Pterygium recurrence, astigmatism and visual acuity following bare-sclera excision and conjunctival autograft with or without additional phototherapeutic keratectomy

[Transplantation of the Bowman's layer in combined treatment of recurrent pterygium]

Pterygium is among the most frequent indications for extraocular ophthalmic surgery. The main method of pterygium treatment - its excision - is often combined with transplantation, non-transplantation, medication and other methods. However, the frequency of pterygium recurrence can exceed 35%, and the cosmetic and refraction outcomes satisfy neither the patient, nor the surgeon.

PURPOSE

The study analyses the technical capability and feasibility for transplantation of the Bowman's layer in the treatment of recurrent pterygium.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The transplantation of the Bowmen's layer was performed according to the developed technique on 7 eyes with recurrent pterygium (7 patients aged 34 to 63 years). The combined surgery technique consisted of pterygium resection, laser ablation, autoconjunctival plasty, exposure to a cytostatic drug, non-suture transplantation of the Bowman's layer. Maximum length of the follow-up was 36 months. Analysis involved data from refractometry, visometry (without correction and with spectacle correction), and optical coherence tomography of the retina.

RESULTS

There were no complications in any of the studied cases. The cornea and the transplant retained transparency throughout the entire follow-up duration. 36 months after surgery mean spectacle-corrected visual acuity amounted to 0.86±0.2, topographic astigmatism - 1.48±1.4 diopters. Recurrence of pterygium was not observed. All patients were satisfied with the cosmetic outcomes of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Non-suture transplantation of the Bowmen's layer recovers normal anatomy, physiology and transparency of the cornea after repeat surgical intervention for pterygium. No pterygium recurrences were observed throughout the entire follow-up after treatment with the proposed combined technique.

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Different Pterygium Surgeries: A Review of the Literature

The search for the "gold standard" in the surgical treatment of pterygium has been ongoing for over two decades. Despite the development of various surgical techniques, recurrence rates range from 6.7% to 88% depending on the method used. This review discusses the latest and most commonly used methods for the surgical removal of pterygium, primarily focusing on efficacy and safety. Moreover, this review includes articles that either evaluated or compared surgical methods and clinical trials for primary and recurrent pterygium. Limited data are available on combined methods as well as on the efficacy of adjuvant treatment. The use of adjuvant intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC) and conjunctival autografting (CAU) are the two most highly recommended options, as they have the lowest rates of postoperative recurrence.

Phototherapeutic keratectomy

Phototherapeutic keratectomy is an excimer laser-based surgical procedure widely performed by corneal surgeons for treating anterior corneal stromal pathologies. Phototherapeutic keratectomy helps by ablating the corneal stroma, thereby improving corneal clarity and smoothening the surface. Transient discomfort and induced hyperopia from corneal flattening are the immediate postoperative concerns. The long-term course is often marked by the recurrence of original corneal pathology and corneal haze formation. Phototherapeutic keratectomy, however, allows for repeat stromal ablation for managing recurrences, as the corneal thickness permits, without affecting the outcome of future keratoplasty. Adjunctive methods such as topical mitomycin-C may be additionally used to reduce recurrence rates. Also, various masking agents such as carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium hyaluronate, and dextran are used in eyes with irregular corneal surface to allow for uniform stromal ablation. Overall, phototherapeutic keratectomy has provided corneal surgeons an additional surgical tool, particularly those residing in developing nations where the availability of donor corneal tissue is an important limiting factor.