Use of healthy-donor granulocyte transfusions to treat infections in neutropenic patients with myeloid or lymphoid neoplasms: experience in 74 patients treated with 373 granulocyte transfusions

Use of Granulocyte Transfusions in the Management of Severe Infections Among Children with Neutropenia

Background/Objectives: Infections remain the leading cause of mortality among neutropenic patients with haematologic malignancies, making effective infection management crucial. Achieving a sufficient neutrophil count is essential for the elimination of pathogens. Granulocyte concentrate (GC) can be a treatment option for neutropenic patients with severe infections. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and impact on survival of GC transfusions in neutropenic children with severe infections treated over the past 13 years in a single centre. Methods: The retrospective study analysed clinical data from 60 children (median age 9.5 years) who received GC transfusions at our centre. Granulocytes were collected by apheresis from donors stimulated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The majority of the patients (70%) were diagnosed with acute leukaemia. The main indications for GC were severe pneumonia (45%) and bacterial sepsis (38.33%). Results: The patients received 1 to 29 GC transfusions for 1 to 70 days, with a median time of administration of 3 days. Neutrophil counts increased to >1000/µL within a median of 5 days. GCs were well tolerated by most patients. One patient presented symptoms of anaphylaxis, the other acute lung injury related to transfusions, and alloimmunisation was reported in one patient. Of the patients analysed, 78.33% survived the infection that justified GC administration. We did not observe significant differences in survival depending on the aetiology of the infection. Conclusions: Based on our research, GC appears to be a beneficiary for neutropenic children with severe infections and reduces infection mortality rates. However, further well-designed randomised trials are needed to define its role in this setting.

Anorectal Infections in Neutropenic Leukemia Patients: A Common Clinical Challenge

Anorectal infections in neutropenic leukemia patients are a significant and potentially life-threatening complication. The pathogenesis of this condition is not entirely understood and believed to be multifactorial, including mucosal injury as a result of cytotoxic drugs, profound neutropenia and impaired host defense. Establishing an early diagnosis is key and often made clinically on the basis of signs and symptoms, but also from imaging studies demonstrating perianal inflammation or fluid collection. The management of anorectal infections in neutropenic leukemia patients is not straightforward, as there are no well-conducted studies on this entity. This review seeks to provide a framework into the pathophysiology and clinical presentation of anorectal infections in neutropenic leukemia patients, propose a diagnostic approach and to discuss controversies in the management of this condition.

Non-irradiated GCSF stimulated leukocyte transfusion for necrotizing fasciitis after allogeneic stem cell transplant: a case report and review of the literature

Severe neutropenia remains among the most common complications associated with hematological diseases and their treatment, especially in the early poststem cell transplantation. Managing life-threatening infections associated with prolonged and profound neutropenia thus remains an essential component for the optimal care of patients undergoing transplant. Several therapeutic interventions have been attempted either to limit the duration of neutropenia through granulocyte colony stimulating factors (GCSF), or to treat associated infections through the use of granulocyte transfusions. The efficacy and safety of granulocyte transfusions have been controversial, and the conflicting results reported by several trials can be explained by the significant variability related to patient selection, timing of initiation, and duration of transfusions, preparation methods among multiple others. We herein report a case of life-threatening necrotizing fasciitis post haploidentical stem cell transplant, responding to the combination of antibiotics and daily transfusions of non-irradiated GCSF stimulated leukocytes from healthy donors without surgical intervention. We also provide a concise review of the available literature regarding the use of this intervention, its efficacy and safety and comparison of irradiated with non-irradiated transfusions.

Role of granulocyte transfusions in combating life-threatening infections in patients with severe neutropenia: Experience from a tertiary care centre in North India

Bacterial and fungal infections still remain an important cause of mortality in patients with hematological malignancies and in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) especially in developing countries like India. Granulocyte transfusions (GTX) from healthy donors may lead to early clearance of index infection and thus prevent mortality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of GTX in combating life-threatening infections and preventing mortality in patients of hematological disorders/recipients of HSCT with severe neutropenia. This study was a prospective, observational analysis of patients with different hematological disorders/recipients of HSCT, who received GTX from January 2014 to December 2017. All patients had an Absolute neutrophil Count (ANC) < 0.5 x 109/L and a life threatening sepsis defined by presence of hemodynamic instability/ impending septic shock/ continuous high fever despite the use of the highest line of antimicrobials. A total of 143 granulocyte collections were done for 66 infectious episodes (IEs) in 60 patients. Multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) were observed in 47/66 IEs (71.2%) and fungal infections were seen in 9/66 IEs (13.6%). Resolution of index infection after GTX was seen in 45/66 IEs (68.2%), and the 30 day overall survival (OS) was 67.7%. OS was significantly higher in patients who received GTX within 7 days of neutropenic sepsis (p = 0.01). Patients with MDROs who received early GTX therapy had a better OS as compared to those who received late GTX (p = 0.02). GTX were well tolerated and only 6 patients' developed mild features of transfusion related acute lung injury (TRALI) which was managed conservatively, and 1 patient demonstrated hypocalcemic tetany. GTX may be of particular relevance in countries like India, where the incidence of infections is very high in neutropenic patients and there is an increasing emergence of MDROs.

Granulocyte transfusions: A concise review for practitioners

Granulocyte transfusions (GTXs) have been used to treat and prevent infections in neutropenic patients for more than 40 years, despite persistent controversy regarding their efficacy. This narrative review attempts to complement recent systematic reviews by the Cochrane Collaboration and provide both historical context and critical assessment of the most significant clinical studies published over the years. The data suggest that properly collected and promptly infused granulocytes are active against infections, both bacterial and fungal. The most important question that remains unanswered is in which patients the administration of granulocytes will be beneficial. The preponderance of evidence suggests that granulocyte transfusions may be efficacious in few select cases as a temporizing measure to control an infection that is expected (or proven) to be refractory to optimal antimicrobial treatment, and that could otherwise be controlled by marrow recovery, which is expected to happen. In this regard, they are best considered a "bridge" that grants enough time for the recipient to develop their own response to the infection. The challenges to use GTXs successfully are both clinical, in terms of timely identifying the patients who may benefit, and logistical, in terms of optimal selection of donors and collection technique.

Granulocyte transfusions in the management of invasive fungal infections

Granulocyte transfusions have a long history of being used in patients with neutropenia or neutrophil dysfunction to prevent and treat invasive fungal infections. However, there are limited and conflicting data concerning its clinical effectiveness, considerable variations in current granulocyte transfusion practices, and uncertainties about its benefit as an adjunct to modern antifungal therapy. In this review, we provide an overview on granulocyte transfusions and summarize the evidence on their role in the prevention and treatment of invasive fungal infections.

Update on granulocyte transfusions: accumulation of promising data, but still lack of decisive evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Inconsistent results regarding the clinical efficacy of granulocyte transfusions for the treatment or prophylaxis of life-threatening infections in neutropenic patients have been attributed to insufficient number of transfused neutrophils. Since the introduction of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to the granulocyte mobilization regimen in the 1990s, the number of transfused cells significantly increased, which directly translated to a significant increase in absolute neutrophil counts in the transfused patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

For therapeutic granulocyte transfusions, neither of the two randomized controlled studies in the G-CSF era could demonstrate a clear clinical benefit. However, a number of small studies or case series have suggested its clinical efficacy, including one that demonstrated the clinical response against drug-resistant invasive fusariosis. For prophylactic granulocyte transfusions, there have been scarce reports in the G-CSF era. A pulmonary reaction is the most significant adverse event after granulocyte transfusions, although its reported frequency varies among studies.

SUMMARY

Despite the expectation that the increased number of transfused neutrophils enables the clear demonstration of the clinical benefit, the role of therapeutic granulocyte transfusions remains controversial. Future directions may include: identifying the patient population who would benefit most from granulocyte transfusions; minimizing the risk of adverse events by identifying the risk factors and the prevention methods; and finding a way to prove the clinical benefit of granulocyte transfusions in therapeutic and prophylactic settings.

Fever of unknown origin in cancer patients

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) remains a challenging clinical problem, namely in patients with cancer. In cancer patients, FUO may be due to the cancer itself, as it is the case of hematological malignancies; digestive tumors (colon cancer, liver metastases) are significantly associated with FUO and infection can be demonstrated in some cases. Prevention with G-CSF and empirical antimicrobial therapy are essential approaches for the management of FUO in cancer patients. New diagnostic approaches, such as PET imaging, should be further evaluated in cancer patients with FUO.

Effectiveness of Granulocyte Transfusions in Neutropenic Adult Oncology Patients: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Among patients with cancer, many factors can cause severe and persistent neutropenia, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. For patients with neutrophil deficiency, replacement with granulocyte transfusion (GTX) seems a rational approach. However, existing data on the efficacy of GTX have been inconclusive, and such adverse effects as respiratory distress and death indicate the need for further investigation into its efficacy. The purpose of this literature review was to address the question, "Are granulocyte transfusions effective in the management of adult oncology patients with neutropenia?" The focus was on adequate dosing, optimal timing of initiation, and adverse effects. Implications for practice for the provider and the niche population of neutropenic adult oncology patients that might benefit from GTX are presented.

Granulocyte transfusions in children and adults with hematological malignancies: benefits and controversies

Bacterial and fungal infections continue to pose a major clinical challenge in patients with prolonged severe neutropenia after chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). With the advent of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize neutrophils in healthy donors, granulocyte transfusions have been broadly used to prevent and/or treat life-threatening infections in patients with severe febrile neutropenia and/or neutrophil dysfunction. Although the results of randomized controlled trials are inconclusive, there are suggestions from pilot and retrospective studies that granulocyte transfusions may benefit selected categories of patients. We will critically appraise the evidence related to the use of therapeutic granulocyte transfusions in children and adults, highlighting current controversies in the field and discussing complementary approaches to modulate phagocyte function in the host.