New-generation multifocal intraocular lens for pediatric cataract

Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Patients With Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation With Optic Capture in Berger Space for Pediatric Cataract

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in pediatric patients with multifocal IOL implantation with optic capture in Berger space.

METHODS

This prospective observational study enrolled 68 children (101 eyes), aged 3 to 14 years, who received multifocal IOL (Tecnis ZMB00; Abbott Medical Optics) implantation with optic capture in Berger space from June 2019 to June 2020 in Qingdao Eye Hospital. Ocular biometry was performed using the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec). The IOL power and intended postoperative refraction were calculated using the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, SRK/T, Haigis, and SRKII formulas. The refractive state of patients, prediction error, and absolute prediction error were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean absolute error of the formulas was significantly different (0.49 diopters [D], Hoffer Q; 0.52 D, Barrett Universal II; 0.47 D, Holladay; 0.54 D, Holladay2; 0.52 D, SRK/T; 0.67 D, Haigis; 0.99 D, SRKII; P < .001). However, the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, and SRK/T formulas had a similar accuracy in predicting refractive error within ±0.50 D (62.4%, 59.4%, 62.4%, 62.4%, and 58.4%). There was a trend toward a greater prediction error in eyes with a shorter axial length (≤ 22 mm) or a steeper cornea (> 43.50 D), for which the Hoffer Q and Holladay2 formulas were more accurate. When the axial length was greater than 22 mm or the corneal curvature was 43.50 D or less, the Holladay, Hoffer Q, and Barrett Universal II formulas were more accurate.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with pediatric cataract treated with multifocal IOL implantation with optic capture in Berger space, the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, and SRK/T formulas performed better than the other formulas. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 20XX;X(X):XX-XX.].

Full-Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens Posterior Optic Capture for Selected Pediatric Cataracts

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short-term outcomes of implantation of a full-diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) with optic capture for selected pediatric cataracts.

METHODS

In this prospective study, patients with pediatric cataract aged 3 to 14 years were selected to receive multifocal IOL (Tecnis ZMB00; Abbott Medical Optics) posterior optic capture. Visual acuity, stereopsis, visual quality, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (66 eyes) were recruited with a follow-up of 9.09 ± 5.93 months (range: 6 to 24 months). The cataract was bilateral in 21 patients and unilateral in 24 patients. At the last follow-up visit, the mean distance-corrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity was 0.28 ± 0.25, 0.43 ± 0.24, and 0.39 ± 0.27 logMAR, respectively. Among the patients with bilateral cataract, postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/40 or better in 79% (33 of 42) of the eyes and 20/20 in 26% (11 of 42) of the eyes. Of the patients with unilateral cataract, 54% (13 of 24) achieved a CDVA of 20/40 or better but none obtained a CDVA of 20/20. All patients developed stereopsis postoperatively (P < .05). There was no significant difference in modulation transfer function cut-off and Strehl ratio between the eyes with a multifocal IOL and the healthy eyes of patients with unilateral cataract (P > .05). Objective Scatter Index values were significantly better in the healthy eyes (P < .05). No posterior capsule opacification, posterior synechiae, secondary glaucoma, pigmentary IOL deposits, or IOL decentration was observed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term follow-up results suggest full-diffractive multifocal IOL optic capture may benefit appropriately selected patients with pediatric cataract. [J Refract Surg. 2021:37(6):390-397.].

Comparative analysis of visual outcomes of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses in congenital cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To assess the impact on visual development of multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implantation in children following congenital cataract surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective interventional consecutive case series.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 56 eyes of 43 pediatric patients who underwent congenital cataract surgery with phacoaspiration and simultaneous implantation of IOL under one year of age. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive error and ocular motility disorders were evaluated after a follow-up greater than 4 years.

RESULTS

We implanted 32 multifocal (18unilateral, Group A and 14bilateral, Group B) and 24monofocal IOLs (12unilateral, Group C and 12bilateral, Group D). Mean follow-up was 6.67 years. Mean CDVA of the eyes with multifocal IOL was 0.75±0.46 logMAR in unilateral cataract surgery and 0.34±0.25logMAR in bilateral ones; with monofocal IOLs was 0.71±0.52logMAR in unilateral and 0.53±0.43logMAR in bilateral ones. No statistically significant difference in CDVA between Groups A and B and Groups C and D has been recorded. Final mean spherical equivalent was -3.88±4.73D; in Group A it was -2.74±4.22D, in Group C was -1.08±1.45D, in Group B was -4.82±4.64D and in Group D was -6.81 ± 4.61D.The difference was statistically significant between Group B and D (p=0.01), but not between Group A and C (p=0.14).Twenty-six patients (60.4%) showed post-operative strabismus. Its surgical correction occurred more in patients with multifocal IOL implanted (p=0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the use of multifocal IOLs did not show significant advantages in visual development in children following congenital cataract extraction under one year of age if compared with monofocal IOLs.

Bilateral trifocal IOL implantation in a pediatric case of cataract following steroid-therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Purpose

To present the case of a 9-year-old child with bilateral posterior subcapsular cataract developed through steroid treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cataract surgery with trifocal intraocular lens implantation was performed in both eyes.

Observations

Uncorrected distance visual acuity increased from +0.3 and + 0.4 logMAR preoperatively to 0.00 and + 0.04 logMAR after surgery. Binocular uncorrected values for intermediate and near visual acuity were −0.04 logMAR and 0.02 logMAR after surgery, respectively. The patient did not report side effects like halos or glare and was able to participate in his daily activities (school and sports) without spectacles.

Conclusions and Importance

This report represents the first description of a bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses in a pediatric cataract case with restoration of visual function in far, intermediate and near distance. Trifocal intraocular lenses to compensate for the loss of accommodation can be an option in selected cases of children with cataract.

Seven-year follow-up of unilateral multifocal pseudophakia in a child

The purpose of the study was to report the long-term outcome of unilateral implantation of a multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) in a pediatric cataract. This study was carried out at Tertiary Academic Ophthalmology Department, AMC, Amsterdam. This is a case report study of a 7-year-old child with a unilateral irradiation cataract, in whom an apodized diffractive multifocal IOL (SN6D3, Alcon) was implanted at the time of cataract surgery. During the follow-up period, visual acuity was preserved at logMAR -0.1; the child did not develop amblyopia. Binocular single vision was established. Few glistenings were seen on the IOL. The non-operated eye developed more myopia during the follow-up period than the multifocally implanted eye. Straylight was increased to log(s) 1.83. Patient and parents satisfaction were high. In selected cases, unilateral implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal IOLs leads to good long-term results in terms of visual acuity and patient satisfaction. No untoward effects were seen, including few glistenings on the IOL. Straylight is increased, but subjectively not disturbing.

Bilateral implantation of multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lens in children above 5 years of age

PURPOSE

To evaluate visual results and complications after bilateral implantation of multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in children above five years of age.

METHODS

In this prospective non-randomized controlled trial, children with bilateral developmental cataract above five years of age were divided into two groups - Group A implanted with multifocal IOL (both refractive and diffractive) and Group B implanted with monofocal IOL in both eyes. Outcome measures of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for distance, distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), contrast sensitivity, stereopsis and complications such as posterior capsular opacification (PCO) and glare were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U and the Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests.

RESULTS

Forty-two eyes of 21 children (mean age: 7.19 years, range: 5-12 years) were included in the study. Group A included 14 eyes (seven children) Group B included 28 eyes (14 children). Both groups showed significant improvement in BCVA at one year follow-up, but no significant difference was found on comparing contrast sensitivity. Stereopsis was slightly better in Group A (125.71 arc-sec) as compared to Group B (140 arc-sec) (p = 0.280). Most patients in Group A were spectacle-independent for near (71.4 %) versus Group B. MRSE at one year was 0.21 in Group A and 0.5 in Group B. Incidence of PCO was similar in either groups (35.7 %). No intraoperative complication was noted in any child.

CONCLUSION

Multifocal IOL implantation is a viable option in children above five years of age with bilateral cataract.