Mixed response to ipilimumab in a melanoma patient with brain metastases: case report and review of the literature

Management of heterogeneous tumor response patterns to immunotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Response to therapy can be complex to evaluate, as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) does not capture heterogeneous responses. In this retrospective single-institution analysis, we describe the management, clinicopathological characteristics, RECIST and disease course of metastatic melanoma patients with a heterogeneous response to first-line anti-CLTA-4 and/or anti-PD-1 between September 2011 and September 2020. In 196 patients, 37 had a heterogeneous response to immunotherapy (19%). Distinct identified responses included a mixed response (MR) (15%), pseudoprogressive disease (PP) (3%), and a sarcoid-like reaction (2%). Patients with a MR and possibly no response to therapy (MR-NR) had a higher median lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH) (P = 0.01), were more often male (P = 0.04), had more involved disease sites (P = 0.01), and had brain metastasis more frequently (P = 0.02). MR patients with later response to therapy (MR-R) and PP patients had a longer overall survival of 1.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-2.7] and 1.6 years (95% CI, 1.3-2.0) versus MR-NR 1.2 (0.7-1.7) (P < 0.01). In this cohort study, we identified prognostic clinical characteristics that can contribute to clinical decision-making for patients with a MR. Additionally, patients with pseudoprogression had benefited from therapy continuation, suggesting the importance of not halting therapy early in case of suspected PP. The male sex, more involved disease sites, brain metastasis and had a higher median LDH were associated with a poor survival for patients with a MR, suggesting that these clinical variables could be used to predict whether a mixed responder will possibly respond to therapy.

Imaging in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Medical Oncology Perspective

Treatment advances have improved outcomes in patients with lung cancer, with a number of targeted therapies and immunotherapies now approved for patients with metastatic disease. Along with longer survival, modern treatment paradigms have increased therapeutic decision-making complexity underscoring informative imaging as paramount in guiding clinical care. In this review, we summarize challenges the thoracic oncologist encounters in common clinical settings. In addition, we explore unmet needs for future investigations with particular focus on positron emission tomography technology and immunotherapies.

Ipilimumab and craniotomy in patients with melanoma and brain metastases: a case series

OBJECT In patients with large or symptomatic brain lesions from metastatic melanoma, the value of resection of metastases to facilitate administration of systemic ipilimumab therapy has not yet been described. The authors undertook this study to investigate whether craniotomy creates the opportunity for patients to receive and benefit from ipilimumab who would otherwise succumb to brain metastasis prior to the onset of regression. METHODS All patients with metastatic melanoma who received ipilimumab and underwent craniotomy for metastasis resection between 2008 and 2014 at the Massachusetts General Hospital were identified through retrospective chart review. The final analysis included cases involving patients who underwent craniotomy within 3 months prior to initiation of therapy or up to 6 months after cessation of ipilimumab administration. RESULTS Twelve patients met the inclusion criteria based on timing of therapy (median age 59.2). The median number of metastases at the time of craniotomy was 2. The median number of ipilimumab doses received was 4. Eleven of 12 courses of ipilimumab were stopped for disease progression, and 1 was stopped for treatment-induced colitis. Eight of 12 patients had improvement in their performance status following craniotomy. Of the 6 patients requiring corticosteroids prior to craniotomy, 3 tolerated corticosteroid dose reduction after surgery. Ten of 12 patients had died by the time of data collection, with 1 patient lost to follow-up. The median survival after the start of ipilimumab treatment was 7 months. CONCLUSIONS In this series, patients who underwent resection of brain metastases in temporal proximity to receiving ipilimumab had qualitatively improved performance status following surgery in most cases. Surgery facilitated corticosteroid reduction in select patients. Larger analyses are required to better understand possible synergies between craniotomy for melanoma metastases and ipilimumab treatment.