Concomitant high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with good prognosis factors and oncologic outcome after radical prostatectomy

The value of multimodality imaging in the investigation of a PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy in the Irish hospital setting

INTRODUCTION

The diagnostic evaluation of a PSA recurrence after RP in the Irish hospital setting involves multimodality imaging with MRI, CT, and bone scanning, despite the low diagnostic yield from imaging at low PSA levels. We aim to investigate the value of multimodality imaging in PC patients after RP with a PSA recurrence.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with a PSA recurrence after RP who underwent multimodality imaging were evaluated. Demographic data, postoperative PSA levels, and imaging studies performed at those levels were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eight (21%) MRIs, 6 (33%) CTs, and 4 (9%) bone scans had PCa-specific findings. Three (12%) patients had a positive MRI with a PSA <1.0 ng/ml, while 5 (56%) were positive at PSA ≥1.1 ng/ml (p = 0.05). Zero patient had a positive CT TAP at a PSA level <1.0 ng/ml, while 5 (56%) were positive at levels ≥1.1 ng/ml (p = 0.03). Zero patient had a positive bone at PSA levels <1.0 ng/ml, while 4 (27%) were positive at levels ≥1.1 ng/ml (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic yield from multimodality imaging, and isotope bone scanning in particular, in PSA levels <1.0 ng/ml, is low. There is a statistically significant increase in the frequency of positive findings on CT and bone scanning at PSA levels ≥1.1 ng/ml. MRI alone is of investigative value at PSA <1.0 ng/ml. The indication for CT, MRI, or isotope bone scanning should be carefully correlated with the clinical question and how it will affect further management.

Clinical features and prognosis of prostate cancer with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical features and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer (PCa) with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN).

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 893 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy for PCa between 2011 and 2012 at Asan Medical Center; 752 of these patients who did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy and were followed up for more than 1 year were included. The cohort was divided into two groups-patients with and without HGPIN-and their characteristics were compared. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze factors affecting BCR.

Results

In total, 652 study patients (86.7%) had HGPIN. There were no significant differences in preoperative factors between the two groups, including age (p=0.369) and preoperative prostate-specific antigen concentration (p=0.234). Patients with HGPIN had a higher Gleason score (p=0.012), more frequent multiple tumor (p=0.013), and more perineural invasion (p=0.012), but no other postoperative pathologic characteristics were significantly different between the two groups. There were no significant differences in BCR (13.0% vs. 11.5%, p=0.665) and HGPIN was not associated with BCR (p=0.745). In multivariate analysis, only the T stage (p<0.001) was associated with BCR.

Conclusions

PCa patients with HGPIN have a higher Gleason score, more frequent multiple tumors, and more perineural invasion than those without HGPIN. The presence of HGPIN is not an independent predictor of BCR.