Focal resection of leptomeningeal angioma in a rare case of Sturge-Weber syndrome without facial nevus

Focal lesionectomy as surgical treatment of epilepsy in patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome: a case-based systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) is a rare neurocutaneous disorder presenting mostly with a facial port-wine stain and leptomeningeal angiomatosis. More than 85% of the patients are affected by epilepsy by the age of 2 years. Seizure and symptom control is the focus of SWS treatment, since no causal therapy exists yet. For pharmacologically intractable epilepsy, surgery is a treatment option. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide an overview of the literature regarding lesionectomy in SWS with a focus on seizure outcome, complications, and motor and cognitive development.

METHODS

The PubMed and Embase databases were searched using a systematic search strategy to identify studies on SWS from their inception until 2021. Two independent researchers assessed the studies for inclusion and quality. Outcome measures were seizure outcome, postoperative complications, and motor and cognitive development. Thereafter, a systematic review was conducted, and a meta-analysis was performed for all included cohort studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Forest plots have been generated for all outcomes; risk ratio was used for pooled outcomes. A p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

After removal of duplicates, the authors screened 439 articles, of which 9 articles with 150 patients were included. Our case and 5 case reports and 4 retrospective cohort studies were included for systematic review. The latter 4 studies qualified for the meta-analysis. In these 4 articles, 144 patients received surgical treatment: 81 (56%) underwent focal lesionectomy and 63 (44%) hemispherectomy. Pooled outcome analysis for postoperative favorable seizure outcome showed a nonsignificant difference between lesionectomy and hemispherectomy (69.2% vs 87.3%; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50–1.08; t = −2.56, p = 0.08). Lesionectomy showed a significantly lower rate for developmental delay and postoperative hemiparesis in comparison with hemispherectomy (29.8% vs 76.3%; RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.28–0.59; z = −4.77, p < 0.0001 and 18.1% vs 100%; RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06–0.21; z = −6.58, p < 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the limited literature available, lesionectomy leads to a nonsignificant lower seizure control rate, while postoperative developmental or motor deficits are significantly lower compared with hemispherectomy. Therefore, focal lesionectomy remains a valid alternative to hemispherectomy in SWS with a clearly localized epileptogenic area; however, individual case-based decisions in a specialized multidisciplinary team are of paramount importance.

Characteristics, surgical outcomes, and influential factors of epilepsy in Sturge-Weber syndrome

Few studies have reported the clinical presentation, surgical treatment, outcomes, and influential factors for patients with epilepsy and Sturge-Weber syndrome.

This large-scale retrospective study continuously enrolled 132 patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome and epilepsy from January 2008 to December 2018 at our hospital to analyze their characteristics. Among these patients, 90 underwent epilepsy surgery, and their postoperative 2-year follow-up seizure, cognitive, and motor functional outcomes were assessed and analyzed. Univariable and multivariable logistic analyses were conducted to explore the influential factors.

Among the Sturge-Weber syndrome patients for whom characteristics were analyzed (n = 132), 76.52% of patients had their first epileptic seizures within their first year of life. The risk factors for cognitive decline were seizure history≥2 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.829, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.810-9.021, p = 0.008), bilateral leptomeningeal angiomas (aOR = 3.173, 95% CI: 1.970-48.194, p = 0.013), age at onset &lt; 1 year (aOR = 2.903, 95% CI: 1.230-6.514, p = 0.013), brain calcification (aOR = 2.375, 95% CI: 1.396-5.201, p = 0.021) and left leptomeningeal angiomas (aOR = 2.228, 95% CI: 1.351-32.571, p = 0.030). Of the patients who underwent epilepsy surgery (n = 90), 44 were subject to focal resection, and 46 underwent hemisphere surgery (19 anatomical hemispherectomies and 27 modified hemispherotomies). A postoperative seizure-free status, favorable cognitive outcomes, and favorable motor outcomes were achieved in 83.33%, 44.44%, and 43.33% of surgical patients, respectively. The modified hemispherotomy group had similar surgical outcomes, less intraoperative blood loss and shorter postoperative hospital stays than the anatomical hemispherectomy group. Regarding seizure outcomes, full resection (aOR = 11.115, 95% CI: 1.260-98.067, p = 0.020) and age at surgery &lt; 2 years (aOR = 6.040, 95% CI: 1.444-73.367, p = 0.031) were positive influential factors for focal resection. Age at surgery &lt; 2 years (aOR = 15.053, 95% CI: 1.050-215.899, p = 0.036) and infrequent seizures (aOR = 8.426, 95% CI: 1.086-87.442, p = 0.042; monthly vs. weekly) were positive influential factors for hemisphere surgery.

In conclusion, epilepsy surgery resulted in a good postoperative seizure-free rate and favorable cognitive and motor functional outcomes and showed acceptable safety for patients with epilepsy and Sturge-Weber syndrome. Modified hemispherotomy is a less invasive and safer type of hemisphere surgery than traditional anatomic hemispherectomy with similar surgical outcomes. Early surgery may be helpful to achieve better seizure outcomes and cognitive protection, while the risk of surgery for young children should also be considered.

Sturge-Weber syndrome: an update on the relevant issues for neurosurgeons

PURPOSE

Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) is a neurocutaneous facomatosis characterized by facial and leptomeningeal angioma, glaucoma, seizures, and neurological disability. Therefore, a challenging multidisciplinary interaction is required for its management. The goal of this paper is to review the main aspects of SWS and to present an illustrative pediatric series.

METHODS

The pertinent literature has been analyzed, focused mainly on etiopathogenesis, pathology, clinical features, diagnostic tools, management, and outcome of the disease. Moreover, a series of 11 children operated on for refractory epilepsy between 2005 and 2015 (minimum follow-up 5 years, mean follow-up 9.6 years) is reported. The series consists of six boys and five girls with 6.5-month and 16.2-month mean age at seizure onset and at surgery, respectively. Seizures affected all children, followed by hemiparesis and psychomotor delay (81%), glaucoma (54%), and other neurological deficits (45%).

RESULTS

All children underwent hemispherectomy (anatomical in three cases, functional in two cases, hemispherotomy in six cases); one patient needed a redo hemispherotomy. Mortality was nil; disseminated intravascular coagulation and interstitial pneumonia occurred in one patient each; three children had subdural fluid collection. Eight patients (72%) are in the ILAE Class 1 (completely seizure and aura free), two in Class 2 (only auras, no seizure), and one in Class 3 (1-3 seizure days per year). AEDs discontinuation was possible in 73% of cases. The most important news from the literature concerned the pathogenesis (role of the mutation of the GNAQ gene in the abnormal SWS vasculogenesis), the clinical findings (the features and pathogenesis of the stroke-like episodes are being understood), the diagnostic tools (quantitative MRI and EEG), and both the medical (migraine, seizures) and surgical management (epilepsy). The epileptic outcome of SWS patients is very good (80% are seizure-free), if compared with other hemispheric syndromes. The quality of life is affected by the neurological and cognitive deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

SWS still is an etiological and clinical challenge. However, the improvements over the time are consistent. In particular, the neurosurgical treatment of refractory epilepsy provides very good results as long as the indication to treatment is correct.