Impact of gestational age on neonatal hearing screening in vaginally-born late-preterm and early-term infants

Change to Hearing Loss-Related Risks and Screening in Preterm Infants

Hearing loss is one of the most common congenital defects in infancy; it increases speech and language delays and adversely affects academic achievement and socialemotional development. The risk of hearing loss in premature infants is higher than that in normal newborns, and because of the fragility of the auditory nervous system, it is more vulnerable to different risk factors. The hearing screening guidelines in current use were proposed by the American Academy of Pediatrics and updated in 2007, but there are no uniform guidelines for hearing screening in preterm infants. This review focuses on the risk factors related to hearing loss in premature infants, hearing screening strategies, and reasons for failure. The aim is to provide a more comprehensive understanding of hearing development in preterm infants to achieve early detection and early intervention. At the same time, attention should be paid to delayed auditory maturation in preterm infants to avoid excessive intervention. KEY POINTS: · Hearing loss is very common in infancy, especially in premature infants.. · Genetic factors, infection, hyperbilirubinemia, drugs, and noise are the main causes.. · We should pay attention to the delayed hearing maturity of premature infants and avoid excessive intervention..

High-frequency otoacoustic emissions in universal newborn hearing screening

OBJECTIVE

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are currently used in many newborn hearing screening programs as the initial hearing test, typically testing frequencies between 1 and 4 or 6 kHz, but they have been associated with high false-positive rates. The objective was to investigate the possible benefit of high-frequency DPOAEs for reducing false-positive rates.

METHODS

255 healthy newborns (138 males and 117 females) undergoing conventional hearing screening based on DPOAE and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) testing were recruited. High-frequency DPOAE amplitudes, noise floors and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were measured for f2 frequencies up to 12 kHz.

RESULTS

Of the 255 newborns who participated in this study, 23 (9%) failed the conventional DPOAE test but passed the AABR test, and 8 (3%) failed both tests. For an SNR threshold of 6 dB, high-frequency DPOAE tests at f2 = 4, 6, 8 and 10 kHz resulted in a reduction in the false-positive rate from 9% to 0.4%, or to zero if only three of the four frequencies were required to exceed the threshold. SNRs were lower in newborns with birth weights greater than 4000 g; lower at 2 kHz in newborns with a gestational age of 41 weeks; slightly higher in vaginally-delivered newborns; and higher at 2 kHz with increasing age in the group that failed the conventional DPOAE test but passed AABR.

CONCLUSION

High-frequency DPOAEs resulted in a reduction in the DPOAE failure rate and the false-positive rate. These findings may be helpful in universal newborn hearing screening programs.

Effects of prematurity on language acquisition and auditory maturation: a systematic review

Purpose

To verify which damages prematurity causes to hearing and language.

Research strategies

We used the decriptors language/linguagem, hearing/audição, prematurity/prematuridade in databases LILACS, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Scielo.

Selection criteria

randomized controlled trials, non-randomized intervention studies and descriptive studies (cross-sectional, cohort, case-control projects).

Data analysis

The articles were assessed independently by two authors according to the selection criteria. Twenty-six studies were selected, of which seven were published in Brazil and 19 in international literature.

Results

Nineteen studies comparing full-term and preterm infants. Two of the studies made comparisons between premature infants small for gestational age and appropriate for gestational age. In four studies, the sample consisted of children with extreme prematurity, while other studies have been conducted in children with severe and moderate prematurity. To assess hearing, these studies used otoacoustic emissions, brainstem evoked potentials, tympanometry, auditory steady-state response and visual reinforcement audiometry. For language assessment, most of the articles used the Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development. Most studies reviewed observed that prematurity is directly or indirectly related to the acquisition of auditory and language abilities early in life.

Conclusion

Thus, it could be seen that prematurity, as well as aspects related to it (gestational age, low weight at birth and complications at birth), affect maturation of the central auditory pathway and may cause negative effects on language acquisition.