Methods of haemostasis during liver resection--a UK national survey

Fibrin-based haemostatic agents for reducing blood loss in adult liver resection

BACKGROUND

Liver resection is the optimal treatment for selected benign and malignant liver tumours, but it can be associated with significant blood loss. Numerous anaesthetic and surgical techniques have been developed to reduce blood loss and improve perioperative outcomes. One such technique is the application of topical fibrin-based haemostatic agents (FBHAs) to the resection surface. There is no standard practice for FBHA use, and a variety of commercial agents and devices are available, as well as non-FBHAs (e.g. collagen-based agents). The literature is inconclusive on the effectiveness of these methods and on the clinical benefits of their routine use.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of fibrin-based haemostatic agents in reducing intraoperative blood loss in adults undergoing liver resection.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group (CHBG) Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science up to 20 January 2023. We also searched online trial registries, checked the reference lists of all primary studies, and contacted the authors of included trials for additional published or unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered for inclusion all randomised clinical trials evaluating FBHAs versus no topical intervention or non-FBHAs, irrespective of publication type, publication status, language of publication, and outcomes reported. Eligible participants could have any liver pathology and be undergoing major or minor liver resections through open or laparoscopic surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the results of the literature search and used data extraction forms to collate the results. We expressed dichotomous outcome results as risk ratios (RRs) and continuous outcome results as mean differences (MDs), each with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We used a random-effects model for the main analyses. Our primary outcomes were perioperative mortality, serious adverse events, haemostatic efficacy, and health-related quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were efficacy as sealant, adverse events considered non-serious, operating time, and length of hospital stay. We assessed the certainty of the evidence with GRADE and presented results in two summary of findings tables.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 22 trials (2945 participants) evaluating FBHAs versus no intervention or non-FBHAs; 19 trials with 2642 participants provided data for the meta-analyses. Twelve trials reported commercial funding, one trial reported no financial support, and nine trials provided no information on funding. Below we present the most clinically relevant outcome results, also displayed in our summary of findings table. Fibrin-based haemostatic agents versus no intervention Six trials (1001 participants) compared FBHAs with no intervention. One trial was at low risk of bias in all five domains, and all other trials were at high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Two trials were at high risk of bias related to blinding. It is unclear if FBHAs compared with no intervention have an effect on perioperative mortality (RR 2.58, 95% CI 0.89 to 7.44; 4 trials, 782 participants), serious adverse events (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.05; 4 trials, 782 participants), postoperative transfusion (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.40; 5 trials, 864 participants), reoperation (RR 2.92, 95% CI 0.58 to 14.61; 2 trials, 612 participants), or postoperative bile leak (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.48; 4 trials, 782 participants), as the certainty of evidence was very low for all these outcomes. Fibrin-based haemostatic agents versus non-fibrin-based haemostatic agents Sixteen trials (1944 participants) compared FBHAs with non-FBHAs. All trials had at least one domain at high or unclear risk of bias. Twelve trials were at high risk of bias related to blinding. It is unclear if FBHAs compared with non-FBHAs have an effect on perioperative mortality (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.72; 11 trials, 1436 participants), postoperative transfusion (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.25; 7 trials, 599 participants), reoperation (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.90; 3 trials, 358 participants), or postoperative bile leak (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.21; 9 trials, 1115 participants), as the certainty of evidence was very low for all these outcomes. FBHAs compared with non-FBHAs may have little or no effect on the risk of serious adverse events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.03; 9 trials, 1176 participants; low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for the outcomes in both comparisons (FBHAs versus no intervention and FBHAs versus non-FBHAs) was of very low certainty (or low certainty in one instance) and cannot justify the routine use of FBHAs to reduce blood loss in adult liver resection. While the meta-analysis showed a reduced risk of reoperation with FBHAs compared with non-FBHAs, the analysis was confounded by the small number of trials reporting the event and the risk of bias in all these trials. Future trials should focus on the use of FBHAs in people undergoing liver resection who are at particularly high risk of bleeding. Investigators should evaluate clinically meaningful and patient-important outcomes and follow the SPIRIT and CONSORT statements.

Clinical and economic impact of oxidized regenerated cellulose for surgeries in a Chinese tertiary care hospital

Aim: To assess the impact of oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) on blood transfusion and hospital costs associated with surgeries. Patients & methods: This retrospective cohort study selected ten surgeries to create propensity-score matching groups to compare ORC versus nonORC (conventional hemostatic techniques such as manual pressure, ligature and electrocautery). Results: NonORC was associated with both higher blood transfusion volume and higher hospital costs than ORC in endoscopic transnasal sphenoidal surgery, nonskull base craniotomy, hepatectomy, cholangiotomy, gastrectomy and lumbar surgery. However, nonORC was associated with better outcomes than ORC in open colorectal surgery, mammectomy and hip arthroplasty surgery. Conclusion: When compared with conventional hemostatic technique, using ORC could impact blood transfusion and hospital costs differently by surgical settings.

Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Liver Resections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Theoretical advantages of robotic surgery compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery include improved instrument dexterity, 3D visualization, and better ergonomics. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine advantages of robotic surgery over laparoscopic surgery in patients undergoing liver resections.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was conducted for studies comparing robotic assisted or totally laparoscopic liver resection. Meta-analysis of intraoperative (operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, conversion rate), oncological (R0 resection rates), and postoperative (bile leak, surgical site infection, pulmonary complications, 30-day and 90-day mortality, length of stay, 90-day readmission and reoperation rates) outcomes was performed using a random effects model.

RESULT

Twenty-six non-randomized studies including 2630 patients (950 robotic and 1680 laparoscopic) were included, of which 20% had major robotic liver resection and 14% had major laparoscopic liver resection. Intraoperatively, robotic liver resection was associated with significantly less blood loss (mean: 286 vs 301 mL, p < 0.001) but longer operating time (mean: 281 vs 221 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in conversion rates or transfusion rates between robotic liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in overall complications, bile leaks, and length of hospital stay between robotic liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection. However, robotic liver resection was associated with significantly lower readmission rates than laparoscopic liver resection (odds ratio: 0.43, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Robotic liver resection appears to offer some advantages compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, although both techniques appear equivalent. Importantly, the quality of evidence is generally limited to cohort studies and a high-quality randomized trial comparing both techniques is needed.

Haemostatic Efficacy of Topical Agents During Liver Resection: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection carries a high risk of parenchymal bleeding both intra- and post-operatively. Topical haemostatic agents are frequently used to control bleeding during hepatectomy, with multiple products currently available. However, it remains unknown which of these is most effective for achieving haemostasis and improving peri-operative outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review and random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised trials investigating topical haemostatic agents in hepatic resection was performed. Interventions were analysed by grouping into similar products; fibrin patch, fibrin glue, collagen products, and control. Primary outcomes were the rate of haemostasis at 4 and 10 min.

RESULTS

Twenty randomized controlled trials were included in the network meta-analysis, including a total of 3267 patients and 7 different interventions. Fibrin glue and fibrin patch were the most effective interventions for achieving haemostasis at both 4 and 10 min. There were no significant differences between haemostatic agents with respect to blood loss, transfusion requirements, bile leak, post-operative complications, reoperation, or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Amongst the haemostatic agents currently available, fibrin patch and fibrin glue are the most effective methods for reducing time to haemostasis during liver resection, but have no effect on other peri-operative outcomes. Topical haemostatic agents should not be used routinely, but may be a useful adjunct to achieve haemostasis when needed.

Hemostatic Efficacy and Safety of the Novel Medical Adhesive, MAR VIVO-107, in a Rabbit Liver Resection Model

Background: Topical hemostatic agents are useful when hepatic hemorrhage is difficult to control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hemostatic efficacy and safety of a biodegradable polyurethane-based adhesive, MAR VIVO-107 (MAR), in comparison with a clinically used fibrin glue. Methods: Thirty female New Zealand white rabbits were randomly assigned to 3 study groups as follows: MAR (n = 10), fibrin glue (n = 10), and saline groups (n = 10). After standardized partial liver resection was performed, each agent was immediately applied to the wound area. Bleeding time until hemostasis and blood loss were recorded. After 7 days, body weight, hematology parameters, and serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and lactate dehydrogenase were measured. Simultaneously, the severity of intra-abdominal adhesion was evaluated. Results: The mean bleeding time in the MAR (38 ± 10 s) and fibrin glue groups (65 ± 17 s) was significantly shorter than that in the saline group (186 ± 12 s). Similarly, the mean blood loss in the MAR (9 ± 3 g) and fibrin glue groups (9 ± 3 g) was significantly less than that in the saline group (23 ± 4 g). No significant differences in bleeding time and blood loss were found between the MAR and fibrin glue groups. The postoperative survival rate was 100% in all the groups. Body weight as well as hematological and serum biochemical values on day 7 were within the small and physiological range when compared with the preoperative baseline values, and significant differences were not detected among the MAR, fibrin glue, and saline groups. The severities of adhesion were similar between the 3 groups. Conclusion: Our data demonstrated that MAR was not inferior to fibrin glue in terms of hemostatic efficacy and safety.

Fibrin glue as a protective tool for microanastomoses in limb reconstructive surgery

Aim: Fibrin glue becomes a more and more routinely used tool for stabilization of microanastomoses and nerve repair. This paper summarizes the technical properties and advantages of its use in a wide variety of microsurgical contexts, and includes an exemplary limb reconstructive case.

Patients and methods: A total of 131 patients who had undergone elective and emergency microsurgery mainly of the limbs were retrospectively analyzed, as was the use of free flaps.

Results: The use of fibrin glue allows for proper positioning of anastomoses and repaired nerves. No torsion of the pedicle could be seen. The flap survival rated >94%. The fibrin glue could stay in place in >99%. In the rare case of revision, the fibrin glue could easily be removed without damaging the region of the microanastomosis.

Conclusion: Fibrin glue should not be used to repair insufficient, i.e., leaking anastomoses, but it does protect the site of anastomosis from tissue and fluid pressure. It prevents the pedickle from torsion and its use facilitates relocation of the microanastomoses in cases of revision surgery.

The impact of portal pedicle clamping on survival from colorectal liver metastases in the contemporary era of liver resection: a matched cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Portal pedicle clamping (PPC) may impact micro-metastases' growth. This study examined the association between PPC and survival after a hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

A matched cohort study was conducted on hepatectomies for CRLM at a single institution (2003-2012). Cohorts were selected based on PPC use, with 1:1 matching for age, time period and the Clinical Risk Score. Outcomes were overall and recurrence-free survival (OS and RFS). Cox regression was performed to assess the association between PPC and survival.

RESULTS

Of 481 hepatectomies, 26.9% used PPC. One hundred and ten pairs of patients were matched in the cohorts. There was no significant difference in OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-1.83], with a 5-year OS of 57.8% (95%CI: 52.4-63.2%) with PPC versus 62.3% (95%CI: 57.1-67.5%) without. Five-year RFS did not differ (HR 0.98; 95%CI: 0.71-1.35) with 29.7% (95%CI: 24.9-34.5%) with PPC versus 28.0% (95%CI: 23.2-32.8%) without. When adjusting for extent of resection, transfusion, operative time and surgeon, there was no difference in OS (HR 0.91; 95%CI: 0.52-1.60) or RFS (HR: 0.86; 95%CI: 0.57-1.30).

CONCLUSIONS

PPC was not associated with a significant difference in OS or RFS in a hepatectomy for CRLM. PPC remains a safe technique during hepatectomy.

Partial nephrectomy driven by cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator under zero ischemia: a pilot study

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and technical applicability of cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA)-driven zero-ischemia open partial nephrectomy in patients with renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively collected data of 13 consecutive patients, who underwent open partial nephrectomy under non-ischemic conditions. Tumor resection was done using an ultrasonic device (CUSA/SONOCA 300). Demographic and laboratory data, tumor characteristics, perioperative, and postoperative variables were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median age was 60.0 years (range 40-76); body mass index 28.0 kg/m(2) (range 22.9-43.3); tumor size 37.0 mm (range 11-110 mm). Patient were stratified according to the PADUA score into low- (score 6-7; n - 4), intermediate- (score 8-9; n - 5), and high-risk (score of >10; n - 4) groups, and the median score was 9.0 (range 6-13; SD +2.3). The vast majority of kidney tumors were diagnosed incidentally (n - 11; 84.6 %). Median operative time was 175 min (55-270 min); median time of tumor extirpation was 12 min (6-25 min); and median blood loss was 250 ml. Serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, and hemoglobin were nearly unaltered before and after surgery in 11 cases (84.6 %). Three patients received a blood transfusion (Clavien-Dindo Grade II); one had Grade IIIa complication (insertion of double J stent without general anesthesia); and three had Grade IIIb complications (insertion of double J under general anesthesia).

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrasonic device demonstrated acceptable hemostatic and resection properties during open partial nephrectomy without ischemia. Our series showed promising perioperative and postoperative outcomes that may help in maximizing preservation of renal function in partial nephrectomy candidates.

Modern technical approaches in resectional hepatic surgery

Techniques in liver surgery have improved considerably during the last decades, allowing for liver resections with low morbidity and mortality. Preoperative patient selection, perioperative management, and intraoperative blood-sparing techniques are the cornerstones of modern liver surgery. Multimodal treatment of colorectal liver metastases has expanded the group of patients who are potential candidates for liver resection. Adjunctive techniques, including preoperative portal vein embolization and staged hepatectomy, have facilitated the safe performance of extensive liver resection. This article provides an overview of indications for liver resection and a systematic description of the technical approach to the most commonly performed resections.

Fibrin sealants and topical agents in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a critical appraisal

INTRODUCTION

Fibrin sealants and topical hemostatic agents have been used extensively in hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) surgery to promote coagulation and clot formation decreasing the need for allogeneic blood transfusion and to act as tissue sealants, ideally preventing biliary, enteric, and pancreatic leaks.

RESULTS

Current literature has demonstrated some favorable outcomes using many different products for application in the field of HPB surgery. However, critical findings exist demonstrating lack of reproducible efficacy or benefit. In all, many clinical trials have demonstrated effectiveness of fibrin sealants and other agents at reducing the need for intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion. Ability to effectively seal tissues providing biliostatic effect or preventing postoperative fistula formation remains debated as definitive evidence is lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

In the following invited review, we discuss current literature describing the use of topical agents and fibrin sealants in liver and pancreas surgery. We summarize major contemporary clinical trials and their findings regarding the use of these agents in HPB surgery and provide evidence from the preclinical literature as to the translation of these products into the clinical arena.

Fibrin sealants and topical agents in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a critical appraisal

INTRODUCTION

Fibrin sealants and topical hemostatic agents have been used extensively in hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) surgery to promote coagulation and clot formation decreasing the need for allogeneic blood transfusion and to act as tissue sealants, ideally preventing biliary, enteric, and pancreatic leaks.

RESULTS

Current literature has demonstrated some favorable outcomes using many different products for application in the field of HPB surgery. However, critical findings exist demonstrating lack of reproducible efficacy or benefit. In all, many clinical trials have demonstrated effectiveness of fibrin sealants and other agents at reducing the need for intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion. Ability to effectively seal tissues providing biliostatic effect or preventing postoperative fistula formation remains debated as definitive evidence is lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

In the following invited review, we discuss current literature describing the use of topical agents and fibrin sealants in liver and pancreas surgery. We summarize major contemporary clinical trials and their findings regarding the use of these agents in HPB surgery and provide evidence from the preclinical literature as to the translation of these products into the clinical arena.