregation was tested if additional family members were available. The pathogenicity of novel variants was assessed based on previous literature and bioinformatic tools such as prediction software and protein modeling.

RESULTS

In six of the 19 families under study, candidate pathogenic variants were identified in MYO6, including three novel variants (p.Gln441Pro, p.Ser612Tyr, and p.Gln650ValfsTer7). Some patients carried more than one likely pathogenic variant in known deafness genes.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest a potential high prevalence of MYO6 variants in Austrian cases of AD HL. The presence of multiple rare HL variants in some patients highlights the relevance of considering multiple-hit diagnoses for genetic counseling and targeted therapy design.

A New Pathogenic Variant in the TRIOBP Associated with Profound Deafness Is Remediable with Cochlear Implantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A rare type of nonsyndromic autosomal recessive hereditary hearing loss is caused by pathogenic mutations in the TRIOBP gene mostly involving exons 6 and 7. These mutations cause hearing loss originating from dysfunction of sensory inner ear hair cells. Of all the affected siblings, 2 brothers and 1 sister, part of an Afghan family, were referred to our clinic for diagnostic workup and candidacy selection for cochlear implantation (CI).

METHODS

Molecular analysis showed a homozygous c.1342C > T p. (Arg448*) pathogenic variant in exon 7 of the TRIOBP gene (reference sequence NM_001039141.2) in all 3 affected siblings. Clinical audiometry demonstrated profound sensorineural hearing loss in all 3 affected siblings (2 males and 1 female), and they were implanted unilaterally.

RESULTS

One month after activation, the pure-tone averages with the CI processor were between 30 and 23 dBHL. Ten months after the first activation of the implant, open-set speech audiometry test could be performed for the first time in the 2 younger CI recipients (S5 and S9), and they could identify up to a maximum 77% phonemes correctly. The oldest brother (S12) could not yet perform open-set speech audiometry at that moment.

CONCLUSIONS

Implant outcomes are better with normal inner ear anatomy in general. The earlier congenital patients are implanted, the better their outcomes. Here, we demonstrate both statements are true in a homozygous c.1342C > T p. (Arg448*) pathogenic variant in the TRIOBP gene in all 3 affected siblings.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlation for Predicting Cochlear Implant Outcome: Current Challenges and Opportunities

The use and utility of cochlear implantation has rapidly increased in recent years as technological advances in the field have expanded both the efficacy and eligible patient population for implantation. This review aims to serve as a general overview of the most common hearing disorders that have favorable auditory outcomes with cochlear implants (CI). Hearing loss in children caused by congenital cytomegalovirus infection, syndromic conditions including Pendred Syndrome, and non-syndromic genetic conditions such as hearing impairment associated with GJB2 mutations have shown to be successfully managed by CI. Furthermore, cochlear implantation provides the auditory rehabilitation for the most common etiology of hearing loss in adults and age-related hearing loss (ARHL) or presbycusis. However, in some cases, cochlear implantation have been associated with some challenges. Regarding implantation in children, studies have shown that sometimes parents seem to have unrealistic expectations regarding the ability of CI to provide auditory rehabilitation and speech improvement. Given the evidence revealing the beneficial effects of early intervention via CI in individuals with hearing disorders especially hearing loss due to genetic etiology, early auditory and genetic screening efforts may yield better clinical outcomes. There is a need to better understand genotype-phenotype correlations and CI outcome, so that effective genetic counseling and successful treatment strategies can be developed at the appropriate time for hearing impaired individuals.

Targeted Mutation Analysis of the SLC26A4, MYO6, PJVK and CDH23 Genes in Iranian Patients with AR Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss

BACKGROUND

Hearing loss (HL) is the most prevalent sensory disorder. The over 100 genes implicated in autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL) makes it difficult to analyze and determine the accurate genetic causes of hearing loss. We sought to de?ne the frequency of seven hearing loss-Causing causing genetic Variants in four genes in an Iranian population with hearing loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred ARNSHL patients with normal GJB2/GJB6 genes were included, and targeted mutations in SLC26A4, MYO6, PJVK and CDH23 genes were analyzed by ARMS-PCR. The negative and positive results were confirmed by the Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

We found only two mutations, one in MYO6 (c.554-1 G > A) gene and another in PJVK (c.547C > T).

CONCLUSION

c.554-1G > A and c.547C > T mutations are responsible for 1% each of the Iranian ARNSHL patients. These genes are not a frequent cause of ARNSHL in an Iranian population.

Diagnosis, Intervention, and Prevention of Genetic Hearing Loss

It is estimated that at least 50% of congenital or childhood hearing loss is attributable to genetic causes. In non-syndromic hearing loss, which accounts for 70% of genetic hearing loss, approximately 80% of cases are autosomal recessive, 15% autosomal dominant, and 1-2% mitochondrial or X-linked. In addition, 30% of genetic hearing loss is syndromic. The genetic causes of hearing loss are highly heterogeneous. So far, more than 140 deafness-related genes have been discovered. Studies on those genes tremendously increased our understanding of the inner ear functions at the molecular level. It also offers important information for the patients and allows personalized and accurate genetic counseling. In many cases, genetic diagnosis of hearing loss can help to avoid unnecessary and costly clinical testing, offer prognostic information, and guide future medical management. On the other hand, a variety of gene therapeutic approaches have been developed aiming to relieve or converse the hearing loss due to genetic causes. Prevention of genetic hearing loss is feasible through prepregnancy and prenatal genetic diagnosis and counseling.

Precision medicine in hearing loss

Precision medicine (PM) proposes customized medical care based on a patient's unique genome, biomarkers, environment and behaviors. Hearing loss (HL) is the most common sensorineural disorder worldwide and is frequently caused by a single genetic mutation. With recent advances in PM tools such as genetic sequencing and data analysis, the field of HL is ideally positioned to adopt the strategies of PM. Here, we review current and future applications of PM in HL as they relate to the four core qualities of PM (P4): predictive, personalized, patient-centered, and participatory. We then introduce a strategy for effective incorporation of HL PM into the design of future research studies, electronic medical records, and clinical practice to improve diagnostics, prognostics, and, ultimately, individualized patient treatment. Finally, specific anticipated ethical and economic concerns in this growing era of genomics-based HL treatment are discussed. By integrating PM principles into translational HL research and clinical practice, hearing specialists are uniquely positioned to effectively treat the heterogeneous causes and manifestations of HL on an individualized basis.

A Comprehensive Study on the Etiology of Patients Receiving Cochlear Implantation With Special Emphasis on Genetic Epidemiology

Objective:

Cochlear implantation is the most important treatment currently available for profound sensorineural hearing loss. The aim of this study was to investigate the etiology of hearing loss in patients with cochlear implantation, and to compare outcomes.

Methods:

Japanese hearing loss patients who received cochlear implants (CIs) or electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) in Shinshu University hospital (n = 173, prelingual onset: 92, postlingual onset: 81) participated in this study. Invader assay followed by the targeted exon-sequencing of 63 deafness genes using Massively parallel DNA sequencing (MPS) was applied. For prelingual patients, additional imaging examination, cCMV screening, and pediatric examination were performed for precise diagnosis.

Results:

Genetic screening successfully identified the causative mutation in 60% of patients with prelingual onset hearing loss and in 36% of those with postlingual hearing loss. Differences in the kinds of genes identified were observed between the two groups. Although there were marked variations in the outcome of cochlear implantation, patients with specific deafness gene mutations showed relatively good results.

Conclusion:

The present study showed genetic etiology is a major cause of hearing loss in CI/EAS patients. Patients possessing mutations in a number of deafness genes known to be expressed within inner ear have achieved satisfactory auditory performance, suggesting that the identification of the genetic background facilitates the prediction of post-CI performance. MPS is a powerful tool for the identification of causative deafness genes in patients receiving cochlear implantation. Therefore, determination of the involved region inside/outside of the cochlea by identification of the responsible gene is essential.

Exome sequencing identifies a novel frameshift mutation of MYO6 as the cause of autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss in a Chinese family

Autosomal dominant types of nonsyndromic hearing loss (ADNSHL) are typically postlingual in onset and progressive. High genetic heterogeneity, late onset age, and possible confounding due to nongenetic factors hinder the timely molecular diagnoses for most patients. In this study, exome sequencing was applied to investigate a large Chinese family segregating ADNSHL in which we initially failed to find strong evidence of linkage to any locus by whole-genome linkage analysis. Two affected family members were selected for sequencing. We identified two novel mutations disrupting known ADNSHL genes and shared by the sequenced samples: c.328C>A in COCH (DFNA9) resulting in a p.Q110K substitution and a deletion c. 2814_2815delAA in MYO6 (DFNA22) causing a frameshift alteration p.R939Tfs*2. The pathogenicity of novel coding variants in ADNSHL genes was carefully evaluated by analysis of co-segregation with phenotype in the pedigree and in light of established genotype-phenotype correlations. The frameshift deletion in MYO6 was confirmed as the causative variant for this pedigree, whereas the missense mutation in COCH had no clinical significance. The results allowed us to retrospectively identify the phenocopy in one patient that contributed to the negative finding in the linkage scan. Our clinical data also supported the emerging genotype-phenotype correlation for DFNA22.